Evidence of Teaching Effectiveness

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing the Teaching Portfolio Carol Tresolini, Ph. D
Advertisements

PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Course Design: The Basics Monica A. Devanas, Ph.D. Director, Faculty Development and Assessment Programs Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Using the Seven Principles as a Framework for the Evaluation of Student Ratings and Teaching Karl Wirth and Adrienne Christiansen Serie Center for Scholarship.
Writing a Teaching Philosophy Statement Bill Burke Associate Director Center for the Enhancement of Learning and Teaching (CELT) Adjunct Faculty, Biology.
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
_\|/_ The Griffith PRO-Teaching Project Steve DrewChristopher Klopper Sharing Ideas to Develop Capabilities.
WELCOME TO THE FACULTY FORUM ON THE FACULTY EVALUATION SYSTEM Thank you for coming! November 2002.
Student Assessment CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING AND LEARNING IN THE COMPOSITION CLASSROOM Or Faculty Journeys Down the Rabbit Hole of SoTL Janice Kelly Instructor, ASU Department.
The Documentation of Faculty Teaching for The USU Regional Campuses April 16, 2013 Laurens H. Smith Jr, PhD. Executive Senior Vice Provost.
Peer Review of Classroom Teaching Anne E. Belcher, PhD, RN, AOCN, ANEF, FAAN Director, Office for Teaching Excellence Johns Hopkins University School of.
Scholarship of Teaching Johns Hopkins University Anne Belcher.
Tips on Preparing a Successful Educational Research Proposal Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, professor, BIT Nancy J. Stone, professor and chair, Psychological Science.
Ideas for Educational Components of CAREER Proposals Jeffrey Froyd Director of Faculty and Organizational Development Office.
Formative Assessment.
Developing & Using Portfolios Carlee K. Ranalli Coordinator of Assessment & Research W120B Smith Building
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Developing a Teaching Portfolio
Creating a Teaching Dossier Shea Wang, Ph.D Interim Faculty Evaluation Coordinator Oct. 21, 2013.
Student Learning Outcome Assessment: A Program’s Perspective Ling Hwey Jeng, Director School of Library and Information Studies June 27,
February 28, 2008The Teaching Center, Washington University The Teaching Citation Program & Creating a Teaching Portfolio Beth Fisher, Ph.D. Assistant.
Gerard L. Hanley, Ph.D. Executive Director, MERLOT Senior Director, California State University Using MERLOT To Support Retention, Tenure, and Promotion.
Faculty Performance Evaluation Reports Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System.
Evidence-Based Teaching, Fall 2011 Drs. Anne Belcher & Linda Adamson, Instructor s Session 9, Oct. 27, 2011 Evidence-Based Teaching, Fall 2011 Drs. Anne.
Developing a Teaching Portfolio for the Job Search Graduate Student Center University of Pennsylvania April 19, 2007 Kathryn K. McMahon Department of Romance.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
Gain an interdisciplinary perspective on how faculty from other units approach teaching and learning Expand knowledge of teaching strategies Acquire the.
IDEA Ad Hoc Committee Report Submitted by: Andreas Veh, Diane Erickson, Nelta Edwards, Kerri Morris UAA Faculty Senate, Dec. 7, 2007.
Mentoring and Teaching Pat Rogers, Associate Vice President: Teaching and Learning Wilfrid Laurier University Annual Academic Administrators Workshop Balsillie.
Handouts 1. Criteria for evaluation 2. Suggested Checklist 3. Personnel Action - Academic.
Formative Assessment. Fink’s Integrated Course Design.
Center for Faculty Excellence Workshops First impressions and the reference encounter (handout.
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #2: Writing SLOs Office of Academic Planning & Accountability Institutional Effectiveness Moderator: Dr. Cathy.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.
Copyright © Springer Publishing Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved. BECOMING A SCHOLAR IN NURSING EDUCATION – Chapter 16 –
Gsu Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning February 6, 2017
Learning Assessment Techniques
NEFLIN Assessment Basics for Library Instruction
The Assessment Process: A Continuous Cycle
Using Video-Annotated Peer Review to Support the Diffusion of
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #4: SLO Annual Report
M-LANG project  Ref. n NO01-KA Interactive Exchange Workshop on how to use response systems and ICT tools for creating interactive learning.
Bob Michael Associate Vice Chancellor, University System of Georgia
Using MERLOT To Support Retention, Tenure, and Promotion Reviews
Student Affairs Assessment
Effective Outcomes Assessment
of Teaching: Challenges
EDU 675 STUDY Lessons in Excellence-- edu675study.com.
EDU 675 STUDY Education for Service-- edu675study.com.
The Documentation of Teaching
Writing a Teaching Philosophy Statement
CEM (NZ) Centre for Evaluation & Monitoring College of Education
Jo Lynn Autry Digranes Coordinator for Assessment Updated 10/2017
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
School of Dentistry Education Research Fund (SDERF)
Scholarship of Teaching
Background on Provincial Report Cards
Bob Michael Associate Vice Chancellor, University System of Georgia
We VALUE HIPs Utilizing VALUE Rubrics and HIP QA Tools in Course Revitalization Presented by Melynda Conner, TBR OSS HIP Specialist 2019.
Consultations and Faculty Development
Starting From Scratch: Meaningful Integration of Information Literacy through Collaborative Course and Assignment Design Chris Sweet, Information Literacy.
QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY
Writing about Teaching for Tenure and Promotion
Selecting Evidence to Demonstrate Teaching Effectiveness
Non-Tenure Track Promotion Workshop
Tenure and Promotion: Crossing the Finish Line
Presentation transcript:

Evidence of Teaching Effectiveness The Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning Quick Notes presents Evidence of Teaching Effectiveness PROVOST’S EVIDENCE OF TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS INITIATIVE The Provost’s Evidence of Teaching Effectiveness Initiative at Oakland University has been created to explore and examine best research based practices for the evaluation of teaching (formative and summative). The goals of this long term project are to: Task Force 1 – Redesigning “Course Evaluation” Develop recommendations using research-based practices in designing and implementing “End-of-Course Student Feedback Surveys” (currently referred to most frequently as “Course Evaluations”) Task Force 2 – Designing Other Measurements for Teaching Effectiveness Develop recommendations for the use of multiple measures and triangulation of other evidence to teaching effectiveness for formative and summative evaluation. FORMATIVE EVALUATION OF TEACHING Used by faculty (and mentor/coach) to develop and enhance teaching effectiveness. Ongoing, continual Reflective practice SUMMATIVE EVALUATION OF TEACHING Used for decision-making purposes Tenure, promotion, merit, course assignments, continuation of employment for part-time RESEARCH ON EVALUATION OF TEACHING recommends that evidence of teaching effectiveness using should be triangulated using multiple measures. TEACHING PORTFOLIO END-OF-COURSE STUDENT FEEDBACK (ESF) SURVEYS Important feedback tool, however, students do not “evaluate” faculty; they provide information on their perceptions and satisfaction of courses and instruction These ratings should only be used as one of multiple measures of teaching effectiveness CONTEXTUAL NARRATIVE Accompanies ESF Surveys to address factors that can impact ratings (e.g. teaching methodology, gender, race, class size, controversial topics, and grading) Analyzes trends over time Teaching philosophy How learning outcomes have been developed and met Syllabi Assignments/Rubrics Course (re)design Program development Mentoring/Advising How teaching, research and service are integrated Letters of support and recommendations Awards FACULTY DEVELOPMENT Participation in workshops, seminars and conferences on teaching and learning Service involvement in teaching and learning SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING AND LEARNING Teaching and learning research Research on their own teaching practice Grants for teaching and learning Publications in teaching and learning Conference presentations in teaching and learning PEER PROTOCOL OBSERVATIONS Colleagues use protocol prompts Observation evaluates teaching practices grounded in research Judy Ableser, Director for the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning at Oakland University. Designed by Christina Moore

The Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning Quick Notes presents REFERENCES Arreola, R. (2007) Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A guide to designing, and Operating large-scale faculty evaluation Systems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers. Benton, S. & Cashin, W. (2012). Student ratings of teaching: A summary of research and literature IDEA Center. Manhattan, Kansas: The IDEA Center Berk, R. (2013). Top 10 flashpoints in student ratings and the evaluation of teaching. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC. Buller, J. (2012). Best practices in faculty evaluation: A practical guide for academic leaders. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers. Center for Research in Learning and Teaching. (2012). “Guidelines for evaluating teaching.” University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan: CRTL Centra, J. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers. Felder, R. & Brent, R. (2004) “How to evaluate teaching.” Chemical Engineering Education, 38(3), 200-202. Hativa, N. (2013). Student ratings of instruction: A practical approach to designing, operating and reporting. Seattle, WA: Oron Publications. Shevlin, M., Banyard, P., Davies, M., & Griffiths, M. (2000). The validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education: Love me, love my lectures? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 397-405. Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Moretlmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: The state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 598-642. Felder, R. & Brent, R. (2004). How to evaluate teaching. Chemical Engineering Education, 38(3): 200-202 Judy Ableser, Director for the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning at Oakland University. Designed by Christina Moore