The Origin and Structure of Elliptical Galaxies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Galaxy Formation and Evolution, Mo, van den Bosch & White, 2010 Galactic Dynamics, Binney & Tremaine 2008.
Advertisements

To measure the brightness distribution of galaxies, we must determine the surface brightness of the resolved galaxy. Surface brightness = magnitude within.
The Role of Dissipation in Galaxy Mergers Sadegh Khochfar University of Oxford.
Dark Matter in Dwarf Galaxies
Formation of Globular Clusters in  CDM Cosmology Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan)
DARK MATTER IN GALAXIES
Padova 03 3D Spectrography 3D Spectrography IV – The search for supermassive black holes.
Galaxy Formation and Evolution Open Problems Alessandro Spagna Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino Torino, 18 Febbraio 2002.
AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Accretion and ejection in AGN, Como,
ANGULAR MOMENTUM AND THE STRUCTURE OF DM HALOS Chiara Tonini Special guest: Andrea Lapi Director: Paolo Salucci C.T., A. Lapi & P. Salucci (astro-ph/ ,
The Distribution of DM in Galaxies Paolo Salucci (SISSA) TeVPa Paris,2010.
Tidal Disruption of Globular Clusters in Dwarf Galaxies J. Peñarrubia Santiago 2011 in collaboration with: M.Walker; G. Gilmore & S. Koposov.
Particle Astrophysics & Cosmology SS Chapter 7 Dark Matter.
Hello!. Ajit Kembhavi IUCAA, Pune Galaxies Near and Far Galaxy Morphology, SuperMassive Black Holes and all that Sudhanshu Barway Yogesh Wadadekar Vinu.
Dark Halos of Fossil Groups and Clusters Observations and Simulations Ali Dariush, Trevor Ponman Graham Smith University of Birmingham, UK Frazer Pearce.
The two phases of massive galaxy formation Thorsten Naab MPA, Garching UCSC, August, 2010.
Current Issues in Disk Galaxy Formation van den Bosch, Burkert, Swaters (2001) Abadi et al. (2003) Swaters et al. (2003) van den Bosch, Burkert, Swaters.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation Section 4: Semi-Analytic Models of Galaxy Formation Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael.
Merger Histories of LCDM Galaxies: Disk Survivability and the Deposition of Cold Gas via Mergers Kyle Stewart AAS Dissertation Talk 213 th AAS Meeting.
Dark Matter Candidates: Particles WIMPs, particularly LSPs: mass >GeV. WIMPs, particularly LSPs: mass >GeV. Neutralinos: New parity associated with supersymmetry.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation (Section 3: Galaxy Data vs. Simulations) Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael Solway.
“ Testing the predictive power of semi-analytic models using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey” Juan Esteban González Birmingham, 24/06/08 Collaborators: Cedric.
Andreas Burkert Max-Planck Institute (MPE, Garching) Observatory University (Munich) Elena D’Onghia Observatory University (Munich) with.
Constraining Galactic Halos with the SZ-effect
Bililign T. Dullo Swinburne University of Technology (Alister W. Graham) Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing NGC 4291 NGC 1426.
Cosmological formation of elliptical galaxies * Thorsten Naab & Jeremiah P. Ostriker (Munich, Princeton) T.Naab (USM), P. Johannson (USM), J.P. Ostriker.
Pseudo-bulges, classical bulges and elliptical galaxies – II Monsters at Heart Dimitri Gadotti (ESO)
AGN downsizing は階層的銀河形成論で 説明できるか? Motohiro Enoki Tomoaki Ishiyama (Tsukuba Univ.) Masakazu A. R. Kobayashi (Ehime Univ.) Masahiro Nagashima (Nagasaki Univ.)
Effects of baryons on the structure of massive galaxies and clusters Oleg Gnedin University of Michigan Collisionless N-body simulations predict a nearly.
