BYPASS GASTRICO DE UNA ANASTOMOSIS (OAGB-BAGUA): RESULTADOS EN UNA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Medical Complications
Advertisements

GI Complications of Gastric Bypass Caroline R. Tadros, MD May 15 th 2013.
A review on bariatric surgery
Gastric Obstruction post “Sleeve gastrectomy”
L Genser (2), A Soprani(1,2), Tabbara M (2), J Cady (1) 1- Clinique Geoffroy Saint Hilaire (Paris), 2- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Hépato-Bilio-Pancréatique,
Combination Surgical Therapy Banding the Bypass Bypassing the Band Matthew Kroh,MD Assistant Professor of Surgery Cleveland Clinic Center for Surgical.
ANALISI COMPARATIVA DELLA GASTRECTOMIA VERTICALE VS BENDAGGIO GASTRICO VS BYPASS GASTRICO IN PAZIENTI CON BMI
Lap-Band Surgery for Adolescents NYU Medical Center Program for Surgical Weight Loss George Fielding, MD Associate Professor of Surgery Evan P. Nadler,
Morbid Obesity Surgery CDR Craig Shepps MD, FACS.
Obesity – Growing epidemic Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2006.
Bariatric Surgery in Obesity and Metabolic Disease Olivier Court MD FRCSC Director, section of Bariatric Surgery McGill University Health Center.
Complications Associated with Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding for Morbid Obesity Dr. Mojtaba Hashemzadeh Dr. Leila Zahedi-Shoolami Dr. Mahmoud.
Bariatric Surgery Mr B.M.Axisa Consultant Laparoscopic and Upper GI Surgeon.
L Genser (2), A Soprani(1,2), Tabbara M (2), J Cady (1) 1- Clinique Geoffroy Saint Hilaire (Paris), 2- Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Hépato-Bilio-Pancréatique,
Post-Surgical Care of the Bariatric Patient
Obesity: Surgical Management Eric S. Hungness, M.D. Assistant Professor of Surgery Department of Surgery Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
Chichester J P Mulier1 Risks Costs Benefits When to say No J P Mulier MD PhD Sint Jan Brugge-Oostende
Surgical treatment for morbid obesity
Fight obesity with effective and guaranteed tools t Haitham Al-Khayat, MD Consultant general and bariatric surgeon New Dar Al-Shifa hospital.
MISS Journal Club 2012 Metabolic Surgery & Emerging Technologies Goal: To review 5 important and clinically relevant papers from 2011, on Metabolic Surgery.
Sleeve En Y Does Changing the Name Change the Perception? Mitchell Roslin, MD FACS Chief of Bariatric Surgery Lenox Hill Hospital Northern Westchester.
BY: HILLARY SULLIVAN MEDICAL NUTRITION THERAPY BASIC EXPLANATION OF BARIATRIC SURGERY TYPES.
Bariatric Surgery and Metabolism Goal: to review 4 important and clinically relevant papers from 2010 on Bariatric Surgery and Metabolism 10/10/20151.
Padova University Hospital Bariatric Unit Mirto Foletto, M.D. SLEEVE OR PLICATION?
Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch
When ? Indications Contraindications ?. When ? Indications Contraindications ?
Complications: Revisions MISS 2010 Bruce M. Wolfe Professor of Surgery Oregon Health & Science University.
Experience with 458 cases of Gastric Plication Surgery Dr Ariel Ortíz Lagardere,FACS. Obesity Control Center hospital, México.
Lap Band in patients with BMI
Treatment of GERD in Obese Patients David W Rattner, MD.
September 26, 2008 Colorado Bariatric Surgery Institute Katayun Irani, MD.
Important questions As good or better ? Cost effective ? Overall, safer? Is it safe as a cancer operation? Can all surgeons do it? Compare to open surgery.
“Complicaties na bariatrische ingrepen”
Carle Bariatrics Weight Loss Surgery Seminar. Major public health problem worldwide Affects 30% of industrialized world American statistics: – 60% of.
Long-term outcomes of bariatric procedures: sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch D Kröll, Y.
Welcome to. Digestive Surgery Clinic is a comprehensive weight loss and GI Surgery institute in India established with a view to offer health management.
Dr Ramen Goel, Bombay Hospital Mumbai : Fixing fat problem with Best Weight Loss Surgeon in India
New Patient Orientation for Bariatric Surgery
Castellani RL, Toppino M, Favretto F, Camoglio FS, Zampieri N
Dr. Mojtaba Hashemzadeh Dr. Leila Zahedi-Shoolami
Helicobacter pylori eradication prior bariatric/metabolic surgery
Weight Loss Surgery: The First Step Toward a More Healthy Life
Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (LOAGB/BAGUA)
STOMACH & DUODENUM-3 Bariatric surgery.
Porqué el BAGUA es tan eficaz a largo plazo: experiencia de 14 años
Lako S, Daka A, Nurka T, Dedej T, Memishaj S
Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication ,challenges and outcomes.
Thirty-day Readmissions Following CABG Surgery in New York JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions 2011;4(5): Hannan EL, Zhong Y, Lahey SJ, Culliford.
Outcomes of bariatric surgery after renal transplant: single center experience in Kuwait Authors Gheith O, Al-Otaibi T, Nampoory MRN, Halim M, Saied T,
Pediatric Bariatric Surgery?
Is the Sleeve Gastrectomy with Jejunal Bypass as good as the Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity? A comparative study Matías.
Wilson MSJ, Alhamdani A, Mahawar K, Boyle M
“Losing it is only the beginning…” Complications of Bariatric Surgery
Mini Gastric Bypass: initial experience
Bariatric Surgery in Cirrhotic Patients. Analysis of 12 cases.
Wilson MSJ, Alhamdani A, Mahawar K, Boyle M
Effect of Metabolic Surgery on diabetes and hypertension
(OAGB) “How do I do it” Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric ByPass
Clinical Aspects after Bariatric Procedures in Adolescent: Long Time Follow-Up Nicola Zampieri1, Roberto Castellani2, Marta Peretti1, Federica Bianchi1,
BARIATRIC SURGERY UT Health | McGovern Medical School
15-year Trend Analysis of Early Onset Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgeries
Weight Loss Surgery: The First Step Toward a More Healthy Life
Background Bariatric interventions offer a more efficacious and durable weight loss than non-surgical approaches Surgical weight loss procedures are limited.
腹腔鏡迷你胃繞道手術 成果分析 林修賢, 吳柏鋼 一般外科, 花蓮慈濟醫院.
Anna Cowell James O’Connell Aintree Weight Management Team
By Dr Khaled Ahmad, MD, FACS, FASMBS
Three-year outcomes of revisional laparoscopic Gastric Bypass after failed laparoscopic Sleeve: A case-matched analysis T. Malinka, J. Zerkowski, Y.
Morbid Obesity Surgery
Outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in super-super- obese patients (BMI ≥60 kg/m2): 6-year follow-up at a single university 
Presentation transcript:

BYPASS GASTRICO DE UNA ANASTOMOSIS (OAGB-BAGUA): RESULTADOS EN UNA SERIE DE 2850 PACIENTES DURANTE 14 AÑOS

RESULTS: Patient Characteristics (July 2002 to July 2016) BYPASS GASTRICO DE UNA ANASTOMOSIS (OAGB-BAGUA): RESULTADOS EN UNA SERIE DE 2850 PACIENTES DURANTE 14 AÑOS RESULTS: Patient Characteristics (July 2002 to July 2016) Age 43 (12 - 74) Gender Female 1691 (61.5%) Male 1059 (38.5%) BMI 46 (31 - 86) EBW (kg) 65 (28 - 220) The results of the first 209 patients operated on with the technique have confirmed our hypothesis. Our patients have no clinical symptoms as well as no objective evidence of GERD (measured in the 20 first patients by endoscopy and pHmetry) and margin ulcers.

RESULTS: Patient Characteristics (July 2002 to July 2016) BYPASS GASTRICO DE UNA ANASTOMOSIS (OAGB-BAGUA): RESULTADOS EN UNA SERIE DE 2850 PACIENTES DURANTE 14 AÑOS RESULTS: Patient Characteristics (July 2002 to July 2016) Primary Surgery 1601 (56.1%) Other Previous Open Surgery 663 (24.1%) Other Associated Procedures 432 (15.7 %) Revisional Surgery 154 (5.4%) The results of the first 209 patients operated on with the technique have confirmed our hypothesis. Our patients have no clinical symptoms as well as no objective evidence of GERD (measured in the 20 first patients by endoscopy and pHmetry) and margin ulcers.

Length of Hospital Stay BYPASS GASTRICO DE UNA ANASTOMOSIS (OAGB-BAGUA): RESULTADOS EN UNA SERIE DE 2850 PACIENTES DURANTE 14 AÑOS RESULTS: Patient Characteristics (July 2002 to July 2016) Length of Hospital Stay Uncomplicated Patients 2,715 (98.8%) 1 day (15-120 h.) Patients with Major Complications 35 (1.2%) 9 days (4-32 d.) The results of the first 209 patients operated on with the technique have confirmed our hypothesis. Our patients have no clinical symptoms as well as no objective evidence of GERD (measured in the 20 first patients by endoscopy and pHmetry) and margin ulcers.

