Chapter 9 Optimizing Network Performance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality of Service CCDA Quick Reference.
Advertisements

QoS Strategy in DiffServ aware MPLS environment Teerapat Sanguankotchakorn, D.Eng. Telecommunications Program, School of Advanced Technologies Asian Institute.
Top-Down Network Design Chapter Thirteen Optimizing Your Network Design Copyright 2010 Cisco Press & Priscilla Oppenheimer.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Module 4: Implement the DiffServ QoS Model Lesson 4.10: Deploying End-to-End QoS.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 4: Implement the DiffServ QoS Model.
Differentiated Services. Service Differentiation in the Internet Different applications have varying bandwidth, delay, and reliability requirements How.
ACN: IntServ and DiffServ1 Integrated Service (IntServ) versus Differentiated Service (Diffserv) Information taken from Kurose and Ross textbook “ Computer.
In-Band Flow Establishment for End-to-End QoS in RDRN Saravanan Radhakrishnan.
Internet QoS Syed Faisal Hasan, PhD (Research Scholar Information Trust Institute) Visiting Lecturer ECE CS/ECE 438: Communication Networks.
A Study on Quality of Service Issues in Internet Telephony  IP Telephony – Applications and Services  Advantages and benefits of Voice over IP  Technical.
1 © 2005 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public IP Telephony Introduction to VoIP Cisco Networking Academy Program.
QoS in MPLS SMU CSE 8344.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 3: Introduction to IP QoS.
Quality of Service (QoS)
Top-Down Network Design Chapter Thirteen Optimizing Your Network Design Oppenheimer.
Switching breaks up large collision domains into smaller ones Collision domain is a network segment with two or more devices sharing the same Introduction.
ﺑﺴﻢﺍﷲﺍﻠﺭﺣﻣﻥﺍﻠﺭﺣﻳﻡ. Group Members Nadia Malik01 Malik Fawad03.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 3: Introduction to IP QoS.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.5: Implementing QoS with Cisco AutoQoS.
Sem1 - Module 8 Ethernet Switching. Shared media environments Shared media environment: –Occurs when multiple hosts have access to the same medium. –For.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNP 1 v3.0 Module 1 Overview of Scalable Internetworks.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Optimizing Converged Cisco Networks (ONT) Module 3: Introduction to IP QoS.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 3.2: Implementing QoS.
An End-to-End Service Architecture r Provide assured service, premium service, and best effort service (RFC 2638) Assured service: provide reliable service.
1 Lecture 15 Internet resource allocation and QoS Resource Reservation Protocol Integrated Services Differentiated Services.
Muhammad Mateen Yaqoob Department of Computer Science COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad 1.
© Airspan Networks Inc. Automatic QoS Testing over IEEE Standard.
Gateway redundancy protocols
Internet Quality of Service
Rami Neiman & Yaron Perry
Chapter 2 PHYSICAL LAYER.
Cisco Networking Academy Program
Instructor Materials Chapter 6: Quality of Service
Networking in the Enterprise
Topics discussed in this section:
Top-Down Network Design Chapter Thirteen Optimizing Your Network Design Copyright 2010 Cisco Press & Priscilla Oppenheimer.
Networking Devices.
Congestion Control and
Congestion Control, Quality of Service, and Internetworking
Computer Data Communications
Queue Management Jennifer Rexford COS 461: Computer Networks
Living in a Network Centric World
Living in a Network Centric World
Switching Techniques In large networks there might be multiple paths linking sender and receiver. Information may be switched as it travels through various.
Chapter 25 Multimedia TCP/IP Protocol Suite
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 6: Quality of Service Connecting Networks.
Cisco Networking Academy Program
Chapter 6: Quality of Service
Cisco Networking Academy Program
Taxonomy of network applications
Chapter 3: Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Model
Switching Techniques In large networks there might be multiple paths linking sender and receiver. Information may be switched as it travels through various.
Living in a Network Centric World
Quality of Service For Mobile IP.
Living in a Network Centric World
Switching Techniques.
Dynamic Management for End-to-end IP QoS
EE 122: Lecture 18 (Differentiated Services)
Congestion Control, Quality of Service, & Internetworking
EE 122: Lecture 7 Ion Stoica September 18, 2001.
Living in a Network Centric World
Living in a Network Centric World
EE 122: Differentiated Services
Requirements Definition
Living in a Network Centric World
CIS679: Two Planes and Int-Serv Model
Chapter-5 Traffic Engineering.
Living in a Network Centric World
Living in a Network Centric World
Living in a Network Centric World
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 9 Optimizing Network Performance CompTIA Network + Chapter 9 Optimizing Network Performance

Objectives Why is high availability a requirement in today’s network designs, and what mechanisms can help provide that high availability? What various technologies optimize network performance? What QoS mechanisms can help optimize network performance? Using what you have learned in this and previous chapters, how do you design a SOHO network based on a set of requirements?

Optimizing Network Performance Networks were once relegated to the domain of data, can now carry voice and video. These additional media types, in addition to mission-critical data applications, need a network to be up and available for its users. Beyond basic availability, today’s networks need optimization tools to make the most of their available bandwidth. QoS, as one example, can give priority treatment to latency-sensitive traffic, such as Voice over IP (VoIP).

