Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
The Institutional Review Board. What is an IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Top Ten Investigator Responsibilities When Conducting Human Subjects Research Thanks to Ada Sue Selwitz, Univ. of Kentucky and PRIM&R (Public Responsibility.
Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
Human Subjects Research Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Associate Professor of Psychiatry Associate Director of SCTR Regulatory Knowledge and Support Core Chair,
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
THE ETHICS OF HUMAN PARTICIPANT RESEARCH Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University.
IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)
Human Subject Protection Judith Birk IRB Health / Behavioral Sciences.
Scientific Data Management for the Protection of Human Subjects Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
Ethical Principles of Human Subjects Protection
Ethical Issues in Research
Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs)
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
1 Wheaton College INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)
Educational Research and the VCOM Institutional Review Board
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Regulatory Authority Governing Clinical Trials Anthony J. Minisi, MD Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program.
Adverse Events and Unanticipated Problems Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP COACH Program Analyst.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
TERRENCE F. ACKERMAN, PH.D. PROFESSOR OF BIOETHICS CHAIR, UTHSC IRB.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
Human Subjects Research at ASU An Overview. Overview Definitions Historical Framework Federal Guidelines Human Subjects Research at ASU.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
Continuing Review Presented by: Karen Jeans, PhD, CCRN, CIP Program Analyst, COACH.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
$100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 Terms Clinical Trial Facts.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
Marianne M. Elliott Office of Research Integrity and Ethics Bureau of Medicine and Surgery U. S Navy.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Doing IRB Right … Together JOHN POTTER, OD, MA Chair, Institutional Review Board.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Conditional IRB Approval
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Institutional Review Board
Chapter 3: Ethical guidelines for psychological research.
Research Compliance and Institutional Review Boards
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Beverley Alberola, CIP Associate Director, Research Protections
Investigator Responsibilities in Human Subjects Research
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Bozeman Health Clinical Research
University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
IRB BASICS: Ethics and Human Subject Protections
Intro to Projects – Research with Human Subjects
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
Human Participants Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Protocol Approval Criteria
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II Institutional Review Board for Human Research (IRB) Human Subject Protections Susan Sonne, PharmD, BCPP Chair, MUSC IRB II

Typical Class Concerns Ensure informed consent is done correctly Protect participants’ privacy and confidentiality Protect participants from harm How to recruit people for research Follow federal regulations and IRB guidelines

The Belmont Report 3 Basic Principles for Protection of Human Subjects: Respect voluntary informed consent privacy protections for vulnerable populations Beneficence Justice

Informed Consent Essential to ethical conduct of clinical investigation Potential subject chooses whether or not they will participate Obtained after full information is given and understood Explanation of study objective, potential benefits, risks, inconveniences, subject’s rights and responsibilities

Therapeutic Misconception Most studies are not designed to directly benefit study participants Important to help participant understand that research is not the same as clinical treatment If participant does not understand the difference, consent is not valid

Beneficence Protecting them from harm Persons treated in an ethical manner Protecting them from harm Helping to secure their well being

Protecting Participants from Harm Does not mean study must be minimal risk Have appropriate selection criteria to exclude individuals at greater risk of harm Have study procedures to evaluate participants’ safety Have DSMB to monitor study progress Potentially stop study early / revise protocol if there are significant risks or benefits identified

Justice Equals ought to be treated equally Fairness in distribution Who ought to receive the benefits of research and bear the burden of research? Equals ought to be treated equally Fairness in distribution What is deserved

Inclusion Criteria Criteria, if fulfilled, will make a person eligible to participate in a research study Typically used to define the study sample Age range Disease state Other characteristics needed for inclusion

Exclusion Criteria List of criteria that get applied to those who meet inclusion criteria Presence of any ONE criterion would exclude person from participating NOT the polar opposite of inclusion criteria! Typically used to define safety issues and confounding variables Concomitant medications Comorbid conditions

All Human Subjects Research Must be reviewed and approved by the IRB Must comply with applicable federal and state regulations Must be conducted the way it is currently approved Principal Investigator is ultimately responsible

IRB Purpose To protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects Authority to approve, require modification and disapprove any research involving human subjects

Institutional Review Board responsible to verify Safety Integrity Human rights Public reassurance Scientific content

What information is reviewed? Protocol Informed Consent Document(s) Informed Consent process HIPAA Authorizations/Waivers Personnel-including who will obtain consent Recruitment process/plan Advertisements Investigator’s brochure Compensation IND/IDE information (if applicable) Adverse events/DSMB

Submitting an IRB Application Pay attention to deadlines! Clearly articulate what you are doing for research purposes Do a mental walk through of your study Where will it be done? By whom? How will you enroll participants? How will you determine inclusion/exclusion criteria? What will participants do? In what order? What data do you need? How/where will data be stored?

The Mountain of Responsibility FDA Sponsor Investigator Protecting Participants Implementing Study Reporting Accurately Research Team Coord, RA, etc

Investigator Obligations Conducts a clinical investigation Responsible for All procedures conducted All data collected May delegate work in conducting study but they retain responsibility

OHRP Suspensions During the last 6-7 years, OHRP has suspended all human research at the following institutions: University of Illinois, Chicago Campus University of Colorado Duke University Johns Hopkins University of Pennsylvania And others

Call the SUCCESS CENTER Regulatory Support Call the SUCCESS CENTER At 792-8300 Free Service Can help craft consent Can help determine level of review Can help with eIRB application

What do you think? A basic scientist colleague conducts research on different biomarkers associated with the immune response. He has been doing this type of research for many years and is proud that he has had a consistent lab staff for the last 15 years. When he needs whole blood for his tests, he typically just asks his lab staff to provide a sample without IRB approval. What are the regulatory concerns? Are there ethical concerns? Are there scientific concerns with this practice?

Useful Regulatory/Policy Material MUSC IRB http://research.musc.edu/ori/irb/home Office for Human Research Protections http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ Food & Drug Administration http://www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/default.htm