SCHOOL REPORT NIGHT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Advertisements

Bureau of Indian Education
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TITLE I PARENT MEETING PRESENTATION.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
HOOKS ISD TITLE I PARENT INVOLVEMENT Shiva McCraw Director of Curriculum & Special Programs.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Using Data to Develop Your School’s Single Plan Parent Institute December 7, 2005 Presenter: Reyna Corral, Categorical Coordinator.
School Improvement Plan
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
What you need to know About Title I Parent Meeting Presentation.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
What you need to know About Title I
Welcome to our SCHOOL’S Parents Are Connected (PAC) Meeting
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Title I Information.
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Title I Information.
AYP and Report Card Last updated: 08/20/09.
AYP and Report Card.
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
Sonoraville Elementary School
Title I Information.
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
Michigan School Report Card Update
What Parents Need to Know
3rd Grade Parent Information Night September 6, 2018
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
What Parents Need to Know
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Annual Title I Meeting & Curriculum Night
Title I Information.
AYP and Report Card.
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
Academic Achievement Report for Washington Manor Middle School
What Parents Need to Know
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

SCHOOL REPORT NIGHT

NCLB BACKGROUND Signed into law on January 8, 2002 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 Four Principles: Accountability for student achievement Increased flexibility and local control Greater role for parents in their child’s education Emphasis on scientifically based instruction

READING INSTRUCTION Reading Instruction Should: Incorporate instruction in phonics, decoding, comprehension and literature appreciation Provide for daily exposure to both fiction and nonfiction Include both vocabulary and comprehension instruction Provide frequent opportunities to write

NCLB TIMELINE 2003-2004 School Year: School Report Cards/Report Night (UMS in February) 2004-2005 School Year: First increase in intermediate progress goals Establishment of “What Works” data base for effective practices 2005-2006 School Year: Annual assessments in reading and math in grades 3-8 and at least once in grades 10-12

NCLB TIMELINE 2005-2006 School Year (continued): Completion of science standards by the states All teachers must meet “highly qualified” requirements of their state 2007-2008 School Year: Science assessments required at least once in each grade span: 3-5, 6-9 and 10-12

NCLB TIMELINE 2013-2014 School Year: Full achievement of state “proficient” level of academic achievement by all students by January 8, 2014, 12 years from the date of enactment of No Child Left Behind

A principal is now responsible for making sure that the instructional methodology, the instructional materials and the professional development activities employed in his or her school meets NCLB’s definition of scientifically based research in terms of the proven effectiveness.

ANNUAL MEASURABLE OBJECTIVE (AMO) The target schools are expected to meet each year. A school’s 2002 AMO serves as a starting point for Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). Schools are expected to be at an AMO of 500 by 2014. 2004 AMO’s English/Language Arts: 385 Math: 314

INDEXES FOR 2002 – 2004 What UMS actually achieved based on a two year average.

CALCULATING AN INDEX DRA # of Students Index Points Total Points Achieved with Honors 39 500 19,500 Achieved 28 14,000 Nearly Achieved 5 300 1,500 Below 1 100 Little or No Evidence 2 50 Non-participant TOTAL 75 --- 35,200

INDEX Based on 2004 UMS DRA results: 469 The ELA index is a two-year average. It includes NSRE results for UMS students. Analytical skills (Reading: analysis and interpretation and Writing: effectiveness) are weighted more than basic skills (DRA, Reading: basic understanding and Writing: conventions).

INTERMEDIATE GOALS The starting point is subtracted from 500 (the 2014 goal) and divided into equal three year expectations.

ELA INTERMEDIATE GOALS

MATH INTERMEDIATE GOALS

COHORTS All Students Free/Reduced Lunch or Milk With Disability Ethnic Group (African American, American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian, Hispanic or Latino, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander and White) English Language Learner

AVERAGE CLASS SIZE YEAR K Grade 1 Grade 2 2003-2004 18.3 20.5 2004-2005 16.8 19.3 19.5 2005-2006 15.7 21.0 State Average K-6: 16.6 National Average K-6: 18.6 NEA Recommends: 15 VT Quality Standards Recommends K-3: fewer than 20

ATTENDANCE Average Daily Attendance 2002-2003: 97% Rate: 234.7 out of 244 Average Daily Attendance 2003-2004: 96% Rate: 239.5 out of 249 Average Daily Attendance 2003-2004: 94% (as of January 31, 2005) Rate: 238.7 out of 253

STAFF EXPERIENCE TEACHERS Mean Years Teaching % w/Masters Degree % w/Level II License Classroom (11) 11.4 27 91 SPED (4) 14.8 100 Specialists (4) 23.8 75 Reading (2) 9.5 50 Guidance (1) 12.0

VT-DRA RESULTS

K-2 ENROLLMENT History and Projections

SCHOOL READINESS QUESTIONNAIRE SOCIAL AND EMOTIONAL the ability to play and meet other children use problem solving skills in social situations adapt to transitions and interact positively with adults separates easily from caregiver State Wide: 66.6% Colchester: 63.4%

SCHOOL READINESS QUESTIONNAIRE APPROACHES TO LEARNING the ability follow simple rules curiosity enthusiasm the ability to pay attention State Wide: 64.8% Colchester: 80.0%

SCHOOL READINESS QUESTIONNAIRE COMMUNICATION the ability to understand simple directions the ability to engage in conversation State Wide: 83.2% Colchester: 90.7%

SCHOOL READINESS QUESTIONNAIRE COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT/GENERAL KNOWLEDGE understanding the purpose of books recalling a sequence of events recognizing one’s name in print the ability to engage in imaginative play State Wide: 74.5% Colchester: 88.0%

SCHOOL READINESS QUESTIONNAIRE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING the ability to learn is rarely inhibited by illness the ability to learn is rarely inhibited by fatigue the ability to learn is rarely inhibited by hunger State Wide: 86.3% Colchester: 95.9%

NAEP – The Nation’s Report Card READING Connecticut 43% Massachusetts 40% New Hampshire 40% New Jersey 39% Colorado 37% Minnesota 37% VERMONT 37%

NAEP – The Nation’s Report Card MATH New Hampshire 43% Minnesota 42% VERMONT 42% Connecticut 41% Kansas 41% Massachusetts 41% North Carolina 41%

NAEP – The Nation’s Report Card A study of math scores on the 1992 NAEP found that the combination of four variables explained a whopping 89% of the difference in state scores.

NAEP – The Nation’s Report Card Four Variables: Number of parents living at home (71%) Parents’ educational background Type of community (e.g. “extreme rural” and “disadvantaged urban”) State poverty rate

VT QUALITY STANDARDS Schools with 10 or more full-time teachers require a full-time principal Grades K-3, when taken together, shall average fewer than 20 students per teacher (UMS average is 18.38) Schools with over 300 students shall have at least one full-time library-media specialist Twice weekly offerings in the arts and physical education

VT QUALITY STANDARDS There shall be no more than 500 students per school nurse An action plan shall be developed and implemented in each school. The plan shall be reviewed at least annually for its effectiveness. Schools with any grades K-8 shall provide at a minimum the equivalent of daily instruction in English/Language Arts, mathematics, science, history and social sciences