The Blackfeet Water Rights Settlement Act

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Law and Institutions – rights and binding agreements U.S. water rights traditionally based on common law: Riparian doctrine in East – land owners.
Advertisements

The Crow Tribe – State of Montana Water Compact Impact on water quality and availability for everyone in Crow Country Presented to Tribal-State Relations.
Components of the Negotiated Settlement and How They Fit Together June 27, 2012.
WATER RIGHTS 101: OVERVIEW OF UTAH WATER LAW Legislative Water Task Force June 15, 2004.
Larry MacDonnell Prospective Panel September 12, 2014.
Selling Assets of Missouri’s Secondary Market - The “MOHELA Plan” Paul Wagner Deputy Commissioner Missouri Department of Higher Education.
Southeast Alaska Land Entitlement Finalization and Jobs Protection Act S. 340 and H.R. 740 Presentation for the Citizens’ Advisory Commission on Federal.
Water and the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs.
1. 2 Arizona’s General Stream Adjudications 1.Gila River Watershed (Maricopa County Superior Ct.) Commenced by Salt River Project in ,000 separate.
Ch. 10 Government Spending. Section 1 Government Spending in Perspective Total government expenditures at all levels was almost $2.9 trillion in 2001-
Notebook # 30 Economics 10-2 Federal Government Expenditures Pages
Yellowstone River Compact Commission Technical Committee Discussions Sheridan County Courthouse Sheridan, WY April 24, 2007 Bighorn Reservoir operations.
PLS 121: American Politics and Government The Constitution The Budget Making Process.
Congressional Committees By: Julian Mullen. House Committees Jurisdiction.
Economic Theory Laissez-Faire Theory that dominated American economic policy (or the lack thereof) in the early years Basic idea is that market will correct.
 18 members  Created in 1816, one of the oldest  Relates to criminal law, human rights, immigration law, intellectual property rights, antitrust law.
2013 National Association of Ordnance Contractors (NAOC) General Membership Meeting November 19 – 22 San Antonio, TX.
Columbia River Water Management Program (CRWMP) Review of Year One Upper Crab Creek Planning Unit Meeting April 17, 2007.
Gathering Background Information and the Role of Technicians in Negotiations Doug Oellermann, P.E.
Title US Department of the Interior Indian Affairs 2016 Indian Affairs House/Senate Mark Presentation to Tribal/Interior Budget Council August 6, 2015.
Drag Picture and Send to Back
A Private Charitable Trust Manage and Distribute Assets from a Natural Resource Damage Settlement.
Jason King, P.E. State Engineer WSWC/NARF Symposium on the Settlement of Indian Reserved Water Right Claims August 25-27, 2015 Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe’s.
Chapter 3 The Constitution. Common Checks and Balances President recommends legislation to congress Presidential veto Congressional override of veto Senate.
Distinguishing: Clean Air Act, EPA Rules, Regulations and Guidance David Cole U.S. EPA, OAQPS Research Triangle Park, NC.
Great Lakes Perspective Samuel W. Speck Chair, Water Management Working Group Council of Great Lakes Governors Chair, Great Lakes Commission Director,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Planning Principles & Procedures – FY11 AUTHORIZATION AND APPROPRIATION OR “It Takes Two to Tango"
Senate Bill 329 The Healthy Oregon Act 2007 Jeanene Smith Administrator Office for Oregon Health Policy and Research SCI Coverage Institute September 26,
Gathering Background Information and the Role of Technicians for the Blackfeet Water Compact With Gerald Lunak.
The Constitution Chapter 5, Lesson 3. The Supreme Law of the Land The Constitution Limited by the consent of the people Organized into articles and clauses.
San Joaquin County Supervisors: Federal Update Paul Sweet NPS September 11, 2012.
The House and Senate Committees of Congress By Christian, Jason,Jeff, AND Tevon 6 th Period.
1 Select Committee on Finance 2006 Adjustments Budget national treasury Department: National Treasury REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA 13 November 2006.
FEDERAL ANTIMONOPOLY SERVICE Moscow 2006 New Antimonopoly Law of the Russian Federation.
PROFESSOR BARBARA COSENS UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO COLLEGE OF LAW Waters of the West Universities Consortium on Columbia River Governance The Columbia River.
TOM PAUL, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OREGON WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Negotiation of Indian Reserved Water Rights Claims August 25, 2015 Photo: Michael McCullough,
LESSON 1.3 Structure of American Government. government-belinda-stutzman
Council of Economic Advisors Water Rights Overview Utah Division of Water Rights Jerry Olds.
PRESENTATION REGARDING CALIFORNIA TRIBES AND LYTTON RANCHERIA FEE-TO-TRUST FOR TOWN OF WINDSOR by Nancy Thorington August 25, 2015.
Appropriations Process:
Policy & Legislative Update
Congress Kernell and Jacobson.
Marilyn’s Month-to-Month Guide for Navigating the General Assembly
Jeopardy.
What is the difference between an authorization bill and an appropriation bill? An authorization bill established a program and says how much can be spent.
THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR’S APPROACH TO INDIAN WATER SETTLEMENTS
Articles to the Constitution
Kansas Experience in Technical Negotiations for Tribal Water Right Settlements Symposium on the Settlement of Indian Reserved Water Rights Claims, Great.
NEGOTIATING INDIAN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENTS
2017 Legislative Session Recap
American Public Human Services Association
CHAPTER ONE OBJECTIVE AND GOAL
FY 2018 Budget Review Process and Schedule
Economic Policymaking Process
The First President Chapter 8, Lesson 1.
Chapter 3: The Constitution
How does OHCA’s budget become
Bell Activity What do you already know about federal spending categories?
AWRA Washington State Conference October 3, 2017
Budget and Appropriations 101
Tribal Water Study Legal Principles
INDIAN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENTS
THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR’S APPROACH TO INDIAN WATER SETTLEMENTS
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN LANGUAGE PRACTITIONERS COUNCIL ACT, 2014 (Act No. 8 of 2014) PRESENTED TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION & RECREATION.
Congress Kernell and Jacobson.
LEGAL PRACTICE AMENDMENT BILL, 2017
Federal Budget Process – Its Challenges as well as its Opportunities
INDIAN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENTS
Congressional Approval of Indian Water Rights Settlements
Presentation transcript:

The Blackfeet Water Rights Settlement Act Samuel D. Gollis Indian Resources Section, ENRD Department of Justice August 9, 2017

Treaties and Agreements between the United States and the Blackfeet Tribe Treaty with the Blackfeet, 1855, Oct. 17, 1855, 11 Stat., 657, Ratified Apr. 15, 1856, Proclaimed Apr. 25, 1856, Act of April 15, 1874 (18 Stat. 28, chapter 96) (Lame Bull Treaty) Agreement of 1888, ratified by the Act approved May 1, 1888 (25 Stat. 113) Agreement of 1895, dated September 26, 1895, ratified by the Act approved June 10, 1896 (29 Stat. 321, 353) 

Treaties with the Blackfeet Nation .

Blackfeet Water Rights - Adjudication United States v. Aageson, No. CIV-79-21-GF (D. Mont. April 5, 1979) stayed since 1983 pending final adjudication in State court In 1979, Senate Bill No. 76 (SB 76), amending the adjudication procedures originally established by the Montana Water Use Act in 1973, established a comprehensive general adjudication of the entire state.

Proper Forum To Adjudicate Indian Reserved Water Rights No. Cheyenne Tribe v. Tongue River Assoc., 484 F. Supp. 31 (1982) No. Cheyenne Tribe v. Adsit, 668 F. 2d 1080 (1982) Arizona v. San Carlos, 463 U.S. 845 (1983)

Blackfeet Water Rights Adjudication 1982 US files protective claims on behalf of the Blackfeet Tribe DOJ/BIA conduct technical studies to support water rights claims 1991 In re the Adjudication of the Existing and Reserved Rights to the Use of Water, Both Surface and Underground, of the Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Reservation within the State of Montana, Civ. No. WC-91-1 (Mont. Water Ct. 1991) 1997 US files more definite statement of claim – includes tribal claims for off-reservation instream flow for Tribe in the Lewis and Clark National Forest and Glacier National Park 2017 Case stayed until January 31, 2018

