Violence Risk Assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conceptual Issues in Risk Assessment Randy K. Otto, PhD Department of Mental Health Law & Policy Florida Mental Health Institute University of South Florida.
Advertisements

The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA)
Kevin S. Douglas Simon Fraser University.  Things change  2500 studies published on violence since Version 2 was released in 1997  Conceptual developments.
Ch. 4, Scientific Method in Abnormal Psychology Prepared by Elizabeth Jacobs, Ph.D.
Transparency 0 Copyright © 2009 Wadsworth Group. Brooks/Cole is an imprint of the Wadsworth Group, a division of Cengage Learning, Inc. Theory and Practice.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Canada Inc Chapter 10 Risk Assessment.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
Research Methods in Psychology Pertemuan 3 s.d 4 Matakuliah: L0014/Psikologi Umum Tahun: 2007.
Experimental Research
Chapter 8 Experimental Research
Joe Judge.  There are significant literatures on risk factors for recidivism in sexual offenders and on the predictive accuracy of different types of.
Criminal Psychology Chapter 6 From Dangerousness to Risk Assessment Talbot Kellogg Community College.
Assessing Risk: Gender responsive considerations Samantha Crawford & Sarah Passmore Higher Assistant Psychologists.
Criminal Psychology Chapter 6 From Dangerousness to Risk Assessment Talbot Kellogg Community College.
Research PHE 498. Define Research Research can be considered as systematic inquiry: A process that needs to be followed systematically to derive conclusions.
Week 1 Introduction to Psychology. Chapter 1 Overview Exploring psychology’s roots Exploring psychology’s roots Schools of thought in psychology Schools.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
SS440 Seminar: Unit 4 Research in Psychopathology Dr. Angie Whalen Kaplan University 1.
Risk Assessment Research Findings Dr Sarah Clarke Ahimsa (Safer Families) Ltd Plymouth, Devon Tel
Preventing Intimate Partner Violence Stephen D. Hart, PhD.
Scott Woodside, LL.B, MD, FRCPC Centre for Addiction & Mental Health.
What We Know About Assessment of Risk of Recidivism and Criminogenic Needs of Offenders: Why and How to Do Assessments? Robin J. Wilson, PhD, ABPP
Educational Research Experimental Research Chapter 9 (8 th Edition) Chapter 13 (7 th Edition) Gay and Airasian.
Module 1 Lesson 6 Research in Psychology Title: Kids at table doing experiment Author: Rejon Source: Openclipart il/38305/kids-at-table-
Module 1 Lesson 6 Research in Psychology Title: Kids at table doing experiment Author: Rejon Source: Openclipart il/38305/kids-at-table-
Research Methods In Psychology
Criminal and Civil Competence
Cari-Ana, Alexis, Sean, Matt
Why is Research Important?
Research Methods in Psychology
Common attentions and many differences
Cognitive feedback Public Administration and Policy
Principles of Quantitative Research
Suicide: Risk Assessment
Civil Commitment Chapter 9.
Abnormal Psychology Second Canadian Edition
Experimental and Control Groups
Psychological Methods
8. Causality assessment:
Concept of Test Validity
Chapter 12 Single-Case Evaluation Designs
Donald E. Cutlip, MD Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Sociological Research Methods
Other Testing Issues Chapter 7 Red book.
Hypothesis Testing, Validity, and Threats to Validity
Understanding Results
پرسشنامه کارگاه.
Module 02 Research Strategies.
Structuring Risk Management Decisions Using Scenario Planning Methods
© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Kristin S. Adams-Pelham, Psy. D. Forensic Psychologist
11/20/2018 Study Types.
Criminal Violence: Patterns, Causes, and Prevention Riedel and Welsh, Ch. 1 “Violence and Criminal Violence”
Chapter 6 Research Validity.
Criminal Violence Riedel and Welsh, Ch
Psychological Research Why do we have to learn this stuff?
ASSESSMENT IN COUNSELLING PREPAIRED BY: DR.MUNA ABDEEN ABDELRAHMAN.
Daniel Murrie, PhD Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy
Introduction.
A Multi-disciplinary Perspective on Decision-making and Creativity:
Critical Appraisal วิจารณญาณ
Individual / Situational Explanations Socially Sensitive Research
Evidence Based Practice
Research Strategies.
Tools of the Trade: Risk Prediction Instruments
Research Design Experimental Method.
Primary Data Collection: Experimentation
Within-Subjects Experiments
Risk Assessment in Deception: Presenting DARN and DRAT
Assessment Chapter 3.
Presentation transcript:

