Changes in the Melt Season and the Declining Arctic Sea Ice

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2012 Arctic Report Card Data visualizations and graphics from the NOAA climate.gov team
Advertisements

(2012) THE ARCTIC’S RAPIDLY SHRINKING SEA ICE COVER: A RESEARCH SYNTHESIS PRESENTATION Zachary Looney 2 nd Year Atmospheric Sciences
Discussion about two papers concerning the changing Arctic sea ice GEO6011Seminar in Geospatial Science and Applications Wentao Xia 11/19/2012.
ASSESSMENT OF CHANGING SEA ICE CONDITIONS AND SHIPPING ACTIVITY IN CANADIAN ARCTIC WATERS University of Ottawa Larissa Pizzolato Jackie Dawson.
Chukchi/Beaufort Seas Surface Wind Climatology, Variability, and Extremes from Reanalysis Data: Xiangdong Zhang, Jeremy Krieger, Paula Moreira,
PDO/PNA The PDO (Pacific Decadal Oscillation) is an index derived from North Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies and it has a high correlation to.
Climate Change Impacts in the United States Third National Climate Assessment [Name] [Date] Climate Trends.
The influence of extra-tropical, atmospheric zonal wave three on the regional variation of Antarctic sea ice Marilyn Raphael UCLA Department of Geography.
Long Term Temperature Variability of Santa Barbara Coutny By Courtney Keeney and Leila M.V. Carvalho.
Excerpts of the AAAS Fiscal Year 2009 Appropriations Summary ( September 2008 summary: Congress has made little progress on the federal.
Outline Further Reading: Detailed Notes Posted on Class Web Sites Natural Environments: The Atmosphere GE 101 – Spring 2006 Boston University Myneni L28:
Arctic Climate Variability in the Context of Global Change Ola M. Johannessen, Lennart Bengtsson, Leonid Bobylev, Svetlana I. Kuzmina, Elena Shalina.
Summer 2010 Forecast. Outline Review seasonal predictors Focus on two predictors: ENSO Soil moisture Summer forecast Look back at winter forecast Questions.
What is El Nino and will it end our drought?. What has caused the drought? We have been experiencing drought conditions since September, We've also.
Interannual and Regional Variability of Southern Ocean Snow on Sea Ice Thorsten Markus and Donald J. Cavalieri Goal: To investigate the regional and interannual.
Uma S. Bhatt 1, I. Polyakov 2, R. Bekryaev 3 et al. 1. Geophysical Institute & 2. International Arctic Research Institute at Univ. Alaska, Fairbanks AK.
Impacts of Open Arctic to Specific Regions By: Jill F. Hasling, CCM Chief Consulting Meteorologist – MatthewsDaniel Weather September 2014.
Comparison of SSM/I Sea Ice Concentration with Kompsat-1 EOC Images of the Arctic and Antarctic Hyangsun Han and Hoonyol Lee Department of Geophysics,
Arctic Sea Ice and the Ice-Albedo Feedback Harry Stern, Polar Science Center, University of Washington, Seattle Climate Complexity Workshop 2012 May 9,
December 2002 Section 2 Past Changes in Climate. Global surface temperatures are rising Relative to average temperature.
Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation
Dr. Lawson Brigham Deputy Director and Alaska office Director, US Arctic Research Commission PhD. (Cambridge, 2000) M.S. (Rensselear Polytechnic Inst.,
Improvement in forecast skill from for ECMWF 5-km hemispheric flow pattern Highlights of the past recent decades.
An analysis of Russian Sea Ice Charts for A. Mahoney, R.G. Barry and F. Fetterer National Snow and Ice Data Center, University of Colorado Boulder,
By Matt Masek March 22, Outline Review of 2011 – 2012 Winter Role of La Niña and Arctic Oscillation Spring Outlook One month (April) outlook Three.
THE FOUR SEASONS. A SEASON is one of the four periods of the year. Each season--spring, summer, autumn, and winter--lasts about three months and brings.
Arctic Sea Ice – Now and in the Future. J. Stroeve National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences.
