Stochastic cooling system: Start-up and project modes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stochastic cooling and 56 MHz SRF update for Run-14 W. Fischer 21 January 2014.
Advertisements

C. Dimopoulou A. Dolinskii, T. Katayama, D. Möhl, F. Nolden,
Progress of the sub-harmonic bunching system (i.e. upgrading progress of BEPCII present bunching system) Pei Shilun for the SHBS team Accelerator center,
Application of cooling methods at NICA project G.Trubnikov JINR, Dubna.
Testing and Development of Feed-Forward System for ATF2 A. Kalinin Accelerator Science and Technology Centre, Daresbury Laboratory, UK Fifth ATF2 Project.
Cooling Accelerator Beams Eduard Pozdeyev Collider-Accelerator Department.
Impedance measurements at SLS E. Koukovini-Platia CERN, EPFL TIARA mid-term meeting, Madrid, 13 th June 2012 Many thanks to M. Dehler, N. Milas, A. Streun.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui IHEP , Beijing Sep 17 th, 08IMAC.
Toward a Test Facility for an ERL Circulator Ring Based e-Cooler MEIC Electron Cooler Test Facility Planning Retreat January 31, 2012.
MEIC Electron Cooling Simulation He Zhang 03/18/2014, EIC 14 Newport News, VA.
Linac e+ source for ILC, CLIC, SuperB, … Vitaly Yakimenko, Igor Pogorelsky November 17, 2008 BNL.
Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Mathilde FAVIER Fellow in BE/BI/QP Mathilde FAVIER BE/BI-QPSCHOTTKY STATUS - BI DAY - December 6th
Peter Spiller, DIRAC Kick-off meeting Peter Spiller Design Study Group DIRAC kick-off meeting SIS100.
MEIC Staged Cooling Scheme and Simulation Studies He Zhang MEIC Collaboration Meeting, 10/06/2015.
Paul Derwent 14 Dec 00 1 Stochastic Cooling Paul Derwent 14 Dec 00
Machine development - results and plans – critical results, what’s to be done? R. Assmann 15/07/2011 R. Assmann for the LHC MD coordination team (R. Assmann,
Status of RF stations for NICA project MAC meeting october 2015.
F Fermilab July 6, 2005Recycler Damper Stability1 Recycler Damper High Frequency Stability Jim Crisp
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS OF NICA ACCELERATOR COMPLEX Tuzikov A., JINR, Dubna, Russia.
Accumulator Stacktail Cooling Paul Derwent December 18, 2015.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
NICA start-up scenario + questions of instabilities A.Sidorin For NiCA team NICA Machine Advisory Committee at JINR (Dubna) October 19-20, 2015.
Collective effects in EDM storage ring A.Sidorin, Electron cooling group, JINR, Dubna.
CERN, 27-Mar EuCARD NCLinac Task /3/2009.
Prospects for RHIC Low-Energy Operations Todd Satogata (W. Fischer, T. Roser, A. Fedotov, N. Tsoupas, M. Brennan, C. Montag, and others) “Can We Discover.
DaMon: a resonator to observe bunch charge/length and dark current. > Principle of detecting weakly charged bunches > Setup of resonator and electronics.
Debuncher Stochastic Cooling Paul Derwent March 3, 2016.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
 NICA is being constructed  For heavy ions we need very highluminosity level – 10 cm s  For keeping up such level we inevitably need cooling  Stochastic.
Intra-Beam scattering studies for CLIC damping rings A. Vivoli* Thanks to : M. Martini, Y. Papaphilippou *
Marina Dolinska 28 th August, Cooling methods Electron (SIS18, ESR, RESR, NESR, HESR) Stochastic (ESR, CR, RESR, HESR) Laser (ESR ??, HESR ??).....other.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Intra-Pulse Feedback at the NLC Interaction Point Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass 2001.
Update on the RHIC Stochastic Cooling J.M. Brennan M.M. Blaskiewicz and K. Mernick COOL Workshop 2015 Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility September.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Stochastic Cooling System for HESR - theoretical and simulation studies - Hans Stockhorst Forschungszentrum Jülich.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Stochastic Cooling System for HESR - theoretical and simulation studies - Hans Stockhorst Forschungszentrum Jülich.
Progress Report on the Ultra-fast Harmonic Kicker Cavity Design and Beam Dynamic Simulation Yulu Huang 1,2 H. Wang 1, R. A. Rimmer 1, S. Wang 1 1.Thomas.
JLEIC and Electron Cooling: An Introduction Yuhong Zhang JLEIC Discussion Forum, August 3, 2016.
O.I.Brovko, A.V.Eliseev, I.N.Meshkov, E.M.Syresin (JINR)
Optimization of the Collider rings’ optics
NICA injection complex status
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
A.Sidorin, on behalf of the team PP PAC, JINR, Dubna, 16 January 2017
Calculation of Beam Equilibrium and Luminosities for
Test of Optical Stochastic Cooling in CESR
HIAF Electron Cooling System &
Simulation of Luminosity Variation
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Test of Optical Stochastic Cooling in CESR
BE/RF-IS Contribution to LIU C. Rossi and M. Paoluzzi
Timing and synchronization at SPARC
ПОЛНОЕ НАЗВАНИЕ ПРОЕКТА
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
CEPC RF Power Sources System
Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP
ATF Fast Kicker R&D at LBNL ILCDR06, Cornell University
Physics Design on Injector I
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
Injection design of CEPC
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
He Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 07/09/2015
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Beam Beam effects for JLEIC
MEIC beam path change with e-ring bypass lines
Presentation transcript:

Stochastic cooling system: Start-up and project modes I.Gorelyshev, N.Shurkhno, A.Sidorin NICA MAC 2017

