Implementing Senate Bill 263

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan Development and Implementation; MPCA Priorities Presentation before the Solid Waste Management Coordinating.
Advertisements

Overview of the Draft Regional Master Plan Presented to the Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board October 26, 2011.
NEW RULES FOR THE PROPER HANDLING OF COMMUNITY DISCARDS Making your Waste a Resource for the 21st Century: Resource Recovery Parks and Food Scrap Composting.
2011 Changes to Solid Waste Management Act. Solid Waste Stats (FY10) million tons disposed in MSW landfills ▪16.5% of waste disposed in MSWs is.
Business and Community Assistance Program Small Business Assistance and Recycling & Market Development.
Zero Waste Operational Plan Policy & Services Committee 3/13/2007.
Washington State Department of Health Division of Environmental HealthOffice of Drinking Water Mike Dexel Water Resources Policy Lead Municipal Water Law.
Albuquerque Recycling Now & In the Future Mayor Martin J. Chávez __ Ed Adams, P.E., Chief Administrative Officer Irene García, Chief Operations Officer.
The Resource Conservation Challenge. The Resource Conservation Challenge (RCC) Was initiated by EPA in September 2002 to find flexible, more protective.
TIA Solid Waste Consultants, Inc.1 Presented by Miriam Zimms, Senior Consultant TIA Solid Waste Consultants, Inc. Tampa, Florida Pollution Prevention Conference.
Funding Discussion State of Vermont Solid Waste Management Districts and State Programs.
“ From Waste to Resource Management: A New Way of Thinking about Waste Services and Contracts” Materials Management Resource Recovery Process (Private.
Presented by: Pechanga Environmental Department Designing and Managing a Recycling Program Source Reduction Strategies for Tribal Solid Waste Programs.
Roadmap to a Sustainable Waste Management Future Waste Diversion Strategies in the Unincorporated Communities of Los Angeles County Throughout the Region.
California Integrated Waste Management Board March 16, 2004 San Jose, CA City of San Jose Diversion Programs.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Sustainability and Market Development Committee Agenda Item 15 December 5,
Minnesota Paint Demonstration Project Stakeholder Work Plan Considerations Mission: Design, implement and evaluate an industry led, fully funded statewide.
12/19/11 VISION: Zero waste and optimized materials management GOALS: Eliminate practices that produce waste wherever possible Minimize use of virgin materials,
Utilities Department Solid Waste Transfer Station Update December 1, 2009.
Overview of Conservation Options in the Colorado River Basin Water Supply & Demand Study WEAN-CRB Webinar January 9, 2013.
Waste Management in Oregon Part 1 - The Background October 2007 Researched and prepared by: Mindy Trask, Environmental Project Manager ODOT Geo-Environmental.
Recycling – A History & Organics Collection Programs; AB 1826 and AB 1594 presenter: - Kathleen Strickley.
Santa Barbara Regional RMDZ Renewal Application Agenda Item 1 March 14, 2006.
Board Workshop: Overview Of CIWMB Waste Characterization Studies and Tools May 9, 2006.
WRAP update January 2010 Richard Harris Regional Business Adviser.
Smooth Sailing Ahead Partnering With Sustainability and Waste Compliance & Mitigation Fernando Berton, CIWMB.
PPSI Oregon Pilot Program Update Call 12/2/09 Oregon’s Paint Product Stewardship Law : 1 st in the Nation Abby Boudouris HHW Coordinator Oregon DEQ Alison.
HHW Program Evolution Jeff Bickford, P.E. Marion County Public Works Environmental Services Division.
Copyright 2013 Coker Composting & Consulting Planning for Food Scraps Diversion VRA 2013 Annual Conference Craig S. Coker Coker Composting & Consulting.
Best Practices, Lessons and Challenges State Panel Ameripen June 2, 2016.
Diversion, Planning and Local Assistance Division Historical Performance Automated Systems Measurement Accuracy The Future WorkshopPresentation October.
FOOD ISN’T GARBAGE Metro Vancouver’s Organics Disposal Ban Simon Fraser University January 20, 2015.
Waste Diversion Planning
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
Solid Waste Service Delivery
Strategic Planning When Engineers and Planners Work Together
Using Surveys to Document LMI Area Benefit
Waste Diversion Planning
Construction Debris Best Management Practices
1.10 Report Findings to Communicate Research Information to Others
Reduce Recycle Reuse Ana Wood Polk County Solid Waste Director
Metro’s Natural Areas: Maintenance Strategy Needed
ORGANICS PROCESSING INFRASTRUCTURE STUDIES, CERTIFICATION, AND SUCCESS
Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board Transition Planning Update
Water, Environment, & development
Implementing a Waste Reduction and Recycling Program in Your Business
Initiating a Waste Reduction and Recycling Program in Your Business
Solid Waste Management Plan Amendment No. 4
Regional Government Involvement in
Wvbadbuildings.org.
Lesson 5 Computer-Related Issues
Designed for internal training use:
Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project Doing More with Our Waste
Tajiguas Resource Recovery Project Doing More with Our Waste
Session 1: Overview Todd Barnell
2017 Total Revenues were: $9,165, Revenues by program:
Wendy Smith HMIS System and Implementation Administrator
EPA’s Resource Conservation Challenge & Organics Projects
The Process for Final Approval: Remediation
Solid Waste Management."
SWAC – Agenda 11/27/18 1. City of Bend – Southeast Development Plan
Solid Waste Grant Program Information Session June 4, 2019.
SWAC – Agenda 10/23/18 Chapter 6 – Alternative Technology – Draft Findings 2. Chapter 7 – Draft Landfill Disposal Existing Disposal System Disposal Options.
Waste Minimisation Task Force Update
5 SWAC Agenda: May 2018 Introduction – Timm Schimke
City of Chelan Recycling Options
Recyclables and Organics Update Sacramento Environmental Commission March 18, 2019 Tim Israel, Superintendent.
The Wausau Wastewater Treatment Facility
Recyclables and Organics Update Sacramento Environmental Commission March 18, 2019 Tim Israel, Superintendent.
Post Point Treatment Plant Resource Recovery Project Update
Presentation transcript:

Implementing Senate Bill 263 February 9, 2017 Craig C. Filip DEQ Materials Management TA 541-686-7868 filip.craig@deq.state.or.us Hello everyone, thank you so much for having me here today. 1

SB 263: Summary of New Requirements Updates statewide recovery goal Updates wasteshed recovery goals for 2025 – all now strictly voluntary 4 new recycling program elements Added contamination prevention component to Expanded Education Element Eliminates the 2% credits 7 New Waste Prevention and Reuse Program Elements Let’s start with a quick look at some the highpoints that we will discuss in more detail next. First, SB 263 updates Oregon’s statewide recovery goal. The state goal was changed from 50% in 2009, to 52% recovery by 2020 and 55% recovery by 2025. It also, revises all wasteshed recovery goals. Each wasteshed chose their own new goal, and these goals are meant to be aspirational and do not have any regulatory consequences for not meeting them. Next, 4 new recycling program elements have been added to the existing list of 9, now giving local governments a list of 13 recycling program elements to choose from for implementation. It also modifies one existing program element, Expanded Education and Promotion, which now includes actions related to contamination in recycling. SB 263, eliminated the 2% credit program, which inflated local and statewide recovery rates if certain waste prevention, reuse, or home composting programs were implemented. In its place are new Waste Prevention and Reuse program elements that are required for some local governments based on their population.

