Sunil Kumar, Namita yadav, Pragya Bhatt, Raj Singh, B. K. Singh, R

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NUCP 2371 Radiation Measurements II
Advertisements

Aurélien Moy Claude Merlet (UM2/GM)
Ch6 X-ray Producing X-ray Moseley formula X-ray diffraction
Ion Beam Analysis techniques:
Saeedeh Ghaffari Nanofabrication Fall 2011 April 15 1.
Geant4 Low Energy Polarized Compton Processes Gerardo Depaola * Francesco Longo + Francesco Longo + * National University of Córdoba (Argentina) + University.
Interaction of High Energy Radiation with Matter review Two basic types Excitation electrons move to a higher orbital shell temporarily ~70% of charged.
Experiments in X-Ray Physics Lulu Liu Partner: Pablo Solis Junior Lab 8.13 Lab 1 October 22nd, 2007.
Chelsea L. Harris 1 Rand Watson 2 1.Texas Southern University; Houston, Texas Texas A&M Cyclotron Institute; College Station, Texas (Summer.
The Origins of X-Rays. The X-Ray Spectrum The X-Ray Spectrum (Changes in Voltage) The characteristic lines are a result of electrons ejecting orbital.
“Pinhole Measurement” Approach to K Measurements using Spontaneous Radiation November 14, 2005 J. Welch, R. Bionta, S. Reiche.
Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry
Particle Interactions
Lecture 2-Building a Detector George K. Parks Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Submitted By:- Nardev Kumar Bajaj Roll NO Group-C
Cross section measurements for analysis of D and T in thicker films Liqun Shi Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, , People’s.
1 Photon Interactions  When a photon beam enters matter, it undergoes an interaction at random and is removed from the beam.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Photoemission Fundamentals of Data Acquisition and Analysis J. A. Kelber, June Texts: PHI handbook, Briggs and Seah Outline: I.Photoemission process.
3. PROTON INDUCED X-RAY EMISSION Procedure of Spectrum Analysis
Electron-impact inner shell ionization cross section measurements for heavy element impurities in fusion reactors Jingjun Zhu Institute of Nuclear Science.
St. Petersburg State University. Department of Physics. Division of Computational Physics. COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CURRENT PRODUCED BY PULSE OF HARD RADIATION.
Preliminarily results of Monte Carlo study of neutron beam production at iThemba LABS University of the western cape and iThemba LABS Energy Postgraduate.
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
References Hans Kuzmany : Solid State Spectroscopy (Springer) Chap 5 S.M. Sze Physics of semiconductor devices (Wiley) Chap 13 PHOTODETECTORS.
Conception of cross section 1) Base conceptions – differential, integral cross section, total cross section, geometric interpretation of cross section.
2. RUTHERFORD BACKSCATTERING SPECTROMETRY Basic Principles.
Energy determination at BEPC-II  Satellite Meeting «On the Need for a super-tau-charm factory» September 26 – 27, 2008, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia M.N.
Determining Radiation Intensity
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
X-rays is a form of electromagnetic radiation having a wavelength in the range of 0.01 to 10 nanometers, corresponding to frequencies in the range 30.
Resident Physics Lectures Christensen, Chapter 2C Production of X-Rays George David Associate Professor Department of Radiology Medical College of Georgia.
2015 Cameca Users Meeting KαKα K L M Fluorescence and absorption… A sample of olivine has Fe, Mg and Si. Fe K α = 6.4 keV Binding energies… Mg K = 1.30.
Three years of cross-section measurements of (n,xn) threshold reactions at TSL Uppsala and NPI Řež O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová,
Interaction of Radiation with Matter
X-ray Fluorescence Physics of XRF Characteristics Caveats Instrumentation.
Chapter 2 Radiation Interactions with Matter East China Institute of Technology School of Nuclear Engineering and Technology LIU Yi-Bao Wang Ling.
Investigation of the proton-induced reactions on natural molybdenum.
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #13 Energy Deposition in Media
K-x-ray Emission in Fast O5+ on Ar Collisions
Preliminary study for Soft X-ray Spectroscopy in VEST
M.I. Abbas - Alexandria University - EGYPT.
DITANET Conference, Seville, Spain
Cross-section Measurements of (n,xn) Threshold Reactions
Performance of the Medipix and Timepix devices for the recognition of electron-gamma radiation fields C. Teyssier1,3, J. Bouchami1, F. Dallaire1, J. Idarraga1,
Choi Ilwoo1,3 , Nam Changhee1,2
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Comparison of Candidates Secondary Electron Emission Materials
Probing core polarization around 78Ni:
Atomic Model: Timeline
Stacy Kopso, M.Ed., RT(R)(M)
Chapter 4 The Nuclear Atom.
Neutron Detection with MoNA LISA
Model-Independent Measurement of Excited State Fraction in a MOT
Resident Physics Lectures (Year 1)
Geometry of experimental setup for studies of inverse kinematics reactions with ROOT Students*: Dumitru Irina, Giubega Lavinia-Elena, Lica Razvan, Olacel.
1. Introduction Secondary Heavy charged particle (fragment) production
ION BEAM ANALYSIS.
Learning Objectives LO 1.7 The student is able to describe the electronic structure of the atom, using PES data, ionization energy data, and/or Coulomb’s.
Summary of alpha etc.
CHAPTER 7 X-RAY PRODUCTION.
Resident Physics Lectures (Year 1)
Alignment of atomic inner shell vacancies-a detailed study
O. Svoboda, A. Krása, A. Kugler, M. Majerle, J. Vrzalová, V. Wagner
Radhabai Kale Mahila Mahavidhyalaya, Ppt. name:- x-Ray techniques
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #5 Monday, Feb Dr. Brandt
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #13 Energy Deposition in Media
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Change of 7Be decay rate under compression
Presentation transcript:

Kα X-ray yields produced from thick Titanium target under impact of 10-25 keV electrons Sunil Kumar, Namita yadav, Pragya Bhatt, Raj Singh, B.K.Singh, R.Shanker * *Atomic Physics Laboratory, Department of Physics, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005 INTRODUCTION In 1895 a German physicist W. C. ROENTGEN (1845-1923) found that a highly penetrating radiation of unknown nature (X-rays) is produced when fast electrons impinge on matter. For this discovery, he was awarded the first noble prize of Physics in 1901. X-Ray Spectrum: A typical X-ray spectrum consist of Characteristic X-rays and Continuous X-rays. Characteristic X-rays are produced by inner-shell ionization of atoms or molecules by impinging charge particles whereas the Continuous X-rays are produced due to Coulomb-interaction between impinging charge particle and the constituents of atoms or molecules. EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP X-ray spectrum Experimental Parameters Beam Energy=10-25 keV Beam Spot Size= ~3mm Electron Beam Current= 50nA Base Pressure < 1.6E-6 Torr Photon Detection Angle=135 Acquisition Time= 1-3 hrs Thick Ti Target (0.13mm) 99.9 % pure CONCLUSIONS Selection rules: Δℓ=±1 Δ j =0,±1 X-ray spectrum is produced from 10-25 keV electrons colliding with thick Ti (Z=22) target. Characteristic Ti Kα yields are obtained for the considered impact energy range. Obtained results are compared with existing theoretical results . A good agreement is found between the present measurement and theoretical calculation. We have also studied the impact energy dependence of the intensity ratio Kα/(Kα+ Kβ) of chosen target under considered impact energy range. The ratio shows a very weak dependence on impact energy in the studied range. The average value of the ration is found to be about 0.881. OBJECTIVES In the present work we have studied: Kα X-ray yields produced from thick Titanium target under impact of 10-25 keV electrons. Impact energy dependence of the intensity ratio Kα/(Kα+ Kβ) of Ti under impact of 10–25 keV electrons. FORMULA USED Uncertainties involved in the measurement : Beam Current ~ 1% Secondary electron correction ~ 3% Solid angle determination ~ 9% Detector’s efficiency determination ~ 4% Background subtraction ~ 5% Overall uncertainty ~ 12% Where, Y(E0) is the Kα yields, Nx(E0) is the integrated net counts of the Kα peak, Ne is the total number of electrons incident on the target and ε(k) and ΔΩ are respectively the efficiency of the detector and the solid angle subtended by the detector on the target. REFERENCES: [1]. Namita Yadav, Sunil Kumar, Pragya Bhatt, Raj Singh, B.K. Singh, R. Shanker, J. Electc. Rel. Phen. 185, 448 (2012). [2]. Z. An, Y. Wu, M. T. Liu, Y. M. Duan, C. H. Tang, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 246, 281 (2006). [3]. D. Bote, X. Llovet, F. Salvat, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 41, 105304 (2008). ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: We would like to acknowledge Department of Science and Technology(DST), GOVT. OF INDIA, for financial support. *Corresponding email address: shankerorama@gmail.com