COSEE Network Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A MERICAN A CCOUNTING A SSOCIATION Faculty Diversity and Initiatives Section Mission The primary forum for the enhancement and support of diversity in.
Advertisements

The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
Transforming Districts and Schools A framework to guide culturally responsive and inclusive changes Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Associate Dean University of.
CADRE I. DRK-12 Science Project Portfolio Descriptive Summary.
WHAT ARE THE GOALS? 1.Provide a model for establishing substantive, long-term partnerships between scientists and informal science education institutions.
Los Angeles Virtual Academy A learning portal to the future.
Special Populations Job Description
Three challenging realities: The critical role that the oceans play in people’s daily lives is not understood by the general population Oceanographic.
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Activities Reporting Frequency tabulations Types of activities Target audiences Participants Synthesis of descriptions Evaluation summaries.
S AN D IEGO AND I MPERIAL V ALLEY B ASIC S KILLS N ETWORK Dr. Lisa Brewster.
Diana Payne Sharon Walker Jim Lubner Sea Grant Education Network Lewis-Burke Associates December 3, 2007.
STEM EDUCATION TRANSFORMATION Barbara McAllister May 2013 INTEL’S MODEL FOR.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
COSEE: A National Success with a Regional Approach Craig Strang, Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California, Berkeley and COSEE California.
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
NSF INCLUDES Inclusion Across the Nation of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science AISL PI Meeting, March 1, 2016 Sylvia M.
Asking the Right K-12 Questions How to Answer Them to Evaluate K-12 STEM Outreach and Engagement Carlos Rodriguez, Ph.D., Principal Research Scientist.
1 Commonwealth of Massachusetts STEM Advisory Council Moving the STEM Agenda Forward CONFIDENTIAL DRAFT FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES ONLY STEM Advisory.
Community Resilience Jill J Artzberger, MPH 2011 Texas Emergency Management Conference Thursday, April 28, 2011.
District Engagement with the WIDA ELP Standards and ACCESS for ELLs®: Survey Findings and Professional Development Implications Naomi Lee, WIDA Research.
How To Build An Assessment And Impact Model Dr. Suzan Harkness
Chapter 4: Planning for Implementation and Continuous Improvement
Commonwealth of Massachusetts STEM Advisory Council
Stephanie L. Craig, M.Ed. University of Kansas
Kentucky college & career connection coalition
Vision Statement: Career and Technical Education in Arizona adds so much value to the lives of its citizens and the state’s economy that every parent and.
World’s Best Workforce (WBWF)
Background Non-Formal Education is recognized as an important sub-sector of the education system, providing learning opportunities to those who are not.
Youth CareerConnect Programs:
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
University Career Services Committee
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge
Oklahoma’s Workforce Information Programs Education Job Seekers Employees Employers Oklahoma’s Workforce.
Exploring How to Communicate Science More Broadly and Increase Your Impact: Gears Professional Development Workshops For Early Career Scientists C. Ferraro1,
CBP Strategic Communications Plan
Creating a College-Going Culture: How Are We Doing?
2016 CEEDAR Cross-State Convening
Supporting Student Success
Comprehensive Planning
13th Governing Council of SIAP 4-5th December,2017 Chiba, Japan
Strategic Planning Update
“CareerGuide for Schools”
ICUDDR and International Networking and Collaboration
Assessment and Evaluation Feedback to Teams
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Background to The Conference
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
Office of Secretary of Defense
PEMPAL – Facilitating Practical Solutions in PFM across ECA
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Internship Bill of Rights
What have we learned, where do we need to go?
Identifying Data Needs:
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
The Heart of Student Success
University-based K-12 teacher education
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
LOCAL TRANSITION APPLICATIONS
Integrating Research & Education
Dr. Phyllis Underwood REL Southeast
Strategic Human Resources Management Providing Accountability for Your Agency’s Mission in Indian Country SAIGE 2019.
2019 Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

COSEE Network Evaluation Report for the Network Meeting April 5 & 6 Washington DC

