Contents Cumulating of uncertainties across site calibration and power curve test Cumulating of uncertainties across wind speed bins Order of uncertainty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Uncertainties in Greenhouse Gas Inventories - Helsinki Sept 2005 Current IPCC Guidance Jim Penman Global Atmosphere Division UK Defra.
Advertisements

ACOUSTICS 9 MW. ACOUSTICS 144 MW.
Inflow angle and Energy Production Jørgen Højstrup Wind Solutions / Højstrup Wind Energy Power Curve Working Group, Louisville 6 October 2014.
Climate Change Committee WG1 QA/QC terminology and requirements from the IPCC Good Practice Guidance and the Guidelines for National Inventory Systems.
2 nd September 2014 REWS – using ANSYS CFX (CFD).
TOWARDS BANKABLE LIDARS - HOW STABLE ARE LIDARS OVER TIME?
Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement Keith D. McCroan MARLAP Uncertainty Workshop October 24, 2005 Stateline, Nevada.
Pooled Cross Sections and Panel Data II
Data Handling l Classification of Errors v Systematic v Random.
Parameterised turbine performance Power Curve Working Group – Glasgow, 16 December 2014 Stuart Baylis, Matthew Colls, Przemek Marek, Alex Head.
PCWG 9 th Meeting: 12 December Glasgow Proposed PCWG Data Sharing Initiative.
LiDAR analysis at a site with simple terrain Alex Clerc, Lee Cameron Tuesday 2 nd September
Generation & Propagation of Uncertainty Analysis P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department A Measure of Confidence Level in compound Experiments…..
Robert delMas (Univ. of Minnesota, USA) Ann Ooms (Kingston College, UK) Joan Garfield (Univ. of Minnesota, USA) Beth Chance (Cal Poly State Univ., USA)
CALIBRATION METHODS.
1 5. Combination of random variables Understand why we need bottoms-up approach for reliability analysis Learn how to compute the probability density function,
Physics 114: Lecture 15 Probability Tests & Linear Fitting Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department.
Wind Power Analysis Using Non-Standard Statistical Models
UNCERTAINTY The Classical Approach ALAN DERRICK SENIOR TECHNICAL MANAGER September
Extrapolation of Extreme Response for Wind Turbines based on Field Measurements Authors: Henrik Stensgaard Toft, Aalborg University, Denmark John Dalsgaard.
Probabilistic Forecasting. pdfs and Histograms Probability density functions (pdfs) are unobservable. They can only be estimated. They tell us the density,
CALIBRATION METHODS. For many analytical techniques, we need to evaluate the response of the unknown sample against the responses of a set of standards.
A New Theoretical Basis for Describing Low Turbulence Wind Turbine Performance Peter Stuart PCWG Meeting – 26 June 2015.
Validity and Item Analysis Chapter 4.  Concerns what instrument measures and how well it does so  Not something instrument “has” or “does not have”
Introduction We have seen how to Integrate in C1 In C2 we start to use Integration, to work out areas below curves It is increasingly important in this.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STUDENT ASSESSMENT JUNE 22, 2011 ORLANDO, FL.
PCWG 15 th Meeting December 2015 – Kings Langley PCWG 2016 Roadmap: Detailed Survey Results.
Upflow correction method EWEA Power Curve Working Group London, 2015 December.
PCWG-Share-01 Initial Results PCWG Meeting Kings Langley 9 th December 2015 Peter Stuart (RES), Lee Cameron (RES), Alex Clerc (RES) & Andy Clifton (NREL),
CHAPTER 4 ESTIMATES OF MEAN AND ERRORS. 4.1 METHOD OF LEAST SQUARES I n Chapter 2 we defined the mean  of the parent distribution and noted that the.
Uncertainty in Measurements There is uncertainty in every measurement, this uncertainty carries over through the calculations – Need a technique to account.
Understanding the Power Curve Interpolation Issue Power Curve Working Group, , Hamburg Axel Albers.
An evaluation of power performance for a small wind turbine in turbulent wind regimes Nicholas J. Ward Ph.D. Student, Energy Engineering Advisor: Dr. Susan.
IEC Ed 2 Collaboration IEA Task 32 Round Robin & PCWG Worked Examples NREL, Colorado, US 10 th August 2016 IEC Task 32: Luke J Simmons (DNV GL)
Estimating standard error using bootstrap
IEC FDIS 2016 Worked Example Industrial Project
IEC FDIS 2016 Consensus Analysis Project
Performance verification
IEC FDIS 2016 Worked Examples Ellie Weyer, AWS True Power
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update 13 December 2016
Upflow correction method
IEA Task 32 Power Performance Uncertainty Round Robin
Antecedents and Consequences of Unsolicited vs
Chapter 15 Panel Data Models.
Results from the Offshore Wind Accelerator (OWA) Power Curve Validation using LiDAR Project Lee Cameron, Alex Clerc, Peter Stuart, Simon Feeney, Ian Couchman.
Turbulence and Heterogeneous Wind
Power curve loss adjustments at AWS Truepower: a 2016 update
The mid-ordinate rule Aims:
MET3220C & MET6480 Computational Statistics
High Resolution Turbine-Specific Matrix
Regression Analysis Simple Linear Regression
Capital Budgeting Techniques FHU3213
Status of ILC cost uncertainty analysis
WIND TURBINE GENERATORS.
Higher-Order Linear Homogeneous & Autonomic Differential Equations with Constant Coefficients MAT 275.
Pipe Components, Piping System.
Week 5 Lecture 2 Chapter 8. Regression Wisdom.
5-beam Avent demonstrator
Where did we stop? The Bayes decision rule guarantees an optimal classification… … But it requires the knowledge of P(ci|x) (or p(x|ci) and P(ci)) We.
CH2. Cleaning and Transforming Data
X.1 Principal component analysis
Chapter 4, Regression Diagnostics Detection of Model Violation
Implicit Differentiation
EU Workshop on Uncertainties in GHG inventories
WG 1 - EC uncertainty analysis
Dr J Frost C2 Chapter 11 Integration Dr J Frost Last modified: 17th October 2013.
Eric TROMEUR, Sophie PUYGRENIER, Stéphane SANQUER

