SLS-CS_12-05 Some results on NGU coding schemes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0111r0 Zhanji Wu, et. Al. December 2012 Submission A Physical-layer Network Coding Relay scheme for IEEE Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE wng-r1 Contribution Labeling Diversity Date: November 2013 Maciej Krasicki (Poznan University of Technology)Slide.
A General Purpose CCSDS Link layer Protocol Next Generation Data Link Protocol (NGDLP) Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 10/17/
CCSDS Security Working Group - Fall 2007 Meeting Research Activities on Encryption and Authentication for Space Applications by the Telecommunications.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Decision making process, Communications and Planning.
Common Coding and Synchronization Layer: Next Steps NASA Optical Communications Working Group 17 April /9/20151.
1 Scalable Image Transmission Using UEP Optimized LDPC Codes Charly Poulliat, Inbar Fijalkow, David Declercq International Symposium on Image/Video Communications.
1 Satellite Link Equations Introduction to Space Systems and Spacecraft Design Space Systems Design.
CS352- Link Layer Dept. of Computer Science Rutgers University.
Local Asynchronous Communication
Done by Sarah Hussein 10\05\2012. Trends in modern communication systems place high demands on low power consumption, high-speed transmission, and anti-
Cesg-1 SLS REPORT 7 May 2010 Jean-Luc Gerner (AD) Gilles Moury (DAD) SPACE LINK SERVICES (SLS) AREA SLP and NGU sections Only.
CCSDS Security WG meeting October 2008, hosted by DLR at DIN premises (Berlin) 1 Data Link Security BOF An ESA contribution on Lessons Learned and Issues/Questions.
OFDM-IDMA Uplink Communication
Montreal – Spring 2004 SPACE LINK SERVICES CODING AND SYNCHRONIZATION WORKING GROUP University of Bologna ITALY ESA – European Space Agency ESOC - European.
Proposal for a TC-2 Protocol Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz Oct /27/20151.
1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Short Uplink LDPC Codes: Proposed Methods for CLTU Acquisition and Termination Kenneth Andrews.
Part 1: Overview of Low Density Parity Check(LDPC) codes.
Apr SLS-SLP WG Goal: Progress TM, AOS Space Data Link Protocol Pink Sheets to Blue (OID frame)* Hold due to FSH/Insert Zone/Security discussion.
Cesg-1 28 April 2009 Jean-Luc Gerner (AD) Gilles Moury (DAD) SPACE LINK SERVICES (SLS) AREA.
Status of Next Generation Uplink Green Book and Next Steps Greg Kazz Ed Greenberg NASA/JPL Oct. 15, 2012.
SLS-CS_12-05 Some results on NGU coding schemes
Doc.: aj SubmissionSlide 1 LDPC Coding for 45GHz Date: Authors: July 2014 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Liguang LiZTE CorporationShenzhen.
Doc.: IEEE wng-r0 Contribution Labeling diversity Date: November 2013 Maciej Krasicki (Poznan University of Technology)Slide.
10-Dec-2012-cesg-1 Presentation to ESTEC Nordwijk, Netherlands 8 April 2014 CCSDS Space Link Services (SLS) Area Area Director: Gian Paolo Calzolari (ESA/ESOC)
CCSDS Telecommand Sync and Channel Coding Specification using advanced Block Codes Ed Greenberg NASA/JPL Oct. 15,
Doc.: IEEE /0243r1 Submission Franck Lebeugle, France Telecom R&D March 2004 Slide 1 Turbo Codes for IEEE n Marie-Helene Hamon, Vincent.
Waseda University Low-Density Parity-Check Code: is an error correcting code which achieves information rates very close to the Shanon limit. Message-Passing.
Next Generation Uplink Options already within our Grasp
FIXED SATELLITE SERVICE and UAS (22 September 2010)
CCSDS Security Working Group - Fall 2007 Meeting
Chapter 4. Digital Transmission
Joint Meeting of the CCSDS and the OMG-SDTF
SLS-CS_13-02 High Data Rate (Gbps +) Coding Architecture
SLS-CS_13-13 SCCC Green Book
Short Uplink LDPC Codes: Proposed Methods
SLS-RFM WG deadlock over
SLS-CS_16-12 Terminology Used with Sliced Transfer Frames
H. Garon, V. Sank, W. Fong NASA/GSFC
Satellite uplink and downlink Analysis and Design
SIGFOX System Description
BITTT and CCSDS in China
VLSI Architectures For Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) Decoders
Variable Length LDPC Codes for 45GHz
Next Generation Space Link Protocol – Raison d’etre
SLS AREA REPORT Goal: Next Generation Uplink WG
LDPC Coding for 45GHz Date: Authors: September 2014
Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 16 September 2005
Considerations for LDPC codes selection
Ed Greenberg Greg Kazz 10/17/2012
January 2004 Turbo Codes for IEEE n
SPACE LINK AREA MID-TERM REPORT
Linglong Dai and Zhaocheng Wang Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
DIGITAL DATA COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES
HNS Proposal for n Physical Layer
LDPC for MIMO Systems July 8, 2004 Jianuxan Du,
July 2017 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suitability Evaluation of FEC Schemes] Date.
CCSDS Liaison Consultative Committee on Space Data Systems
DIGITAL DATA COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUES
Variable Length Ldpc Codes for 45GHz
Turbo Codes for IEEE n May 2004
July 2017 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Suitability Evaluation of FEC Schemes] Date.
January 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Rate 1/4 LDPC interleaver proposal] Date.
Advanced Coding Comparison
January 2019 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Rate 1/4 LDPC interleaver proposal] Date.
EEC4113 Data Communication & Multimedia System Chapter 2: Baseband Encoding by Muhazam Mustapha, September 2012.
Questions Concerning the PBCC-22 Proposal for High Rate b
HNS Proposal for n Physical Layer
Introduction Communication Modes Transmission Modes
The role of spectrum in achieving interoperable governmental and commercial communications networks Enrico Vassallo, ESA Frequency Management Office Head.
Presentation transcript:

SLS-CS_12-05 Some results on NGU coding schemes SLS-CS_12-05 UnivPM-UniBO_NGU_Input.v2 SLS-CS_12-05 Some results on NGU coding schemes Marco Baldi1, Marco Chiani2, Franco Chiaraluce1, Enrico Paolini2 1 Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy {m.baldi, f.chiaraluce}@univpm.it 2 Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy {marco.chiani, e.paolini}@unibo.it

(128, 64) NASA binary LDPC code

Max Iterations vs Performance

Comparison with non-binary codes

(256, 128) NASA binary LDPC code

Max Iterations vs Performance

Comparison with non-binary codes

(512, 256) NASA binary LDPC code

Max Iterations vs Performance

Binary VS non-binary codes Short non-binary LDPC codes outperform their binary counterparts by 1 dB or more This appears to be independent of the maximum number of iterations allowed for decoding a received frame The convergence speed (in terms of used iterations) of binary and non-binary codes is comparable The parity-check matrices of the non-binary codes which have been used as a reference are the same used in: L. Costantini, B. Matuz, G. Liva, E. Paolini, M. Chiani, «Non-binary protograph low-density parity-check codes for space communications,» Int. J. of Satellite Communications and Networking, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 43–51, 2012

Comments on TC Randomization It has already been observed [Alvarez2006] that, when used at high data-rates, the CCSDS standard TM randomizer incurs spurious problems The problem is mainly due to Only Idle Data (OID) Frames, which are typically filled by zero bits before randomization Depending on the mission requirements, some solutions have been studied to ensure suitable randomization of high rate data [Garello2009] [Alvarez2006] O. Alvarez and G. Lesthievent, “Pseudo-Random Codes for High Data Rate Telemetry: Analysis and New Proposal”, presented at CCSDS RF & Modulation & Channel Coding Working Groups, Rome, Italy, 12 June 2006. [Garello2009] R. Garello, M. Baldi, F. Chiaraluce, “Randomizer for High Data Rates”, European Space Agency Contract Report, March 2009, ESOC Contract No. 20959/07/D/MRP.

Comments on TC Randomization (2) At the Earth's surface, the power flux density (PFD) produced by spacecraft emissions must not exceed prefixed values, fixed by ITU and ECSS These limits are those of interest for high data rate TM links Concerning NGU links, transmission occurs from Earth to a spacecraft, or between two spacecrafts What are the requirements to be considered for spurious frequencies (PFD masks, synchronization issues…)? Idle frames in asynchronous uplink services?