Learning Solution Accreditation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

District Accreditation
Quality Assurance in eLearning Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK.
A Quality Matters “Quickie”
STUDENTS’ UNION QUALITY MARK. Strategic Context New Approach Principles of new model How it will work in practice Opportunity to shape the approach.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Quality Matters TM Professional Development and Certifications ©MarylandOnline, Inc All rights reserved.
CBAP and BABOK Presented to the Albany Capital District Chapter of the IIBA February 3, 2009.
Purpose of the Standards
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
Sustainability of CICMC – June 30, 2010 Develop and Implement a strategy for the sustainability of CICMC: Business Development Needs Brenda Pope, CMC.
STRATEGIES FOR ONLINE LEARNING IN A GLOBAL NETWORK UNIVERSITY INTED 2013 Annette Smith, Kristopher Moore, Erica Osher Reifer New York University.
Overview Changes in the re-accreditation process since 2007 Assessment Resources.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Instructional Strategies for the workshop will include a combination of: Organizational Strategy Characteristics Delivery Strategy Characteristics Management.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Apprenticeships and Benefits Pocketfit Team. Apprenticeship Offer Instructing Fitness Studio Instructing Operational Services Management and Leadership.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
Office of Service Quality
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
Denise Kirkpatrick Pro Vice-Chancellor The Open University, UK Quality Assurance in Distance Education.
Recognizing Quality School Systems Billy K. Floyd, Director Mary Ann Keeley, Director Richard Parkins, Assoc. Director Southeast Region Northeast Region.
Strategic planning A Tool to Promote Organizational Effectiveness
ISSAI IMPLEMENTATION INITIATIVE
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Transitional ISO 9001:2015 Internal Audit
CHW Montana CHW Fundamentals
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Monitoring and Evaluation
Operational Reviews at the National Cemetery Administration (NCA)
Mona El-Ayoubi Director Learning, Innovation & Strategy
Program Review For School Counseling Programs
Online Driver Education and Virtual Classroom
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
Focusing on Quality at UTT
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
The view from the ‘regulator’
Supporting Beginning Teachers
Learning Portfolios: Creating a Culture of Learning
European TRAINING FOUNDATION
Resource 1. Evaluation Planning Template
Standard Four Program Impact
Faculty Development Dr Samira Rahat Afroze.
What Is Gap Analysis? Gap analysis is a survey instrument used to determine the gaps between a service offered and a customers expectations.
Using Data to Assess High Quality Professional Development Findings From Interviews With Massachusetts Educators May 2015 Massachusetts Department.
February 21-22, 2018.
Developing and sustaining a district and school literacy team
SMART & CARING GRANT APPLICATION WORKSHOP
Completing your Program Review
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Furthering the Field GROWING THE MOVEMENT
Certified Information Technology Professional (CITP) Credential
Online Driver Education and Virtual Classroom
World’s Largest Educational Community
An Introduction to LiFE
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
IEA DSM Virtual Center of Excellence Proposal
Leicestershire Holiday Activities & Food Programme:
Quality Matters How USFSP leads the way in online course excellence Nelson Poynter Library.
Region 9 Regional Tourism Organization, The Great Waterway(RTO9)
Presentation transcript:

Learning Solution Accreditation Including: Instructor-led workshops Online (synchronous & asynchronous) training Self-study or Independent study Structured On-the-Job/Practicum-based Blended delivery methods

Accreditation Accreditation: a process by which a program is evaluated against defined standards and recognition is awarded by a third party if in compliance with the standards” (Association Trends, 2016)

Accreditation Standards Certified Learning Solutions Demonstrate: Potential – Recognition of an Opportunity Partnering – Engagement of Stakeholders Planning – Alignment of the Content and the Delivery Method Proof – Confirmation of its Viability & Feasibility Practice – Reinforcement of Behaviors to Build Capacity Pursuit – Monitoring the Application of the Content Promotion – Measurement of Impact Promise – Continuous Improvement

