Deonarain Brijlall & Noor Ally

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Completing the cycle: an investigation of structured reflection as a tool to encourage student engagement with feedback Jackie Pates Lancaster Environment.
Advertisements

Functional Maths Skills Learner Issues Su Nicholson Principal Examiner for Functional Maths Edexcel Resources produced as part of LSIS funded project.
College Algebra Course Redesign Southeast Missouri State University.
Presenter: Kay Fenton UNITEC Institute of Technology Auckland, New Zealand.
1 Positive Learning Outcomes Through Problem-Based Learning Willie Yip Department of Computing.
Analytical methods for Information Systems Professionals Week 13 Lecture 1 CONCLUSION.
Intel® Education K-12 Resources Our aim is to promote excellence in Mathematics and how this can be used with technology in order.
Miguel Martins, Senior Lecturer – Marketing Department eLearning Celebration 22 July 2007 Improving performance on a Marketing module through the use of.
Faculty of Education and Arts Video Conferencing in a Multi-Campus Tertiary Context: Exploring the strengths and weaknesses Katrina Kavanagh :
LINC 2007 M-Learning from a Cell Phone: Improving Students’ EMP Learning Experience through Interactive SMS Platform By: Jafar Asgari Arani
1 Integrating Google Apps for Education to Business English Student Trainees’ On-the-Job Training English Reports Asst.Prof. Phunsuk Kannarik.
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
1 How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Presenters: Wei-Chih Hsu Professor : Ming-Puu Chen Date : 11/10/2008.
Dr Elena Luchinskaya, Lancaster University/ Leeds Metropolitan University, UK.
The Maths Pipeline Programme for the FE and Skills Sector
Seeking and providing assistance while learning to use information systems Presenter: Han, Yi-Ti Adviser: Chen, Ming-Puu Date: Sep. 16, 2009 Babin, L.M.,
Pathfinder Project Semester Dr Sury Rajah Mr Noor Ally Prof Deonarain Brijlal Prof David Day Prof Darren Lortan Dr Adhir Maharaj Pathfinder Team.
Perceptions of the Value of the Online Tools Alessandra Abbattista and Ali Messer, University of Roehampton Dr Arthur Chapman, Institute of Education.
Bruce White Ruth Geer University of South Australia.
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
SOLSTICE Conference th & 5 th June 2015 iSpring – Digital Assessment Guides Claire Moscrop & Sue Canning, Edge Hill University.
Semester Pathfinder-Maths-Student Feedback and Evaluation.
Mathematics Pathfinder Semester Adoption of Educational Technology - Franziska Moser’s Model highlights the complexities of integrating technology.
Monitoring and Assessment Presented by: Wedad Al –Blwi Supervised by: Prof. Antar Abdellah.
Learning Active Citizenship using IPADS, Political Blogs and Social Media Professor Bryony Hoskins, University of Roehampton.
Engaging Students in Technical Modules: The Quest to Promote Student Identification of Problematic Knowledge. Dr William Lyons, School of Engineering,
Are you listening ? Aiming to improve student engagement in assessment feedback using GradeMark ext 2294.
Open Math Module Welcome Welcome to the “Open Math – Open Resources: Engage Adult Learners for 21 st Century Skills” course! Use the navigation buttons.
Key Updates. What has changed? National Curriculum Early Years baseline assessment SATS Teacher Assessments Assessment without levels, expected standards.
23/11/2016 | Page 1 Welcome. 23/11/2016 | Page 2 Background In September 2014 the Government released a new National Curriculum for schools, outlining.
LEAP 2025 Practice Test Webinar for Teachers
Postgraduate Taught Experience Survey (PTES) 2010 Interim Results
Technical Communication: Concepts and Features
FROM BLENDED LEARNING TO BLENDED SURVEYING
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Clickers in a Biology Lab
Mentoring CPD Festival 2017.
© DMTI (2017) | Resource Materials |
Diana Skrzydlo and Nam-Hwui Kim
MID-Semester Online CTLE: How to make the best use of student feedback
How to Moodle 1.
How learners learn in my teaching world…
Online Course Design: Is the Conversation Over?
Paulina Liżewska Paweł Kamiński
Factors facilitating academic success: a student perspective
Oleh: Beni Setiawan, Wahyu Budi Sabtiawan
THIS IS TO EVIDENCE YOUR WORK AND GET THE BEST GRADE POSSIBLE
NDLR Symposium 2012 Engaging Students in Technical Modules: The Quest to Promote Student Identification of Problematic Knowledge. Dr William Lyons, School.
Does Peer Assisted Learning Promote Transitions Amongst Students?
CHAN Ka Wing, LAM Chung Man and YEUNG Yau Yeun
Key strategies for planning for challenge
Giving instant Feedback to Disabled Students with Technology to Create Engagement and Motivation By John O’Sullivan.
Course name: Weekly Planning
Study Island Teacher Training
Maths Counts Insights into Lesson Study
Findings from Cardinal Ambrozic Grade Nine Math Survey
JET Education Services: Innovations in Teacher Support and Curriculum Development Presentation to the Care and Support for Teaching and Learning Regional.
Business and Management Research
Curriculum Night 8th Grade-Mathematics
ENC 3254: Professional communication for Engineers
Key strategies for Planning for challenge
Dr Claire Kotecki (STEM) & Dr Prithvi Shrestha (WELS)
LO2 - Be Able to Design IT Systems to Meet Business Needs
The curriculum The curricullum tells «What and how the learners should learn» at specific levels of the education system. It includes the objectives and.
Business and Management Research
Essentials of Oral Defense
Creative assessment and feedback
NEPf-Aligned Student Perception Survey Implementation
Guided Math.
By Kaone Bakokonyane Tiro Mokgoare
Presentation transcript:

Deonarain Brijlall & Noor Ally Transforming traditional mathematics classrooms using e-learning support Deonarain Brijlall & Noor Ally Department of Mathematics, Durban University of Technology, South Africa

National Benchmarking Tests (NBTs) written at a South African university of technology showed that students across all programs which were serviced by the Mathematics Unit have revealed a low level of preparedness in Basic Mathematics for higher education. While the issue of remedying this serious problem lies firstly at the Basic Education level, Higher Education institutions cannot ignore the consequences of this situation which presents itself with our accepted entry level student cohort.

In order to improve conceptual understanding and competencies in these prior learning areas, interventions have to be done outside of the lectures (Ally, Brijlall, Rajah, Day, Maharaj A. & Lortan 2015, Maharaj, Brijlall & Narain 2015)

Previously, such interventions included additional tutorials during the week as well as on Saturdays. However, feedback from tutors and lecturers supervising such interventions indicated that students focused on the content discussed during lectures as well as revision of work in preparation for minor and major tests and not on improving basic mathematics skills.

In this scenario, e-learning presents a suitable vehicle for implementing interventions outside of lectures and might be an effective communication tool for developing students’ conceptual understanding and procedural fluency in Basic Mathematics. It is proposed that "at risk" students be identified and inducted in a pathfinder project using e- learning as the primary mode of delivery for academic support in Basic Math.

In this study the researchers used e- learning support materials to promote independent learning. In this paper we explore the students’ during e-learning We allow students to reflect on their use of tablets and laptops.

The incorporation of e-learning would be examined over a long period in terms of design of learning, teaching and assessment material with Mathematical content communication through electronic devices between learners and tutors/lecturers in formats which include Mathematical symbols and text multiple online assessments in an interactive E- environment with instant feedback and tutorial support.

Transformative learning was introduced by Mezirow (1997) as a change process that transforms frames of reference (Imel 1998). His theory defines frames of reference as "the structures of assumptions through which we understand our experiences. They selectively shape and delimit expectations, perceptions, cognition, and feelings" (Mezirow 1997: 5).

According to this view, "actions and behaviors will be changed based on the changed perspective” (Cranton 1994: 730). In this research we allowed students to express their perceptions and expectations of the use of e-learning technologies like the laptop and tablet.

A qualitative research method was adopted and focused on the lecturers as researchers. This focus of enquiry enhanced the action research carried out in this study. The qualitative paradigm was employed, as the investigation was not concerned with statistical accuracy (Cohen, Manion & Morrison 2007).

The main focus of the paper was to explore the students’ experiences during e-learning and to gather their reflections on the use of technology during e-learning. Semi-structured questionnaires were used to establish what transpired in and out of the problem-solving class during the research period by fourteen engineering students.

A. Device evaluation 1. Did you find it easy to use the device A. Device evaluation 1.Did you find it easy to use the device? Explain why? Tablet(5) Laptop(9) YES 5 1. Access internet easily- 3 2. Touch screen good for zooming in on unclear questions and easy to use-2 3. User friendly with instructions-1 4. Not so heavy to carry-1 9 1. I used a computer before at home.- 5 2. People helped me /easy to learn- 4 NO

2. Were you able to access the internet easily with your device 2. Were you able to access the internet easily with your device? If not, were there problems with the network or the device you used? Tablet Laptop YES 5 No problems with network – 4 Sometimes a problem with the network - 1 9 No problems with network. One response indicated no access at residence. NO

3. Was there any feature of the device that was useful or helpful in reading or doing the tests in the Pathfinder? Explain. Tablet Laptop Positives 1 Liked the S-pen to write and do calculations -2 2. Could read notes, answers to quizzes and correct mistakes. Also access google for help – 3 1. Clarity of screen and adjustment of font size -2 2. Microsoft word -1 3. It was hard to access with phone(Laptop was possibly better). Other comments were in terms of benefits in doing the tests, not on the device. Negatives 1- no explanation, but later indicated no problems with device. May have indicated “No” problem.