Violence Risk Assessment Chapter 5

Nature Violence and Violence Risk Assessment Defining violence Actual, attempted, or threatened physical harm that is deliberate and non consenting Violence as a choice The proximate cause of violence is a decision to act violently The decision is influenced by a host of biological, psychological, and social factors Neurological damage, hormonal abnormality Psychosis, personality disorder Exposure to violent models, attitudes that condone violence

We can not predict violence . . . Violence is too rare to predict with any accuracy by any means Clinical decisions are particularly poor Mental health experts have no particular expertise in the field of violence Predictions of behavior necessitate a deterministic view of human behavior

. . . or, can we? The issue of prediction is moot Don’t predict, we evaluate risk (e.g., suicide) Regardless, predictions made by mental health professionals are reliably better than chance The scientific literature on violence is large and growing Any choice can be predicted

Illegal Realities of Violence Risk Assessment Barefoot v. Estelle (1983) APA amicus curiae brief stated that predictions were unreliable and incorrect Court ruled testimony admissible and expressed faith in the adversarial process O’Connor v. Donaldson (1975), Addington v. Texas (1979), Schall v. Martin (1984), Kansas v. Hendricks (1997), Kansas v. Crane (2002) Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California (1976)

The Evolution of Risk Assessment Early History of Risk Assessment First Generation – 1970s Studies were poor in comparison to subsequent generations clinical decision making 50/50 chance (Monahan, 1981) Second Generation More focus on short-term predictions and psychiatric samples Identification of individual and contextual risk factors Moved from predicting violence to assessing risk Third Generation marked by the use of actuarial or structured approaches to risk assessment

Clinical, Actuarial, and Structured Risk Assessments Clinical Predictions informal, subjective impressions arrived at with human judgment Actuarial Predictions formal, algorithmic, objective procedures used to arrive at a statistical conclusion VRAG, ICT, COVR Criticized for lack of generalizability Nomothetic nature (studying groups) compared to the idiographic (studying individuals) nature of risk assessment 7

Structured Professional Judgments formal but flexible predictions based on the empirical literature HCR-20, SVR-20 Identifying a list of important risk factors and guidelines for using them Scoring can be similar to actuarial measures, but clinical judgment is encouraged May increases the chance of bias Support for SPJ is promising

Risk and Protective Factors Static Factors Historical in nature variables that are unlikely to change and are often fixed History of Past violence Young Age Psychopathy Hx Employment Instability Substance Use Major Mental Disorder

Dynamic Factors Clinical in nature variables that are subject to change Lack of Insight Negative Attitudes Psychiatric Symptoms Behavioral and Affective Instability Unresponsiveness to Treatment

Risk Management Risk Management Risk Assessment Reduce likelihood of violence Dynamic Post assessment control is high Multiple administrations Risk Assessment Identify potential for future violence Static and dynamic Post assessment control is variable One administration

Protective Factors protective factors as characteristics or conditions that interact with risk factors to reduce violence offer an explanation for why individuals who face the same degree of risk may be affected differently protective factors do not guarantee that an individual will not become violent. reduce the probability that people facing a risk factor or factors will become involved in violence

Accuracy of Risk Assessment Difficulties in Risk Assessment Difficult to follow-up Measurement of violence Definition of violence Low base rate behavior

When are we good at assessing risk? predictions are for the short-term environmental settings for which we have past data high base rates of violence

Communicating Risk Risk management Categorical risk levels Probability Frequencies