Clinical Learning Environment Review GMEC January 8, 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aim: Advance the adoption of proven strategies to improve the reliability, safety and quality of care received by patients in Tennessee hospitals.
Advertisements

Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
The Challenge and Importance of Evaluating Residents and Fellows Debra Weinstein, M.D. PHS GME Coordinators Retreat March 25, 2011.
ACGME Next Accreditation System AAMC Contacts: Carol Aschenbrener, M.D., Sunny Yoder
OB Fellowship Program Requirement Overview Cynthia A. Wong, M.D. October 2011.
Standard 6: Clinical Handover
What it Means to be a Program Director Rita M Patel MD Professor of Anesthesiology & Vice-Chair, Education Department of Anesthesiology Associate Dean.
Association of Polysomnographic Technologists A non-profit, international professional membership society for Sleep Technologists.
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Next Accreditation System Safe Care for Current and Future Patients.
©2013 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Information current as of December 2, 2013 Recent Changes in ACGME Policy.
How to Prepare for a FTCA Site Visit Office Hours
Preliminary Feedback from ACGME CLER Site Visit August 19-21, 2014
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
By Lynne Meyer, PhD, MPH August What is CLER? CLER Site Visits are required by the ACGME every 18 months (similar style to JCAHO) Focuses on the.
Preparing for the Clinical Learning Environment Review
Annual Data Collected and Reviewed 1. Annual ADS Update - Streamlined ◦ Program Attrition ◦ Program Characteristics – Structure and Resources ◦ Scholarly.
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
The Otorhinolaryngology Hand-Off: Pursuing Excellence in Patient Care and Safety Mark A. Zacharek, MD, FACS, FAAOA Associate Professor Associate Residency.
Presented by Vicki M. Young, PhD October 19,
“SEE ONE, DO ONE, TEACH ONE” Supervision. Libby Zion Case Issue of work hours galvanized the press and the public and led to subsequent major reforms.
Welcome to…... The Single Accreditation System: AOA/ACGME Integration At Last! Judith Pauwels, MD AAFP Residency Program Solutions Consultant.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
Building Clinical Infrastructure and Expert Support Michael Steinberg, MD, FACR ULAAC Disparity Project Centinela/Freeman Health System.
Outcomes Methods RRC-Internal Medicine Educational Innovations Project: Clinical Quality Improvement and Patient Safety- Deliverables to Healthcare from.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
New Certification Requirements Michelle DiBaise, MPAS, PA-C, DFAAPA.
Information Call April 29, Today’s Call –BCPSQC –Aim & Objectives –Overview of Quality Academy –Curriculum –Supports and Benefits of Participation.
New Hanover Health Network Wilmington, North Carolina An Innovative Approach to Establishing Shared Governance Gabriele Pike, RN New Hanover Health Network.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
STACEY T. GRAY, MD PROGRAM DIRECTOR, HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Loudon County Schools External Review Exit Report February 19-21, 2013.
AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones are Coming: A Conversation with the Family Medicine Milestones Committee May 2013.
360 DEGREE FEEDBACK: A NOVEL FORMAT FOR A PROGRAM EVALUATION COMMITTEE IN AN ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE RESIDENCY PROGRAM Holly Caretta-Weyer, MD; Morgan.
CLER Pathways II January 28, 2016 PARTNERS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, INC. Presented by: Tori Hanlon, MS, CHCP GME Consultant.
ACGME CLER Visit USF and TGH September 22-24, 2014 Results.
Next Accreditation System (NAS) Primer Cuc Mai IM Residency Program Director Annual PD Workshop 2015.
AdvancED Accreditation External Review October 23-26, 2016
Trends at the ACGME (where we are going
PAFP Fall 2015 milestones workshop Pam Vnenchak
I’m CLER, You’re CLER, We’re All CLER
MUHC Innovation Model.
Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER):
The Clinical Learning Environment Review (CLER) Program
ACGME Institutional Accreditation
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Getting Started with Your Malnutrition Quality Improvement Project
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
UW DERMATOLOGY RESIDENT QI COURSE
Oversight of Underperforming Programs Through Special Reviews
Be Part of Governing your Community Hospital
February 21-22, 2018.
Be Part of Governing your Community Hospital
Fort Valley State University
Are you ready? Preparing for your ACGME Site visit
Module 3 Part 2 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Planning and Execution Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Quality.
Site Visits and Clerkship Coordinators – Defining a Best Practice
An Introduction to the ACGME
How to Survive a Self-Study!!
Presentation transcript:

Clinical Learning Environment Review GMEC January 8, 2013 CLER Clinical Learning Environment Review GMEC January 8, 2013 NAS as it applies to GME

Journal of Graduate Medical Education, September 2012 Goal of CLER “…to move from an initial focus on duty hours to a broader focus on the GME learning environment and how it can deliver high quality, safe patient care and physicians prepared to contribute to health system improvement over a lifetime of practice.” Journal of Graduate Medical Education, September 2012 In 2010, during the deliberation on the duty hours standards that were implemented as part of the 2011 Common Program Requirements, the Board of Directors of the ACGME authorized the development of a new program of periodic site visits to al sponsoring institutions focusing on their responsibility for the quality and safety of their learning and patient care environment. In response, the ACGME established the CLER program as a component of its Next Accreditation System

