University of Split School of Medicine Research Ethics Mario Malički 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UH employees and students who conduct research involving human subjects are required to obtain approval from the Committee on Human Studies (CHS). John.
Advertisements

THE ETHICS OF HUMAN PARTICIPANT RESEARCH Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University.
Ethics in Research.
Detectives in the Classroom - Investigation 2-3: What's Wrong with This Picture? What's Wrong with This Picture?
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم. THE TITLE “INTRODUCTION”
FOUNDATIONS OF NURSING RESEARCH Sixth Edition CHAPTER Copyright ©2012 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Foundations of Nursing Research,
Human Subject Protection Judith Birk IRB Health / Behavioral Sciences.
Ethics in research involving human subjects
Ethics in Research involving Human Subjects Dr. Walid S. Abdelkader Head of Preventive Medicine and Primary Care Division IMC Feb
Human Subject Research Ethics
RESEARCH ETHICS 1.Violation of research ethics: History of violations of research ethics date back to 1930’s 1932 Tuskegee syphilis study conducted by.
Research ethics & ethical clearance. Ethics Ethics a set of principles that determine the a set of principles that determine the right and acceptable.
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Ethics in Psychological Research Mr. Jochem. Reflections on Ethics Before we begin… answer the following question: 1) What is Ethics? What do you know.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
A History of Human Research Protections and Institutional Review Boards Roger L. Bertholf, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pathology Chair, University of.
O VERVIEW OF H UMAN S UBJECTS R ESEARCH AND THE IRB KNR 164.
15 September Development of Nursing Research.
–Population: The collection of objects or individuals. N-value: The number of individuals in the population. N-value: The number of individuals.
Ethical Concerns in Research
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD HISTORY AND ETHICS. 2 Ethical History : Holocaust : Nuremburg Trials 1964: Declaration of Helsinki :
HUMAN RESEARCH HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. Objectives Identify the history events that lead to the development of principles, regulations, and guidance.
Responsible Conduct in Research Fred Lombardo, Pharm.D.,MS Howard University.
“What’s Ethics Got To Do With It” Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Gary Kent Head Governance Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
Research Methods Leadership 389.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Human Subjects Research at ASU An Overview. Overview Definitions Historical Framework Federal Guidelines Human Subjects Research at ASU.
Chapter 5 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research.
Research Ethics. Ethics From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character From the Greek word, “Ethos” meaning character Implies a judgment of character.
Theoretical and Conceptual Framework. THEORY Theory is: a generalized abstraction about the relationship between two or more concepts a systematic abstract.
Research Ethics.
The Ethics of Research on Human Subjects. Research Activity on Human Subjects: Any systematic attempt to gain generalizable knowledge about humans A systematic.
Chapter Three: Ethics in Psychological Research. The Need for Ethical Principles Psychologists must ask and answer questions such as: Are we putting our.
Consent Procedures. What is Informed Consent? Consent by a patient to a surgical or medical procedure or participation in a clinical study after achieving.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
THE DECLARATION OF HELSINKI Presented by :- (Group 7) SHARON PINTO SHARON PINTO PRIYANKA KAR PRIYANKA KAR SHIV KARAN SINGH SHIV KARAN SINGH SHRIJIT PILLAI.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
$100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 Terms Clinical Trial Facts.
Objective 9/23/15 Today we will be completing our research methods unit & begin reviewing for the upcoming unit assessment 9/25. Agenda: -Turn in all homework.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Is public "Health” & “Pride” influence by? Health & Pride Nationalism Public Opinion PropagandaJustice Presentation by Maria C Alvarez May 6 th, 2015.
Protection of Human Research Subjects Theresia Yiallourou Nora Leonardi Ulrike Kettenberger November 19 th 2010.
HUMAN TESTING: Ethical or unethical?. What is human testing? ■Human subjects research: any research or clinical investigation that involves human subjects.
Beyond Regulations: Ethical Considerations in Research
M6728 Ethics in Research Informed Consent/IRBs Reporting Research Results.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
PRIMER: Human Subjects, Past, Present, and Future Susan Metosky, Arizona State University Debra Murphy, Arizona State University.
Principles for the Protection of Human Rights Beneficence Primary goal of health care as doing good for clients under our care. Good care requires that.
Dr Hidayathulla Shaikh Lecturer, College Of Dentistry, Majmaah University.
Ethics in Research A class discussion. What is Ethics in Research? and Why is it Important?
Research ethics.
Ethical consideration in research Before you move any further look at the ethics ……!
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
Ethical Dilemma Research that is most likely to reveal something important about human nature is also the most likely to violate human rights. A number.
Ethics in Social Psychology
Ethics in Human Medical Research
The Importance of Ethical and Human Rights Issues in Global Health
CHAPTER 2 Ethics in Psychological Research
The Importance of Ethics and the Protection of Subjects By Westley R
Ethical Principles of Research
Ethics in Medical Research. Ethics in Medical Research.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE CONDUCT OF HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH
CHAPTER 7: Ethics in Psychological Research
بنام خداوند جان و خرد كزين برتر انديشه بر نگذرد
Ethics in Research.
ETHICAL ASPECTS OF HEALTH RESEARCH
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
Ethics Review Morals: Rules that define what is right and wrong Ethics: process of examining moral standards and looking at how we should interpret and.
The Need for Ethical Principles
Presentation transcript:

University of Split School of Medicine Research Ethics Mario Malički 1

Human experimentation Animal experimentation Environmental ethics Publication ethics

Research ethics – critical evaluation of dilemmas arising from research Research integrity – the moral code of the academia: the use of honest and verifiable methods in proposing, performing, and evaluating research; reporting research results

Human experimentation

The WHO Manual (Section XV.2) defines research with human subjects as 'any social science, biomedical, behavioural, or epidemiological activity that entails systematic collection or analysis of data with the intent to generate new knowledge, in which human beings: are exposed to manipulation, intervention, observation, or other interaction with investigators either directly or through alteration of their environment; or become individually identifiable through investigator's collection, preparation, or use of biological material or medical or other records

History

Nazi human experimentation Nuremberg trials Nuremberg Code

1933 Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring (Ger 1933 Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring (Ger. Gesetz zur Verhütung erbkranken Nachwuchses) USA: Indiana became the first state to enact sterilization legislation in 1907, followed closely by California and Washington in 1909. ~60,000 till 1970s

Any person suffering from a hereditary disease may be rendered incapable of procreation by means of a surgical operation (sterilization) (2) For the purposes of this law, any person will be considered as hereditarily diseased who is suffering from any one of the following diseases: – (1) Congenital Mental Deficiency, (2) Schizophrenia, (3) Manic-Depressive Insanity, (4) Hereditary Epilepsy, (5) Hereditary Chorea (Huntington’s), (6) Hereditary Blindness, (7) Hereditary Deafness, (8) Any severe hereditary deformity. (3) Any person suffering from severe alcoholism may be also rendered incapable of procreation.

1934 - 62,400 sterilized 1935 - 71,700 sterilized Genetic Health Courts (Erbgesundheitsgericht) - 200 400,000 sterilized by the end of the WWII

Concentration camps since 1933 Concentration camps since 1933. Till 1945 ~ 20 000 First extermination camps (Todeslager) 1941 - Final Solution to the Jewish question Chełmno extermination camp (Vernichtungslager Kulmhof) in Poland. Aushwitz, Dachau, Buchenwald, Mauthausen, Ravensbrück. Zyklon-B – Hydrogen cyanide is a poisonous gas that interferes with cellular respiration Carbon monoxide

Heinrich Himmler visited the outskirts of Minsk in 1941 to witness a mass shooting. He was told by the commanding officer there that the shootings were proving psychologically damaging to those being asked to pull the triggers. Thus Himmler knew another method of mass killing was required. Auschwitz Commandant - Rudolf Höss

Military experiments Drug experiments Ratial motivation

Experiments on twins - change iris colour, conjoined twins Bone, muscle, and nerve transplantation experiments Head injury experiments Freezing experiments Malaria experiments Immunization experiments (malaria, typhus, tuberculosis, typhoid fever, yellow fever, and infectious hepatitis)

Mustard gas experiments - (ClCH2CH2)2S Sulfonamide experiments Sea water experiments Sterilization experiments Experiments with poison Incendiary bomb experiments High altitude experiments Blood coagulation experiments - Polygal

1984 – 45 citations Dachau Metodology criticism

International Law Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 Geneva protocol 1925/1928 Geneva conventions1864/1906/1929/1949 1901 – Noble peace prize – Jean Henri Dunant i Frédéric Passy (Međunarodna lige za mir - Inter-Parliamentary Union)

Charter of the International Military Tribunal – Annex to the Agreement for the prosecution and punishment of the major war criminals of the European Axis - 8 August 1945 Three categories of crimes were defined: crimes against peace, war crimes, crimes against humanity

“Doctors’ trial” Doctors’ trial (officially United States of America v. Karl Brandt, et al.) as the first of 12 trials for war crimes of German doctors that the United States authorities held in their occupation zone in Nuremberg, Germany, after the end of World War II. 20 out of 23 were medical doctors Out of the 23, 7 were found not guilty, 10 were sentenced to death, and the rest were sent to prison form 10 years to lifetime.

