Bringing Students Together: The Obstacles & Opportunities of School District Consolidation June 15, 2016 Benefits of and Obstacles to School District Consolidation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Foundations of American Education, Fifth Edition
Advertisements

Heather Zavadsky, Ph.D. Bringing School Reform to Scale: Moving From Islands of Greatness to Successful Systems.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance Staff Presentation June 13, 2002 Bryon Moore, Senate Ways and Means Committee Staff Denise Graham, House Appropriations.
Distributing the Benefits and Burdens of Growth: Metropolitan Equity in the Portland Region.
FUNDING FOR ACHIEVEMENT A Report and Comprehensive Proposal for State Education Aid Reform: Why We Need to Change Educational Funding New York State Association.
Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: Diversity and Coordination Troy University PA6650- Governmental Budgeting Chapter 14.
* * 0 PUBLIC EDUCATION FINANCE IN PENNSYLVANIA: UNEQUAL AND INADEQUATE Prepared by The Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia March 2008.
1 State Aid to School Districts in New York State: An Overview Based on the Laws of 2004 State Aid Work Group New York State Education Department August.
Educating Every Student An overview of educational investments for the future and New York State’s funding failure Annenberg Institute for School Reform.
The Future of School Integration: Socioeconomic Integration as an Education Reform Strategy Richard D. Kahlenberg, Senior Fellow, The Century Foundation.
Chapter Nineteen: State and Local Government 1. Learning Objectives Describe in general terms the differences between the U.S. Constitution and state.
No Time to Lose The Imperatives to Educate A New Majority: Low Income Students in Georgia “One by one their seats were emptied…Here the circle has been.
Local Taxes in New York: Easing the Burden Citizens Budget Commission Conference December 6, 2007 Held at the Rockefeller Institute, Albany, NY.
Arkansas Department of Workforce Education Adult Education Division.
Racial and Economic Segregation in Schools: Barrier to Quality and Equality in Education Baris Gumus-Dawes.
1 Oregon Department of Education (ODE) State School Fund Ways & Means Education Sub-Committee March 24, 2003 Pat Burk, Deputy Superintendent Brian Reeder,
1 State Aid to School Districts in New York State: An Overview Based on the Laws of 2007 State Aid Work Group New York State Education Department April.
Chapter 6 Eroding Local Control
Oregon Department of Education Agency Overview Susan Castillo, Superintendent of Public Instruction Patrick Burk, Deputy Superintendent Mike Greenfield,
THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF PUBLIC EDUCATION Dr. Leonard Elovitz Kean University.
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance September 25, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
Appropriate Educational Programming in the Rolling River School Division Presented to the Rolling River School Division Liaison Committee June 8, 2011.
Chapter 13 Finance School Funding and Taxes The power of taxation for education resides with the state limited only by federal and state constitution.
Future PastPresent Change ~ and~ Challenge Planning for 2012 and Beyond Washington School District.
Good morning ladies and gentlemen!. Overview on Education in VietNam Development History, Achievements, Challenges and Solutions A Presentation to senior.
A.ABDULLAEV, Director of the Public Fund for Support and Development of Print Media and Information Agencies of Uzbekistan.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Chapter 16 The Road Ahead in School Finance This multimedia product and its contents are protected under copyright law. The following are prohibited by.
School Funding and School Reform. School Funding- 3 main sources Local44% State50 % Federal 6%
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance August 20, 2002 Bill Freund, Consultant To The Task Force.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
2006 – 2007 Budget Outline Keeping the promise by adjusting and aligning our budget.
14 – 16 Curriculum Seminar The impact of recent DfE changes on curriculum planning and outcomes for schools.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
INFRASTRUCTURE CSIR 2015 CONFERENCE “IDEAS THAT WORK"
Brief History of School Finance Litigation 1994: Woonsocket, Pawtucket, and West Warwick receive successful ruling at trial of Pawtucket v. Sundlun. 7/20/95:
Funding an Adequate Education in Urban Schools: Lessons from New Jersey (US) International Conference on Education Finance and Decentralization World Bank.
Wells Branch Leadership Academy Annual Title 1 Meeting September 23, 2015.
Expanding School Resources Dr. Len Elovitz. Privileged-Based Taxation Fees assessed for users of specific government services Should schools be able to.
FUNDING FOR EDUCATION. FACTS Every child has a right to free public education (K-12) Education is EXPENSIVE What does money go to?
Organizing and Paying for American Education Chapter 5.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
Comparison of Proposals to Restructure Central Office Administration Owen Maurais Executive Director, PREP February 8, 2007.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool Agnes von Maravic Children’s Rights Division Council of Europe Based on slides prepared by Gerison.
Ready At Five & Maryland State Department of Education.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Tony McCoy EDL 518 Summer 2010 Elmwood High School- iirc Data Evaluation.
Universal coordination in governmental policy-making: Aligning the interests of local authorities with national objectives Mr. Lytou Bouapao; Vice Minister.
Politics in States and Communities (15 Ed.)
School board trustees: roles and responsibilities
Progress in Achieving Triple Aim of Health Equity
trustees: roles and responsibilities
Alignment between Curriculum, Teaching & Assessment
Sports in Society: Issues & Controversies
trustees: roles and responsibilities
So, what exactly is the Opportunity School District?
School Segregation by Race & Socioeconomic Status
Chapter 13 Governance and Financing of Elementary and Secondary Schools By Delis Corke EDU /30/13.
THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF PUBLIC EDUCATION
Chapter 3 Challenges of School Reform
Legislative Council Study Committee on the Identification and Management of Dyslexia Dee Pettack, Legislative Liaison Barb Novak, Literacy Consultant.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool
DRAFT This is how we work
Mun C. Tsang Teachers College Columbia University
Independent School District No. 720 Shakopee, Minnesota
Quality Education Commission Presentation to the Senate Committee
Families as a Legitimate Focus of Public Policy: Yesterday and Today
Contracts for Excellence
Presentation transcript:

Bringing Students Together: The Obstacles & Opportunities of School District Consolidation June 15, 2016 Benefits of and Obstacles to School District Consolidation Remarks by Paul Tractenberg

Benefits of and Obstacles to School District Consolidation The mandate for an “efficient system of free public schools” and the role of school district consolidation NJ Constitution’s Education Clause: “The Legislature shall provide for the maintenance and support of a thorough and efficient system of free public schools for the instruction of all the children in the state between the ages of five and eighteen years.”

Benefits of and Obstacles to School District Consolidation The (In)efficiencies of NJ’s current system: 1) The crazy quilt of more than 700 school districts (each charter school its own school district) About two-thirds of all districts not K-12 Curriculum articulation problems Lack of meaningful local governance authority for schools in another school district High administrative costs Contributes to racial, ethnic and socioeconomic isolation A root cause of school funding inequities

Benefits of and Obstacles to School District Consolidation 2) A seriously problematic school funding system Heavy reliance on grossly disparate local property tax bases with a preponderance of at-risk students in low property wealth districts Perennial failure of the legislature to fully fund its own school aid formula State aid decisions too late in the school year to permit effective educational planning Nation’s highest property taxes and among the highest per capita education spending

Benefits of and Obstacles to School District Consolidation 3) Extreme racial, ethnic and socioeconomic segregation from district to district with at-risk students disproportionately isolated in poor urban and poor rural school districts NJ public schools among the most segregated in the nation racially, ethnically and socioeconomically even though NJ has the strongest state constitutional law in the nation requiring racial balance in the public schools “wherever feasible” About 26% of NJ’s black students and 13% of its Hispanic students are being educated in “apartheid schools,” those with fewer than 1% white students. When black and Hispanic students being educated in “intensely segregated schools” (fewer than 10% white students) are added, the numbers exceed 40%. Many white students are educated in “reverse-apartheid” schools Consequent academic and social learning deficits as well as failure to prepare students effectively to be citizens and workers in an increasingly global and technological world

Benefits of and Obstacles to School District Consolidation 4) Too much focus on standardized testing as main benchmark for students, teachers, schools and districts 5) Lack of capacity in the state department of education and other branches of state and local government Extends to research, technical assistance, and effective monitoring and oversight Too much attention and too many resources devoted to extended state takeover and operation of large urban districts

Benefits of and Obstacles to School District Consolidation How can we enhance the efficiency of our system of free public schools? 1) Follow what a succession of NJ blue ribbon commissions have recommended repeatedly over the past 50 years—school district and municipal consolidation Current NJ law and policy favors consolidating districts into K-12 systems 2) Follow best practices models in this country For district consolidation In most of the U.S. there has been a precipitous decline in the number of school districts over the past three quarters of a century; in NJ there has been a substantial increase In 1939, the first year in which the number of school districts was published, there were more than 119,000 in the U.S.. By 2013, the number had declined to about 13,500, a decline of almost 90%. By contrast, the number of NJ districts increased by at least 20% A number of state have adopted county school districts, some with notable success (e.g., Maryland); NJ’s own experience with county vocational districts and their magnet high school programs suggests it’s an idea worth considering

Benefits of and Obstacles to School District Consolidation For integrating the schools Make racial, ethnic and socioeconomic diversity a primary goal of K-12 consolidation Adopt the Morris School District model of district consolidation for racial balance Create a pilot county-wide district (Essex County?) Amend the existing inter-district public school choice statute to emphasize racial, ethnic and socioeconomic diversity as a primary goal

Benefits of and Obstacles to School District Consolidation 3) Follow best practices models in other countries For example, in the neighboring Canadian province of Ontario, during the past dozen years a number of relevant reforms have reshaped the education system: Ontario consolidated its relatively small number of school districts (135 for 2.1 million students, as compared to about 700 for 1.35 million students in NJ) to 75; Ontario has almost 30,000 students per district; NJ has less than 2,000 Ontario rejected a shared provincial/state-local funding system in favor of full provincial funding Ontario has virtually no standardized testing and relies on classroom teachers for most of its accountability system Ontario has eschewed school choice and charter schools focusing instead on enhancing the quality of its public schools Ontario stresses child well-being at least to the same extent as academic achievement By the way, Ontario spends only about 60% as much as NJ does on education per pupil and its students are the highest- scoring English-speaking students in the world on NAEP

Benefits of and Obstacles to School District Consolidation Conclusion Mandate of an “efficient system of free public schools” has been part of NJ’s state constitutional education clause since 1875 yet it has been honored more in the breach than in the observance. It is long past time to remedy that default and to attend seriously to our state’s public schools. They must be made to serve all our children well. That is the essence of the mandate of an “efficient system of free public schools for the instruction of all the state’s children.” School district consolidation is a foundational aspect. Main obstacles: Political third rails NJ’s passionate love affair with localism Fiscal details of funding consolidated districts The “other people’s children” syndrome?