Recent Activities Contributed to special issue of Current Maintained activities database Constructed activities “gaps” request Reviewed evaluation reports for activities evaluation summaries Made first attempt at summarizing evaluation results and addressing missing information Created evaluators survey Worked on 2006 evaluation report

Activities Reporting Frequency tabulations Synthesis of descriptions Types of activities Target audiences Participants Synthesis of descriptions Evaluation summaries

Types of Activities (by Year) Activity Type Year 2003 2004 2005 2006 College Program 1 7 4 Conference 9 Evaluation K-12 Program 5 18 3 Meeting 2 13 12 11 Other Outreach 14 8 Workshop 33 51 43 Total 65 123 84

Conferences Target Audiences Formal Educators 3 Informal Educators 1 K-12 Students Scientists 5 Formal Educators, Informal Educators Formal Educators, Scientists 2 Formal educators, Informal educators, Scientists College students, informal educators, government agencies, Scientists General Public, Government Agencies, Industry Representatives, Scientists Government agencies, industry representatives, informal educators, Scientists Total Conferences 22

Meetings Target Audiences Formal Educators 1 Informal educators Other 3 Scientists 8 Formal educators, Scientists 16 Informal educators, Scientists Formal educators, Informal educators, Scientists 5 Formal educators, Government agencies, Informal educators Total Meetings 36

Outreach Target Audiences Formal Educators 1 General Public 11 K-12 Students 2 Scientists 3 General Public, Other Industry Representatives, Informal Educators, Scientists 5 Total Outreach Activities 23

Workshop Target Audiences Formal Educators 52 General Public 2 K-12 Students 1 Other Scientists 7 College students, Formal educators Formal Educators, General Public Formal Educators, Informal Educators 20 Formal Educators, K-12 Students Formal Educators, Scientists 21 Industry representatives, Scientists Informal educators, Scientists 3 College students, Formal educators, Scientists Formal educators, Informal educators, K-12 students Formal educators, Informal educators, Scientists 9 Formal educators, Informal educators, General public, Government agencies, Scientists Total Workshops 126

Target Audiences Summary College Students 15 Formal Educators 169 General Public 20 Government Agencies 6 Industry Representatives 9 Informal Educators 60 K-12 Students 28 Scientists 106 Other 7

Participation in Activities* Participants Scientists Informal Ed. Formal Ed. Students Frequency 45,065 1,410 3,652 20,762 *Frequencies are over-estimates of the numbers of participants because some individuals may participate in multiple activities

Goal #1: Increase public understanding of the ocean and its relevance to our social and economic well-being and the quality of our lives Two-Year Targets (2007 - 2008) Output Metrics Activity Progress Update Disseminate the Ocean Literacy framework among strategic audiences (e.g., politicians, educational policy makers, informal institutions, professional associations, teachers) Numbers and positions of individuals who have received a copy of the Ocean Sciences Literacy Framework No documentation received regarding those who have received the framework. Incorporate the Ocean Literacy Framework explicitly in COSEE programs Documentation of how the Framework is incorporated into COSEE programs No specific activity data on the Ocean Sciences Literacy Framework. Promote and monitor the inclusion of Ocean Literacy principles into K-12 state standards and assessments List of standards that include ocean science concepts and identification of the concepts that are included in these standards at the state level No activity data with a list of state standards. COSEE California has addressed science standards through 2 conference presentations, 5 workshops, and 1 K-12 programs. COSEE Florida's OSCI model addresses the state's science standards. COSEE Southeast reported 1 workshop that addressed the science standards. No specific activity data on national standards. Promote and monitor the inclusion of Ocean Literacy principles into national K-12 standards and assessments List of standards that include ocean science concepts and identification of the concepts that are included in these standards at the national level Create a set of coordinated Ocean Literacy messages for media outlets Documentation of the development of an official COSEE ocean literacy "message" No activities documenting an official ocean literacy message.

