Gregory W. Smith, Executive Director February 3, 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Retirement Systems and Their Contributions to Capital Markets … The 401(k) Experience in the U.S. John J. Palmer.
Advertisements

Overview of Act 120 of 2010 A Look at PSERS Retirement Benefit Changes Presentation at: PASBO Annual Conference March 16, 2011.
Ohio University January 27,  OPERS has a long history of proactively addressing issues as early as possible (examples include the Choices Health.
1 New Hampshire Retirement System Presentation to NHSAA September 25, 2008.
An Overview: Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana Prepared for the Advisory Group on Civil Service and Employee Benefits August 25, 2009.
Florida Government Finance Officers Association Webinar GASB’s New Pension Standards December 18, 2014.
Ron Snell National Conference of State Legislatures Pensions Issues and State Legislation in 2010 Denver University Strategic Issues Panel on the Future.
Public Employee Pension Plans Steven Kreisberg Steven Kreisberg Collective Bargaining Director Collective Bargaining DirectorAFSCME 1.
Copyright © 2012 GRS – All rights reserved. TMRS Rate Stabilization Part of the Toolkit October 8, 2012 Mark Randall.
VRS Overview Virginia Governmental Employees Association Robert P. Schultze, VRS Director September 13, 2014.
COH PENSION SYSTEMS STATUS UPDATE BUDGET & FISCAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE December 7, 2010 Craig Mason Chief Pension Executive.
TEACHERS’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OKLAHOMA Actuarial Valuation as of June 30, 2008 Presented by J. Christian Conradi and Mark Randall on October 22, 2008.
Virginia Government Finance Officers’ Association 2011 Spring Conference Virginia Retirement System Update for Local Government June 10, 2011 Barry C.
GASB 45 at SMCCCD District Committee on Budget and Finance October 3, 2006.
1 Statewide Retirement Systems Funding Updates Presentation to the Legislative Commission on Pensions & Retirement Dave Bergstrom, MSRS Executive Director.
Arizona State Retirement System Presentation to the Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona January 7, 2011.
TMRS for City Managers and City Officials 2007, Texas Municipal Retirement System Annual Training Seminar.
Collin County Retirement Plan Briefing September 7, 2010.
Funding Public Pensions Seventh Annual Employee Benefits Symposium John Marshall Law School April 20, 2009 by Jon Forman Alfred P. Murrah Professor of.
Covered Employer Training Program Module One Introduction to the Retirement Systems.
Actuarial Assumptions and Methods: What is Reasonable?
Covered Employer Training Program Introduction to the Retirement Systems FY 2016.
California State Employees Retiree Healthcare Benefits GASB 45 Projections December 13, 2007.
TRSL UPDATE Louisiana School Board Association 2016 Convention February 15, 2016.
Copyright © 2016 by The Segal Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability (UAAL) Presentation to the Joint Board of Supervisors.
Town of Plymouth, Massachusetts Results of the January 1, 2015 GASB 45 Valuation September 22, 2015 Linda L. Bournival, FSA Consulting Actuary KMS Actuaries,
20-1 An arrangement whereby an employer provides benefits (payments) to retired employees for services they provided in their working years. Pension Plan.
New Member Mid-CareerNearRetirementAfterRetirement Municipal Pension Plan Operations and Financial Review December 31, 2002.
Covered employer training program Introduction to the Retirement Systems FY 2017.
OPERS Pension Plan Changes and Health Care. Learning Objectives 2 OPERS History and Funding Challenges Pension Changes Health Care Changes Communicating.
THE BASICS OF THE GASB OPEB CALCULATION PRESENTED BY: MARK VAN BUSKIRK, PHD, ASA, MAAA HOLMES MURPHY AND ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 23,
GASB’s OPEB Changes - Will they impact public sector health care benefits? November 7, 2014 Eric Gary, FSA, FCA, MAAA Chief Health Actuary.
myRA® (my Retirement Account) A New Way to Start Saving for Retirement
Five-Year Financial Forecast August 2007
Closing the Pension Funding Gap
2016 NCPERS Public Retirement Systems Study Webinar
TRS Funding and Pension Benefits
For Tier One, Tier Two & OPSRP members
“The Future of Social Security”
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits
The Canadian Retirement Income System – a Society Perspective
Chief Deputy County Executive
PSRS/PEERS Update October 2017.
RTD/ATU 1001 Pension Plan February 9, 2016 Pension Fund Status
Director, Center for Workers’ Benefits and Capital Strategies, AFT
Pension Reform Presentation
Pre-Retirement Seminar March 23, 2018
GASB Implementation Report – Colorado PERA
Other Post Employment Benefits
Fiscal Sustainability Task Force
Personal Finance Retirement Planning – 1 Employer Plans
21 Taxes, Inflation, and Investment Strategy Bodie, Kane, and Marcus
California Employers’ Retiree Benefit Trust
Funding Pension Benefits for Georgia’s Educators
Pension Reform Presentation
TRS – PROVIDING FOR YOUR FUTURE
Communicating the Facts on the MERS Experience Study
Understanding your PERSI Base Plan
Senate E-12 Finance March 19, 2018
Presented by: Director of Finance, Joseph Lillio February 5, 2019
Actuarial Audit of the Employees’ Retirement Fund of the City of Fort Worth October 21, 2008.
Retirement 101 James Wilbanks, Ph.D. Retirement Administrator
Fiscal and Economic Issues Discussion Group
OHIO POLICE AND FIRE HEALTH CARE
CalPERS Update: A Solid Foundation for the Future
Pension Regulations Presented by David Maccoux, CPA, Shareholder
GASB Update Colorado pera
CalPERS Update & Discussion
Presentation transcript:

Gregory W. Smith, Executive Director February 3, 2016 Colorado PERA Update Gregory W. Smith, Executive Director February 3, 2016

Positively Impacting Colorado’s Economy As of September 2014 2

PERA Membership November 30, 2015

25-Year History of Assets and Distributions In billions Beginning Balance January 1, 1990 $9.4 Employer Contributions 14.7 Member and Other Contributions 13.4 Investment Income 50.2 Denver Public Schools’ Plan Transfer 2.8 Benefit and Refund Payments (45.8) Administrative Expenses (0.5) Ending Balance December 31, 2014 $44.2 25-Year History of Assets and Distributions – for Five Defined Benefit Trust Funds Grown the Fund from $9.4 billion in 1990 to $44.2 billion in 2014. For members – this means they can rely on receiving their monthly benefits that they earned and saved for. For taxpayers – this is an incredible return on investment and ensures retirees can remain self-sufficient for their lifetime. For our communities and businesses – this means economic certainty and stability – it’s a stable funding stream coming in to support schools, roads, and other services. It’s a stable business clientele which supports jobs. 4

PERA Benefit Distributions and Distributions Relative to Payroll by County Total Distributions = $3.5 Billion $5.2 billion economic output 29,000 jobs statewide $267 million state and local tax revenue $5.2 Billion in Economic Output Sustains over 29,000 jobs statewide The $267 million in state and local tax revenue means money for schools, road repairs, water sanitation and other services we depend upon. Annual benefit payments and percentage of payroll data from 2014 County Business Patterns and U.S. Census Bureau, calculation from Pacey & McNulty 5

Investment Asset Allocation November 30, 2015 Over $585 million invested in companies and properties domiciled in the State More than 55 percent of assets managed directly by PERA staff An additional $50 million is allocated to the Colorado Mile High Fund for private equity investments in the state

Investing for Long Term Annualized investment returns for periods ending December 31, 2014 7.5% PERA return for 2014 = 5.7 percent vs. Benchmark of 5.7 percent BNY/Mellon Medial Public Fund Universe = 6.2% for 2014 PERA annualized returns over last three years (2012 - 2014) = 11.3 percent vs. Benchmark of 11.7 percent BNY/Mellon Medial Public Fund Universe = 11.4% annualized over last three years PERA annualized returns over last five years (2010 - 2014) = 9.9 percent vs. Benchmark of 10.0 percent BNY/Mellon Medial Public Fund Universe = 9.5% annualized over last five years PERA annualized returns over last ten years (2005 - 2014) = 6.8 percent vs. Benchmark of 6.6 percent BNY/Mellon Medial Public Fund Universe = 6.4% annualized over last ten years PERA’s responsibility under the law is to provide a comprehensive package of retirement benefits for public employees. PERA is fulfilling the promise to pay lifetime benefits to its members. The investment program is a key ingredient in PERA’s funding program. Based on PERA’s asset allocation, and long-term projections of inflation and investment gains above inflation, PERA’s Board, investment staff, and independent consultants believe that PERA’s investment return will average 7.5 percent per year in the future. In 2013, PERA earned 15.6 percent. Over the past 30 years, the returns have averaged 9.4 percent. The PERA investment program is managed very carefully, with a lot of concern for diversification, risk management, and efficiency. The returns have compared well against other plans. For the 3-year period ending December 31, 2014, PERA earned an average annual return of 11.3 percent compared to 11.4 percent for the median public plan. The total expense of managing the PERA defined benefit plan, including both investment and administrative expenses, was about four-tenths of 1 percent of assets in 2014.   7

