UL/DL Considerations of BDA fed Active DAS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Senior Algorithm Engineer Aeroflex Test Solutions Stevenage, UK
Advertisements

Pensinyalan (2) Perbandingan antara sinyal analog dan digital.
October, RF Engineering 102 v1.0 (c) 1997 Scott Baxter Working in Decibels Chapter 9 Section A.
Design of a Low-Noise 24 GHz Receiver Using MMICs Eric Tollefson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Advisor: Dr. L. Wilson Pearson.
ECE 5233 Satellite Communications
Quiz Draw a block diagram of a quadrature (I/Q) demodulator. Carrier Recovery cos(  o t) Splitter  /2) LPF Recovered Q Data: Q R (kT) Recovered I Data:
08/16/01. Link Budgets for Cellular Networks Presented by Eric Johnson.
08/16/01.
Mid-Semester Design Review High Frequency Radio with BPSK Modulation.
Benjamin Sam, Charly El-Khoury 3/18/2015
Gain, Attenuation, Decibels
2.4-GHZ RF TRANSCEIVER FOR IEEE B WIRELESS LAN UF# UF#
CHAPTER Noise 5.2 Transmission Media & EM Propagations.
CE 4228 Data Communications and Networking
Equipment Noise Characterization P s (W) N TH (W) = kTB B Desired Signal Thermal Noise G1G1 GNGN Ideal Components Contained within bandwidth “B”
3.1 Chapter 3 Data and Signals Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Summary Thus far we have: ECE 4710: Lecture #39
1 EE 499 Wireless Communications Project by Team 4: Arati NagarkarHemant Samtani Supriya HerwadkarChinmay Shete Shivani KaushalSalil Sawhney.
Amplitude Modulation 2.2 AM RECEIVERS
CHAPTER 2 Amplitude Modulation 2-3 AM RECEIVERS. Introduction AM demodulation – reverse process of AM modulation. Demodulator: converts a received modulated-
CHAPTER Noise 5.2 Transmission Media & EM Propagations EKT 231 : COMMUNICATION SYSTEM CHAPTER 5 : NOISE IN COMMUNICATION SYSTEM.
CHAPTER 2 Amplitude Modulation 2-3 AM RECEIVERS. Introduction AM demodulation – reverse process of AM modulation. Demodulator: converts a received modulated-
Amplifiers Amplifier Parameters Gain = Po/Pi in dB = 10 log (Po/Pi)
Channel capacity A very important consideration in data communications is how fast we can send data, in bits per second, over a channel.
ECE 4710: Lecture #37 1 Link Budget Analysis  BER baseband performance determined by signal to noise ratio ( S / N ) at input to detector (product, envelope,
Travis Newton LO-IF Engineer EVLA LO/IF PDR January IF Downconverter Travis Newton LO/IF Engineer.
Tests of STO IF Components S. Weinreb April 15, 2009 Two 1-2 GHz IF amplifier plates and one 5 GHz converter plate for the Texas test flight have been.
CHAPTER 1 Part 2.1  Noise.
CHAPTER 1 (cont…) Part 2.1  Noise. Objectives To differentiate the types of noise To calculate the thermal noise generated by a resistor To calculate.
CSE598A Analog Mixed Signal CMOS Chip Design FM Mixer CMOS Realization (Final Presentation) Zhang Yi.
1 Noise Figure Improvement using a Front End Transformer Hooman 9/9/13.
Evaluating Active Components Presenter: Blaine Davidge Westell Technologies 4/8/161Copyright © 2016 | CIBET | All rights reserved.
DISTRIBUTION AMPLIFIERS Distribution Amplifier Duplicate Audio Signals to Multiple Outputs.
Numericals.
Radio Frequency Components
Integrated Phased Array Systems in Silicon
Preamplifier R&D at University of Montreal for the drift chamber J.P. Martin, Paul Taras.
Amplitude Modulation Part 2 - AM RECEPTION.  To define AM demodulation  To define and describe the receiver parameters  To describe the operation of.
WUR Link Budget Analysis
In-Building Working Group Report
Noise Figure vs. IP3 Skip Crilly CTO, Cellular Specialties, Inc.
Communication 40 GHz Anurag Nigam.
LNA LNA LNA Uplink Optimization in Distributed Antenna Systems Presentation by Dennis McColl January 14th, 2014 IBTUF 2014 Austin, Texas PUSCH PUCCH.
IBTUF VIII – AUSTIN, TX Distributed Antenna Systems for Large Venues
Lets Design an LNA! Anurag Nigam.
CT-474: Satellite Communications
CSE598A Analog Mixed Signal CMOS Chip Design
CMA46 Questions & Answers.
Tropo-Scatter Link Budget
Transmission Media.
5.1 Noise 5.2 Transmission Media & EM Propagations
Noise Figure, Noise Factor and Sensitivity
Amplitude Modulation 2-3 AM RECEIVERS
Understanding Receiver Specifications
S Meters.
IBTUF VIII – AUSTIN, TX Distributed Antenna Systems for Large Venues
Full Duplex Benefits and Challenges
Antennas Topologies Directly connecting two duplexers together can affect each other’s filter characteristic, thereby losing the isolation that is needed.
LTE-Advanced New UE Categories[4] LTE-Advanced New UE Categories[4]
RF Front End Radio Design- Simulations and Specifications
High Performance IF and Transverter Design
Inside the K3 High Performance Rig Design
. Who is Most Merciful and Beneficial With the Name of Allah
A Software Defined Radio for the Masses, Part 4
Principles of Communications SEE 3533 Section 01 Dr Noor Asmawati Samsuri
Noise Figure, Noise Factor and Sensitivity
CH-6 CABLE TV.
Full Duplex Benefits and Challenges
CSE 313 Data Communication
KOMUNIKASI DATA Materi Pertemuan 5.
Presentation transcript:

UL/DL Considerations of BDA fed Active DAS Steve Blum Senior Solutions Engineer Jan, 2014

Donor Site Noise Rise Avoid Donor site de-sense from DAS/BDA Noise Signal and Noise Noise Power – Path Loss Donor Antenna DAS Remote DAS Antenna A 1 BDA DAS Interface

Generic DAS Remote converts and amplifies RF Transport medium Head end with RF interface to signal source and conversion for transport

DAS UL Noise Figure Noise Figure is the degradation in Signal to Noise from the input to output Passive DAS 16 dB Loss -90 signal -113 noise SNR = 23 -106 signal -113 noise SNR = 7 -90 signal -113 noise SNR 23 Active DAS with 16 dB NF -90 signal -97 noise SNR 7

Noise Power DAS UL Noise Power = -174 dBm (thermal noise floor, 50 ohms, 1kHz) + 10log(Bandwidth of RX) + NF + Gain For CDMA = -113 + NF + Gain Coax adds to NF but subtracts from gain, net 0 impact to noise power

Combined Noise Power Noise Figure = Base noise figure + 10log (number of remotes) NF = 10 + 10log(4) or 6 = 16 dB NF Gain = 10 Noise Power = -113 + 16 + 10 = -87 dBm

Mitigating DAS Noise UL Attenuation will reduce Noise Small Impact to NF/SNR -90 Signal -113 Noise S/N = 23 Stages NF Gain Cascade Calculations   DAS 16.0 10.0 16.32 10.00 UL Atten 15.0 -15.0 -5.00 Passive 0.0 BDA Coax Antenna Stage 8 Noise -101.68 -80/-87 S/N = 7 -95/-101.7 S/N = 6.7 -15 dB NF 16, Gain 10

Noise Power ERP Noise Power ERP = DAS Noise - Coax + BDA Noise - Coax + Antenna Gain Noise Power ERP -113 + 16 + 69 = -28 dBm BDA DAS Remote A 1 DAS Interface Antenna gain 2 Coax BDA Gain Cascaded Calculation Stages NF Gain Cascade Calculations   DAS 16.0 10.0 16.00 10.00 UL Atten 0.0 Passive 1.0 -1.0 16.03 9.00 BDA 5.0 60.0 69.00 Coax -5.0 64.00 Antenna 0.5 Stage 8 Noise -27.97 The Noise Figure is pretty much set by the DAS so the only way to reduce Noise Power is to reduce the gain. But where we do that is important and we can analysis this with the cascaded calculation 1 Coax Noise Power

Reducing UL Noise Cascaded Calculator to evaluated effects of UL attenuation Goal is to reduce attenuation with minimal impact to NF 15 dB UL attenuation on DAS 15 dB UL attenuation on BDA

Optimizing UL Attenuation Splitting Attenuation reduces UL overdrive concerns with minimal degradation to NF

DAS Remote Gain Adjust Adjusting Remote UL Gain impacts NF Normal, 10 dB Atten Adjusting Remote UL Gain impacts NF Low, 1 dB Gain, 13 dB NF Normal, 11 dB Gain, 10 dB NF High, 21 dB Gain, 7 dB NF +6 to NF for 4 remotes Low, no UL Atten High, 20 dB Atten Keep in mind that UL IMD can become a concern with higher UL gain at the remote

Balancing Remotes High Gain on 1 remote will dominate the noise floor

DL Gain Considerations BDA DAS Remote A 1 DAS Interface DAS Remote adds gain to distribute RF DAS Net Gain = DAS Remote Composite Pout – BDA Composite Pout DAS HE attenuates DL for transport

Balancing DL Gain DAS Remote gain stays the same BDA DAS Remote A 1 DAS Interface DAS Remote gain stays the same BDA DL gain reduced = lower Pout Net effect = No gain change With lower Pin, DAS HE reduces attenuation

Balancing DL Gain? Net DL Gain = BDA Gain + BDA Pout – DAS Remote Pout BDA = 60 dB Gain and 30 Pout Remote = 33 Net gain = 63 Net UL Gain Remove donor coax and antenna Lower power DAS BDA = 60 dB Gain and 30 Pout Remote = 20 Net gain = 50 Either adjust the UL gain/attenuation to match DL or reduce DAS remote Pout

BDA – DAS Oscillation When Gain is higher than isolation Donor Antenna Isolation Attenuate and/or isolate the specific antenna DAS Remote DAS Antenna A 1 BDA At -5 isolation, the system will oscillate activating AGC and causing alarms. At 15, generally everything will be fine but 20 allows for no problems DAS Interface

Mixed Power Remotes DAS common head end with a mix of remote options

Summary UL Noise from a BDA fed DAS may de-sense the donor base site Noise is determined by the cascaded NF + gain Find best place to adjust gain while minimizing NF increase Increasing the DAS remote gain can reduce NF but may create IMD concerns Adjusting BDA DL gain to match UL gain adjustment will not balance the gain Adjusting DL net gain requires reducing remote Pout Preventing oscillation will require attenuating/isolating the offending antenna (DL/UL) DAS with mixed remotes may require independent head end components