Enterprise Architecture

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrated EA conference London March
Advertisements

EA Demonstration Study : Dissemination Forum – 8 June EAEA Framework Proposal Paolo Monaco EA Unit.
ARCHITECTURE FRAMEWORKS IN COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS SIMPLIFYING THE MYSTERY OF I.T. SYSTEMS IN SMALL AND LARGE ENTERPRISES JOHN HODGSON, I.T. ARCHITECT.
1 INCOSE Chesapeake Chapter Enterprise SE Panel Discussion L. Mark Walker/LMC 21 March 2007.
Applying the Human Views for MODAF to the conception of energy-saving work solutions Dr Anne Bruseberg Systems Engineering & Assessment Ltd, UK on behalf.
Connecting People With Information DoD Net-Centric Services Strategy Frank Petroski October 31, 2006.
Oncor’s EIM Program.
NATO Network Enabled Capabilities
Rational Worldwide Software Symposium
Preparing the Way for NATO Network Enabled Capability J. Troy Turner C4 Interoperability Standardization ACT C4I Division.
Enterprise Architecture
Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information TechnologyAPEX | 1 Copyright © 2009 Boeing. All rights reserved. Architecture Concept UG D- DOC UG D-
-Nikhil Bhatia 28 th October What is RUP? Central Elements of RUP Project Lifecycle Phases Six Engineering Disciplines Three Supporting Disciplines.
DoD Acquisition Domain (Sourcing) (DADS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) E-Business/SPS Joint Users’ Conference November 15-19, 2004 Houston, TX.
Architectural Framework
OOI CI LCA REVIEW August 2010 Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI Cyberinfrastructure Architecture Overview Michael Meisinger Life Cycle Architecture Review.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
Enterprise Systems Architectures EGN 5621 Enterprise Systems Collaboration (Professional MSEM) Fall, 2012.
Transboundary Trust Space February 16, 2012 Ensuring trust in information exchange – proposal and approaches from Russia and CIS-states (RCC states) National.
Resource Manager for Distance Education Systems Goran Kimovski Vladimir Trajkovik Danco Davcev Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science,
J. Scott Hawker p. 1Some material © Rational Corp. Rational Unified Process Overview See and use the RUP Browser on lab machines.
Overview of RUP Lunch and Learn. Overview of RUP © 2008 Cardinal Solutions Group 2 Welcome  Introductions  What is your experience with RUP  What is.
Information Architecture BOF: Report of the Fall 2003 Meeting October 28, 2003 Dan Crichton, NASA/JPL.
Organizing Programs, Business Units and other Service Systems Diamond of Organization Credit function The concept of Flow Project Explorer.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e As of: 3/1/2016 Air Force Weather Agency CEISC Committee Focus Shift - Proposed Modification to.
Enterprise Architecture Reference Framework Generalities
Enterprise Architectures. Core Concepts Key Learning Points: This chapter will help you to answer the following questions: What are the ADM phase names.
Basic Concepts Key Learning Points : The objectives of this chapter are as follows:  To provide an introduction to the basic Concepts of enterprise architectures,
IPDA Architecture Project International Planetary Data Alliance IPDA Architecture Project Report.
Enterprise Architectures Course Code : CPIS-352 King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah Saudi Arabia.
ESS Enterprise Architecture Reference Framework Jean-Marc Museux, Eurostat 2016 UNECE CSPA Workshop on CSPA Geneva
1 The XMSF Profile Overlay to the FEDEP Dr. Katherine L. Morse, SAIC Mr. Robert Lutz, JHU APL
Process 4 Hours.
What is Enterprise Architecture?
Core Services block.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Unified Architecture Framework NATO Architecture CaT Introduction
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7 Working Group 42 - Architecture Johan Bendz
Architectures in Support of Capability Development
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Overarching Architecture v2.5 Architecture Workshop 1 June 2006
Introduction to MODEM Building a Semantic Foundation for EA: Reengineering the MODAF™ Meta-Model Based on the IDEAS Foundation Model Lt Col Mikael Hagenbo,
NATO/EAPC UNCLASSIFIED
The ESS vision, ESSnets and SDMX
DATA VERTICAL Technical Exchange
US Kickoff brief to Frameworks Convergence Meeting
NDIA Architecture Analysis for System-of-System (SoS) Interoperability Assessment Karen L. Lauro, Ph.D Oct 21, 2003.
Agenda All-Monday 15 Sep 0800 Welcome - Opening remarks
Webinar Optimize Your Business Applications Strategy
Architecture Design Rules in LedsystT
Alternativ 1 – Core services
The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Introducing Statistical Standards -GAMSO
Enterprise Data Model Enterprise Architecture approach Insights on application for through-life collaboration 2018 – E. Jesson.
Rational Worldwide Software Symposium
XMSF and Command & Control - GIG, XBML/C4I Testbed, XDV, XMSF Profiles
Metadata in the modernization of statistical production at Statistics Canada Carmen Greenough June 2, 2014.
Rational Worldwide Software Symposium
Software engineering -1
System Modeling Assessment & Roadmap Joint OMG/INCOSE Working Group
Update from Sweden A new Joint CIO for Swedish Armed Forces (SwAF) assigned. His name is Commander Thomas Engevall. My new role is head of architecture.
Systems Engineering for Mission-Driven Modeling
International Defence Enterprise Architecture Specification (IDEAS)
Enterprise Architecture at Penn State
CORE Name: CORE® Description:
Rational Worldwide Software Symposium
US Kickoff brief to Frameworks Convergence Meeting
Valuing our place in the world
Requirements and Objectives for holistic PLM
IDEAS Group Model for Interoperability
Presentation transcript:

Enterprise Architecture SwAF Enterprise Architecture Swedish Defence Material Administration peder.Blomqvist@fmv.se FM A Architecture developing and implementation work

Presentation overview Short history of the architecture work SwAF EA programme 2005-2007

Short history (main objectives) 2000-2001 FMA Version 1.0 milestone (M3) 2002 Financed by LedsystT Phase 1, 1+ developing FMA version 2.0 milestone (M4, M5) 2003 Working with information and presentation material based on FMA version 2.0 M5, evaluate Test, adapt and implement FM A based concepts in LedsystT, Service concept, System concept, SitSyst concept, Design rule concept etc.. 2004 EU/NATO related work, evaluating EA initiatives, NATO-NAF-FM AR analysis, Design Partner EA support for adoption of architecture concepts and rules. 2005-01 FM A developing and implementation project established FMV/FM (2005-2007) FM A & FM AR version 3.0-5.0 M6-M11 FMA

The current FM A projects ordered by SwAF FM A Development and PARP adjustment 2005 2006 2007 328 743,11GBP 328 743,11GBP 328 743,11GBP FM A Implementation and PARP adjustment 2005 2006 2007 620 959,20 GBP 620 959,20 GBP 620 959,20 GBP PARP – Planing and Review Process (Nato)

Architecture implementation programme : FM A Implementation and PARP adjustment Implementation means establishing a framework of rules for architecture together with NATO/EAPC, practicable and introduce able in the organisation. Focus shall be on establishing, preparing, endorsement and management of framework, concept, principles and rules for overarching and generic architecture. PARP – Planing and Review Process (Nato) EAPC – Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council

Architecture development programme : FM A development and PARP adjustment The objective is to be on the frontline of the development, following initiatives taken by Network NEC and NCO. Focus shall be on developing strategies, concepts, methods and technical enablers for the Business. PARP – Planing and Review Process (Nato) NEC – Network Enabled Capabilities NCO – Net-Centric Operations

NBD SwAF EA & NBD ARCHITECTURE ”Structure” ”Development model” Usability Quality of Service Interoperability Efficiency ”Content”