Arctic Sea Ice Cover: What We Have Learned from Satellite Passive-Microwave Observations Claire L. Parkinson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Presentation.
Poleward amplification of Northern Hemisphere weekly snowcover extent trends Stephen Déry & Ross Brown ENSC 454/654 – “Snow and Ice”
Climate Monitoring Branch. Global (Jan-Oct) Land ranked 6 th warmest. Anom.: +0.75˚C (+1.35˚F) WYR: 2007 (+1.02˚C/+1.84˚F) Ocean ranked 10 th warmest.
Western Australia Annual Preparedness Briefing Mike Bergin, Regional Director 7 September 2015.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
SNOW SEASON FRACTIONAL FLOW 4 Trends in Eurasian Arctic runoff timing and their relationship to snow cover changes Amanda Tan 1, Jennifer C. Adam 2, Dennis.
Lecture 9: Air-Sea Interactions EarthsClimate_Web_Chapter.pdfEarthsClimate_Web_Chapter.pdf, p ; Ch. 16, p ; Ch. 17, p
TIME SERIES ‘Time series’ data is a bivariate data, where the independent variable is time. We use scatterplot to display the relationship between the.
Winter Outlook for the Pacific Northwest: Winter 06/07 14 November 2006 Kirby Cook. NOAA/National Weather Service Acknowledgement: Climate Prediction Center.
Global Ice Coverage Claire L. Parkinson NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Presentation to the Earth Ambassador program, meeting at NASA Goddard Space Flight.
Figure 1. The three overlapping study regions. The small region is centered on Disko Bay. The areas of the small, medium, and large regions (not including.
Michael Steele Polar Science Center / APL University of Washington Jan 14, 2009 AOMIP WHOI Mechanisms of Upper Ocean Warming in the Arctic and the Effect.
Exemplar 3.8B Polar Ice.
Arctic Sea Ice in 2008: Standing on the Threshold
W. N. Meier, J. C. Stroeve, and J. Smith (Correspondence: Introduction
The Emergence of Surface-Based Arctic Amplification
Evidence of a Changing Climate
Yinghui Liu1, Jeff Key2, and Xuanji Wang1
Sea Surface Temperature as a Trigger of Butterfish Migration: A Study of Fall Phenology Amelia Snow1, John Manderson2, Josh Kohut1, Laura Palamara1, Oscar.
Daylength Local Mesoscale Winds Chinook Winds (Foehn) Loma, MT: January 15, 1972, the temperature rose from -54 to 49°F (-48 to 9°C), a 103°F (58°C)
Atmospheric & Oceanic Processes Lecture 4: The changing Arctic
Natural Causes of Climate Change
W. N. Meier, J. C. Stroeve, and J. Smith (Correspondence: Introduction
Overview of 2016/17 Winter Climate over South Korea
The Global Hydrological Cycle
The El Niño/ Southern Oscillation (ENSO) Cycle Lab
Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
Polar Climate Change in CCSM3: Climatology and trend
Jeff Key*, Aaron Letterly+, Yinghui Liu+
EL NINO Figure (a) Average sea surface temperature departures from normal as measured by satellite. During El Niño conditions upwelling is greatly.
CLIMATE Key question #10 What is the difference between climate and weather? How do we pictorially represent climate over a year?
Year 2 Autumn Term Week 12 Lesson 1
ATMS790: Graduate Seminar, Yuta Tomii
Effects of Temperature and Precipitation Variability on Snowpack Trends in the Western U.S. JISAO/SMA Climate Impacts Group and the Department of Civil.
Climate Changes due to Natural Processes
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Year 2 Autumn Term Week 12 Lesson 1
Calendar.