Nuclotron-based Ion Collider fAcility Stochastic cooling system – one of the crucial elements of NICA project Tasks: Beam accumulation(at low intensities) Longitudinal emittance reduction during the bunching Luminosity preservation(IBS counteration)

Only longitudinal cooling Start-up mode Project mode RMS bunch length 1,2 m RMS bunch length 0,6 m URF = 50 kV URF < 1000 kV h = 22 h = 66 Ions 179Au97+ ε⫠max= 1,1 π mm mrad Energy range 3-4,5 GeV/u Bandwidth 2-4 GHz Only longitudinal cooling 3-D cooling

IBS simulation condition Project mode IBS calculations: BETACOOL Structures compared: 3-D cooling IBS simulation condition σs = 60 cm

Luminosity ΔQ = 0,05 Lmax = 1027сm-2s-1 Project luminosity attainment βIP, m 0,35 0,7 1,0 E, GeV/u 3.0 3.2 3.4 N, 109 2.3 2.85 3.25

Intrabeam scattering Requirement: cooling rates has to exceed IBS rates In the range from 3,3 to 4,5 GeV/u IBS times for compared structures does not significantly depend on βIP and are about (700-1800 s)

Bandwidth & Working Point Bandwidth 2-4 GHz Preferable working point is Having bandwidth 2 – 4 GHz we have the absence of overlapping 1.5 – 4.6 σp

Cooling Acceptance At energies below 3.9 GeV/u cooling by the filter method does not cover the whole separatrix, which leads to additional beam loss. The Filter method is rejected for the project mode due to the low acceptance

Cooling times(at optimal gain) Time-of-Flight method does not provide faster cooling tempo than tempo of IBS heating. Only Palmer method satisfied the requirements and it is chosen for the project mode.

Drift force is not linear The core is cooled faster than the tail

E=3Gev/u β*=35cm β*=70cm β*=100cm IBS/CoolRMS 2,034 2,543 2,464 IBS/CoolFWHM 5,110 5,584 5,302 For the project mode the Palmer cooling rates 2-5 times exceed the IBS rates at any discussing choice of β–function in the interaction point

Longitudinal cooling only IBS simulation condition Start-up mode Longitudinal cooling only IBS simulation condition σs ≤ 120 см

Intrabeam scattering Required luminosity for start-up mode L = 5∙1025cm-2s-1

Bandwidth & Cooling Acceptance Separatrix covered: Palmer: >1,7 GeV/u Filter: >2,5 GeV/u Absence of band overlapping > 6σp Palmer and Filter methods are allowed to be implemented by acceptance criterion. Filter method provides faster cooling rates therefore it is chosen for the start-up mode.

Luminosity (at equal IBS/Cooling rates) for project luminosity For the core of the distribution the stochastic cooling system provides the required cooling rates

Output peak power is chosen Power & Gain Mode Start-up Project Long. cool. method Filter Palmer Optimal gain, dB 69 91 Equipment losses, dB 67 37 Total gain, dB 136 128 Output peak power is chosen 500 Watt/channel Gain is chosen 140 dB

List of Equipment Low power(<–30dBm): Pickups, Low noise Preamplifiers, Couplers Medium power: Preamplifiers, Feeder Cable, Optical Comb Filter, Attenuators, Phase Shifters High power(>30dBm): Main Amplifiers, Dividers, Kickers

Placement & Delay Start-up mode: Longitudinal channel 1 (Equipment own delay 452 ns) Project mode: Longitudinal channel 2 (473 ns) Transverse channels 1, 1’ with combined kicker (405 ns, 418 ns) Channel 1 Channel 1’ Channel 2 Min. constant delay: Channel 1 – 595 ns Channel 2 – 490ns + Variable delay: Range 32 ns Precision 1 ps There is a reserve in delay for all channels and modes

Pickups, Kickers & Main Amplifiers FZJ Ring-slot couplers are chosen as Pickups & Kickers Purchase list: Pickup – 2 basic structures Kicker – 4 basic structures 6 pickups & 4 kickers in total 16 amplifiers per kicker 100 amplifiers in total Basic structure – 16 rings High Impedance 30W amplifier per each pair of combiner boards Kicker dissipates ~ 120 Watt Negotiations with FZJ concerning pickups & kickers are on the way Main 30W Amplifiers R&D is in progress (OKB TSP, Minsk)

Diagnostics Equipment is being purchased Signal Spectrum Analyzer 4-channel Vector Network Analyzer Equipment is being purchased Schottky diagnostics BTF measurements Power meter

Status & Plans More detailed plan is in the database Equipment Status Diagnostics Being Purchased Finished by the end of 2017 Optical Comb Filter Components being purchased Purchased (III 2017) Assembled (I 2018) 4 Kickers Test bench Production Negotiations (FZJ) First Tests (III-IV 2017) Production + Assembly 1 unit/year starting 2018 6 Pickups Main amplifiers R&D R&D finished (end 2017) 16 units/yr starting 2018 Electronics Being purchased Purchase + Assembly 1 channel/year starting 2018

Beam Transfer Function: Recent results Beam Transfer Function: Nyquist diagrams of 41 harmonics measured

BTF measurements at FZJ

Conclusions Stochastic cooling system can provide the required luminosity at any discussing beta-function in the interaction point for both Start-up and Project modes. For longitudinal cooling in the Start-up mode the Filter method is chosen, Palmer method is chosen in the Project mode. Also main parameters are defined. For the Start-up mode the stochastic cooling system provides the required cooling rates for the core of the distribution. Evolution of the distribution function tails has to be investigated numerically. Equipment purchasing is started, main amplifiers R&D is in progress, negotiations with FZJ concerning pickups and kickers are on the way.

Thank you for attention