Areas of interest SwAF AF Version 2.0 milestone 5, business and information views SwAF LedsystT experiences and results (FM LedsystT) Multinational Experiments (MNE) Multinational Interoperability Council (MIC) Multinational Information Sharing (MNIS) Net-Centric Operations (NCO) Global Information Grid (GIG) NATO Network Enabled Capabilities (NNEC) NATO Content Based Information Sharing (CBIS) Shared Tactical Ground Picture (STGP) Combined Federated Battle Laboratory Network (CFBL-net) Coalition Battle space Management Language (CBML)

NAF SVOPIT Operational View Systems View Technical View Not in NAF NOV-1 NOV-2 NSV-3 NSV-4 NSV-7 System view, SitSyst, System of System Service approach Service definitions Process NOV-5 NSV-5 Realization of Services Service use case Organisation NOV-4 Org-Roles Competence NOV-3 extended Competence Roles Information NOV-3 NOV-6 NSV-10 NSV-6 Information architecture Information exchange models Technical NSV-1a, 1b, 1c NSV –2 NTV-3 NTV-4 NTV-5 Life cycle and other NA-2 dictionary NSV-8 NSV-9 NTV-1 NTV-2

Comparison NC3A AEM – FMLS 2010 (RUP SE based) Architecture requirements Architectures Leads to AEM för Bi-SC AIS TA Idea requirements Architectures System Leads to FMLS 2010 - RUP SE

FMA Points Of Departure NATO NATO ISO/IEC 15288 System C3 System Life-Cycle Processes NATO C3 System Architecture Framework (NAF) SwAF A and SwAF AF - Objectives and Strategy FMA IEEE 1471 Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems SwAF Transformation - Objectives and Strategy OMG NATO C3 System Interoperability Directive (NID)

Architecture project deliverables Foundation work Architecture in practice Quick Wins- Capability driven Reports and white papers Scientific approach EA Services and capabilities Method approach Requirement process Capability models Modelling and simulation models Technical study reports Developing methods Information models

By structuring the SwAF requirements and needs, we can generate executable models Repository/textual Repository/formal Executable Documents The Vision is to be able to launch Simulation Based Acquisition (SBA)

Our intention is to store all the models and information about systems in a distributed repository environment. Rules and Principles, Methods Conceptual Effect Logical Objective Repository Service Achiev Identification References Management Phase & States Entity Description component Capab. System Physical

Some of the work includes a capability driven development approach in order to support the missions. The work is done by following risk and delivery driven iterative process approach Idea Phase Concept phase Specification phase The work is delayed by SwAF implementing a new organisation and the new Architecture manager wanted to analyse the programme 2005-06-30 -First version of NBD Developing method - First version of NBD capability driven and Model based developing approach - NATO information models - NAF adjustments part one 2005-12-31 Second version of NBD Developing method and capability driven and Model based developing approach NATO-adjustment part two Validation of models experimentation and Simulations of models 2006-06-30 Specification Production for implementation

Architecture ongoing activities at present time

Key points for the FM A work ahead ! Interoperability with US, UK and NATO (NAF v3/MODAF v2/NC3TA v8) FM AR version 2 as a NATO adjusted System description framework with extensions for architecture principles, design rules and patterns and lifecycle user support over time. FM A as the SwAF Architecture as a whole FM A principles in focus, System concept, Service concept, Lifecycle concept, Information concept, SitSyst concept. Technical design rules from LedsystT based on DRP:s and meta design rules from FM A, and the NBD system engineering developing method as the main deliverables from LedsystT. Collaborate NATO Systems Open Group (NOSWG) Collaborate NAF revision syndicate work in the SE area Collaborate NC3TA NNEC adjustments in syndicate work in the SE area Collaborate EU NEA (Network Enable Ability) Standards Collaborate With key partner, Architecture & Methods (UK, US & NATO)