Goal #2: Better integrate the ocean research and science education enterprises Two-Year Targets (2007 - 2008) Output Metrics Activity Progress Update Understand the types of ocean science research and education collaborations by categorizing the types of collaborations List of types of ocean science and research collaborations Many of the activities address collaboration. There were 21 workshops specifically targeted at facilitating partnerships between ocean science researchers and formal educators. Additionally, 20 workshops targeted formal educators and informal educators. 9 activities targeted formal & informal educators and scientists. Many of these workshops involve the facilitation of scientists visiting the classrooms. Develop guidelines on effective practices for stimulating and sustaining scientist-educator collaborations List of guidelines on effective practices for stimulating and sustaining scientist-educator collaborations No activity data about guidelines. Many activities focus on the collaborations between ocean researchers and science educators. Determine COSEE program participants' perceptions of the quality and impact of educator-scientist collaborations Scores on a self assessment rubric for assessing the quality and impact of scientist-educator collaborations No scores on a self-assessment rubric. Some post-workshop data regarding program participants' perceptions of the quality and impact of educator-scientist collaborations. Data is overwhelmingly positive and participants primarily point to 'lack of time' as the barrier to more collaboration.

Goal #3: Increase and diversify the ocean workforce Two-Year Targets (2007 - 2008) Output Metrics Activity Progress Update Gather and synthesize the best information available to define and describe ocean-related jobs, their relationship to the ocean economy and present and future workforce trends (emphasis is placed on ocean science and technology occupations) Synthesis report of “current knowledge” on ocean-related occupations and trends COSEE California has developed the Ocean Careers website. Identify barriers to participation in ocean related occupations An ocean workforce workgroup report of evidence/identification of barriers to widespread participation in ocean science and technology education and careers No activity data identifying barriers to participation in ocean-related occupations. Gather and synthesize what information is known about how to increase and diversify the STEM workforce List of types of successful STEM and diversity programs and products; list of guidelines on effective practices for STEM/diversity products/programs; criteria for rating the quality and impact of STEM products/programs No data or synthesis about how to increase and diversify the STEM workforce.

Goal #4: Increase the access to, and participation in, ocean sciences and ocean sciences education by underrepresented/underserved populations Two-Year Targets (2007 - 2008) Output Metrics Activity Progress Update Develop partnerships with diversity-focused organizations that have a diverse membership and/or programs that reach a diverse audience Documentation of partnerships A few sites have documented partnerships with diversity-focused organizations. COSEE California, COSEE Southeast and COSEE Mid-Atlantic each have activities that specifically address the needs of underserved populations. Create a national COSEE committee on equitable access responsible for responding to questions and needs of COSEE sites and collaborating with other federal/state diversity initiatives Documentation of a national COSEE committee on equitable access established by 2007 (including members from diverse populations) and of recommendations/communication strategies disseminated to the COSEE network by 2008 No activity data on a national committee on equitable access or other federal/state diversity initiatives. Identify and disseminate generalizable recruitment/engagement strategies that target underserved and underrepresented populations and adapt/apply these based on local or regional opportunities (act nationally, work locally) Documentation of recruitment/engagement strategies and dissemination techniques We have no documentation of recruitment/engagement strategies. We have some data on underserved populations, but this information has not been reported in any standardized way. Of 258 activities, 118 of these, or approximately 46%, include diversity data of some kind. Some activities only include reports of ethnic diversity while others include gender diversity.

Goal #5: Improve the quality of K-12 ocean sciences teaching Two-Year Targets (2007 - 2008) Output Metrics Activity Progress Update Establish school district partnerships in each COSEE region Descriptions of district partnerships in each COSEE region California has established a partnership with the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), New England has developed a 7th grade oceanography program for the Plymouth School District. Engage ten higher education institutions in offering teaching pre-service (methods) courses focused on ocean/earth systems science Lists of institutions teaching these curricula, numbers of courses taught, and student enrollment data COSEE California's college course, Communicating Ocean Sciences has been presented at UC Berkeley, a short course was presented at California Science Teachers Association, and the Communicating Ocean Sciences course has also been implemented through COSEE Mid-Atlantic. California also worked on the COSMOS Program for high school students with San Diego State University and the Scripps Institute of Oceanography. COSEE Mid-Atlantic's "Taking the Pulse of Our Changing Planet," professional development program has been implemented at Hampton University. Florida has developed the Ocean Science Concept-Driven Interactive Model (OSCI).