Dr. Leo Alexander had submitted to the Counsel for War Crimes six points defining legitimate medical research, in May 1947 4 more added Dr. Andrew Ivy Harold Sebring, judge Nurnberški kodeks - August 1947

Nuremberg Code Required is the voluntary, well-informed, understanding consent of the human subject in a full legal capacity. The experiment should aim at positive results for society that cannot be procured in some other way. It should be based on previous knowledge (like, an expectation derived from animal experiments) that justifies the experiment. The experiment should be set up in a way that avoids unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injuries. It should not be conducted when there is any reason to believe that it implies a risk of death or disabling injury.

The risks of the experiment should be in proportion to (that is, not exceed) the expected humanitarian benefits. Preparations and facilities must be provided that adequately protect the subjects against the experiment’s risks. The staff who conduct or take part in the experiment must be fully trained and scientifically qualified. The human subjects must be free to immediately quit the experiment at any point when they feel physically or mentally unable to go on. Likewise, the medical staff must stop the experiment at any point when they observe that continuation would be dangerous.

Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male 1932-1972 399 sifilis 201 zdravih 1947 – penicilin javno dostupan Ponoviti studiju iz Osla – na bijelcima 1964 Helsinška deklaracija 74 umrlo +100 od komplikacija 40 zena zarazeno, 19 djece rodjeno s kongenitalnim sifilisom

9 billion dollars USA paid to the victims May 16, 1997 - Bill Clinton formally apologized and held a ceremony at the White House for surviving Tuskegee study participants (5 od 8 prisustvovalo)

1979 BELMONT REPORT The three fundamental ethical principles for using any human subjects for research are:[2] Respect for persons: protecting the autonomy of all people and treating them with courtesy and respect and allowing for informed consent. Researchers must be truthful and conduct no deception; Beneficence: The philosophy of "Do no harm" while maximizing benefits for the research project and minimizing risks to the research subjects; and Justice: ensuring reasonable, non-exploitative, and well- considered procedures are administered fairly — the fair distribution of costs and benefits to potential research participants — and equally.

According to the Research Ethics Committee in Croatia (Split) researcher is obligated to respect: Helsinšku deklaraciju Kodeks medicinske etike i deontologije (NN 55/08) Pravilnik o kliničkim ispitivanjima lijekova i dobroj kliničkoj praksi (NN 25/2015 i 125/2015) Zakon o zdravstvenoj zaštiti Republike Hrvatske (NN 150/08, 71/10, 139/10,  22/11 i 84/11) Zakon o pravima pacijenata Republike Hrvatske (NN 169/04, 37/08)

Declaration of Helsinki 1964: Original version. 18th Meeting, Helsinki 1975: First revision. 29th Meeting, Tokyo 1983: Second revision. 35th Meeting, Venice 1989: Third revision. 41st Meeting, Hong Kong 1996: Fourth revision. 48th Meeting, Somerset West (SA) 2000: Fifth revision. 52nd Meeting, Edinburgh 2002: First clarification, Washington 2004: Second clarification, Tokyo 2008: Sixth revision, 59th Meeting, Seoul 2013: Seventh revision, 64th Meeting, Fortaleza 1964 WMA (World Medical Association)

Points Risks, Burdens and Benefits Vulnerable Groups and Individuals Research Protocols Research Ethics Committees Privacy and Confidentiality Informed Consent Use of placebo Post-Trial Provisions) Research Registration and Publication and Dissemination of Results Unproven Interventions in Clinical Practice

Kodeks medicinske etike i deontologije Zakon o pravima pacijenata Istraživač ne smije utjecati na odluku ispitanika o sudjelovanju ili nesudjelovanju u terapijskom ili neterapijskom istraživanju, osobito kada je ispitanik ovisan o istraživaču Zakon o pravima pacijenata Znanstveno istraživanje nad poslovno nesposobnim pacijentom, pacijentom koji nije sposoban za rasuđivanje te nad maloljetnim pacijentom može se provesti jedino ako istraživanje usporedive učinkovitosti ne može se provoditi nad pacijentima koji su sposobni dati pristanak

WHAT APPLIES TO MEDICAL STUDENTS Medical students and students of medical professions are obliged to keep the professional secrets. (Zakon o zdravstvenoj zaštiti) In receiving health services, each person has the right to refuse treatment by students and refuse all interventions independently performed by health care workers who have not passed the state exam and acquired the permit for independent work. (Zakon o zaštiti prava pacijenata)

Drug phases

Example – BIAL Phase 1 One person has been left brain dead and five others are in serious condition after taking part in the clinical trial of an experimental painkiller made by Portuguese drug company Bial, the French Health Ministry said on Friday. The medicine involved works by targeting the body’s pain-controlling endocannabinoid system, which is also responsible for the human response to cannabis. The ministry said the six volunteers in Rennes, in western France, had been in good health until taking the oral medication at a private facility that specializes in carrying out clinical trials.