I N T R O D U C T I O N The mechanism of galaxy formation involves the cooling and condensation of baryons inside the gravitational potential well provided.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Equal- and unequal-mass mergers of disk and elliptical galaxies with black holes Peter Johansson University Observatory Munich 8 th Sino-German workshop.
Cosmological Galaxy Formation
Gary Mamon, 2 July 2005, PNe as astronomical tools, Gdansk Do planetary nebulae indicate a lack of dark matter in elliptical galaxies? with Avishai DEKEL.
Understanding formation of galaxies from their environments Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory.
The co-evolution of massive ellipticals & their black holes Thorsten Naab University Observatory, Munich 8 th Sino-German Workshop on Galaxy Formation.
Scaling relations of spheroids over cosmic time: Tommaso Treu (UCSB)
Dimitri Gadotti (Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics – Garching) MAGPOP Network Meeting What can we learn from imaging and spectroscopy of well-resolved.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
Models & Observations galaxy clusters Gabriella De Lucia Max-Planck Institut für Astrophysik Ringberg - October 28, 2005.
Assembly of Massive Elliptical Galaxies
Semi-analytical model of galaxy formation Xi Kang Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS.
The Evolution of Intracluster Light Craig Rudick Department of Astronomy Case Western Reserve University.
Nearby mergers: ellipticals in formation? Thorsten Naab University Observatory, Munich October 4th, 2006 From the Local Universe to the Red Sequence Space.
18 / Feb / 2008 Galaxy Evolution Meeting 김태선 & 이석영 Dept. of Astronomy, Yonsei University Intrinsic Axis Ratio Distribution of Early-type Galaxies Using.
Semi-analytic modelling in the era of wide, deep and multiwavelenght surveys Gabriella De Lucia Max-Planck Institut für Astrophysik Bologna – May 25, 2006.
LISA double BHs Dynamics in gaseous nuclear disk.
What Shapes Galaxies?STScI, 27 April 2016 Anne-Marie Weijmans University of St Andrews Tim de Zeeuw, Eric Emsellem, Davor Krajnović, Pierre-Yves Lablanche.
Correlations Between Core Mass Deficit M def, M,  – The “Smoking Gun” for Core Scouring by Binary Black Holes John Kormendy University of Texas at Austin.
Simulating the Production of Intra-Cluster Light Craig Rudick Department of Astronomy CERCA - 02/17/05.
Arman Khalatyan AIP 2006 GROUP meeting at AIP. Outline What is AGN? –Scales The model –Multiphase ISM in SPH SFR –BH model Self regulated accretion ?!
T. J. Cox Phil Hopkins Lars Hernquist + many others (the Hernquist Mafia) Feedback from AGN during Galaxy Mergers.
The prolate shape of the Galactic halo Amina Helmi Kapteyn Astronomical Institute.
The formation of ultra-compact dwarf galaxies and nucleated dwarf galaxies Collaborators: Ben Moore, Stelios Kazantzidis, Tobias Kaufmann, Andrea V. Macciò.
On the Origin of Galaxy Morphology in a Hierarchical Universe
The morphology and angular momentum of simulated galaxy populations
Dynamical Models for Galaxies Observed with SAURON Michele Cappellari
Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter
The formation and dynamical state of the brightest cluster galaxies
Sugata Kaviraj Hertfordshire Based on: Kaviraj 2014, MN, 440, 2944
Speaker: Bingxiao Xu Peking University
Luciano del Valle & Andrés Escala Universidad de Chile
Glenn van de Ven Institute for Advanced Study
Lecture Angular Momentum
Why are Massive Black Holes Small in Disk Galaxies ?
The SAURON Survey - The stellar populations of early-type galaxies
- = + = Quasars, Mergers, and the Formation of Elliptical Galaxies
Niranjan Sambhus, Flavio De Lorenzi, Ortwin Gerhard (Basel)
Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs
Presentation transcript:

The Origin and Structure of Elliptical Galaxies Structure formation by hierarchical merging. Spiral galaxies: merging of small, gas-rich substructures. Elliptical Galaxies: merging of equal-mass substructures (Toomre & Toomre 1972). Spiral galaxies Elliptical Galaxies (Moore 2000)

The Origin and Structure of Elliptical Galaxies Collisionless merger Gas-rich merger ( Hernquist 92, 93, Naab & Burkert 93) ( Bekki 99; Mihos & Hernquist 96; Springel et al. 05) ( Naab & Burkert )

Testing the Merger Hypothesis The merger hypothesis has been investigated numerically (Gerhard 81;Barnes 92; Hernquist 92,93; Mihos & Hernquist 93,96) Remnants spheroidal and follow a de Vaucouleurs law slowly rotating and anisotropic v (Binney 82) Anisotropy: v

Violent Relaxation of Collisionless Particle Systems CDM simulation DM density profile NFW (Hetznecker & Burkert)

Isophotal Shapes More insight requires a more detailed investigation of departures from pure elliptical isophotes Boxy and disky ellipticals: boxy: disky: (Bender 1987)

Disky and Boxy Ellipticals Boxy and disky ellipticals form two distinct groups with different kinematical properties (Bender et al. 88,89). Violent relaxation cannot explain these observations. Can the merger scenario explain this dichotomy? boxy disky

Initial Conditions High-resolution merger simulations with mass ratios 1:1, 2:1, 3:1, and 4:1 (Naab & Burkert 99 - 06). Spirals consist of disk, bulge and dark halo. face on Edge on

Anisotropy of Merger Remnants versus v Equal mass mergers are anisotropic and boxy 3:1 and 4:1 remnants are fast, isotropic rotators and disky 2:1 remnants show intermediate properties 1:1 2:1 3:1 4:1 Anisotropy and isophotal shape depends on the mass ratio.

The Frequency of Boxy and Disky Ellipticals The ratio of boxy-to-disky ellipticals should not depend on luminosity Khochfar & Burkert 03

The Frequency of Boxy and Disky Ellipticals The ratio of boxy-to-disky ellipticals should not depend on luminosity observations theory Khochfar & Burkert 03

Spheroidal and Mixed Mergers The merger fraction between galaxies of different morphologies depends strongly on redshift and mass (Khochfar & Burkert 03). E-E E-E 1 2 3 4 -22 -20 -18 z Massive boxy ellipticals might result from E-E mergers.

Spheroidal Merger Simulations E-E merger simulation 1 S-S 3:1 E-E -1 -2 (Naab, Khochfar & Burkert 05) E-E merger remnants are boxy and very anisotropic even for large mass ratios of 3:1 or 4:1.

More than 20% gas accretion Assumption 1: E-E mergers boxy Assumption 2: More than 20% gas accretion disky BH feedback Assumption 3: Star formation suppressed for (Naab, Khochfar & Burkert 05)

Energetic Feedback by Central Black Hole (Springel et al. 05)

Kinematics of Merger Remnants The main difference between disky, unequal mass merger remnants and boxy, equal-mass mergers is not their anisotropy but their rotation. (Burkert & Naab 05)

Kinematics of Merger Remnants (Burkert & Naab 05)

SAURON Integral Field Kinematics (De Zeeuw et al. 92) M 31 Intrinsic properties from axisymmetric three-integral Schwarzschild models.

SAURON Integral Field Kinematics (Cappellari et al. astro-ph/0509470) boxy disky 0.6 0.4 0.2 Disky ellipticals are anisotropic with high ellipticities. Boxy ellipticals are isotropic and round.

boxy disky 0.6 0.4 0.2 (Burkert & Naab 06)

What‘s about early-type mergers? prolate oblate

Summary The major merger scenario can explain the origin of fast rotating, disk ellipticals equal-mass merger slowly rotating, boxy ellipticals unequal-mass merger All ellipticals show a large spread in anisotropy. Ellipticals with assembled from early-type mergers. Central BH feedback suppresses star formation for Major mergers are not consistent with the structure of ellipticals as predicted from Schwarzschild models.

The End

The Merging History of the Universe Extended Press-Schechter theory (Kauffmann & White 1993; Khochfar & Burkert 2000, 2001, 2002) Frequency of minor or major mergers. Redshift dependence Final mass dependence N z Disky : Boxy = 5 : 3, independent of z and M

The Skewness of Elliptical Galaxies Bender, Saglia & Gerhard (94) studied the line-of-sight velocity distribution of elliptical galaxies. They detected small deviations from a Gaussian distribution that can be characterized by Gauss-Hermite-functions. > 0: shift to negative v < 0: shift to positive v

Rotation of Merger Remnants v versus 1:1 2:1 3:1 4:1 Equal mass mergers rotate slowly. 3:1 and 4:1 remnants rotate fast. 2:1 remnants show intermediate rotation Rotation depends on the mass ratio.

