MOON VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL Performance Award System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/18/2008 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
Advertisements

Bureau of Indian Education
Boonville High School Freshman Enrollment Presentation.
Georgia’s New Dual Enrollment Program
The Freshman On-Track Rate: A Leading Indicator of High School Graduation John Q. Easton Consortium on Chicago School Research July 2, 2008.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
District Accountability Update May February 2007.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
WTCS Framework for Student Success WTCS Board Meeting March
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
NO FAILURE ZONE!!! JENNINGS HIGH SCHOOL- 9 TH GRADE.
Roncalli Central High School Cardinals.
Will your students be college ready? Carolyn Mendiola 1.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
1 Strategic Plan Baseline Data September 2004 Prince William County School Board October 6, 2004.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
1 East Baton Rouge Parish School System September 2013 Committee of the Whole Presented by Liz Frischhertz Accountability, Assessment & Evaluation Eleventh.
Uri Treisman Professor of Mathematics Director, Charles A. Dana Center The University of Texas at Austin URBAN MATH LEADERSHIP.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
OAASFEP Report Card Update Marianne Mottley – October 13, 2015.
FRESHMEN YEAR MAKING IT COUNT. OMHS Guidance and Counseling Center Who’s Who?  Kristi Wade- 9 th & 10 th A-K  Jerry Riggins- 9 th & 10 th L-Z  Bobby.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Department of Accountability: “Anyone can measure the rain; we build arks.” Assessment Update: Preliminary Results Department of Accountability.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
June 5, 2014 Accountability Update. Accountability Updates 110% for At-Risk, Criterion #4 Accountability Manual Updates.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Cajon Valley Middle School Title I Parent Meeting.
School Report Card and Identification Progression
Performance Goals Samples (Please note, these goals are not proficient- they are for training purposes) What do you think?
California’s New LCFF Accountability Rubrics and School DAshboard
Teacher SLTs
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Overview of Year One and Into Year Two November, 2016
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Welcome to Sandy Creek High School
TAPCo: College and Career Readiness Plan
Lubbock ISD AP Training and Incentive Program (APTIP)
understanding LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Teacher SLTs
Annual WBWF Student Achievement Report 2017
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Issaquah School District
Academic Report 2007/2008 AYP.
AYP and Report Card Last updated: 08/20/09.
Ridgewood High School Stacy Ionno, School Counselor
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
FRESHMEN YEAR MAKING IT COUNT
Welcome Willis Independent school district Pre-Advanced Placement
Teacher SLTs
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Advanced Placement & International Baccalaureate Assessments
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
Teacher SLTs
North Dakota Honor Society
AYP and Report Card.
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Teacher SLTs
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Presentation transcript:

MOON VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL 2008 - 2009 Performance Award System

TWO MAJOR COMPONENTS A) 50% of Total Funding Available in August B) 50% of Total Funding Available in November

Performance Award System This funding is awarded for individual school accountability. Funding not awarded to specific schools will be available to those schools to help fund local improvement plans.

November Funding AZ Learns Components AIMS (60%) Performing Label (10%) Graduation Rate (12.5%) Drop-Out Rate (12.5%) AYP (5%)

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT COMPONENTS (August) District Assessments – 75% Local School Goal – 6% Advanced Placement – 4% Surveys – 15% Parent Satisfaction, Post Graduate, Student Participation

District Assessments 1st Criteria: % Students Successful Funding > 80% 100% 76-79% 90% 72-75% 80% 67-71% 70% < 66% 0%

District Assessments 2nd Criteria: % Students Improvement Funding > 80% or improve 3% 100% Improve 2% 95% Maintain + 1% 90% Decrease 2% 85% Decrease 3% 80% < 66% or Decrease 4% 0%

Moon Valley High School Student Achievement Index 2008-2009 82% 2007-2008 81% 2006-2007 77% 2005-2006 78%

District Assessments 1st Criteria: % Students Successful Funding > 80% 100% 76-79% 90% 72-75% 80% 67-71% 70% < 66% 0%

August Performance Pay For District Assessments MVHS receives 100% of available funding (75% of August money)

Improvement from previous year ADVANCED PLACEMENT 1st Criteria: 20 % of Seniors enrolled -OR- Improvement from previous year 1st Criteria – 2%

Moon Valley High School Percentage of Seniors Enrolled

Improvement from previous year ADVANCED PLACEMENT 2nd Criteria: # of students with (2), 3, 4, 5 is 40% -OR- Improvement from previous year 2nd Criteria = 2%

Moon Valley High School Percentage of Students Successful

August Performance Pay For Advanced Placement Classes MVHS receives 4% which is all of the available funding

PARENT SATISFACTION SURVEY Criteria: 91% Parent Satisfaction Somewhat Satisfied/Satisfied Very Satisfied -OR- Improvement from Last Year

Moon Valley High School Longitudinal Parent Satisfaction

MOON VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL 92% Parent Satisfaction Survey MOON VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL 92% WELL DONE !

August Performance Pay For Parent Satisfaction Survey 5% of total funding

75% of Seniors enrolled in continuing education POST GRADUATE SURVEY Criteria: 75% of Seniors enrolled in continuing education -OR- Improvement from previous year

Moon Valley High School % of Graduates in Post Secondary Education

August Performance Pay For Post Graduate Survey 5% of total funding

STUDENT PARTICIPATION SURVEY Criteria: 65% of students participate or improvement

Moon Valley High School Participation in Extracurricular Activities

August Performance Pay For Student Participation Survey 5% which all available in this category

School Goal Goal: Moon Valley High School will reduce the number of freshmen failures* for the 2008-09 school year by at least 3 percent. *total number of freshmen students who failed one or more classes

Assessment Measure 1st & 2nd semester freshmen failures for 2008 – 09 Baseline Data 1st semester freshmen failures for 2007-08 was 33 % 2nd semester freshmen failures for 2007-08 was 28% 31% freshmen failure rate for 2007-08.

Data for 2008 -2009 1st semester freshmen failures for 2008-09 was 34 % 2nd semester freshmen failures for 2008-09 was 32% There was 33% freshmen failure rate for 2008-09; consequently, we failed to achieve our school goal.

Small Learning Community Data Failure Rate for Core SLC teacher Clark - T. Science 1% Kamman – Math 9 % James – English 8 % Average failure rate for SLC core subjects – 6% vs. 16% non SLC SLC 11% drops vs. non SLC drops 24%

School Goal If successful the school goal represented 6% of the performance award for August. We did not meet the school goal this year.

August Performance Pay Summary District Assessments 75% Local School Goal 0% Advanced Placement 4% Parent Satisfaction 5% Post Graduate Survey 5% Student Participation 5%

MOON VALLEY RECEIVES

94%