Montana Compact Commission 5-2-702 (1) The reserved water rights compact commission . . . may negotiate with the Indian tribes or their authorized representatives jointly or severally to conclude compacts authorized under 85-2-701, “for the equitable division and apportionment of waters between the state and its people and the several Indian tribes claiming reserved water rights in the state.” 5-7-702(2) The compact is effective and binding upon all parties upon ratification by the legislature of Montana and any affected tribal governing body, and approval by the appropriate federal authority. 

Blackfeet Compact Negotiations Tribe initiates negotiations with State Department appoints a Federal Negotiation Team 2007 State and the Tribe reach agreement State Legislature approves Compact

Federal Legislation Blackfeet Water Rights Settlement Act 111th Congress - S. 3290 (2010) 112th Congress – S. 399 (2011) 113th Congress – S. 434 (2013) 114th Congress – S. 1125 (2015)

Federal Legislation Hearings The Department testified on 3 occasions – S. 399 – 10/20/2011 - Senate Comm. Indian Affairs S. 434 – 05/08/2013 - Senate Comm. Indian Affairs Draft – 05/24/2016 – House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water, Power and Oceans

Federal Legislation Administration Concerns S. 399 Cost - $591 million plus additional sums as may be necessary Inadequate State Cost Share Lack of detail about water infrastructure projects and costs Federal mitigation fund to benefit a non-tribal beneficiary Lack of finality on contentious water management issues

Federal Legislation Administration Concerns S. 434 Federal mitigation fund to benefit a non-tribal beneficiary Lack of finality on contentious water management issues Cost remains high Other policy concerns

Resolution of Federal Concerns Four Horns Project Pipeline to deliver water off-Reservation to non-tribal water users Department opposed because of cost and inadequate State cost share Tribe and State redesign reduced Project costs by $70 Million. $500,000 Design Work on Four Horns Project $14,500,000 State Payment to Tribe $14,000,000 State Mitigation Fund for Pondera Water Users $20,000,000 State's infrastructure costs $49,000,000 Total State Contribution

St. Mary Canal and Associated Features

Federal Legislation S. 1125 - Introduced April 28, 2015 Reported out of Committee February 3, 2016 Strong support of Montana Congressional Delegation Negotiations with Federal Government continued Subject to analysis under the new “Bishop Process”

Federal Legislation Securing Administration Support 5/16/16 - Support letter sent to Chairman Bishop, with consensus legislation (S. 1125 with amendments) 5/24/16 - Hearing on Blackfeet discussion draft before House Natural Resources Subcommittee 7/11/16 - HR 5633 introduced 7/22/16 - Letter confirming Blackfeet settlement conforms to Criteria and Procedures

Settlement Benefits Safe and secure water supply Tribal Water Resources and Energy Administration Lake Recreation and Infrastructure Development Fisheries Program Development Hydropower Development Irrigation and on farm development

Federal Infrastructure Funding Construction and expansion of the Blackfeet MR&I System Water storage in Milk River and Cut Bank Basins On farm irrigation improvements on Tribal trust lands Deferred maintenance of the Blackfeet Irrigation Project Safety of Dams replacement of Four Horns Dam

Important Fiscal Measures Cap on Federal expenditures Projects may be modified within spending caps Cost savings incentives for Tribe Long term economic development opportunities for Tribe Long term employment opportunities for tribal members Limit on Federal obligations Promotion of self-determination and economic self sufficiency Fulfill Federal Trust Responsibility

Resolution of Federal Concerns Agreement on St. Mary water rights Waiver of claims against the United States Tribe to withdraw objections against United States water rights claims Process to resolve Ft. Belknap/Blackfeet water use conflict Process to reestablish St. Mary Canal right of way Agreement on Tribe’s instream flows in the Lewis and Clark National Forest and Glacier National Park