Department of Juvenile Justice

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

Creating vital partnerships between: Children Home School Community.
Mn Juvenile Justice & Mental Health Initiative Mental Health Screen Best Practices From: Blueprint for Change.
MISSION: To protect the public and reduce crime by and reduce crime by holding youth offenders accountable and holding youth offenders accountable and.
Virginia Juvenile Justice Association EFFECTIVE PAROLE TRANSITION & RE-ENTRY: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN & HOW November 2, 2006 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D.
Ex-Offenders and Housing
SLOWING THE GROWTH OF MEDICAID SPENDING IN VIRGINIA STRATEGIES DESIGNED TO CONTROL CHILDREN’S MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES EXPENDITURES.
Washtenaw County Office of The Sheriff Preliminary Proposal Jail Space Expansion.
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
Oregon Youth Authority “Hillcrest Youth Correctional Facility” Presented by Jason Bratsouleas April 25, 2005.
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community Section 6: Reentry.
DIVISION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE: WHAT WE DO AND HOW WE’RE DOING. March 10, 2014 Anchorage Youth Development Coalition JPO Lee Post.
California Bridges to Youth Self-Sufficiency An Overview.
C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition
Child and Adolescent Task Force Report Charlotte V. McNulty, Vice Chair Presentation to House Health, Welfare and Institutions General Assembly Building.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Offender Rehabilitation
The Iowa Delinquency Assessment Tool
Review of Judicial Branch Activities in “Raise the Age” Presented by the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division June 28, 2012.
Classification and Supervision in Probation and Parole
Youth Services Institute Continuum of Care
PREPARING YOUR CASE- MEETING & DEALING WITH PROBATION Rachele M. Guerrero SAFE Unit Supervisor Bexar County Juvenile Probation Department.
Community-Based Corrections for Juveniles
OREGON YOUTH AUTHORITY BUDGET DEVELOPMENT Oregon Youth Authority.
February 13, 2013 DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE ROADMAP TO SYSTEM EXCELLENCE PUTTING FLORIDA FAMILIES FIRST PRESENTED IN THE FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
LJIC Intercept Filter 2 October 1, 2007 Brenda Desmond Leslie Halligan Dr. Laura Wendlandt.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.
CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Fort Worth City Council May 12, 2009 Presenter: Randy Turner Chief Juvenile Probation Officer Tarrant County Juvenile Services Scott D. Moore Juvenile.
Office of Juvenile Justice The Office of Juvenile Justice protects the public by providing safe and effective individualized services to youth, who will.
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant Preliminary Findings Crown Ward Review 2011 February 28-March 10, 2011.
Chapter 16: Part 2. Procedures in Juvenile Court  Custody: Juveniles can be taken into custody for criminal and status offenses ○ Running away, truancy,
Transitioning Youth with Mental Health Needs Out of Detention: Strategies from Multnomah County David Koch Multnomah County Juvenile Services Division.
Community Treatment Solutions
Session Outcomes Overview of Project STAY OUT
Probation and Community Justice Program Overview
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
Introduction to the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ)
Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?
Summit County Probation Services
Criminal Law and Young People
Santa Clara County Probation Department
The Children’s Aid Society of Brant
Bergen County Division of Family Guidance
Transitional Housing for Offender Reentry
Confidential Records and Protected Disclosures
TRIAD Prevention Program
Unit 7 Connecting to Resources
4 Domains Child Welfare, Juvenile Education and Mental/Health
Offender Management Plan
The Effective Management of Juvenile Sex Offenders in the Community
As we reflect on policies and practices for expanding and improving early identification and early intervention for youth, I would like to tie together.
Behavioral Health Crisis Center “A back of the napkin view”
Residential Provider Oversight
Comprehensive Youth Services
Comprehensive Youth Services
California Bridges to Youth Self-Sufficiency
Presentation to the Senate Finance Committee August 18, 2010
California Bridges to Youth Self-Sufficiency
Marion County Re-Entry Coalition Presentation to CWF coaches
Regional Center of Orange County 2011 Performance Contract
Barriers for Youth with Disabilities in Juvenile
What works across Intercepts
Presentation transcript:

Department of Juvenile Justice Legislative Briefing House Justice Appropriations Subcommittee Residential Bed Management February 13, 2013

Bed Capacity Profile 2775 total bed capacity 95 programs sited at 53 different locations 7 programs (5.5%) are managed and operated by the Department 88 programs (94.5%) are contracted with private providers 1

Bed Capacity 906 Secure Residential beds 1869 Non-secure Residential beds

All programs provide Supervision and Behavioral Management Delinquency interventions (evidence based and promising practices) Screening and assessment services Medical Services Individual and Family Counseling Case management and transition planning Life and social skills Educational and vocational services Physical and recreational activities All residential commitment programs provide some type of specialized services, such as: Mental health services – which includes, Comprehensive and Intensive Substance abuse treatment – both Overlay and Integrated services Sex offender treatment Services for youth with developmental disabilities Vocational training and job placement Mother/infant program

Total Beds

Total Juvenile Commitments by Month

Reduction of Bed Capacity

Non-Secure 985.03-Florida Statutes 44) "Restrictiveness level" means the level of programming and security provided by programs Non-Secure b) Low-risk residential.--Youth assessed and classified for placement in programs at this commitment level represent a low risk to themselves and public safety but do require placement and services in residential settings. (c) Moderate-risk residential.--Facilities are either environmentally secure, staff secure, or are hardware-secure. Youth assessed and classified for placement in programs at this commitment level represent a moderate risk to public safety and require close supervision. 6

Secure (d) High-risk residential.--High-risk residential facilities are hardware-secure with perimeter fencing and locking doors. This level of commitment requires close supervision in a structured residential setting. (e) Maximum-risk residential.--Facilities are maximum-custody, hardware-secure with perimeter security fencing and locking doors. Youth committed to a maximum program require a high security residential setting. Programs at this level have a mandatory minimum stay of 18 months.

PLACEMENT PLANNING PROCESS Juvenile Probation Officer has many tools at their disposal to ensure that Commitment of a youth is in the best interest of the youth, family and community. These include: Completion of a Positive Achievement Change Tool (PACT) which helps to identify a youth’s strengths and weakness. Department policy requires that all appropriate community options are explored prior to a recommendation of commitment for all youth that score low or moderate risk to reoffend as assessed by the PACT. A Comprehensive Evaluation is conducted to identify treatment needs related to health, mental health, substance abuse, educational and vocational services.

A Multidisciplinary “commitment staffing” is held to determine the need for residential commitment as well as the restrictiveness level that may be needed to ensure public safety. Juvenile Probation Officer makes a recommendation to the court. A court may order commitment, and restrictiveness level, the selection of a specific program to place youth is made by the Department. All of the above information is utilized by a Commitment Manager who will then place youth on the most appropriate programs waiting list.