Surgical Early Major Complications BYPASS GASTRICO DE UNA ANASTOMOSIS (OAGB-BAGUA): RESULTADOS EN UNA SERIE DE 2850 PACIENTES DURANTE 14 AÑOS Surgical Early Major Complications Intraoperative Complications (resolved by Open Surgery) 4 (0.14%) Bleeding 2 (0.072 %) Gastro-esophageal Perforation 1 (0.036 %) Incorrect Gastric Transection Immediate Postoperative Complications (resolved by Open Surgery) 6 (0.21%) Leaks Intestinal Obstruction Partial Necrosis of Excluded Stomach Immediate Postoperative Complications (resolved by Lap. Surgery) 17 (0.61%) 10 (0.36%) 3 (0.109 %) Acute Gastric Distension The results of the first 209 patients operated on with the technique have confirmed our hypothesis. Our patients have no clinical symptoms as well as no objective evidence of GERD (measured in the 20 first patients by endoscopy and pHmetry) and margin ulcers. TOTAL 25 (0.909%)

Mortality Non Surgical Early Major Complications Mortality Total BYPASS GASTRICO DE UNA ANASTOMOSIS (OAGB-BAGUA): RESULTADOS EN UNA SERIE DE 2850 PACIENTES DURANTE 14 AÑOS Non Surgical Early Major Complications Mortality Complications Treated Conservatively Mortality Leaks 8 (0.29 %) Acute Pancreatitis 1 (0.036 %) Infected Hematoma Total 10 (0.36%) Massive Pulmonary Embolism 1 (0.036 %) Nosocomial Pneumonia (Post-reintervention) DIC-Post Band reversion Total 3 (0.109%)

Gastro-intestinal stenosis BYPASS GASTRICO DE UNA ANASTOMOSIS (OAGB-BAGUA): RESULTADOS EN UNA SERIE DE 2850 PACIENTES DURANTE 14 AÑOS Late Complications Gastro-intestinal stenosis 9 (0.3%) Pneumatic Dilatation 7 (0.25%) Prosthesis 2 (0.072%) Anastomotic Ulcer Medical treatment 29 (0.9%) Malnutrition 28 (0.9%) B1-B6 Vitamin (severe deficit) 3 (0.1%) Weight regain Revisional surgery 1 (0.03%) Chronic reflux 12 (0.4%) TOTAL 82 (2.82 %)

Percent of mean (and range) BYPASS GASTRICO DE UNA ANASTOMOSIS (OAGB-BAGUA): RESULTADOS EN UNA SERIE DE 2850 PACIENTES DURANTE 14 AÑOS Weight Loss Percent of mean (and range) EWL at: 1 year 84% (55 –112%) 2 year 88% (58 –115%) 3 year 81% (55 –103%) 4 year 79% (51 –102%) 5 year 77% (48 –100%) 10 year 14 year 70% (45–98%) 70% (40–98%)

Arterial Hypertension Gastroesophageal reflux disease BYPASS GASTRICO DE UNA ANASTOMOSIS (OAGB-BAGUA): RESULTADOS EN UNA SERIE DE 2850 PACIENTES DURANTE 14 AÑOS Severe Comorbidities - Resolution Index at 2-years at 14-years Dyslipidemia 98% 86% Type II Diabetes 94% 90% Arterial Hypertension 87% Sleep apnea 100% Gastroesophageal reflux disease 92% Fatty liver

IFSO- European Database Control COMPARATIVE: OAGB vs. RYGB vs. GB vs. SG IFSO- European Database Control (Since January 2010) BMI Distribution TOTAL OPERATIONS 938 TOTAL OPERATIONS 14161 OAGB RYGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 2542 TOTAL OPERATIONS 16225 GB SG

IFSO- European Database Control Co-morbidities Prevalence COMPARATIVE: OAGB vs. RYGB vs. GB vs. SG IFSO- European Database Control (Since January 2010) Co-morbidities Prevalence TOTAL OPERATIONS 938 TOTAL OPERATIONS 14161 OAGB RYGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 2542 TOTAL OPERATIONS 16225 GB SG

IFSO- European Database Control COMPARATIVE: OAGB vs. RYGB vs. GB vs. SG IFSO- European Database Control (Since January 2010) Hospital Stay TOTAL OPERATIONS 938 TOTAL OPERATIONS 14161 OAGB RYGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 2542 TOTAL OPERATIONS 16225 GB SG