Understanding and constraining snow albedo feedback
Korea Ocean Research & Development Institute, Ansan, Republic of Korea
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Moisture Situation Update
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Presentation transcript:

Changes in the Melt Season and the Declining Arctic Sea Ice J.C. Stroeve, W. Meier, T. Markus, J. Miller http://nsidc.org Background Changes in Melt Season from Satellite Passive Microwave Data The last few years have seen a remarkable reduction in the Arctic summer ice cover with extensive retreats observed off the shores of Alaska and Siberia [Stroeve et al., 2005; Serreze et al., 2003]. Since 1979, when routine satellite observations became available, the amount of area in the Arctic covered by sea ice during summer declined by over 20%. Mean Decadal Melt Onset Dates Regional Changes in Length of Melt Season Figure 6. The melt season has increased by more than a week per decade in the Beaufort, Chukchi and E. Siberian Seas. The only region in the Arctic that does not show a statistically significant trend towards a longer melt season is in the central Arctic. The longest melt season recorded for the central Arctic occurred in 1995 (122 days). In the Beaufort Sea, the melt season was 34 days longer than normal in 1998 (lasting 166 days). In the Chukchi/E. Siberian Sea, melt lasted more than a month longer than normal in 1990, the year with the longest melt season (162) in that region. All these years (e.g. 1990, 1995 and 1998) were years that experienced large ice losses either off the shores of Siberia and/or Alaska and indicate that warmer spring, summer and fall temperatures played a role in the decline of the sea ice in those years. 1979-2005 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2005 Figure 1. Time-series of September sea ice extent from 1979 to 2005. Ice extent is obtained by summing all pixels with at least 15% ice and assuming that the area not imaged by the sensor is 100% snow covered. The linear least squares trend is also included showing a decline of 8.5% per decade in September ice cover since 1979. Figure 3. Average date of melt onset, together with the mean melt onset dates in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. There has been a clear shift towards earlier melt since the 1980s, particularly north of Alaska and Siberia. These trends towards elier melt onset agree with trends towards springtime warming observed in surface air temperatures in the last couple decades. Chukchi E. Siberian Annual ice losses have been less, but this appears to be changing. Although sea ice extent during September 2002 and 2003 was substantially below the long-term mean of 7 million sq-km, ice extent recovered to near its median position during the following winters. This was not the case following the 2004 September minima: ice extent remained low throughout the 2004/2005 winter and spring, with record low extent observed in December through April resulting in the wintertime trend approaching -3% per decade [Meier et al., 2005]. Generally, if the ice is pulled back in one sector of the Arctic Ocean, it has advanced in another. Winter 2004/2005 was unique in our 30-year history of passive microwave observations in that the 2004/2005 winter ice extent is within the median edge position everywhere, encompassing both the Pacific and Atlantic sectors, with the exception of a small area west of Iceland in February. Laptev Kara Mean Decadal Freeze-up Dates Beaufort Central Arctic Barents 1979-2005 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2005 Figure 7. The largest trends are observed in the eastern Arctic (e.g. Kara and Barents Seas) where the melt season duration has increased by nearly 2 weeks per decade. The longest melt season for the Laptev and Kara Seas occurred in 1995, with a melt season lasting 167 and187 days, respectively and more than 2 standard deviations from the mean. In 1995, the ice losses were primarily observed off the shores of Siberia and therefore, the record melt season is consistent with the spatial pattern of ice losses that year. Figures 6 & 7 4 illustrate melt durations have become more variable since 1988 throughout most of the Arctic (the exception being the Barents Sea). Periods of low Arctic Oscillation (AO) index (e.g. 1979-1988) exhibited less variable melt durations in both perennial and first year ice because the dominant anticyclonic conditions would have maintained a cooler and more uniform climate. This changed after 