4. Did you experience any particular problem with the device which you needed to get help for? Explain. Tablet Laptop YES 1- password issue 1- could not see questions clearly 1- could not access internet NO 5 6

5. Did you use the device to contact or communicate with the lecturer when you needed assistance with a problem in Maths? How did you do this and were there any difficulties? Tablet Laptop Sms-email-message box 3 In class during consultation 2 6

6. Were there problems in accessing the Moodle site 6. Were there problems in accessing the Moodle site? If Yes, Explain briefly what these problems were. Tablet Laptop YES 1- Logging in issue 3 – Logging in issue NO 4 5

7.Any other comments on the device that you would like to share. Tablet Laptop 1. Using the device helped improve my Math 2. Perfect for connecting to internet 3. S- Note for writing notes and easy to carry about 1. Useful but have to be responsible that it does not get lost. 2. Appreciate it if organise to get it next semester. 3. Need to see questions more clearly-could not answer some.

Trigonometry - 9 Graphs - 5 Factoring - 4 Solving equations - 1 B. Basic Mathematics tutoring assistance 1. Which sections in Basic High school Maths( Eg. Factoring, solving equations, trigonometry, graphs etc) were you finding difficult at the start of the semester? You can write down more than one. Trigonometry - 9 Graphs - 5 Factoring - 4 Solving equations - 1

2.Were there any sections not covered in the tuition which you needed help in? ALL ANSWERED NO.   3. How helpful was the tuition in assisting you to improve your understanding of the high school math? Circle your answer. Very helpful – 4 tablet + 5 Laptop /helpful – 1- tablet + 4Laptop / not helpful-nil  

***4. Has your participation in the pathfinder improved your performance in Math 1? Yes/No ALL RESPONDED YES How so ? Tablet Laptop 1. Obtained distinction, found math more interesting. 2. More practice 3. At first I did not participate but when I got to use daily, my understanding increased and I passed Maths 4. I am starting to be faster than before when it comes to thinking. 5. It helped me to identify my weaker areas and I began focussing to improve that. 1. I was exposed to difficult situations and examples 2. Becoming faster to answer questions 3. Practice is helpful to improve performance 4. I used to get 40%-50% now I get 70% - 80% 5. I might not be a genius yet but it taught me that Math need practice and through that you can improve marks, that worked for me. *5. Need to add Math 1 work as well.

5.Were you motivated to complete the tests every week? Why? YES YES/NO 1. My way of testing my capability in Math 2. Lecturer constantly motivated us. 3. To see my test scores and if I made improvement 4. Because I used to get almost all right 5.I benefitted something 6. Yes, I was studying anyway, it was routine. 1. Not really 2. Not yet- too much work in other subjects.

6. Was the online work (tests, notes etc) enough 6.Was the online work (tests, notes etc) enough? If not what could we have done more to improve it? YES NO 9 Enough, more than enough 4(2 said yes but made comment) More examples, quizzes, include Math1, more daily practice

7. Was the feedback helpful after each test was marked? Explain. YES – corrected mistakes, identify mistakes. YES, but only answer given

8. Do you have any other comments regarding the Pathfinder that may help to make it more beneficial Tablet Laptop 1. Happy 2. More students to participate 3. More examples on quizzes, more clear 1. Make Login easier. 2. Feel the programme could help a lot of other students 3. Thank you it was helpful 4. Recommend for all students

CONCLUSION In this study the researchers have served as facilitators of learning. They identified from previous engineering student mathematics engagement misconceptions and gaps in learning.

Thereafter diagnostic tasks in the forms quizzes and multiple choice questions were designed and placed on the moodle platform. Students had access to these and were provided either tablets or laptops. In this paper we considered in the case study fourteen respondents and summarised their responses in a tabular form question-wise.

By allowing students to reflect on their experiences we were able to gather the rationale for the implementation of technological tools and also make a comparison of the two types of electronic machines provided to students by the mathematics department. The tablet seemed to have more reasons for being easy to use. In both cases students implied that it was easy to use and in one case it was made explicit that the laptop eased learning.

The user-friendliness of the tablet would seem to provide a better frame of reference for mathematics learning than previous frames of reference where only text books and the chalkboard were used. Also, students prefer to bring into their learning their past experience.

This report is part of a larger study which is in progress. The students’ reflections have allowed us to make alterations in our instructional design to compensate for some shortfalls identified by these students. This was a case study. The findings of a case study cannot be generalised. We suggest a large scale study on the work presented in this paper.

WE WOULD LIKE TO PLACE OUR SINCERE APPRECIATION TO THE CONFERENCE ORGANISERS THANK YOU