ATLAS full run-2 luminosity combination
Presentation transcript:

Worked Examples Feedback Power Curve Working Group, 2016-12-13, Glasgow Axel Albers

Contents Cumulating of uncertainties across site calibration and power curve test Cumulating of uncertainties across wind speed bins Order of uncertainty cumulating

Problem of Cumulating Uncertainties Across Site Calibration and Power Curve Test FDIS IEC 61400-12-1, Ed.2: Error in equation E.34: Correlation of uVHW,i and uVT,i neglected Correct: where mostly Some guidance given in Annexes C.6.2 and E.9 how to treat this: but inconsistent (only appropriate in E.9.2 for anemometer calibration)

Practical Approach Correlation of entire uncertainty of SC uVT,i and of wind speed measurement at PC uVHW,i is difficult to estimate: - Coming up with an entire uncertainty of SC is useless! Uncertainties are correlated across SC and PC, but uncertainties are not correlated across components Solution: Assess effective uncertainty of wind speed component by component for combined process SC and PC - take full uncertainty of wind speed measurement at turbine position into account as wind speed measure- ment at PC is corrected back to this measurement - take only uncorrelated part of uncertainties of reference position measurements of SC and PC into account as the correlated part basically cancels out in the combined process SC and PC (correlation of uncertainty of this measurement across SC and PC per component can be estimated)

Theoretical Background for Practical Approach Wind speed finally applied for PC analysis is approximately: Error propagation: with approximation: SC: site calibration PC: power curve test R: measurement at reference position T: measurement at turbine position

Why you should Use Equation E. 4 of FDIS IEC 61400-12-1, Ed Why you should Use Equation E.4 of FDIS IEC 61400-12-1, Ed.2 Instead of E.5 E.5 is only an approximation of E.4 and always leads to a higher uncertainty than E.4 E.4 is easy to apply (no reason to use E.5) E.4 provides uncertainties in AEP of each component, useful to identify uncertainty drivers and unimportant factors:

Uncertainty Cumulating in General Rules of error propagation: Uncertainties of power curve must be cumulated over: - measurement steps (SC, NTF, PC) - direction bins (site calibration) - measurement heights (REWS) - components In addition, uncertainty in AEP must be cumulated over: - wind speed bins Simplification needed! indices: g,h, number: O indices: f,e, number: P indices: c,d, number: Q indices: k,l, number: R indices: i,j, number: N Example: O=2, P=6, Q=5, R=20, N=40 gives 48000 sub components and 162729000 correlation coefficients

Uncertainty Cumulating Approach in IEC 61400-12-X Uncertainties in different steps O, different direction bins P and different heights Q are considered as additional components (not explicitly written in IEC 61400-12-X, but implicit assumption): Not yet simplification!

Uncertainty Cumulating Simplifications in IEC 61400-12-X (part 1) Uncertainty components fully uncorrelated across each other Only a few components are direction dependent (some SC components), these are considered either fully correlated across direction bins, or fully uncorrelated across direction bins. The correlation of these uncertainties across direction bins is independent on their correlation across wind speed bins and measurement heights. The cumulating of each of these components across direction bins provides a set of directional independent components (but some can be height dependent in case of evaluation of REWS). Not correct for same type of component across steps SC, NTF, PC! Special approaches for that in each standard!

Uncertainty Cumulating Simplifications in IEC 61400-12-X (part 2) Only a few components are height dependent (from REWS measurement). The correlation of these uncertainties across heights is independent on their correlation across wind direction bins and wind speed bins. The cumulating across heights provides a set of height (and direction) independent components. Aim of simplifications: Set of fully uncorrelated components! Category A uncertainties fully uncorrelated across wind speed bins, category B uncertainties fully correlated across wind speed bins:

Order of Uncertainty Cumulating Over steps SC, NTF, PC (e.g. same wind speed components) - must come first for assessing part cancellation Over directions (is basically independent from rest) Over heights (only in case of REWS) - must come after steps 1. and 2. because of rule given in Annex C.1 of FDIS IEC 61400-12-1, Ed.2 to assess separate site calibration for each height Over wind speeds (only for AEP) Over components

Thank you for your attention contact: a.albers@windguard.de