DZ11 Qweisma.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Distribution Systems – Part 1
Advertisements

Free software costs money
DESIGN LAYOUT OF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
THE DEVELOPMENT OF LABUAN WATER-SUPPLY GIS (LWS GIS)
Design of W.W. Collection System
Fluid Mechanics 07.
II. Dimensioning of a Branched Distribution System Main Procedures 1. Determination of the design water flowrates 2. Determination of the pipe diameters.
Outline Objectives of the Project. Study Area. Questionnaire Analysis. Network Analysis. Future Demand Estimates. Design Criteria EPANET Analysis Cost.
Biet Qad Village Climate Relative Humidity Evaporation.
Farnsworth GROUP Rocky Mountain Section - American Water Works Association 2002 Joint Annual Conference CONDITION ASSESSMENT of Pinery Water and Wastewater.
Tigard_WSP_0410 Components of a Water System Master Plan 1. Chapter 1 – Existing System 2. Chapter 2 – Demand Projections 3. Chapter 3 – Hydraulic Model.
Pipe Flow Considerations Flow conditions:  Laminar or turbulent: transition Reynolds number Re =  VD/  2,300. That is: Re 4,000 turbulent; 2,300
1 WATER PUMPING SYSTEM DESIGN REPORT. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0MARKET DEMAND (Identification of human need) Water requirements for students and staff at.
1 Investor 27 Oct Overview i2O offers a solution to huge problem of water leakage Managed service with recurring revenue Seeking £4m to reach.
WESTERN CARY WATER STORAGE TANK Town of Cary Preliminary Engineering Report Progress Meeting June 8, 2015.
Water network in Meithalun Prepared by:-- -Khalid Nairat -Ghaith Daraghmeh -Mohammed Daraghmeh Supervisor:-- Dr. Amal Al Hudhud An – Najah National University.
GIS / Hydraulic Model Integration 2008 ESRI UC Will Allender, GISP Planning and Engineering Asset Systems Planning August 6, 2008.
Unit: V-Flow Through Pipes. Flow Through Pipes  Major Energy Losses - Darcy-Weisbach Formula - Chezy’s Formula  Minor Energy Losses -Sudden expansion.
1 CTC 261 ► Energy Equation. 2 Review ► Bernoulli’s Equation  Kinetic Energy-velocity head  Pressure energy-pressure head  Potential Energy ► EGL/HGL.
Prepared By Abeer Mohammed Ala' Snober Suhad Dwaikat Wajeha Ma'ani Submitted to Dr. Amal Al-hudhud.
An-Najah National University Civil Engineering Department Analysis of the Water Distribution Network of howara- Nablus Submitted by: Rami Ahmad Mohammed.
ELK MEADOWS HOA Water Master Plan (Supply, Treatment, Distribution, and Storage) May 2005.
Best for the Buck: Using Asset Management for Project Design at Highline Water District Matthew J. Maring, P.E. April 30, 2008.
Developing a Non- Revenue Water Strategy
Introduction Before going ahead into our project I want first talk in a brief about the importance of water, water is essential to sustain a life and.
Importance Of Water Water is life. Living on the earth may be impossible without adequate water quality and quantity. Water makes up more than half of.
An-Najah National University Civil Engineering Department
April 21, 2015 Presented by: Heidi Springer, P.E. Brian Ginter, P.E.
Objectives Introduction Introduction Study Area Methodology Results & Recommendations.
AN – Najah National University
CE 3372 Water Systems Design Lecture 006: Introduction to US EPA-NET.
PILOT PROJECT ON NRW IN SHEETAL PARK AREA OF RAJKOT CITY IN GUJARAT Danish Water Forum AND Rajkot Municipal Corporation.
-1- 游叡研幫工程司 Water Leakage Improvement Ray-Yen, YU Assistant Engineer Taipei Water Department 2013 Seoul Study Workshop.
Lecture (11): Water Distribution Systems
4/14/2018.
DZ01 – Marka D B E C B G A B C.
SMART Water Management PWC’17 Samoa - 10 August 2017 Presentation by Richard Taylor, Thomas Consultants, Auckland.
Water Distribution Network for South- East Zone of Qalqilia City
Balaa Water Distribution Network
Graduation Project Water Works for Al-Marj Neighborhood
Prepared By : Kamal Hamaydeh Ahmad Odet-allah
Water Distribution Network of Anabta
OBJECTIVE 1 Irrigation District Infrastructure Studies
An-Najah National University Faculty Of Engineering
Analysis and Design of the Water Distribution Network for Teeba area,Nablus By Ranin Abu Gharbieh Under supervision of Dr. Mohammad Almasri.
Tamer Sultan Mousa Ziadeh
An – Najah National University
An– Najah National University
An-Najah National University Faculty Of Engineering
TOWN OF Penetanguishene Payette Reservoir Upgrades
Prepared By : Osama amr Qutayba mElhim
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering
تحليل وتصميم شبكات التغذيــــه بالميـاه بإستخدام الحاسب الآلي
الجزء الثالث دراسة السوق.
Developing Hydraulic Model of Water Distribution Network in Rafidia Area, Nablus by Abeer Melhim Noor Saleh Supervisor Dr.Mohmmad.
Selat al-daher water distribution network
Town of Dunn Sanitary District No. 3
AN-najah National University Faculty of Engineering Civil engineering Department Hydraulic Analysis of the Water Distribution Network of Kifl Haris using.
Design of water distribution network for Silwan village By Ahmad Amen Abassi & Mohammed Abd Al-Aziz & Mohammed Al-Akhras Under supervision of Dr.
Under supervision of: Eng. Hamees S. Tubeileh
Graduation project report II Supervisor: Dr. Anan Jayousi
Water Distribution Networks Under Intermittent Pumping: Development of a hydraulic model and Assessment of water losses Prepared by Mohammad Jihad Abdo.
50 m EML3015C Thermal-Fluid I Fall 2000 Homework 4
District Metered Areas
Analysis of the Water Distribution Network of
An - Najah National University Civil Engineering Department
An-Najah National University Civil Engineering Department Graduation project  Hydraulic analysis & Redesign of Al-Masaken & Old Askar Camp Water Supply.
Mohammad Khalid Sawalha
Metropolitan Tunnel Redundancy Program Update
Prepared By Waleed Osama Alkilani Anas Ahmad Khalid
Presentation transcript:

DZ11 Qweisma

Introduction - Current System DZ11 is divided into 12 district Water Source: Ø600mm from Al-Qwesima reservoir which has an elevation of 984. Number of customers: 35,000 customers Number of persons as per CDM study : 8.1 persons/customer Network received from GIS department and updated through meetings with Miyahuna operation and maintenance concerned personnel as well as extensive site visits to verify the elevations, boundaries, critical areas …etc.

Population District No. of Customers Population 11A 2,566 20,785 11B 4,557 36,912 11C 1,418 11,486 11D 526 4,261 11E 6,763 54,780 11F 882 7,144 11G 1,334 10,805 11H 5,962 48,292 11I 3,264 26,438 11J 3,263 26,430 11K 360 2,916 11L 4,166 33,745 Total 35,061 283,994

Entrance District Elevation Min. and Max. Elevations District H.P. L.P.(All) Difference Entrance District Elevation 11A 946 906 40 940 11B 934 840 94 912 11C 928 859 69 921 11D 903 874 29 11E 925 861 64 915 11F 941 914 27 938 11G 933 896 37 929 11H 930 826 104 924 11I 948 885 63 11J 854 67 901 11K 961 33 11L 860 61 900 Reservoir Elevation: 984 meters Reservoir height: 8.5m

Hydraulic Analysis C(Roughness Coefficient) Zone 1 Total 141,183 Base consumption 120 l/c/d 20% NRW C(Roughness Coefficient) Ex. DI 120 PE & New pipes 130 Zone 1 District Population Avg. Demand (m³/d) Peak Demand (m³/d) 11B 36,912 5,537 11074 11C 11,486 1,723 3446 11D 4,261 639 1278 11E 54,780 8,217 16434 11L 33,745 5,062 10123 Total 141,183 21,177 42,355 Ex Steel and Galv 100

Hydraulic Analysis Total 142,811 21,422 42,843 Zone 2 11A 20,785 3,118 District Population Avg. Demand (m³/d) Peak Demand (m³/d) 11A 20,785 3,118 6235 11F 7,144 1,072 2143 11G 10,805 1,621 3242 11H 48,292 7,244 14488 11I 26,438 3,966 7932 11J 26,430 3,965 7929 11K 2,916 437 875 Total 142,811 21,422 42,843 Zone 2

Main Feeders - Existing

Schematic - Existing Schematic - Existing

Hydraulic Model – Zone 1

Hydraulic Model Results - Zone 1 Pressure District Percentages < 1 Percentage 1<P<5 Percentages 5<P<7 Percentage P >7 11B 75 25 11C 16 84 11D 100 11E 83 17 11L 80 20 All DZ 72% 28% 0%

