Agenda TSOG 8th November

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Second Draft of the NERC Standard PRC Disturbance Monitoring and Reporting JSIS Meeting August 10, 2010 Salt Lake City, UT.
Advertisements

Network Code on Operational Planning & Scheduling DSO Associations views on the final version of 27 February 2013 Jorge Tello Guijarro, Member of DSO Technical.
Sistan & Balouchestan Electric Power Distribution Company
Reliability Software1 Reliability Software Minimum requirements & Best practices Frank Macedo - FERC Technical Conference July 14, 2004.
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/ ) under grant agreement.
Network Code LFC&R Reserve Provision – TSO-Perspective
EBADGE EU wide inteligent balancing market Peter Nemček.
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Coordination between TSOs and DSOs – a necessity for system planning and operation Dr. Ralph Pfeiffer Amprion GmbH 1.
System Operator Conference Simulator Drill Orientation 2014 System Operator Conferences Charlotte NC & Franklin TN SERC/SOS Facilitator Team.
Supervisory Systems.
Review of progress and future work SQSS Sub Group 2 August 2006 DTI / OFGEM OFFSHORE TRANSMISSION EXPERTS GROUP.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
Turkish Power System Overview March 2012
Generation & Trading CIST REGIONAL ENERGY MARKET IN SOUTH EAST EUROPE (REM) Athens – 27 th of October 2004.
Voltage Collapse M. H. Sadeghi Winter 2007 KNTU. Power System Stability IEEE: Power system stability is defined as the capability of a system to maintain.
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 ARCHITECTURE AND FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS OF DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSMISSION CONTROL SYSTEMS TO ENABLE AND EXPLOIT ACTIVE.
Barcelona– May 2003 CIRED’2003 Beta session 4a: Distributed Generation Controllability of DG helps managing Distribution Grids J. A. Peças Lopes
Black Sea Regional Transmission Planning Project By Predrag Mikša EKC - Electricity Coordinating Center Istanbul, March 2011.
Renewables and System Services Ann Scully.
1Texas Nodal Texas Nodal NMMS/RARF Data Discussion By John Moseley, ERCOT, Network Modeling Group.
Delivering for 2020 TSO Facilitation of Renewables Studies EirGrid Customer Conference Jonathan O’Sullivan October 2009.
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez May 4, 2007.
Capacity, Demand and Reserves Report Bill Bojorquez Board of Directors Meeting May 16, 2007.
Voltage Control Brad Calhoun Consultant, Sr. Trainer Spring 2016.
Évora demonstrator site
GC0096 Electricity Storage Grid Code Requirements
GC0104 – Demand Connection Code (DCC)
Transmission-Distribution Interface Working Group Meeting
Operation of power systems with high shares of wind power
GC0087 Frequency Response Provisions
Transposition of European Network Codes
Demand Connection Code
FACTS BY SVC, FLEXIBLE AC TRANSMISSION
SIMULATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF FC-TCR
IG BASED WINDFARMS USING STATCOM
GC0102 – System Management & Compliance
ERCOT – Southern Cross Transmission ROS/WMS Working Group Assignments
New transparency guidelines
RfG – Fast Fault Current Injection Update
Transmission Planning Code – Draft Document
Subteam 1a Competitive Solicitations Framework Working Group Meeting
Breakout Session on Smart Grid Data Analytics
Afsnit 7 - Afsluttende bestemmelser
Implementation of Connection Network Codes The French process
2009 TSO Transparency Gas Regional Initiative North-West
Transmission Planning Code
KORRR INFORMAL STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP
Évora Demonstrator Site
Storage Connection requirements
Topic Operational Information Exchange
Electricity Distribution Network Design Training & Courses
Planning Tools Overview
EU-IPA12/CS02 Development of the Renewable Energy Sector
Implementation of Connection Network Codes The French process
Afsnit 7 - Afsluttende bestemmelser
DEC System Voltage Planning - June 2018
Synchronous Area Framework Agreement for RG CE
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Electrical Engineering - Slovenia
Jose GONZALEZ PASTOR Economic & Adequacy Analyst - Elia
Grid integration and stability of 600MW windfarm at Kriegers Flak
EE362G Smart Grids: Architecture
Planning Tools Overview
Survey on Ancillary services procurement, Balancing market design 2018
Svetlana Rybina, Lauri Holopainen
Jakov Chavez Vega Kalle Valtavirta
FACTS BY SVC, FLEXIBLE AC TRANSMISSION
The Global Forum Electricity Ancillary Services and Balancing | Berlin, SmartNet Pilots: The demonstration of the different TSO-DSO coordination.
Information Provision for Transitional Exit Capacity
Energy Storage Roadmap & Flexibility Roadmap Information Session
National Institute of Wind Energy(NIWE)
Presentation transcript:

Agenda TSOG 8th November 10.00-10.20 TSOG Legal Interpretation 10.20-10.40 Ofgem Update 10.40-11.10 GC0095: Issues Tracker – Review by Exception 11.10-11.15 Comfort break 11.15-12.00 TSOG Entry into Force requirements 12.00-12.20 Scope Data Exchange and Operational Planning 12.20-12.30 AOB/next meeting 12.30 Lunch

Data Exchange

Structure of TSOG & Data Exchange TSOG is structured as follows: Parts (II: Operational Security) Titles (2: Data Exchange) Chapters (1-6 based on which party) Articles (40 – 53) Data exchange Title is grouped by whom data exchanged is with, which customer

