Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP 5 : Clouds & Aerosols L.G. Tilstra and P. Stammes Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) SCIAvisie Meeting, KNMI, De Bilt, Absorbing.
Advertisements

Seasons.
EE580 – Solar Cells Todd J. Kaiser Lecture 03 Nature of Sunlight 1Montana State University: Solar Cells Lecture 3: Nature of Sunlight.
Evaluation of Satellite NO2 Stratospheric Columns with the SAOZ/NDACC UV-Vis Network J.-P. Pommereau 1, F. Goutail 1, A. Pazmino 1, D. Ionov 1,3, F. Hendrick.
High Altitude Equatorial Clouds as Seen with the OSIRIS InfraRed Imager A.E. Bourassa, D.A. Degenstein, N.D. Lloyd and E.J. Llewellyn Institute of Space.
Improvement and validation of OMI NO 2 observations over complex terrain A contribution to ACCENT-TROPOSAT-2, Task Group 3 Yipin Zhou, Dominik Brunner,
Infrared spectroscopy of Hale-Bopp comet Rassul Karabalin, Ge/Ay 132 Caltech March 17, 2004.
Comparison of the aerosol extinction coefficient retrieved from MAX-DOAS measurements to in-situ measurements P. Zieger 1, K. Clemer 2, S. Yilmaz 3, R.
R. Van Malderen 1,5, E. Pottiaux 2,5, H. Brenot 3 and S. Beirle 4 R OYAL M ETEOROLOGICAL I NSTITUTE OF B ELGIUM 1 R OYAL O BSERVATORY OF B ELGIUM 2 B ELGIAN.
Aircraft spiral on July 20, 2011 at 14 UTC Validation of GOES-R ABI Surface PM2.5 Concentrations using AIRNOW and Aircraft Data Shobha Kondragunta (NOAA),
Page 1 Sciamachy Validation Workshop – Bremen December 2004 Contribution to the validation of SCIAMACHY scientific data products for CO, CH 4, CO.
Introduction A new methodology is developed for integrating complementary ground-based data sources to provide consistent ozone vertical distribution time.
Now That I Know That… What Do I Do? (Analyzing your Microtop Solar Radiometry Data)
ICDC7, Boulder, September 2005 CH 4 TOTAL COLUMNS FROM SCIAMACHY – COMPARISON WITH ATMOSPHERIC MODELS P. Bergamaschi 1, C. Frankenberg 2, J.F. Meirink.
M. Van Roozendael, AMFIC Final Meeting, 23 Oct 2009, Beijing, China1 MAXDOAS measurements in Beijing M. Van Roozendael 1, K. Clémer 1, C. Fayt 1, C. Hermans.
Page 1 Validation by Model Assimilation and/or Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Monitoring of near-real-time SCIAMACHY, MIPAS, and.
AMFIC third progress meeting MariLiza Koukouli & Dimitris Balis Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Validation workshop, Frascati, 13 December 2002Page 1 SCIAMACHY products quality and recommendations Based on presentations and discussions during this.
Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing IUP/IFE-UB Physics/Electrical Engineering Department 1 Measurements.
AMFIC second progress meeting MariLiza Koukouli & Dimitris Balis Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Herman G.J. Smit, COST 723, Bern, 6-7 Oct, MOZAIC-Data, Particularly the Use of Water Vapor Data for UTLS-Studies and the Urgent Need for Integrated.
AMFIC final meeting LAP/Auth validation activities Dimitris Balis & MariLiza Koukouli Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Developing GOES and POES Land Surface Temperature Products Yunyue Yu 1.
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Validation of the method to retrieve the AOD and first preliminary results of the aerosol measurements campaign.
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Validation of the method to retrieve the AOD and first preliminary results of the aerosol campaign. RMI December.
Hyperspectral Infrared Alone Cloudy Sounding Algorithm Development Objective and Summary To prepare for the synergistic use of data from the high-temporal.
QA filtering of individual pixels to enable a more accurate validation of aerosol products Maksym Petrenko Presented at MODIS Collection 7 and beyond Retreat.
OMI Science Team 2014, Anders Lindfors / FMI OMI cloud optical depth contributes to the observed positive bias in surface UV Anders V. Lindfors, T. Mielonen,
MAX-DOAS observations and their application to validations of satellite and model data in Wuxi, China 1) Satellite group, Max Planck institute for Chemistry,
Validation of OMI NO 2 data using ground-based spectrometric NO 2 measurements at Zvenigorod, Russia A.N. Gruzdev and A.S. Elokhov A.M. Obukhov Institute.
Evaluation of OMI total column ozone with four different algorithms SAO OE, NASA TOMS, KNMI OE/DOAS Juseon Bak 1, Jae H. Kim 1, Xiong Liu 2 1 Pusan National.
Understanding Aerosol Measurements. Purpose: Looking for Relationships  Between Aerosols and –Temperature –Cloud cover –Humidity –Precipitation –Seasonal.
Layered Water Vapor Quick Guide by NASA / SPoRT and CIRA Why is the Layered Water Vapor Product important? Water vapor is essential for creating clouds,
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Validation of the method to retrieve the AOD and first preliminary results of the aerosol campaign. RMI December.
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
Validation of OMI and SCIAMACHY tropospheric NO 2 columns using DANDELIONS ground-based data J. Hains 1, H. Volten 2, F. Boersma 1, F. Wittrock 3, A. Richter.
IGARSS 2011, Vancuver, Canada July 28, of 14 Chalmers University of Technology Monitoring Long Term Variability in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content.
Page 1 OMI ST Meeting #11, KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands, June 2006 Validation of OMI trace gas products Main contributors (this work): Michel Van.
Consulting and Technology Technical Excellence | Pragmatic Solutions | Proven Delivery Calibration Test Sites Selection and Characterisation WP 240 Equipment.
COST ES1206 (GNSS4SWEC) M.C. Meeting Reykjavik, Iceland NATIONAL REPORT OF BELGIUM, 2016 Eric Pottiaux, Royal Observatory of Belgium (ROB) Roeland van.
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course
The homogenization of GPS Integrated Water Vapour time series: methodology and benchmarking the algorithms on synthetic datasets R. Van Malderen1, E. Pottiaux2,
Water Vapour, Meteorology, and Climate
Weather Cloud Detection
GSICS Web Meeting, 17 November 2011
DOAS workshop 2015, Brussels, July 2015
Synthetic benchmark datasets for homogenization of IWV time series
Aerosol retrieval from spectral measurements in twilight conditions: ground-based and satellite-based cases Nina Mateshvili (1), Didier Fussen (1), Giuli.
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium
Roeland Van Malderen (and input from Olivier Bock)
The homogenization of GPS Integrated Water Vapour time series: methodology and benchmarking the algorithms on synthetic datasets R. Van Malderen1, E. Pottiaux2,
Intercomparison of SCIAMACHY NO2, the Chimère air-quality model and
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium
Huiqun Wang1 Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad1, Xiong Liu1, Kelly Chance1
Intercomparison of IWV measurements from radiosonde, sunphotometer, FTIR, and GPS instruments at Uccle K. Clémer1 C. Hermans1, M. De.
sun- (/sky-) photometer ground-networks
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium
Absolute calibration of sky radiances, colour indices and O4 DSCDs obtained from MAX-DOAS measurements T. Wagner1, S. Beirle1, S. Dörner1, M. Penning de.
Requirements for microwave inter-calibration
R. Van Malderen1,6, E. Pottiaux2,6, G. Stankunavicius3, S. Beirle4,
Sentinel 5 Precursor Ozone Column products
Aura Science Team Meeting
Intercomparison of SCIAMACHY NO2, the Chimère air-quality model and
CONSISTENCY among MOPITT, SCIA, AIRS and TES measurements of CO using the GEOS-Chem model as a comparison.
Diurnal Variation of Nitrogen Dioxide
Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium
Validation for TPW (PGE06)
Seasons.
WP4 Advanced characterisation of NORS data products
Cloud trends from GOME, SCIAMACHY and OMI
Presentation transcript:

Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium 1 Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy 2 Royal Observatory of Belgium 3 Max Planck Institute for Chemistry 4 Solar-Terrestrial Centre of Excellence 5 Evaluating satellite retrievals of Integrated Water Vapour (IWV) data by co-located ground-based devices for climate change analysis R. Van Malderen1,5, H. Brenot2, E. Pottiaux3,5, S. Beirle4, C. Hermans2, M. De Mazière2, T. Wagner4, H. De Backer1, and C. Bruyninx3

EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013 Outline ROB Instruments and datasets Sensitivity analysis of selection criteria Day-night differences in AIRS Homogeneity of GOMESCIA Impact of cloud cover Spatio-temporal variations Geographical variations Seasonal variation Conclusions EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013

GOME/SCIAMACHY/GOME-2 AIRS Instruments & datasets Sensitivity analysis Spatio-temporal variations Conclusions ROB GOME/SCIAMACHY/GOME-2 AIRS total column water vapour CIMEL sun photometer radiosondes GPS EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013

Ground-based device GNSS/GPS Instruments & datasets Sensitivity analysis Spatio-temporal variations Conclusions ROB Ground-based device GNSS/GPS International GNSS Service (IGS) database (homog. reprocessing 1995-2011) at all weather conditions, always high time frequency (every 5 minutes) Ts and ps are needed: Zenith Total Delay  IWV EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013 The IGS network of GPS stations

