Corridor Studies, Tom Greco

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Measures CTP 2040 Policy Advisory Committee August 19, 2014.
Advertisements

Public Workshop Welcome -to the -. What is the ?
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
Freight in the Southeast Conference Bob Romig State Transportation Development Administrator Florida Department of Transportation February 9, 2011 Florida’s.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
Florida’s Future Transportation Corridors Florida’s Future Transportation Corridors Presented to: Florida Redevelopment Association Presented by: Bob Romig.
Subcommittee on Rail Transportation
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
o The Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT), in conjunction with the Wyoming Business Council, is developing a Statewide Rail Plan (SRP). o The.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan AASHTO Standing Committee on Rail 2010 Washington Meeting Freight in State Rail.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
1 June 11, 2015 Raleigh, NC. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVE To give an overview on the newly adopted Strategic Transportation Corridors. 2.
Engaging Freight and Supply Chain Representatives in Public Sector Projects.
Jennifer Murray Traffic Forecasting Section Chief, WisDOT Metropolitan Planning Organization Quarterly Meeting July 28 th, 2015.
1 Context Sensitive Design CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Howard R. Green Company.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
I-69 Corridor: A Citizens’ Report on Transportation Needs Judy Hawley Chair I-69 Corridor Advisory Committee.
Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative 2006.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
USA Parkway Project Welcome Public Information Meeting to the
Freight-21: A National Strategic Freight Mobility Program & Trust Fund Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
Our Mission... “To facilitate collaboration and partnerships through a comprehensive master plan which promotes economic growth, community development.
Addressing Freight in the Planning and Programming Process presented by Jim Brogan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July 11, 2001 FHWA Freight Planning Workshop.
GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 1 Goods Movement Collaborative and Goods Movement Plan Final Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission.
Freight Forum RTC Washoe March 31 st, The reliable, cost effective, and safe movement of goods and products across the State of Nevada and.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Town of Chapel Hill | 405 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. | Greenways Commission Presentation “Planning ahead for better days” October.
Rail Planning Efforts and Lessons Learned Nicole Katsikides Acting Director, Office of Freight & Multimodalism Maryland Department of Transportation Presentation.
Rice University – Baker Institute
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Office of Greenways & Trails
Office of Transportation Planning Modal Planning Update
Project Overview – Phase 1
REFLECTED IN JAMAICA’S ENERGY POLICY
Prepared by: Paritosh Kasotia, Iowa Energy Office, IEDA
Future Interstate 11 Kevin Verre
What is the Regional Transportation Plan?
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION & ECONOMIC EXPANSION
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
John Martin Reservoir Master Plan Revision
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Ohio Rail Development Commission November 15, 2017 Meeting
Texas FREIGHT AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE: FREIGHT MOBILITY & border master planS 1st Annual Sustainable Civil Infrastructure Management & Planning Conference.
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
VicRoads – Movement & Place
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
Engaging the Business Community in Economic Development Planning
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
What is an MPO Anyway? (and why should I care?)
Good afternoon. Thank you for attending the 2013 Arizona Transit Association conference. I hope that you found the sessions valuable and have enjoyed your.
MPO Board Presentation
Minnesota State Planning Conference September 28, 2011
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Bannock County Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

Corridor Studies, Tom Greco Session 3 - “Projects” BREATH– SMILE CORRIDOR Studies Only one of the many planning tools Planning is good A good planning quote Corridor Studies, Tom Greco

Planning “I get up every morning determined to both change the world and have one hell of a good time. Sometimes this makes planning my day difficult.” E.B. White (1899-1985) New yorker mag Sharlets web

Connecting Nevada NV Freight Program I-80, CA, NV, UT, WY I-11, NV & AZ Review 4 planning studies by NDOT Project website Thank my project managers And apologize for butchering them all up with my need to shorten each www.nevadadot.com Studies & Programs

Corridor Studies Why How When Who Commonality amongst corridor studies STUDIES ARE BUT ONE TOOL IN THE PLANNING STEPS PLANNING INCLUDES; MONITORING EXISTING CONDITIONS FORECASTING FUTURE NEEDS IDENTIFYING SYSTEM DEFECIENCIES AND DEVELOPING STRAGIES TO ADDRESS THOSE NEEDS. CORRIDOR STUDIES HELP WITH ALL 4 OF THESE STEPS HOW, WHEN AND WHO, LOOK FOR COMMONALITIES

STUDY PURPOSE AND GOALS August 2012 STUDY PURPOSE AND GOALS Engage stakeholders Establish policies and guidance Recognize and encourage multimodal opportunities Develop a long-range transportation plan Link NEPA and planning I-15 Las Vegas CONNECTING NV A 50 YEAR LONG RANGE PLAN MULTIMODAL SUSTAINING EXISTING CORRIDORS AND PRESERVING POTENTIAL CORRIDORS FOR NDOTS FUTURE Reno Stakeholder Meeting