The Skewness of Elliptical Galaxies Bender, Saglia & Gerhard (94) studied the line-of-sight velocity distribution of elliptical galaxies. > 0: shift to negative v < 0: shift to positive v Ellipticals show a distinct correlation between their local and . 3 h v (Pickney et al. 03)

The Skewness of Elliptical Galaxies Bender, Saglia & Gerhard (94) studied the line-of-sight velocity distribution of elliptical galaxies. > 0: shift to negative v < 0: shift to positive v Ellipticals show a distinct correlation between their local and . 3 h v (Bender et al. 94)

The Skewness of Collisionless Merger Remnants 2 dimensional analysis of the LOSVD on a grid superimposed on the merger remnant. Collisionless merger major axis v > 0 v < 0 v

The Role of Gas in Major Mergers

Gas-rich Merger Simulations Formation of a gaseous disk.

Evidence for Gaseous Mergers 2 dimensional analysis of the LOSVD on a grid superimposed on the merger remnant. Gaseous merger v > 0 v < 0 major axis v > 0 v < 0 v

The Early-Type Angular Momentum Problem Faint ellipticals rotate faster than the fastest simulated remnants. v Gas cannot solve this problem (Naab & Burkert 04) Angular momentum problem for early-type galaxies. (Cretton, Naab, Burkert, Rix 2000)

Conclusions Elliptical galaxies formed by major mergers. Kinematics and isophotal shape of merger remnants is determined by their mass ratio: 1:1-2:1 anisotropic + boxy 3:1-4:1 fast rotating + disky. Low luminosity ellipticals experienced substantial gas inflow after the last major merger disky 2-component systems with a disk embedded in a spheroidal component Their LOS velocity distribution also indicates that the progenitors were gas-rich spiral galaxies. Very luminous, boxy ellipticals might have formed from gas-poor, early-type mergers.

Statistics of Boxy and Disky Ellipticals The CDM-model predicts an overabundance of disky ellipticals which should be independent of mass. Disky : Boxy = 5 : 3 log I This ratio agrees with observations of intermediate- and low mass ellipticals. Properties of ellipticals with Boxy More massive than disk galaxies High metallicities and enhanced (Mehlert et al. 00,03) log Formation redshift:

Projection Effects Projection effects lead to a large scatter but do not change the result. v v v v

The central stellar disk in NGC 3623 (de Zeeuw et al. 02) I (Naab & Burkert) 3:1 merger

Central Properties of Merger Remnants Sauron data M32 with gas 3:1 merger simulation I

Luminous ellipticals did not form through Additional Problems Luminous ellipticals: are more massive than disk galaxies formed at high redshifts have high metallicities (Mehlert et al. 03, Thomas et al. 03) Luminous ellipticals did not form through major mergers

The End

Problem 2: Anisotropy 1:1 2:1 3:1 4:1 (Naab & Burkert 2003)

Problem 1: Isophotal Shapes 20% bulge 10% bulge no bulge with gas (Naab, Burkert 2003)

Projection effects Projection effects lead to a large scatter but do not change the result. v v v v Violent relaxation alone cannot explain this dichotomy.

Spiral 1:1 Merger E-E Merger Gas-rich 3:1 merger

Elliptical Galaxies The de Vaucouleurs law: Cluster galaxies Collaborators: Th. Naab, S. Khochfar, R. Jesseit, M. Wetzstein The de Vaucouleurs law: Cluster galaxies Spheroidal stellar systems. No star formation.

Elliptical Galaxies The Sersic Law Cluster galaxies Collaborators: Th. Naab, S. Khochfar, Roland Jesseit The Sersic Law Cluster galaxies Spheroidal stellar systems. No star formation. n -12 -24 1 10 Graham et al. 02 Trujillo & Burkert 04

Kinematical Properties Massive elliptical galaxies are anisotropic, triaxial systems (e.g. Binney 82; de Zeeuw 97; Cretton et al. 00) Ellipticity distribution Anisotropy v (Binney & Tremaine 87) (Binney 82) v Anisotropy:

The Cosmological Angular Momentum Problem Major mergers are required to produce extended galactic disks. (D‘Onghia & Burkert, astro-ph/0402504) bulgeless disks (van den Bosch et al. 01) minor mergers The merging history of Es cannot be studied in a cosmological context.

The Formation of Elliptical Galaxies

Collisionless Merger Simulations Equal-mass merger Analysis of the remnant based on the same methods as used by observers.