1989 and interestingly, the amount of September sea ice has also generally become more variable after1988. Figure 4. Average date of freeze-up, together with the mean freeze-up dates in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. There has been a clear shift towards later freeze-up dates since the 1980s, particularly north of Alaska and Siberia but also in the Greenland Sea and the Kara and Barents Seas. Overall, the ice is now freezing nearly 2 weeks later than it did in the 1980s. Table 2. Trends in melt onset, freeze-up and length of melt season (days per decade). Included are the values of the mean melt onset, freeze-up and melt duration (standard deviation given in parenthesis). Values shaded in yellow are statistically significant at the 95% confidence interval. Month/Year Ice Extent Trend (%/decade) Mean Ice Extent (x 106 km2) (1979-2000) and standard deviation (in parenthesis) Ice Extent (x 106 km2) during 2005 (2004 during November and December) January -2.91 + 1.69 14.84 (0.33) 13.68 February -2.55 + 1.59 15.64 (0.32) 14.37 March -2.52 + 1.58 15.74 (0.35) 14.74 April -2.85 + 1.66 15.00 (0.37) 14.10 May -2.63 + 1.83 13.60 (0.37) 13.00 June -3.10 + 2.05 12.16 (0.31) 11.36 July -5.08 + 2.48 10.09 (0.46) 9.02 August -7.08 + 3.47 7.67 (0.45)` 6.30 September -8.41 + 3.78 7.04 (0.55) 5.56 October -3.73 + 2.85 9.28 (0.34) 8.49 November -4.00 + 2.33 11.37 (0.40) 10.29 December -2.82 + 1.86 13.36 (0.28) 12.75 Table 1. Monthly trends in Arctic ice extent (given in %/decade together with the standard deviation) for each calendar month derived from satellite passive microwave observations beginning in 1979. Extents are given in million sq-km. Plots can be viewed and extent figures obtained from the Sea Ice Index archive (http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/archives/). Trends that are statistically significant at the 95% confidence interval or higher are shaded in light gray. Region Melt Onset Trend Freeze-up Trend Melt Season Duration Trend Mean Melt Onset Mean Freeze Up Mean Melt Season Duration Central Arctic -3.9 1.1 4.4 158.5 (5.9) 258.6 (6.6) 100.4 (9.2) Beaufort -4.7 5.0 9.9 142.3 (8.4) 276.0 (9.4) 132.5 (14.5) Chukchi/E. Siberian -4.6 5.8 10.1 144.4 (8.3) 274.0 (7.6) 129.2 (13.6) Laptev -4.1 4.5 8.5 143.4 (13.6) 269.7 (8.5) 121.2 (15.9) Kara -7.3 6.0 13.5 294.2 (9.2) 152.1 (16.7) Barents -8.8 -7.0 13.3 106.3 (12.2) 317.2 (18.3) 240.1 (15.2) Mean Decadal Length of Melt Season 1979-2005 1980-1989 1990-1999 2000-2005 There is a strong inverse correlation between the length of the melt season and the amount of sea ice left in September, where years with low sea ice correspond to years with longer melt seasons. This is true for the Beaufort, Chukchi, E. Siberian and Laptev Seas, where the correlation coefficients are around -0.8. Little or no correlation between length of the melt season and amount of sea ice in September is found for the central Arctic, and the Kara and Barents Seas. Freeze-up dates are also strongly correlated (between 0.7 and 0.8) with the amount of September sea ice for all regions except the central Arctic and the Barents Sea whereas the timing of melt onset shows less correlation with the September ice conditions, yet a positive correlation exists in the western Arctic. Table 3. Correlation coefficients between the amount of sea ice in September with the timing of when melt begin, when the ice freezes back up and the length of the melt season. Figure 2. Time-series of October through February sea ice extent from 1979 to 2005. Ice extent is obtained by summing all pixels with at least 15% ice and assuming that the area not imaged by the sensor is 100% snow covered. The linear least squares trend for each moth is shown in Table 1. Region Melt Onset Freeze-up Melt Duration Central Arctic -0.13 -0.14 -0.01 Beaufort 0.55 -0.77 -0.78 Chukchi/E. Siberian 0.60 -0.82 Laptev 0.59 -0.81 Kara -0.11 -0.71 -0.34 Barents 0.03 0.02 -0.18 Figure 5. Average length of the melt season, together with the mean melt season duration in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. There has been a shift in the length of the melt season since the 1980s, with the season lasting longer particularly north of Alaska and Siberia. This shift is primarily influenced both by a shift towards earlier melt onset dates as well as later freeze-up dates. Overall, the melt season has increased by approximately 10 days per decade throughout the Arctic since the late 1970s although there is substantial regional and interannual variability.