Measuring Quality of Life in Denmark – A New Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring Gender Equality and Institutions Improving Data Collection and Data Quality Nistha Sinha Economist, Gender and Development Unit The World Bank.
Advertisements

Professor Claire Wallace Professor Pamela Abbott.
Extreme poverty and vulnerability in OECD countries Dominic Richardson How to measure Extreme Poverty in the EU Brussels 22 nd September 2009.
Persistence of Social Exclusion Among Older People in Australia Riyana Miranti* and Peng Yu** * National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling (NATSEM),
Ethno-cultural groups in Population Censuses An evaluation of the UNECE/EUROSTAT Recommendations for Population Censuses and proposals for the 2010 round.
Jane Scobie Cross-national research on well-being of older people: Insights from Global AgeWatch Index Setting the scene: Population.
Gender Aspects and Minority Data: An Illustrative Case of Roma Women in Southeast Europe United Nations Development Programme Nadja Dolata and Susanne.
OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being
"Analysis of opportunities on the use of KNI for international comparisons in the context of sustainable development" Dr. Gyula Pulay Supervisory manager.
ACTIVE AGEING Definition: Giving opportunities to the millions of healthy older people to take an active part in society and use their experience to the.
Priorities of the draft National Youth Strategy Sergiu STANCIU, Deputy Minister of Youth and Sports of the Republic of Moldova.
Measuring Quality of Life – a new way forward for official statistics? Niels Ploug, Director of Social Statistics, Statistics Denmark.
Israel visit 29 th of April. 13:00 – 13:30 Brief introduction to Danish social registers - The central personal register -Income register -Health register.
Measuring disability in South Africa: Data gaps & challenges Population Statistics Division Statistics South Africa 7 December 2016.
Interstate statistical committee
The Sure Start Programme – Practical Model of an Integrated Policy for Early Childhood Development in Europe Maria Petkova Tulip Foundation.
EU indicators on social inclusion and social protection and the EU 2020 poverty and social exclusion target – state of play Kornelia Kozovska Secretariat.
Dominik Rozkrut Central Statistical Office of Poland
Rabia Khalaila, RN, MPH, PHD Director, Department of Nursing
Social and Housing Statistics Section
KEY INDICATORS OF THE LABOUR MARKET - KILM
THE SITUATION AND RIGHTS OF WOMEN WITH DISABILITIES
Statistics Netherlands Division Social and Spatial Statistics
OSH challenges and perspectives in the new EU-Member States:
Regional disparities, regional policy and the well-being agenda
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics Belgrade November, 2017
Informal Sector Statistics
Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in the Republic of Uzbekistan Geneva, April 12, 2017.
Task force on statistical units: survey of current practices
MISSOC NETWORK MEETING Bratislava, November 2017
Understanding the resilience of NSW farmers:
Main results of the Urban Audit pilot phase Mireille Grubert
Integrating a Gender Perspective into Statistics
11/13/2018 Poverty and Deprivation in Central Europe: Concepts, Measurement and Application Frank (FH) Flinterman Faculty of Spatial Sciences University.
NCN module on cultural participation:
The importance of administrative data in the era of SDGs
Document E4/URBAN/2001/6_EN
Strength of Evidence; Empirically Supported Treatments
Employers, Founders and Gazelles: Developments in Business Demography in Europe Since th International Roundtable on Business Survey Frames - Wiesbaden.
Woman Participation in the Palestinian Labour Market
Impact and outcomes – making sure these are central to your case –
National Bureau of Statistics of China
Central Statistics Organization
Branislav Mikulic: QUALITY OF LIFE IN EUROPE: Concept, measurement and results (EQLS survey) Forum “Estonian Quality of Life in European Comparison,
MISSOC NETWORK MEETING Amsterdam, June 2016
Expert Group on Quality of Life Indicators
WORKSHOP ON THE DATA COLLECTION OF OCCUPATIONAL DATA Luxembourg, 28 November 2008 Occupation as a core variable in social surveys Sylvain Jouhette
Stiglitz Commission GDP and beyond
Quality of life in Europe
Sub-regional workshop on integration of administrative data, big data
The concept and approach of European Quality of Life survey
ESF Evaluation Partnership Meeting
Core Variables revised guidelines 2011
Objective of the workshop
Society in Israel Report
Raising awareness of sensory impairment amongst older people
Stiglitz Commission GDP and beyond
The European Social Model and Quality of Life
UNODC-UNECE Manual on Victimization Surveys: Content
Statistics on Enterprises’ ICT Usage
Household Arrangements and Economic Poverty: A Subjective Well-Being Approach The Family’s Role in Poverty Abatement Mariano Rojas Universidad de las.
Expert Group on Quality of Life Indicators
S.A.M.P.L.E. Small Area Methods for Poverty and Living condition Estimates Siena, Sample 6 October 2010 Some results from the survey on local stakeholders.
Woman Participation in the Palestinian Labour Market
Financial System: Sustainability for Growth
The social and employment situation of people with disabilities MEP lunch meeting European Parliament, 6 March EU agencies across EU that play.
Quality and access to social services – a European issue?
Objective of the workshop
International Academic Multidisciplinary Research Conference in Rome
HAPPINESS Meik Wiking CEO The Happiness Research Institute.
Presentation transcript:

Measuring Quality of Life in Denmark – A New Project Preben Etwil & Inez Lindemann Kristensen 10th Conference “Social Monitoring and Reporting in Europe” 2015

Focus Measure Quality of Life in Denmark Comparing Danish municipalities Both objective and subjective indicators Analysis Dessimination

The Danish project Initiated in 2014 Funded by TrygFonden, Region of Southern Denmark and Statistics Denmark The project consists of three employees The work is conducted by Statistics Denmark and drawing on all the institution's register data and collected subjective data from DST-Survey The project will be completed at the end of 2016, if there are no external funding

Recommendations? Statistics Denmark has tried to follow the most recognized international recommendations Specifically, we looked at report from Stiglitz, Sen and Fitosussi, but also other recommendations from OECD and EU The international recommendations have focused on country comparisons. In Denmark, the focus has been to compare municipalities

Objective quality of life (register data) The indicators cover all 5 regions and 98 municipalities in Denmark Most of the indicators are associated with a personal identification number (CPR) Can be compared with the subjective indicators Projektet råder over alle registerdata i DST til de objektive indikatorer Ikke penge til survey i alle 98 kommuner Survey på web og telefon Pilottest i september Dataindsamling oktober-februar

Objective quality of life (register data) Quality of life depends on objective conditions and capabilities in multiple dimensions Health Safety Employment Education Life expectancy Hospital admissions per 1000 inhabitants Burglaries in a residential per 1000 inhabitants Violence per 1000 inhabitants Employment rate, 30-59 year olds Proportion long-term unemployed 30-59 year olds Proportion with qualifying education 30-59 year olds Social mobility in education Economy Social interactions Housing Governance and basic rights Disposable incomes Risk of poverty Divorces per 1000 married Living area per person Participation in parliamentary election Participation in municipal elections

Subjective quality of life (survey data) Only selected in 38 municipalities (of 98) Full cover of Region Southern Denmark (funded by region) In the other four regions: Largest population High income municipalities Outlying Municipality And closest to the region's age structure 1,000 respondents per municipality 2,000 responses covering the whole country Projektet råder over alle registerdata i DST til de objektive indikatorer Ikke penge til survey i alle 98 kommuner Survey på web og telefon Pilottest i september Dataindsamling oktober-februar

Subjective Quality of Life I OECD definition of Subjective well-being include: Life evaluation: a reflective assessment on a person’s life or some specific aspect of it Eudaimonia: a sense of meaning and purpose in life Affect: a person's feelings and emotional state, typically measured with reference to a specific point in time

Subjektive QoL II (survey) Overall, how satisfied are you with life as a whole these days? [0-10] Overall, to what extent do you feel the things you do in your life are worthwhile? The following questions ask about how you felt yesterday: How about happy? How about worried? How about depressed? OECD’s Guidelines on measuring subjective well-being anbefaler nationale statistikbureauer som minimum at stille disse fem spørgsmål

Subjective QoL III (survey) In addition, we ask questions about: Domain specific evaluation, e.g. satisfaction with the economic situation, social interactions and employment Self-reported health, stress, exercise, solitude, volunteering, financial flexibility, experienced safety, confidence in politicians etc.

The Danish CPR-system The Central Personal Register was introduced 1968 It assigns a unique ID too anyone living in Denmark CPR-numbers: DDMMYY-XXXX The CPR-system is used by all parts the public sector in Denmark, when relating with the public.

The Central Personal Register (CPR) Name Age Sex Marital status Citizenship Place of birth Address Resp. municipality Family (CPR of mother, father, spouse) Protection of address Member of public church from CPR-number

Several set of data but only one key Survey data Perception of economy Perception of education Perception of employment Perception of safety Subjective indicators Perception of health CPR Register data Economy Education Employment Safety Objective indicators Health

Subjective indicators One observation Subjective indicators Survey data ● Objective indicators Register data Combination of objective and subjective indicators ∑CPR Self-reported health Income x

Subjective indicators Survey data ● Objective indicators Register data From a single observation to statistics ∑CPR Income x Self-reported health y=ax+b x

Unlimited analysis possibilities I Municipality Z Objective indicator X Subjective indicator X

Unlimited analysis possibilities II Municipality Z Subjective indicator Y Subjective indicator X

Unlimited analysis possibilities III Municipality Z Objective indicator Y Objective indicator X

Unlimited analysis possibilities IV Municipality Z Objective indicator Y Time from 2008 and forward

Dessimination of indicators? Long-term unemployed

Thank you for your attention any questions?