Eligibility Requirements The Learning Solution should: Have a well defined purpose Have been tested in the marketplace to confirm its viability Have processes that communicate the ethics expected of learners; learners’ superiors; course sponsors; developers; and contractors

Instructional Design Requirements The learning solution should demonstrate each of the 9 Instructional design development standards Address Sustainability Align the Solution Assess Performance Collaborate and Partner Elicit Performance Practice Engage Learner Enhance Retention and Transfer Ensure Context Sensitivity Ensure Relevance

Organization/Sponsor Requirements The learning organization or program sponsor should demonstrate each of the following: Analyze - identify the need or opportunity for the learner, organization, or marketplace Focus –derive the rationale for this solution based on the results of the analysis Resource - commit resources (human, technology, and financial) to support program delivery, maintenance, and improvement Prove – create meaning from the data captured to show impact and sustainability Forecast - monitor learner, organizational, or marketplace needs to assure continued relevance and effectiveness

How to Satisfy the Eligibility Requirements Submit a written description of: Purpose: why was the learning solution developed; what was the driver behind it; Demographics: industry/size; reach-local/regional, multi- national; security level/type required of reviewers Structure: how is it organized; what is the delivery format; what is the age of program; what is the average number of attendees (usage); how frequently is it offered Ethics: What behaviors and commitments are expected of Learners; Learners’ Superiors; Course Sponsors; Learning Developers; Contractors

How to Satisfy the Instructional Design Requirements Once eligible: Confirm the solution was developed by a Certified Instructional Designer Developer (CIDD). OR Have the program lead designer apply for and earn the CIDD certification. Undergo an external audit of the program to confirm its design and delivery satisfies the Accreditation Standards. The audit includes a review of a sample of the instructional components and an interview with the lead designer or program manager.

Organization/Sponsor Requirements The learning organization or program sponsor should demonstrate each of the following: Analyze – describe identify the need or opportunity for the learner, organization, or marketplace Focus –derive the rationale for this solution based on the results of the analysis Resource - commit resources (human, technology, and financial) to support program delivery, maintenance, and improvement Prove – create meaning from the data captured to show impact and sustainability Forecast - monitor learner, organizational, or marketplace needs to assure continued relevance and effectiveness

How to Satisfy the Organization/Sponsor Requirements Complete a form and participate in an interview that collectively: Analyze – describe the process used to identify the need or opportunity for the learner, organization, or marketplace Focus – describe the process and rationale for the justification of this solution based on the results of the analysis Resource - describe the resources (human, technology, and financial) used to support program delivery, maintenance, and improvement Prove – describe the data collected and give evidence that shows impact and sustainability Forecast – describe the forecasting methods used to identify trends in learner, organizational, or marketplace needs and to assure continued relevance and effectiveness

Annual Renewal Year 1: Electronic Survey plus an interview Year 3: Desk Review Plus Interview of: Demographic changes Solution content changes Solution structure changes

Fees Eligibility fee is $1,200 Application review fee is: 1. A desk review and interview to assess the organization/sponsor requirements - $2,950 AND 2a. If the learning solution was created by a CIDD no other fee is required OR 2b. If you want to co-certify the lead instructional designer at the same time the additional fee is $750 3. If the ID is not available to be certified an audit is required. The audit fee for instructor-led courses is calculated in units of class time. One-day (1-10 hours) is $1,500. Additional days are $1,050 per day. The eligibility fee is waivered for subsequent learning solutions that are part of a series. The eligibility fee for additional learning solutions not part of a series is discounted by 15%. The fee for auditing additional learning solutions using a different delivery mode will be quoted separately

Fees Continued Annual/Renewal Year 1: survey & interview $500 Year 3: re-audit of the learning organization standards with focus on sustained and forecast $3,725 * Repeats cycle * Note if the structure significantly changes, for example the solution goes from instructor-led to online modules, a new application will be required. This is an opportunity to certify the new program at a discount.

Summary Meet the eligibility requirements Satisfy the instructional design requirements Program was developed by a CIDD Program undergoes an audit Satisfy the Organizational requirements Commit to the annual renewal