Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Roman Civics

Precedent Case A case that serves as a model for future cases. Example – Privacy rights 1965 – Griswold v. Connecticut – woman has a right to privacy when buying birth control 1973 – Roe. v. Wade – woman has a right to privacy when getting an abortion Precedents are useful for helping SC judges make opinions

Marbury v. Madison (1803) The decision established “judicial review”: the evaluation of federal laws’ constitutionality as a power of the Supreme Court The Supreme Court has the ability to review laws, cases, decisions, etc. and judge their constitutionality. Major Check/Balance power against the other two branches

Plessy v. Fergusson (1896): A Louisiana law required separate seating for white and African Americans on public railroads (segregation). --Herman Plessy said his 14th Amendment rights (Equal Protection Clause) had been violated. --The Supreme Court ruled that his rights were not violated, and segregated public facilities were permitted until 1954. - SEPARATE BUT EQUAL

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954) 10-year-old, Linda Brown, was not allowed to attend her neighborhood school because she was African American. --Linda Brown said her 14th Amendment rights (Equal Protection Clause) had been violated. --The Supreme Court ruled that “separate but equal” segregation was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. This decision overturned the precedent established by Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896.

Clarence Gideon

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): Clarence Gideon was found guilty of breaking and entering and sentenced him to 5 years in prison. Gideon appealed claiming that he did have the right to an attorney and the Supreme Court agreed Gideon received a new trial (with a court-appointed attorney) and was found not guilty. “The Gideon Rule”: guarantees counsel to all poor persons facing a felony charge (6th Amendment).

Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Ernesto Miranda was arrested for kidnapping and sexual assault – he signed a full confession including a statement that he “had full knowledge of his legal rights.” Miranda appealed claiming that he had not received warning or legal counsel to guide his decision to confess. The Supreme Court agreed with Miranda, saying that all suspects must be forewarned that they have the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. “Miranda Rule”: before a suspect is questioned by police, he/she must be:

The Miranda Rights: 1. Told of their right to remain silent. 2. Warned that whatever they say may be used in court. 3. Informed of their right to an attorney. 4. Informed that an attorney will be provided if they cannot afford one. 5. Told that they can stop police questioning at any time.

New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985): T.L.O. (a New Jersey high school student) was sentenced to probation by juvenile court after a vice-principal searched her purse and found cigarettes and marijuana. T.L.O. appealed the ruling saying the principal’s search was unreasonable. The Supreme Court denied the appeal, saying that schools are allowed more leeway when conducting searches. The Court created a “reasonable suspicion” rule for schools conducting searches, instead of the “probable cause” rule that exists for the rest of society.

Additional Cases Meyer v. Nebraska (1923) Said it’s unconstitutional for a state to ban the teaching of foreign languages. Tinker v. Des Moines School Dist (1969) Said it’s unconstitutional to deny students the right to free speech at school, unless the students’ speech disrupts school activities.