Supplemental Savings Opportunities with PERAPlus Allows participants opportunity to seek investment advice at no additional cost Received GFOA’s Award for Excellence in Government Finance Promotes the crucial concept of asset allocation in retirement investing Makes allocation decisions easier for participants Provides participants access to custom, easy-to-understand, and diversified PERAdvantage investment options Employers may elect to add Roth options Low fees maximize participant contributions 8

GASB Pension Standards GASB has issued two pension statements Statement No. 67, Financial Reporting for Pension Plans For financial periods beginning after June 15, 2013 PERA’s first GASB 67 CAFR was December 31, 2014 Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions For financial periods beginning after June 15, 2014 9

Five Things to Know About GASB Statement No. 68 New account standards impact accounting, not funding No change in employer funding obligation or contribution rate Adjusted pension reporting should not significantly impact credit ratings PERA has partnered with employers and auditors to implement the new requirements PERA is sustainable now and into the future, and the reforms from SB 10-001 are working to return PERA to full funded status More information, including videos, available at www.copera.org/employers/gasb-reporting-standards 10

Review of SB 14-214 Studies Plan Design Study Study compares cost and effectiveness of the design of the Colorado PERA Hybrid Defined Benefit Plan to alternative plan designs in the public and private sector The results show the reforms to the benefit provisions of Colorado PERA, contained in SB 1, created a plan design that “is more efficient and uses dollars more effectively than the other types of plans in use today.”1 The next most efficient retirement plan structure was 60 percent more costly 1 GRS Plan Design Study Report, June 2015, page 2. Alternative plan designs are 60 percent to 140 percent more expensive – to provide the same level of benefits as PERA Hybrid Plan

Review of SB 14-214 Studies Plan Design Study PERA provides better income replacement considering: All other plan designs in use All starting ages and career lengths More progress toward retirement security than any other plan design considering every career path

SB 1 Study Report Key Findings Item Message 1 PERA is sustainable into the foreseeable future 2 As of 2014, SB 1 reforms significantly reversed PERA’s predicted course from running out of money to projections of full funding in approximately 38 years 3 SB 1 reforms reduced benefits for all active and retired members; consequently PERA employers and taxpayers are saving money by providing a more affordable benefit 4 Over the past five years, SB 1 reforms saved PERA approximately $15 billion in unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) 5 Over the last five years, the reduction in the Annual Increase (AI) provisions had the most significant impact on the UAAL—accounting for 90 percent of the $15 billion in savings 6 Even recognizing the AI reforms, PERA retirees retained their purchasing power over the last five-year period. Main objectives [C.R.S. § 24-51-220] To report to the General Assembly regarding the economic impact of the 2010 legislative changes and the progress made toward eliminating the unfunded liabilities of each division of the association To be performed every five years First report was due to the General Assembly by January 1, 2016

SB 1 Study Report Key Findings The PERA membership embraced considerable sacrifice through benefit provision changes to ensure the plan’s sustainability, representing approximately 90 percent of the burden A typical retiree receiving a $3,000 monthly benefit as of January 1, 2010, will sacrifice the equivalent of about seven years of retirement payments over a 25-year retirement A typical new hire with a membership date on or after January 1, 2011, generally will work longer, pay more, and receive less over a shorter period of time in retirement than an individual with a prior membership date

Contact Us Web address www.copera.org Social media PERA on the Issues, www.peraontheissues.com The Dime, www.thedimecolorado.com Twitter, @ColoradoPERA and @thedimeCO Facebook, www.facebook.com/thedimecolorado Office locations 1301 Pennsylvania Street, Denver 1120 West 122nd Avenue, Westminster Phone number 1-800-759-PERA (7372) 15