Six Areas of Integration of residents into institution’s Patient Safety programs, and demonstration of impact Integration of residents into institution’s Quality Improvement programs and efforts to reduce Disparities in Health Care Delivery, and demonstration of impact Establishment, implementation, and oversight of Supervision policies Oversight of Transitions in Care Oversight of Duty Hours Policy, Fatigue Management and Mitigation Education and monitoring of Professionalism Patient Safety- including opportunities for residents to report errors, unsafe conditions, and near misses, and to participate in inter-professional teams to promote and enhance safe care Quality Improvement- including how sponsoring institutions engage residents in the use of data to improve systems of care, reduce health care disparities and improve patient outcomes Transitions in Care- including how sponsoring institutions demonstrate effective standardization and oversight of transitions of care. Supervision- including how sponsoring institutions maintain and oversee policies of supervision concordant with ACGME requirements in an environment at both the institutional and program level that assures the absence of retribution Duty Hours Oversight, Fatigue Management, and Mitigation- including how sponsoring institutions (1) demonstrate effective and meaningful oversight of duty hours across all residency programs institution-wide; (2)design systems and provide settings that facilitate fatigue management and mitigation; and (3) provide effective education of faculty members and residents in sleep, fatigue recognition, and fatigue mitigation Professionalism-with regard to how sponsoring institutions educate and monitor professionalism of their residents and faculty.

The CLER Program CLER Site Visit CLER Evaluation Committee Support for Faculty and Leadership Development Site Visit Evaluation Committee Faculty Development The CLER program consists of 3 related activities: The CLER site visit The CLER Evaluation Committee Support for faculty and leadership development in the areas emphasized by the program

The CLER Site Visit Occurs on an ongoing basis every 18 months Initially will focus on the primary clinical teaching site in respect to the 6 focal areas The visit will include Discussion with executive leadership (CEO, DIO, Chair of GMEC, etc.) Walking tour of clinical areas Interaction with residents, faculty, nurses, and other health care professionals, and possibly patients 1) The CLER visits will occur approximately every 18 months and the institutional self studies will occur approximately every 10 years. Beta testing of the site visit protocol began in Fall of 2012 and will target nearly 400 institutions that have 2 or more residency or fellowship programs for baseline data collection Notification allows for three 3 weeks of prep time 3a)Provides the leadership of the sponsoring institution and executive leadership of the participating clinic site(s) with information that they can use to improve resident training and engagement with issues that are of national concern.

Flow of CLER Site Visit Initial Meeting: Leadership CPS/CQO Meeting Walk Around I Resident Meeting Walk Around II Core Faculty Meeting Walk Around III PD Meeting Exit Meeting: Leadership The purpose of the opening discussion with senior leadership is to inform the site visit team of relevant institutional policies and solicit baseline impressions of how the executive leadership perceives their performance across the 6 focus areas. At the exit meeting, the site visit team will provide senior leadership with some initial feedback on their findings. Between these two bookended meetings with leadership, the site visit team will meet with residents, GME faculty, and other key member of hospital leadership. The site visitors will also conduct walking tours of clinical areas such as: clinical inpatient and outpatient areas, operating room, ICU, ER departments using this opportunity to interact with residents , faculty, nurses, and other healthcare professionals including patients

5 Key Questions for Site Visit Who and what form is the hospital's infrastructure designed to address the six focus areas? How integrated is the GME leadership and faculty in the hospital’s efforts across the six focus areas? How engaged are the residents? How does the hospital determine the success of its efforts to integrate GME into the six focus areas? What are the areas the hospital has identified for improvement? 1)What organizational structures and administrative and clinical processes does the Sponsoring Institution and its major participating sites have in place to support GME learning in each of the 6 focus areas? 2)What is the role of GME leadership and faculty to support resident learning in each of the 6 areas? 3)How comprehensive is the involvement of residents and fellows in using these structures and processes to support their learning in each of the 6 areas? 4)From the perspective of the SI and its major participating sites, what are the measures of success in using this infrastructure and what was the level of success? 5)From the perspective of the SI and major participating sites, what are seen as opportunities for improving the quality and value of the current clinical learning environment infrastructure to support the 6 focus areas?

Evaluation Process Site visitor provides oral review and feedback prior to leaving site Site visitors complete draft written report, send draft to Sponsoring Institution for review and response CLER Evaluation Committee reviews site visit report and institutional response and develops recommendations CLER Evaluation Committee sends final report to sponsoring institution

The CLER Evaluation Committee Separate and distinct from ACGME Review Committees Set expectations for the 6 focus areas provide feedback to institutions Does not “issue accreditation” decisions Provides insight to other Review Committees about the level of GME engagement in the 6 focus areas across the institution For the first cycle of site visits (18 months), any information shared with the ACGME Review Committees and its review committees will be de-identified and/or reported in aggregate. Beginning with the second cycle, it is anticipated that the Evaluation Committee will begin to share relevant information from the CLER site visits with the Institutional Review Committee and other ACGME Review Committees to help inform the Next Accreditation System.

Faculty and Leadership Development The ACGME, in collaboration with other key organizations will seek to develop resources to educate and support faculty and executive leadership across the 6 focus areas AAMC, AHME, AIAMC, IHI, AHA, ACPE, ACMQ, OPDA and others

How Can We Prepare Now? Update copies of existing documents Identify participants in advance Educate participants on process Documents to update: organizational charts committee rosters organization and each program’s involvement in patient safety and quality initiatives policies on supervision, transitions in care, duty hours Participants: Identify alternates: DIO or designee to host the day Alternate resident escorts Educate participants: GMEC Resident Orientation Annual DIO Report to Medical Staff