Contamination Reduction Education Plan must determine levels of contamination and take action to reduce contamination Points of Assessment At customer/generators container(lift lids, truck cameras) At point of transfer or material recovery facility Education to reduce contamination At customer/generators (tags, door hangers, invoices) Community wide message (media articles, post cards, newsletters, billboards) This plan requires jurisdictions to assess contamination in curbside recycling programs or at depots and take steps to reduce it. We want to emphasize that this is an education program and not a quantitative evaluation and reporting of contamination. Points of assessment can be at the curb or at a MRF/TS. This can be as straightforward as surveying your local MRF to determine what are the top 3 contaminants and why are they a problem material. Educational materials must include a list of priority contaminants and information on how to recycle or dispose of those contaminants properly. Here are some examples of how you could provide outreach. DEQ is currently working with a group of stakeholders to explore how a jurisdictions might be able to comply with this new rule and we will be creating sample implementation plans to help local governments meet the requirements. This change in rule goes into effect Jan 1, 2018, therefore local governments that choose this element, must have their programs up and running by that date.

New Opportunity to Recycle Program Elements: A commercial recycling program that requires businesses that generate large amounts of recyclables to recycle those materials A food waste collection program for residential customers. A recovery program for construction and demolition debris that separates material for recovery. A commercial food waste program that requires generators of large amounts of food waste to separate the food waste for recovery. As I mentioned, SB 263 has added four new recycling program elements to the exiting list of nine in rule. Now there are 13 recycling programs a cities may choose from to meet Opportunity to Recycle Requirements. Here is just a summary of the elements - for details you can look at the rule specifically. Let’s go over each one briefly. . 4

Changes to Recycling Program Requirements Population Cities within the Metro UGB Cities outside Metro UGB but close to Portland* Cities further from Portland** 50,000+ Add 3 recycling elements Any 8 elements, or first 3 plus any other 4 elements Add 2 recycling elements, so: Any 7 elements, or first 3 plus any other 3 elements * < 150 mi. from Portland No new recycling elements Any 5 elements, or first 3 plus any other 1 additional element ** > 150 mi. from Portland 10,000 – 50,000 Add 1 recycling element, so: Any 6 elements, or first 3 plus any other 2 elements ** > 150 mi. from PDX 4,000 – 10,000 Add 1 recycling element , so: Any 4 elements * < 120 mi. from Portland Any 3 elements ** > 120 mi. from PDX Less than 4,000 No requirements – regardless of distance from Portland No requirements – regardless of distance from Portland In addition to 4 new recycling elements, the number of required elements a local government must implement has also changed. This is based on a city’s population and distance from Portland (the main market destination for recyclables state-wide). Here is a table that summarizes these changes.

SB 263 Changes - The WP&R Elements City or county-wide education and promotion program (plan is required) Residential waste prevention campaign focused on a toxic, energy intensive material or purchasing practice (campaign plan is required) Commercial waste prevention campaign focused on a toxic, energy intensive material or purchasing practice A waste prevention and reuse education program in schools (plan is required) Funding or infrastructure support program for reuse, repair, leasing or sharing activities. Technical assistance program to promote for reuse, repair, leasing or sharing activities Support for local food rescue program Here is a brief summary of all seven Waste Prevention & Reuse Program elements. They were largely modeled after the most effective of the old 2% recovery rate credit programs.

Summary of New Waste Prevention & Reuse Program Requirements Cities of 50,000 population or within the Metro Urban Growth Boundary Cities with 10,000 to 50,000 populations in a county with more than 100,000 populations: All other cities: Must implement 5 WP&R program elements Must implement 3 WP&R program elements No WP&R elements required Can substitute the first WP&R element, plus any other 2 WP&R elements, for any one of the re-quired recycling program elements. So which cities will be required to implement these new Waste Prevention and Reuse elements. This a table provides a summary.

Timelines: Reference: January through December 2017 DEQ Outreach and Education Local Governments – Planning and Decisions Plan Development - Examples and Templates Stakeholder Involvement Throughout The Year January 1, 2018 Program Implementation Reference: OAR 340-090-0040 - Recycling Program Elements OAR 340-090-0041 - Contamination Reduction Education Plan OAR 340-090-0042 - Waste Prevention and Reuse Program Elements