High Availability If a network router or switch stops operating correctly (meaning that a network fault occurs), communication through the network could be disrupted, resulting in a network becoming unavailable to its users. Therefor, network availability, called uptime, is a major design consideration. The availability of a network is measured by its uptime during a year. For example if a network is said to have five nines of availability, it is up 99.999% of the time, which translates to a maximum of 5 minute of downtime per year.

Fault-Tolerant Network Design Figure 9-1 Redundant Network with Single Points of Failure

Fault-Tolerant Network Design Figure 9-2 Redundant Network with No Single Point of Failure

Hardware Redundancy Having redundant route processors in a switch or router chassis improves the chassis’ reliability. An end system can have redundant NIC’s. The two modes of NIC redundancy are; Active-active: both NIC are active at the same time. Active-standby: one NIC is active and the other is waiting to take over, in the event of a failure. Have redundant routers and switches improves the network’s reliability. Hot standby Router Protocol (HSRP) Common Address Redundancy Protocol (CARP)

Figure 9-3 HSRP Sample Topology Hardware Redundancy Figure 9-3 HSRP Sample Topology

Figure 9-4 LACP Sample Topology Hardware Redundancy Figure 9-4 LACP Sample Topology

Design Considerations When designing networks for high availability, answer the following questions: Where will module and chassis redundancy be used? What software redundancy features are appropriate? What protocols characteristics affect design requirements? What redundancy features should be used to provide power to an infrastructure device. What redundancy features should be used to maintain environmental conditions.

High-Availability Best Practices The following steps are five best practices for designing high-availability networks: Examine technical goals. Identify the budget to fund high-availability features. Categorize business applications into profiles, each of which requires a certain level of availability. Establish performance standards for high-availability solutions Define how mange and measure the high-availability solution

Figure 9-5 Content Engine Sample Topology Content Caching Figure 9-5 Content Engine Sample Topology

Figure 9-6 Content Switching Sample Topology Load Balancing Figure 9-6 Content Switching Sample Topology

QoS Technologies Quality of Service (QoS) is a suite of technologies that allows you to strategically optimize network performance for select traffic types. Through the use of QoS, you can identify which traffic types need to be sent first, how much bandwidth to allocate to various traffic types, which traffic types should be dropped first in the event of congestion, and how to make the most efficient use of the relatively limited bandwidth of an IP WAN.

QoS Technologies Issue Description Delay Delay is the time required for a packet to travel from its source to its destination. Jitter Jitter is the uneven arrival of packets. Drops Packets drops occur when a link is congested and a router’s interface queue overflows.

QoS Technologies Fortunately, QoS features available on many routers and switches can recognize important traffic and treat it in a special way. As a packet travels from its source to its destination, its effective bandwidth is the bandwidth of the slowest link along that path.

Figure 9-7 Effective Bandwidth of 256 kbps QoS Technologies Figure 9-7 Effective Bandwidth of 256 kbps

QoS Configuration Steps 1. Determine network performance requirement for various traffic types. Voice: Video Data 2. Categorize traffic into specific categories. Low Delay Low Priority 3. Document your QoS policy and make it available to your users.

QoS Components Issue Description Best-effort Best-effort treatment of traffic does not truly provide QoS to that traffic, because there is no reordering of packets. Best-effort uses FIFO queuing. Integrated Services (IntServ) IntServ is often referred to as hard QoS, because it can make strict bandwidth reservations. IntServ uses signaling among the network devices to provide bandwidth reservations. Differentiated services DiffServ, differentiates between multiple traffic flows. Specifically, packets are marked, and routers and switches can then make decisions based on those markings.

Figure 9-8 QoS Categories QoS Components Figure 9-8 QoS Categories

QoS Mechanisms The DiffServ approach to QoS marks traffic. However, for markings to impact the behavior of traffic, a QoS tool must reference those markings and alter the packets’ treatment based on them. The following is a collection of commonly used QoS mechanisms: Classification Marking Congestion management Congestion avoidance Policing and shaping Link efficiency

Marking Figure 9-9 ToS Byte

Congestion Management Figure 9-10 Queuing Example

Figure 9-11 Random Early Detection (RED) Congestion Avoidance Figure 9-11 Random Early Detection (RED)

Figure 9-12 Traffic Shaping Policing & Shaping Figure 9-12 Traffic Shaping

Figure 9-13 RTP Header Compression (cRTP) Link Efficiency Figure 9-13 RTP Header Compression (cRTP)

Figure 9-14 Link Fragmentation and Interleaving (LFI) Link Efficiency Figure 9-14 Link Fragmentation and Interleaving (LFI)

Case Study You are to create a network design to meet a collection of criteria. Network design is part science and part art, multiple design models can meet the specified requirements. When designing a network keep the following in mind; Meeting all requirements Media distance limitations Network device selection Environmental factors Compatibility with existing and future equipment

Figure 9-15 Case Study Topology

Figure 9-16 Case Study Proposed Topology

Summary Network availability was discussed, including how availability is measured and can be achieved through redundant designs. Performance optimization strategies were discussed, including the use if content cashing, link aggregation, and load balancing. A variety of QoS technologies were reviewed, with an emphasis on traffic shaping, which can limit the rate of data transmission on a WAN link to the CIR. You were given a case study, where you were challenged to design a network to meet a collection of criteria.