Contemporary Moral Problems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Personhood Begins at Conception
Advertisements

An Argument that Abortion is wrong
Why Abortion is Immoral
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 18 Marquis on Abortion
By Don Marquis. According to Marquis, killing a being with a right to life is seriously morally wrong because it robs such a being of its future.
“Why Abortion is Immoral” Donald B. Marquis  Marquis holds that to resolve the morality of abortion it is necessary to first determine why it is that.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 17 Warren on Abortion
1 Is Abortion Wrong? I I. 2 Some Background 1 st Mo.2 nd Mo.3 rd Mo.4 th Mo.5 th Mo.6 th Mo.7 th Mo.8 th Mo.9 th Mo. Conception “Zygote” “Embryo” “Fetus”
Don Marquis Presentation by Christina Precious. Many of the most insightful and careful writers on the ethics of abortion-such as Joel Feinberg, Michael.
1 Abortion I I. 2 Some Background 1 st Mo.2 nd Mo.3 rd Mo.4 th Mo.5 th Mo.6 th Mo.7 th Mo.8 th Mo.9 th Mo. Conception “Zygote” “Embryo” “Fetus”
Chapter Four: Abortion
ON THE MORAL AND LEGAL STATUS OF ABORTION AUTHOR: MARY ANNE WARREN BY: MEREDITH MOREY.
Marquis on the Immorality of Abortion. Getting Right to It.  Marquis's purpose is to provide a defensible anti-abortion position which is free from "irrational.
Morality and Social Policy Vice and Virtue in Everyday Life Chapter 7.
Rosalind Hursthouse: Virtue Theory and Abortion
Abortion Pro: Don Marquis Assumption: “…whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose.
Mary Anne Warren. A Brief History Abortion has been used throughout history, and has not become a criminal offence until anti- abortion legislation in.
Chapter Four: Abortion Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
1 Abortion III Abortion. 2 Marquis’ Project Thesis: In the overwhelming majority of cases, deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. Don Marquis: “Why.
1 Is Abortion Wrong? III. 2 Brody’s Project Brody argues that, given Thomson’s presumption that the squidge has a full right to life, her argument that.
From Last time Noonan argues that because the fetus is a human being, and human beings have a right to life, then Abortion is immoral. Warren argues that.
Philosophy 220 Abortion Liberal, Moderate and Conservative Views.
Why Abortion is Immoral Don Marquis. Attacking a Straw Man The whole point behind philosophical argument (and argument in general) is progress. If one.
Why Abortion is Immoral
Abortion and Moral Considerability
1 The Morality of Abortion Soazig Le Bihan - University of Montana.
Abortion. “Why Abortion is Immoral” Don Marquis The anti-abortionist charges, not unreasonably, that pro-choice principles concerning killing are too.
Chapter 9: Abortion Pope John Paul II, “The Unspeakable Crime of Abortion” – Main argument: 1. The human fetus from conception is “an innocent human being.”
Contemporary Moral Problems
Violinists and People Seeds
PHIL102 SUM2014, M-F12:00-1:00, SAV 264 Instructor: Benjamin Hole
Philosophy 242 MEDICAL ETHICS
PHIL242: MEDICAL ETHICS SUM2014, M-F, 9:40-10:40, SAV 156
Contemporary Moral Problems
Contemporary Moral Problems
Contemporary Moral Problems
PHIL242: MEDICAL ETHICS SUM2014, M-F, 9:40-10:40, SAV 156
PHIL242: MEDICAL ETHICS SUM2014, M-F, 9:40-10:40, SAV 156
Contemporary Moral Problems
INSTRUCTOR: BENJAMIN HOLE
Contemporary Moral Problems
Philosophy 242 MEDICAL ETHICS
Phil 240, Introduction to Ethical Theory, W9L1
Contemporary Moral Problems
Abortion as a Contemporary Moral Issue
PHIL102: Contemporary Moral Problems
Contemporary Moral Problems
Philosophy 242 MEDICAL ETHICS
PHIL242: MEDICAL ETHICS SUM2014, M-F, 9:40-10:40, SAV 156
Philosophy 242 MEDICAL ETHICS
PHI 208 RANK Life of the Mind/phi208rank.com
Bernard Williams: A Critique of Utilitarianism Phil 240, Introduction to Ethical Theory, W6L5 Benjamin Visscher Hole IV.
PHIL242: MEDICAL ETHICS SUM2014, M-F, 9:40-10:40, SAV 156
Benjamin Visscher Hole IV Phil 240, Intro to Ethical Theory W5,L4
Personhood & the Euthanasia debate
Chapter 10 Cherishing Each Person: Abortion, Euthanasia and Respect for Life Mr. Salter Morality.
Contemporary Moral Problems
Abortion.
PHIL242: MEDICAL ETHICS SUM2014, M-F, 9:40-10:40, SAV 156
PHI 208 RANK Education Your Life - phi208rank.com.
Meta-Ethics Objectives:
Introduction to Philosophy Spring 2009
Warren on Abortion Feb. 27 and Mar. 1 Warren on Abortion Ethics 1.
Lecture 05: A Brief Summary
The Ethics of Abortion When, if ever, is Abortion morally permissible?
Moral Reasoning 1.
The abortion debate arises from the conflict between two basic rights: the fetus’ right to life and the mother’s right over her own body. The pro-life.
Why Abortion Is Immoral
Tooley’s Abortion and Infanticide
Philosophy 224 Moral Persons Pt. 1.
Presentation transcript:

Contemporary Moral Problems M-F12:00-1:00SAV 264 Instructor: Benjamin Hole Email: bvhole@uw.edu Office Hours: everyday after class

Agenda Any administrative questions? Clicker Quiz Last thoughts on the Infanticide Objection to Warren? Marquis, “Why Abortion is Immoral”

What does Marquis claim is the main reason why it is presumptively wrong to kill a fetus? The fetus can feel pain The fetus is an innocent person from conception with an inviolable right to life Abortion will harm the woman Killing the fetus would deprive it of a valuable future The fetus actually meets Warren’s five criteria for personhood All of the above

Which of the following claims is/are not defended by Marquis: a future like ours is a sufficient condition for presumptive moral standing a future like ours is a necessary condition for presumptive moral standing the ability to make one’s own maxims is a necessary and sufficient condition for personhood and dignity A & C B & C

Marquis claims that: abortion is presumptively morally wrong contraception is presumptively morally wrong contraception is not presumptively morally wrong A & B A & C

The Infanticide Objection Mary Anne Warren, “On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion”

The Infanticide Objection The Objection If Warren’s “5 criteria” theory of personhood is correct, then infanticide is morally permissible. But it is not! Therefore, Warren’s “5 criteria” theory of personhood is incorrect. Warren’s response Infanticide is not always morally impermissible “neonates are so very close to being persons that to kill them requires a very strong moral justification” Neonates have indirect moral standing, but are not themselves persons

“Why Abortion Is Immoral” Marquis

Exegesis Marquis, Core Argument Contraception Objection Marquis, Response P1. If abortion is (presumptively) morally permissible, then the fetus is not a person with full moral standing.   P2. Abortion is morally permissible. Therefore, a fetus is not a person with full moral standing. P1. If X has a future like ours of great value and killing X deprives X of that future, then killing X is (presumptively) morally wrong. P2. A fetus has a future like ours and killing that fetus would deprive it of a valuable future. Therefore, abortion is (presumptively) morally impermissible. P1. If the “future like ours” premise is true, then contraception would be morally impermissible. P2. But contraception is not morally impermissible! Therefore, the “future like ours” premise is false. P1. If there is “no non-arbitrarily identifiable subject of the loss in the case of contraception,” then contraception is morally permissible (according to the “future like ours” premise). P2. There is “no non-arbitrarily identifiable subject of the loss in the case of contraception” Therefore, contraception is morally permissible (according to the “future like ours” premise).

What is moral standing? To determine whether abortion is wrong, Marquis claims we must first determine what makes killing generally wrong. His answer: When someone is wrongly killed, he or she is deprived of a valuable future: “experiences, projects, activities” “When I am killed, I am deprived... of what I now value [and] also what I would come to value... Therefore, when I die, I am deprived of all of the value of my future.”

What is moral standing? To determine whether abortion is wrong, Marquis claims we must first determine what makes killing generally wrong. “The category that is morally central to this analysis is the category of having a valuable future like ours; it is not the category of personhood.”

A future like ours If X has a future like ours of great value and killing X deprives X of that future, then killing X is morally wrong. Implications: A future like ours is a sufficient, but not necessary condition for presumptive moral standing. It is seriously presumptively wrong to kill children and infants. It is not the case that only biologically human life can have great moral worth, e.g., intelligent animals/aliens. It might be seriously wrong to kill some currently existing non-human mammals. Does not entail that euthanasia, physician assisted suicide, and infanticide are morally wrong (in all cases).

Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Neutral Somewhat Disagree Disagree Do you agree with Marquis? “If X has a future like ours of great value and killing X deprives X of that future, then killing X is morally wrong.” Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Neutral Somewhat Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree

A future like ours Conclusion: “Since the loss of the future to standard fetus...at least as great a loss as the loss of the future to a standard human being who is killed, abortion, like ordinary killing, could be justified only by the most compelling reasons.” In other words, he concludes that abortion is “seriously presumptively wrong.” Marquis intentionally avoids the question of whether the fetus is a person.

The Contraception Objection Marquis: “the immorality of contraception is not entailed by the loss of a future like ours simply because there is no non-arbitrarily identifiable subject of the loss in the case of contraception …” Objection If Marquis' view were true, then contraception would be wrong. But that's absurd. 

Do you agree with the Contraception Objection? Strongly Agree Agree Somewhat Agree Neutral Somewhat Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree

Exegesis Marquis, Core Argument Contraception Objection Marquis, Response P1. If abortion is (presumptively) morally permissible, then the fetus is not a person with full moral standing.   P2. Abortion is morally permissible. Therefore, a fetus is not a person with full moral standing. P1. If X has a future like ours of great value and killing X deprives X of that future, then killing X is (presumptively) morally wrong. P2. A fetus has a future like ours and killing that fetus would deprive it of a valuable future. Therefore, abortion is (presumptively) morally impermissible. P1. If the “future like ours” premise is true, then contraception would be morally impermissible. P2. But contraception is not morally impermissible! Therefore, the “future like ours” premise is false. P1. If there is “no non-arbitrarily identifiable subject of the loss in the case of contraception,” then contraception is morally permissible (according to the “future like ours” premise). P2. There is “no non-arbitrarily identifiable subject of the loss in the case of contraception” Therefore, contraception is morally permissible (according to the “future like ours” premise).