Ship’s structure safety - a necessary condition for safe shipping

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Methods MEC3045F Non-destructive evaluation.
Advertisements

Welcome to SMMs Presentation offering a synopsis of our Emergency Response Service on a 24 Hour basis PRESS RIGHT MOUSE CLICK IF YOU WANT TO MOVE BACK.
Lessons Learned from the Application of Risk Management in the Shipment of LNG.
Structure of dangerous goods Maritime Office in Gdynia.
COMPLACENCY AS AN ELEMENT OF MARITIME ACCIDENTS.
GBS PILOT PROJECT ROUND TABLE REVIEW TRIPARTITE TOKYO 20th SEPTEMBER 2007.
Modelling and Computer Animation of Damage Stability K. Hasegawa, K. Ishibashi, Y. Yasuda Presentation: Marcel van den Elst.
Emergency Response Service IASST Safety Seminar September the 20 th 2010 Alexis CARAUX Head of Emergency Response Service.
The Relationship between Nuclear Safety, Security and Safeguards
Structural Reliability Theory
Univerity of Genova Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Technologies Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Technologies University of Genova,
20 10 School of Electrical Engineering &Telecommunications UNSW UNSW 2. Laguerre Parameterised Hawkes Process To model spike train data,
VOSClim Project Information. Why do we want the VOSClim information? The purpose of VOSClim Project To provide a high-quality set of marine met obs Detailed.
An Ocean of Opportunity: An integrated maritime policy for the EU 1 Places of refuge: General legal framework and developments within IMO and the EU Alexandros.
IMO Goal Based Standards for New Ship Construction Roberto P. Cazzulo RINA Member of IACS Council Former IACS EG GBS Chairman.
1 Software Testing and Quality Assurance Lecture 39 – Software Quality Assurance.
Trondheim Tekniske Fagskole The “Design Wave Philosophy’’ Calculation of the design wave Wave forces on semi-submersible platforms Wave forces and bending.
Tripartite Meeting Beijing, 1 November 2005 IMO GBS Classification Society’s View about the Scope, Verification Process and Acceptance Criteria Roberto.
«Enhance of ship safety based on maintenance strategies by applying of Analytic Hierarchy Process» DAGKINIS IOANNIS, Dr. NIKITAKOS NIKITAS University of.
Identify the Causes 2009 MORT Management Oversight and Risk Tree
Ice Navigation & Seamanship A tanker master’s experience
Guidance Notes on the Investigation of Marine Incidents
Tor Svensen DNV-GL merger: increased safety focus Nor-Shipping press conference,
Mediterranean MoU 7th Committee Meeting on PSC Alexandria, EGYPT 31st January - 2nd February A Presentation by INTERTANKO Port State Control Capt.
DESIGNING FOR SAFETY CHAPTER 9. IMPORTANCE OF DESIGNING FOR SAFETY  In the near future, the level of safety that companies and industries achieve will.
GL – Your competitive edge Take the lead through innovation Fuel Cells in maritime Applications - Challanges, Chances and Experiences
Marine Services Condition Assessment Condition Assessment © 2003 Lloyd’s Register of Shipping.
INTERCARGO International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners Presentation to the Public Forum, Anchorage March 29th, 2005.
Captain Stephen Thomas Maritime Administration Department.
SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Non Conformance Reporting
Rogue Waves 2004 Ship design rules and regulations – an overview of major themes Gil-Yong Han Int’l Association of Classification Societies.
Trondheim Tekniske Fagskole The “Design Wave Philosophy’’ Calculation of the design wave Wave forces on semi-submersible platforms Wave forces and bending.
Software Testing and Quality Assurance Software Quality Assurance 1.
Nautical Institute Hong Kong Marine Accidents Problems and Solutions Successful accident prevention in the tanker industry Tim Wilkins Regional Manager.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Manager – Pipeline Safety 1.
INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON MARINE OIL POLLUTION CONTROL - ATHENS, GREECE 09, June 2006 POP&C – POLLUTION PREVENTION & CONTROL Risk/Pollution Reduction and.
Tripartite Meeting Seoul, Korea, September 2009 Safety & SOLAS Agenda item 4.1 Goal-Based Standards --- application and compliance --- Toshiro Arima.
David Eley Designation of Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas (PSSA)
Dieser Platz ist für Ihr Bild vorgesehen Goal Based Standards – A unique chance to define a new framework for the development of rules and regulations.
Sea level Workshop – Paris 2006 Assessing the impact of long term trends in extreme sea levels on offshore and coastal installations Ralph Rayner Marine.
Risk reduction and response scenarios BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.
September 2015 VERIFICATION OF CONTAINER WEIGHTS: BACKGROUND AND NEW OPERATIONAL REALITY.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
MARCSMARCS Marine Accident Risk Calculation System.
Bridge Resource Management
Erman Taşkın. Information security aspects of business continuity management Objective: To counteract interruptions to business activities and to protect.
1 IMO Goal-based Standards A shipbuilders ’ opinion September 20, 2007 The Shipbuilders ’ Association of Japan NISHIYAMA, goro.
Evaluating GIS for Disaster Management Bruce Kinner GEOG 596A.
4th ASF/SNEC – ACS Seminar, Seoul, 22 March 2013
LECTURE 7 AVIATION SAFETY & SECURITY
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
SOLAS and SAR JIHOON WI.
MAXSURF Naval Architecture Software
WORLD MARITIME DAY PARALLEL EVENT
Žilinská univerzita v Žiline Fakulta špeciálneho inžinierstva
5/16/2018 4:40 PM Shipbuilding industry’s perspective on the new IACS Common Structural Rules SHIBASAKI, Kohta Japan Marine United Corp. The Shipbuilders’
Critical systems design
Ship Disaster Investigation
Saint- Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation
Ship Disaster Investigation
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
The Extensible Tool-chain for Evaluation of Architectural Models
“Walk the Talk” Truck Reception, Unloading and Departure
SPATIALLY ENABLED DISASTER RISK ENGINEERS
BACKGROUND 1987 Joint MSC/MEPC working group on:
Special Considerations for Structural design and Fabrication for tankers or similar vessels with Large Size (150m or more in length) in polar waters
Effect of Earthquake on Fire Protection Systems
FERRY FIRES: Analysis of Structural and Human Factor Issues
Organizational Flexibility
What is the target safety level of offshore structures?
Presentation transcript:

Ship’s structure safety - a necessary condition for safe shipping Darek Rudziński

Shipping is a highly random type of activity not only due to uncontrolled atmospheric and sea waving conditions but also arbitrary loading condition, shipping routes and decisions of the crew, some tired, some with limited experience. The process of ship designing and construction as well as its technical maintenance is also a an arbitrary process. 2

We cannot change the weather or sea waving conditions but safety can be enhanced by looking to the technical state of the ship and reducing the number of human errors. A ship technically safe is the necessary condition for safe shipping, whereas the sufficient condition to be met is safe ship operation. 3

Catastrophes at sea in recent years 4

The last 25 years witnesses the sinking of 419 bulk carriers, and resultant loss of life of about 2000 crew members. In most cases sinking was caused by structural failure in severe weather conditions. 5

6

In 1994, the ferry „Estonia”, sank on route from Tallinn to Stockholm with loss of 852 lives. The ferry sank at night in approximately 50 minutes as shown in the scenario below. 8

9

10

In 1999, the tanker „Erica” broke up on passing the French coast causing an environmental disaster. The causes underlying the incident lay in the bad technical condition of the hull structure. The Spanish coast suffered similar consequences after the catastrophe of the tanker „Prestige”. 11

Traditionally safety standards are developed in reaction to catastrophes, i.e. : - following the „Estonia” ferry disaster Sweden organised a conference with the signing of the so called Stockholm Understanding on ferry safety in damaged condition; - IACS developed „Common Structural Rules for tankers and bulk carriers”. 13

The „Prestige” case, stimulated IMO to embark on developing technical safety standards for the first time in the history of the organisation. Work started with bulk carrier and tanker structural issues. This area had in the past been the domain of classification societies. 14

IMO began to work on safety standards for bulk carrier and tanker hull structure applying risk analysis. The work for the Polish government is performed by Polski Rejestr Statków. 15

Application of risk analysis requires development of theoretical models (based on mathematical and physic theories), which provide grounds for developing simulation of ship motion in waves and the ship structure reaction to waves. Simulations are used to identify elements and situations that influence safety. 16

Risk based analysis assumes different scenarios of ship structure failure, which enables calculation of:  probability of specific structure failure modes in assumed scenario  probability of ship sinking due to combination of different scenarios.

Example of bulk carrier structure failure scenarios (risk model)

Example of bulk carrier structure failure scenarios (risk model)

Example of bulk carrier structure failure scenarios (risk model)

Hull girder failure

Example of bulk carrier structure failure scenarios (risk model)

Simulation of frame deformations in waves

Example of bulk carrier structure failure scenarios (risk model)

Simulation of sloshing in flooded hold

Collapse of the corrugated bulkhead

Example of bulk carrier structure failure scenarios (risk model)

Simulation of ship’s sinking due to structural failure

Example of bulk carrier structure failure scenarios (risk model)

Simulation of green seas on the fore part of the deck

Still we have problems in building complete and consistent risk models Still we have problems in building complete and consistent risk models. The risk model should enable to derive criteria for particular mode of failure.

IT development enable the programming of software packages, which installed on board ships provide better control over the loading process and assist the ship master in decision making in difficult situations. 19

20

21

Conclusions 22

Shipping is a business random in nature, therefore, it is difficult to project potential events, and consequently, to assure safety at sea. 22

2. Following the series of catastrophes, IMO decided to take over the task of defining ship standards for ship structures and fittings from classification societies. The proposed risk analysis methodology, which involves reviewing possible events, i.e assuming the deductive approach (from general to particular) provides an opportunity to significantly improve technical safety of ships. 23

3. Safety of ship operation depends on many factors, e. g 3. Safety of ship operation depends on many factors, e.g. crew training and their good marine practice, or equipment. Safety can also be enhanced by installing software packages assisting control and decision making processes by projecting potential events. These in turn facilitate taking appropriate action to assure safety. 24

Thank you Darek Rudziński d.rudzinski@prs.pl www.prs.pl