Instruments & datasets Sensitivity analysis Spatio-temporal variations Conclusions ROB selection of 28 sites world-wide (NH), with focus on CIMEL-GPS co-location and based on meteo data availability (GPS)! EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013

GOME/SCIAMACHY/GOME-2 Instruments & datasets Sensitivity analysis Spatio-temporal variations Conclusions ROB Satellite devices AIRS Atmospheric InfraRed Sounder on board Aqua operates in the wavelength range 3.7 to 15 μm JPL/NASA retrieval method pixel size: ellipsoidal, with major axis varying from 13.5 km (at nadir) to 31.5 km IWV calculated from cloud-cleared radiances data available from 2002 - now GOME/SCIAMACHY/GOME-2 air mass corrected differential optical absorption spectroscopy method applied to nadir measurements from 608-680 nm MPI-C retrieval method pixel size: 40 km×320 km (GOME), 30 km×60 km (SCIAMACHY), and 40 km×80 km (GOME-2) cloud cover is an issue data available from 1995 – now EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013

STEP 1: all overpass measurements  1 value Instruments & datasets Sensitivity analysis Spatio-temporal variations Conclusions ROB STEP 1: all overpass measurements  1 value AIRS Δt = 30 minutes d < 50 km between ground pixel centre and GPS Qual_H2O = 0 or 1 (pbest=psurf or < 300hPa) GOMESCIA Δt = 30 minutes GPS station in ground pixel kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk normalized O2 absorption > 1 distance ↘  correlation ↗ cloud flag criteria are necessary for “reasonable” correlations! GPS STEP 2: sensitivity analysis of the selection criteria STEP 3: geographical and seasonal dependency STEP 3: of GPS-satellite IWV correlations EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013

Instruments & datasets Sensitivity analysis Spatio-temporal variations Conclusions ROB “GOMESCIA” ??? Brussels “GOMESCIA” can be treated as one database, despite pixel size differences MPI-C retrieval with instrument dependent offsets seems to work well conclusion also valid for other stations EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013

Day-night difference (AIRS) Instruments & datasets Sensitivity analysis Spatio-temporal variations Conclusions ROB Day-night difference (AIRS) Brussels night day IWV GPS [mm] IWV GPS [mm] night-time AIRS retrievals show better agreement with GPS (higher R2, lower RMS) night-time retrievals have positive bias, daytime negative bias daytime retrievals have higher regression slopes EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013 conclusion also valid for other stations

Cloud cover impact Brussels GPS-AIRS GPS-GOMESCIA Instruments & datasets Sensitivity analysis Spatio-temporal variations Conclusions ROB Cloud cover impact Brussels GPS-AIRS GPS-GOMESCIA pbest = psurf  clear sky pbest < 300hPa  cloud cover cloud flag ↗  O2 column density ↗  clearer sky cloud cover ↗  correlation coefficients ↘, bias ↘ (overestimation  underestimation), RMS ↗, regression slope ↘ only for GOMESCIA EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013 conclusion also valid for other stations

Geographical variations Instruments & datasets Sensitivity analysis Spatio-temporal variations Conclusions ROB Geographical variations GPS - GOMESCIA GPS - AIRS GPS - GOMESCIA GPS - AIRS scatter plot properties for the 28 co-locations, ordered with increasing latitude from left to right geographical dependency?  only for RMS EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013

Seasonal variation GPS-GOMESCIA GPS-AIRS Instruments & datasets Sensitivity analysis Spatio-temporal variations Conclusions ROB Seasonal variation GPS-GOMESCIA EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013 GPS-AIRS

Instruments & datasets Sensitivity analysis Spatio-temporal variations Conclusions ROB Seasonal variation bias minimal for maximum mean IWV (summer) and maximal for minimum mean IWV (winter) ?  different “sensitivities” of GPS and satellite sensors at the IWV  extremes RMS maximal for maximum mean IWV and minimal for minimum mean IWV  consistent with latitudinal variation  in the presence of strong humidity gradients (moister air involved)  location and sampling differences might be more significant EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013

Instruments & datasets Sensitivity analysis Spatio-temporal variations Conclusions ROB Conclusions although originally tracing other slants/directions, good agreement between GPS and satellite devices Cloud cover is certainly an issue for satellite IWV retrievals, use of cloud flag data is essential for good agreement with GPS! day-night differences in the AIRS IWV retrieval Homogeneity of “GOMESCIA” database (1995-2011) seems OK for our purposes. only for RMS of GPS-satellite scatter plots: seasonal and latitudinal dependency (RMS ∝ mean IWV) submitted to ACP EUMETSAT/AMS conf. Vienna, 16-20 Sept. 2013