David Urner Oxford University/JAI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Andrea Paoli AdV 1 st Project Review Cascina, November 3 rd, 2008 IME – infrastructure modifications for environmental noise reduction.
Advertisements

MONALISA: Interferometric Position Monitor at the Nanometre Scale David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
Development of a mover having one nanometer precision and 4mm moving range Y. Morita, S. Yamashita ICEPP, University of Tokyo Y. Higashi, M. Masuzawa,
Wed 15 Jul 2009 ATF2 weekly meeting Oxford MONALISA 1 MONALISA at ATF2 First installation report 15 July 09.
ILC roles Interferometry Results 2009 / 2010 Mon 20 Apr :00 JST (01:00 UTC) MDI TILC09 – Tsukuba OXFORD MONALISA 1.
Final Doublet Stability and in-detector Interferometry MONALISA David Urner Oxford University.
Sta bilization of the F inal F ocus : Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision.
Workshop TS May 2008 GENERAL CLIC ALIGNMENT Progresses and strategy. Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, TS/SU/MTI.
StaFF: Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision Proposed experiment conducted within framework of StaFF (Stabilization of Final Focus for ILC). Funded.
MONALISA David Urner, Armin Reichold, Paul Coe, Matthew Warden, Geoff Rayner Monitoring Alignment and Stabilisation with high Accuracy (Previously known.
Effects of the cryogenics operational conditions on the mechanical stability of the FLASH linac modules Ramila Amirikas, Alessandro Bertolini, Jürgen Eschke,
Vacuum system in the main Linacs C. Garion CERN/TE/VSC CLIC09 workshop, October.
Status on MONALISA presented by D. Urner 6 th stabilization day 9. June 09.
MONALISA David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University.
Concepts for Combining Different Sensors for CLIC Final Focus Stabilisation David Urner Armin Reichold.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
1 StaFF Progress Report David Urner University of Oxford.
Quad-to-quad correlated motion in FLASH Ramila Amirikas, Alessandro Bertolini DESY Hamburg XFEL beam dynamics meeting, February 25 st 2008.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
ATF2 meeting LAPP; David Urner 1 David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Geoffrey Rayner MPhys alumnus MONALISA Monitoring, Alignment.
Tue 31 Mar :50 (CEST) 13:50 UTC CLIC stabilisation day 5 - LAPP OXFORD MONALISA 1 Options for interferometric monitoring of CLIC test magnet M.
CLIC MDI stabilization update A.Jeremie G.Balik, B.Bolzon, L.Brunetti, G.Deleglise A.Badel, B.Caron, R.Lebreton, J.Lottin Together with colleagues from.
MONALISA an Update David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Monitoring, Alignment & Stabilisation with high Accuracy.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
Stabilization of Focus at ATF2 David Urner University of Oxford.
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
The CLIC alignment studies 1 CLIC workshop October 2007 THE CLIC ALIGNMENT STUDIES Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
CLIC Module WG 20/07/2009 H. MAINAUD DURAND, BE-ABP/SU Pre-alignment system and impact on module design.
The stabilisation of the final focus (StaFF) system Sun 12 th March 2006 MDI – LCWS06 at I I Sc Bangalore David Urner, Paul Coe, Armin Reichold.
LASER FRAME: Straightness monitor (Tentative results of resolution test) Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF May 30-31,2005 KEK Nano BPM Group Y.Higashi,
MONALISA David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Monitoring, Alignment & Stabilisation with high Accuracy.
1/13 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 9, 2006) Mount.
09:40 – 10:00 (JST) Wed 5 Mar 2008 MONALISA : JAI Oxford MDI ATF2 TILC08 Sendai Japan 1 / 26 MONALISA Laser based alignment and stability monitoring.
J. Pfingstner Imperfections tolerances for on-line DFS Improved imperfection tolerances for an on-line dispersion free steering algorithm Jürgen Pfingstner.
Location of the LW detector- Simulation of the LW signals Lawrence Deacon RHUL ATF2 meeting August 23 rd 2006 KEK.
STABILISATION AND PRECISION POINTING QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS IN THE COMPACT LINEAR COLLIDER S. Janssens, P. Fernandez Carmona, K. Artoos, C. Collette, M. Guinchard.
Current Status of LASER FRAME for KEK-Nano BPM (Tentative results of resolution test) Second Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF December 11-12, 2004.
Beam Dynamics IR Stability Issues Glen White / SLAC September IRENG07 Vibration tolerances for final doublet cryomodules Settlement of detector.
Superconducting final doublet Support A.Jeremie. SC magnet steps Motivation: have an active stabilisation as planned in ILC and CLIC => need to evaluate.
MONALISA Update David Urner ATF2 Meeting Dec
ATF2 weekly meeting 4 July 2007 MONALISA: Attachment of Vacuum Vessels for ATF2 David Urner.
CERN, 27-Mar EuCARD NCLinac Task /3/2009.
Test plan for CLIC MB linac quad LAPP option A.Jeremie.
Vibration measurements with and without Monalisa 15/07/09 Benoît BOLZON (LAPP) David Urner (Oxford) Paul Coe (Oxford) 1 Benoît BOLZON.
10-meter Interferometer Results M. Woods (special thanks to Steve Myers and Tim Slaton) Jan. 31, 2000 Commissioning Setup System Noise Monte Carlo simulation.
Update on the ESS monolith design Rikard Linander Monolith and Handling Group ESS Target Division TAC 10, Lund, Nov 5,
Summary of Presentation 1. Tolerances i. Vertical tolerances on BPMs (rf-BPM: ± 0.2μm, user BPMs: ±0.1μm, and X-BPMs: ± 0.1μm) ii. Tolerances on magnets’
The ballistic free-fall absolute gravimeter FG5#202  Accuracy : g ( g = 9, 8xx xxx xX m/s²)  1 µgal [= 10 nm/s²]  Vertical displacement of 3.
Alignment and stability session
SRI 2007: CLS Optical Metrology Facility- Overview
BNL-SLAC-Annecy TeleConference
Digital Light Sources First introduced in 2001.
Summary FD Support System
Vibration issues at Linear Colliders:
Correlated Misalignments Studies for LCLS-II SC Linac
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
Beam Dynamics in Curved ILC Main Linac (following earth curvature)
Topics on Vibration Issues
Hongyu Bai LCLS-II 2 K Cold Box FDR March 9, 2017
David Urner Paul Coe Matthew Warden Armin Reichold Oxford University
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid with Large Crossing Angle
Vibration Measurement Standards of Optical Components
Isotropic View Conceptual Design for MONALISA setup at CERN Magnet
Beam-Based Alignment Results
IP configuration session
David Urner, Armin Reichold , Paul Coe, Matthew Warden, Geoff Rayner
Adjustment of the 3 reference tables at building 180 AT960 measurement
Presentation transcript:

David Urner Oxford University/JAI MONALISA David Urner Oxford University/JAI Clic stabilization day #4

What can laser interferometry do for you? Nanometre level relative distance measurements Micrometre level absolute distances Large range of frequencies: from hours to 100kHz Large motion range (mm) Clic stabilization day #4

Clic stabilization day #4 Recent Results In Air Distance 40cm Offset: 0.001nm Sigma: 0.29nm Clic stabilization day #4

Good results in protected air Experiment done with our new prototype launch head: 1sec: RMS 0.4nm 1min: RMS 1nm Reason to believe that increase is caused by laser frequency shifts Air protection: simple cardboard box Clic stabilization day #4

Work at standard pressure Advantage: No vacuum systems needed Cheaper Flexible Disadvantage: Long-term stability compromised by pressure and gas temperature changes Can be measured and corrected to a certain degree R&D needed Further improvements possible Frequency stabilization of laser to Rb87 line Proper enclosure Usage of light gas such as he instead of air Lose some of cheap/flexible advantage Clic stabilization day #4

Clic stabilization day #4 Mockup Short distances: Vertical ~50cm Horzontal~1m Resolutions in air sufficient. Vacuum vessel: Influences magnet support Isolation with bellows possible but requires fancy force cancelation Clic stabilization day #4

Start with protected air measurements for Mockup Simple plastic pipe tubes sufficent Allows in situ adaptation of observation network Prior simulations would suggest a triangle with cross-braces should give good results Requires proper simulations Possible measurements of magnet: Vertical motion Horizontal motion Flexing 1st and higher modes Expansion (compare quadrants) Comparison with seismic measurements Long term behaviour Temperature dependence Typical beam tube dia: 5cm Get a view At pole tips Possible way to compare to seismic measurements Clic stabilization day #4

Clic stabilization day #4 Summary Protected air – gas at normal pressure likely to be sufficient Start with simple system but leave room for possible upgrade to helium or vacuum Determine best configuration of interferometers Specify and prioritize overall goals to be measured with mock-up Need input from beam dynamics group to understand what the specifications for beamline quadrupoles really mean: Stabilize one quad with respect to next? What is limit for other than 1 second How far can quadrupoles move at a beam interruption before full beam based alignment is required Ho far can quadrupoles move before mechanical alignment is required Clic stabilization day #4