August 2012 Project Process How to stay involved Current efforts build on Phase 1 (FEASIBILITY) Completed in 2009 Focus areas: Structure Process Policy Tools/resources Began with a large Data Collection Effort: reached out to a wide range of data sources; developed the transportation network and reviewed existing studies. We then had two stakeholder meetings (Las Vegas, Reno, Elko, Winnemucca, Ely and Tonopah) in between we developed the Travel Demand Model in which we requested and received the models from the large RTCs of the State-Las Vegas, Reno, Carson City Area, and Lake Tahoe.) We then weaved this data into our statewide transportation system. Process will continue beyond completion of Phase 2. How to stay involved Participate in planning Get updates from your city Check online at www.connectingnevada.org Sign up for emails

August 2012 Primary Needs Safety Economic Development Partnership Development Improved Access Environmental Issues US-50 Eureka From “What we heard” board Safety: Note that this is at the top of NDOT’s priorities. SAVE LIVES, REDUCE CRASHES 1) Signage/ITS; 2) Turn-out and passing lanes; 3) access to emergency services and communications, esp. in rural parts of state. Economic Development Support and encourage economic development and diversification Identify key sectors including renewable energy, mining, distribution and tourism that will be affected by transportation planning Coordinate long range transportation planning with Nevada economic development goals and objectives Partnership Development Take advantage of opportunities for shared/multiuse corridors (transportation, utilities, and communications) Proactive, inclusive process encouraging collaboration among agencies Public/private partnerships Improved Access Expansion of freight capacity (dedicated truck lanes, urban bypass routes) Planning for sustainability and quality of life (walkability, complete streets) Strengthen network of bike lanes and regional trails Environmental Issues Implications of NEPA on certain corridors/projects Integrate NEPA and transportation processes Understand constraints (water, T&E, conservation areas)

Connecting Nevada Update Process Connecting Nevada Plan Project Update Yearly Updates from sponsors, MPO’s and public works departments Overall Plan Update every 3 years Input from stakeholders/ outreach Verify tools, applicability, and inputs UPDATE YEARLY OVERHALL EVERY 3 YEARS Projects advance with additional studies to long range plan and beyond

Planning Tools Connecting Nevada Webmap NVTDM User Interface MANY TOOLS Connecting Nevada Webmap

Nevada Freight Program Freight in Nevada Nevada Freight Program NV FREIGHT PROGRAM NDOT will develop a State Freight Plan that provides renewed attention to safe and efficient freight transportation to promote economic growth. MAP-21 seeks to strengthen America’s transportation network, create jobs, and support economic growth. NDOT is empowered under MAP-21 to improve the condition and performance of the State’s freight network to achieve economic competitiveness and efficiency goals.

Freight Before NDOT develops a Freight Plan our first step will be NDOT’s Freight Assessment to assess current freight infrastructure and the industries that depend on each of the modes involved in freight transportation. Identify opportunities for improving the competitiveness of existing freight-dependent industries and the potential for growing new and emerging industries This project will provide a framework for future planning activities to move Nevada toward creating the first MAP-21-compliant State Freight Plan.

Create a Freight Advisory Committee Freight in Nevada Create a Freight Advisory Committee Map-21 requires a Freight Advisory Committee for the upcoming freight plan. Our Goal is to develop a group for Public Involvement and Stakeholder Outreach Plan that will be used for the future State Freight Plan which will be called the Freight Advisory Committee . We will work to broaden our in-house Freight Working Group, as needed, to include a comprehensive representation of individuals with broad interests in the State’s freight system. The Group can provide significant input and guidance to realize the project’s milestones, deliverables, and decision points during the study.

Freight in Nevada Other activities: A Freight Website Freight Plan

I-80 Corridor System Master Plan Corridor Stewardship Taking the Longview Communities are connected in multiple ways Economically Socially Culturally Scarce resources Declining fuel tax revenues Anti tax political environment Coordinated action to improve outcomes for all parties I80 CORRIDOR SYSTEM MASTER PLAN STAKEHOLDERS IN CA, NV, UT, AND WY

Corridor Stewardship Comprehensive and inclusive strategic dialogue required Identify existing proposed ideas that improve the corridor Improved insight to diverse interrelated issues throughout the I-80 corridor Generate a vision and plan for I-80 that enhance the future for corridor communities Establish a stakeholder supported system for strategically implementing the plan VISION AND PLAN FOR I-80 TO ENHANCE THE FUTURE FOR COMMUNITIES