Categories of data exchange in TSOG Structural Topology Technical data on plant Scheduled (SGUs) Forecasted active power output & reserves Availability or scheduled unavailability Forecasted restriction in reactive power control capability Real-time Frequency Active & reactive power Voltages Aggregated generation

TSO-SGU Data Exchange Structural Scheduled Real-Time Type B, C, D General data – installed capacity & primary energy source Cold & warm start times Short-circuit calculation data Transformer data FCR, FRR or RR data Restoration data Dynamic simulation data Protection data Voltage & reactive power control capability Type B, C, D Active power output & reserves amount and availability* Scheduled unavailability or active power capability restriction Forecast restriction in the reactive power control capability * Day-ahead & Intraday Type B, C, D Position of Circuit Breakers at connection point Active and reactive power at connection point Net active and reactive power* * In the case of power generating facility with consumption other than auxiliary consumption Type B, C, D

TSO-HVDC Data Exchange Structural Scheduled Real-Time Name plate data Transformer data Filters & filter bank data Reactive compensation data Active power control capability Reactive power & voltage control capability Active or reactive operational mode prioritization Frequency response capability Dynamic model data Protection data Fault ride-through capability Active power schedule & availability* Scheduled unavailability or active power capability restriction Forecast restriction in the reactive power or voltage control capability * Day-ahead & Intraday Position of Circuit Breakers Operational status Active & reactive power

Demand Facilities - Tx Structural Scheduled Real-Time Electrical data of transformers Load characteristics of the demand facility Reactive power control characteristics Active & forecast reactive power consumption* Schedule of its structural minimum and maximum power to be curtailed** Forecast restriction in the reactive power or voltage control capability * Day-ahead & Intraday ** In the case of DSR participation Active & reactive power at the connection point Minimum and maximum power range to be curtailed. Behaviour at the voltage ranges specified by the TSO

Demand Facilities - Dx Scheduled Real-Time Structural minimum and maximum active power available for DSR Maximum and minimum duration of any potential usage of this power for DSR Forecast of unrestricted active power available for DSR Real-time active and reactive power at the connection point Confirmation that the estimations of the actual values of DSR are applied

TSO-TSO Data Exchange Structural Real-Time Synchronous Area Substation topologies Transmission line technical data Transformer data Max and min active & reactive power Phase-shifting transformer data HVDC data Reactors, Capacitors & static VAR compensators Operational security limits Frequency FRCE Aggregated generation infeed System state Power exchange via virtual tie-lines Substation topologies Bay active & reactive power Regulating positions of transformers Busbar voltage Restrictions on active & reactive power supply Reactive power from Capacitor, Inductor or static VAR compensator Synchronous Area Observability Area

TSO-DSO Data Exchange Structural Real-Time Substations Lines connecting substations Transformers from substations SGUs Reactors & Capacitors in substations Total aggregated generation capacity & related frequency data * Provide update on data at least every 6 Months. Substation topologies Bay active & reactive power Tap positions of transformers Busbar voltage Restrictions on active & reactive power supply Reactive power from Capacitor, Inductor or static VAR compensator Aggregated generation in DSO area Aggregated consumption in DSO area

Data Exchange timelines Entry into Force (EIF) is expected ~Jan 17 Whole of data exchange Title applies 18 months after EIF BUT that includes time needed for NRA approval, which is 6 months so Data exchange requirements must be decided by Jan 18* *That date includes consultation with industry However certain details must be decided with ‘All TSOs’ within 6 months after EIF; see article 40.6

Relevant concepts SGUs Significant Grid Users: scope of who this code applies to Flexibility Article 40.5 gives wide ‘wiggle room’ to apply the data requirements appropriately Reserve types Makes reference to other part of TSOG which details different types of reserves

Relevant concepts – cont’d Observability area Concept of ‘how far’ into other peoples networks you need sight of Multiple TSOs In UK there are multiple ‘certified’ TSOs to whom this code could apply to.

SGUs Article 2.1 sets the scope for the whole code existing and new power generating modules classified as type B, C and D in accordance with the criteria set out in RfG existing and new transmission-connected demand facilities; existing and new transmission-connected closed distribution systems; existing and new demand facilities, closed distribution systems and third parties if they provide demand response directly to the TSO in accordance with the criteria in DCC providers of redispatching of power generating modules or demand facilities by means of aggregation and providers of active power reserve in accordance with Title 8 of Part IV of this Regulation; and existing and new high voltage direct current ('HVDC') systems in accordance with the criteria in HVDC

SGUs

Article 40.5 - flexibility In coordination with the DSOs and SGUs, each TSO shall determine the applicability and scope of the data exchange based on the following categories: structural data in accordance with Article 48; scheduling and forecast data in accordance with Article 49; real-time data in accordance with Article 44 and Article 50; and provisions in accordance with Article 47, 51, Article 52 and Article 53.

Operational Planning

Article 75 Methodology for coordinating operational security analysis Operational Planning Relevant Assets A part of the network or SGU connected to the TSOs network that has a large enough degree of influence to be considered for Cross Boarder Outage Coordination. Note – the level of influence is not yet defined. Article 75 Methodology for coordinating operational security analysis Article 84 Methodology for assessing the relevance of assets for outage coordination