IFSO- European Database Control Intra-operative Complications COMPARATIVE: OAGB vs. RYGB vs. GB vs. SG IFSO- European Database Control (Since January 2010) Intra-operative Complications Bleeding Liver Failure Injury splenic Other Gastrointestinal perforation vascular Deaths % TOTAL OPERATIONS 938 TOTAL OPERATIONS 14161 OAGB RYGB TOTAL OPERATIONS 2542 TOTAL OPERATIONS 16225 GB SG

IFSO- European Database Control Post-operative Complications COMPARATIVE: OAGB vs. RYGB vs. GB vs. SG IFSO- European Database Control (Since January 2010) Post-operative Complications

IFSO- European Database Control General Complications COMPARATIVE: OAGB vs. RYGB vs. GB vs. SG IFSO- European Database Control (Since January 2010) General Complications 0.56% 4.06% TOTAL OPERATIONS 938 TOTAL OPERATIONS 14161 OAGB RYGB 3.96% 4.29% TOTAL OPERATIONS 2542 TOTAL OPERATIONS 16225 GB SG

IFSO- European Database Control COMPARATIVE: OAGB vs. RYGB vs. GB vs. SG IFSO- European Database Control (Since January 2010) General Complications: “Esophageal” 0.54% 0% TOTAL OPERATIONS 938 TOTAL OPERATIONS 14161 RYGB OAGB 1.4% 2.42% TOTAL OPERATIONS 2542 TOTAL OPERATIONS 16225 GB SG

IFSO- European Database Control COMPARATIVE: OAGB vs. RYGB vs. GB vs. SG IFSO- European Database Control (Since January 2010) General Complications: “Gastric” 0.22% 1.32% TOTAL OPERATIONS 938 TOTAL OPERATIONS 14161 OAGB RYGB 0.17% 0.16% TOTAL OPERATIONS 2542 TOTAL OPERATIONS 16225 GB SG

IFSO- European Database Control COMPARATIVE: OAGB vs. RYGB vs. GB vs. SG IFSO- European Database Control (Since January 2010) General Complications: “Metabolic” 0.63% 0.34% TOTAL OPERATIONS 938 TOTAL OPERATIONS 14161 OAGB RYGB 0.04% 0.67% TOTAL OPERATIONS 2542 TOTAL OPERATIONS 16225 GB SG

IFSO- European Database Control COMPARATIVE: OAGB vs. RYGB vs. GB vs. SG IFSO- European Database Control (Since January 2010) General Complications: “Hepatobillary” 1.02% 0% TOTAL OPERATIONS 938 TOTAL OPERATIONS 14161 OAGB RYGB 0.20% 0.98% TOTAL OPERATIONS 2542 TOTAL OPERATIONS 16225 GB SG

IFSO- European Database Control COMPARATIVE: OAGB vs. RYGB vs. GB vs. SG IFSO- European Database Control (Since January 2010) General Complications: “Non - specific” 0.55% 0% TOTAL OPERATIONS 938 TOTAL OPERATIONS 14161 OAGB RYGB 0.16% 0.13% TOTAL OPERATIONS 2542 TOTAL OPERATIONS 16225 GB SG

IFSO- European Database Control COMPARATIVE: OAGB vs. RYGB vs. GB vs. SG IFSO- European Database Control Evolution of % EWL

IFSO- European Database Control COMPARATIVE: OAGB vs. RYGB vs. GB vs. SG IFSO- European Database Control Evolution of % EBMIL

BYPASS GASTRICO DE UNA ANASTOMOSIS (OAGB-BAGUA): RESULTADOS EN UNA SERIE DE 2850 PACIENTES DURANTE 14 AÑOS CONCLUSIONS The OAGB (BAGUA) technique in our experience does not reduce the “complexity” of the surgical procedure, but significantly reduces operative time and lenght of hospital stay compared to other complex techniques; it also substantially decreases both early and late complication rates. In conclusion

BYPASS GASTRICO DE UNA ANASTOMOSIS (OAGB-BAGUA): RESULTADOS EN UNA SERIE DE 2850 PACIENTES DURANTE 14 AÑOS CONCLUSIONS Excellent results in our long-term follow-up in regards to EWL, EBMIL, resolution of co- morbidities and quality of life make OAGB a safe and effective technique, and a powerful alternative for the treatment of morbid and super-morbid obesity after a 14-year experience. In conclusion

CENTER OF EXCELLENCE FOR THE STUDY AND OBESITY SURGERY TREATMENT