Corridor Stewardship Dialogue Champions Washoe County Regional Transportation Commission worked with the Nevada Congressional delegation to advance corridor stewardship Nevada Department of Transportation partners to provide facilitative support Dialogue extended to include stakeholders in California, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming Consultant facilitation assistance secured WHO

Corridor Stewardship Engaging in the I-80 CSMP Dialogue Identify and organize topic specific Working Groups Energy Infrastructure Program/Project Delivery Freight & Logistics Public Engagement GIS Rural Planning MAP 21 Tourism Maintenance Safety Managed Lanes/Tolling Truck Parking Mobility Operations/ITS Wildlife Crossings TOPIC SPECIFIC WORKING GROUPS

I-11 & Intermountain West Corridor Study I-11 and Intermountain West Corridor Study: Corridor Operations Focus Group Meeting February 19, 2013 I-11 & Intermountain West Corridor Study Two-year study of I-11 and Intermountain West Corridor (began in July of 2012) in close partnership between ADOT & NDOT as sponsoring agencies and close collaboration with local MPOS (MAG & RTC of So. NV) and our Federal partners (FHWA & FRA). Two levels of investigations: Detailed corridor planning for the high-priority I-11 segment between (and including) the Las Vegas and Phoenix metropolitan areas, and High-level visioning approach to possible future connectivity segments from Las Vegas to Canada, and from Phoenix to Mexico. A “corridor” implies the use of different modes: Transportation, freight rail, water, power, telecommunication, and potentially passenger rail

I-11 and Intermountain West Corridor Study: Corridor Operations Focus Group Meeting Study Area February 19, 2013 Two-year study of I-11 and Intermountain West Corridor (began in July of 2012) in close partnership between ADOT & NDOT as sponsoring agencies and close collaboration with local MPOS (MAG & RTC of So. NV) and our Federal partners (FHWA & FRA). Two levels of investigations: Detailed corridor planning for the high-priority I-11 segment between (and including) the Las Vegas and Phoenix metropolitan areas, and High-level visioning approach to possible future connectivity segments from Las Vegas to Canada, and from Phoenix to Mexico. A “corridor” implies the use of different modes: Transportation, freight rail, water, power, telecommunication, and potentially passenger rail

I-11 and Intermountain West Corridor Study: Corridor Operations Focus Group Meeting Opportunities February 19, 2013 This corridor has the potential to become the new north-south transcontinental corridor through the Intermountain West. This would allow significant commerce, tourism and international trade opportunities across the western United States. There are a number of potential benefits, including: Connecting communities, major trade hubs, existing and future domestic and international deepwater ports, and intersecting transcontinental roadways and railroad corridors. Enhancing the economic vitality of communities connected and served by the corridor. Improving safety and travel time reliability for the movement of people and goods throughout the Intermountain West. Providing relief for congested Western United States north-south corridors, such as I-5 and I-15. Enhancing commercial capabilities by linking trade between Mexico and the Intermountain West. Serving the region’s businesses and helping to improve their global competitiveness. Last but not least, opportunities for alternative energy (solar development, wind farms, etc.)

I-11 and Intermountain West Corridor Study: Corridor Operations Focus Group Meeting Constraints February 19, 2013 - Crossing the Colorado River - Topography - Funding $ - Changing demographics - International border crossings - International facilities - Sensitive lands and wildlife migration paths

Business Case Scenarios I-11 and Intermountain West Corridor Study: Corridor Operations Focus Group Meeting Business Case Scenarios February 19, 2013 In addition to looking at the needs within the two states, we are looking at the business case from a larger economic perspective using the following scenarios to build a “Business Case” for the corridor. Scenario 1: Baseline (includes Panama Canal widening) Scenario 2: Pacific Rim trade expands much greater than forecasted West Coast ports reach capacity and Mexico adds port capacity Latin American trade remains constant Scenario 3: Latin American trade greatly expands Asia trade remains constant Scenario 4: Economic diversification plans for Arizona and Nevada are realized

Connecting Nevada Tim Muller NV Freight Program Bill Thompson I-80, CA, NV, UT, WY Coy Peacock I-11, NV & AZ Sondra Rosenberg IN SUMMARY NDOTS WEBSITE, DRILL TO STUDIES AND PROGRAMS, TO THE STUDY THANK THE PM AND THE CONSULTANT CONNECTING NV/ TIM MULLER AND HDR NV FREIGHT PROGRAM/ BILL THOMPSON AND JACOBS i-80/COY PEACOCK AND ATKINS i-11/SONDRA ROSENBERG AND CH2MHILL www.nevadadot.com Studies & Programs