Hydraulic Model – Zone 2

Hydraulic Model Results - Zone 2 Pressure District Percentages < 1 Percentage 1<P<5 Percentages 5<P<7 Percentages >7 11A 100 11F 86 14 11G 11H 88 12 11I 11J 11K 17 83 All DZ 89% 11%

Proposed System The proposed solutions include: Split DZ Modify Districts’ Boundary Spilt Districts Add main Feeders Network Reinforcement Add PRVs and District Meters

DZ11-Zone 1

DZ11-Zone 2

Main Feeders - Proposed Proposed Main Feeders – Zone 1 Proposed Main Feeders – Zone 2

Schematic - Proposed Schematic - Proposed

District B

District C

District E

District L

Zone 1 Hydraulic Model – Peak Demand

Zone 1 Hydraulic Model – Peak Demand Pressure District Percentages < 1 Percentage 1<P<5 Percentages 5<P<7 Percentages>7 11B 96 4 11C 100 11D 11E 99 1 11L All DZ 0% 98% 2%

Zone 1 Hydraulic Model – Avg. Demand

Zone 1 Hydraulic Model – Avg. Demand Pressure District Percentages < 1 Percentage 1<P<5 Percentages 5<P<7 Percentages >7 11B 89 11 11C 55 45 11D 50 11E 93 6 1 11L 100 All DZ 0% 89% 11%

Zone 1 Hydraulic Model – Night Flow

Zone 1 Hydraulic Model – Night Flow Pressure District Percentages < 1 Percentage 1<P<5 Percentages 5<P<7 Percentages >7 11B 99 1 11C 100 11D 11E 98 11L 3 97 All DZ 0.5% 98% 1%

PRV Settings for Zone 1 District Peak Flow Average Flow Night Flow From (bars) To (bars) Flow (m³/d) BC&D 6.4 3.5 15,768 6.9 2.0 7,899 7.1 1,580 E2 7.0 6,875 7.5 0.5 3,438 7.7 688 E1 7.2 3.0 9,559 7.6 1.0 4,779 7.8 956 L 8.0 10,122 8.9 2.5 5,061 9.3 1,012 B2 4.5 4,665 5.2 1.5 1,780 5.9 356 C2 4.6 1,367 683 137

PIPES ESTIMATED QUANTITIES (ZONE 1) District Diameter Length (m) Main Line Zone 1 600 1430 E1 300 750 B2 200 500 Total   2,700

PRV ESTIMATED QUANTITIES (ZONE 1) District New BCD √ B2 C2 E1 E2 L Total 6

Zone 2 Hydraulic Model – Peak Demand

Zone 2 Hydraulic Model – Peak Demand Pressure District Percentages < 1 Percentage 1<P<5 Percentages 5<P<7 Percentages >7 A 100 F G H 13 83 I 79 21 J 57 34 9 K All DZ 1% 70% 24% 6%

Zone 2 Hydraulic Model – Avg Demand

Zone 2 Hydraulic Model – Avg Demand Pressure District Percentages < 1 Percentage 1<P<5 Percentages 5<P<7 Percentages >7 A 97 3 F 100 G 74 26 H 93 7 I 87 13 J 65 29 2 K All DZ 0% 75% 22% 1%

Zone 2 Hydraulic Model – Night Flow

Zone 2 Hydraulic Model – Night Flow Pressure District Percentages < 1 Percentage 1<P<5 Percentages 5<P<7 Percentages >7 A 93 7 F 100 G 78 22 H 37 57 I 4 33 63 J 1 71 20 8 K All DZ 3% 63% 20% 15%

PRV Settings for Zone 2 District Peak Flow Average Flow Night Flow From (bars) To (bars) Flow (m³/d) F 4.1 1.0 2,144 5.1 1,072 5.4 214 AG&F 4.0 2.5 9,477 5.0 2.0 4,739 5.3 948 H 5.8 3.5 14,488 7.3 3.0 7,244 7.8 1,449 K 875 4.9 437 5.2 87 J Inactive 7,866 7.6 3,979 8.2 833 I 4.2 7,935 4.5 3,968 794

PIPES ESTIMATED QUANTITIES (ZONE 1) District Diameter Length (m) H 400 1100 300 530 I 1540 Total   3,200

PRV ESTIMATED QUANTITIES (ZONE 1) District Replace New A,G √ F H I J  √ K Total  2 4

Percentages 5<P<7 District J District Percentages < 1 Percentage 1<P<5 Percentages 5<P<7 Percentages >7 J (ALL) 57 34 9 J1 & J2 81 16 3

District J