The Data Piece: MULTIPLE PATHWAYS FOR ALL STUDENTS:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Successful Practices Network Career & Technical Education CTE Program Approval NYS Board of Regents Approved New Regulations for Career.
Advertisements

CTE Accountability and Planning Perkins Planning Meeting March 2013 MSDE/DCCR Accountability Team Pat Mikos, Program Manager George Comegys, CTE Specialist.
The work reported herein was supported under the National Research Center for Career and Technical Education, PR/Award (No. VO51A070003) as administered.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 2 (REVISED FEBRUARY 2012)
CTE Reporting CNYRIC Data Administrators Meeting 6/10/2010.
PEIMS is a Five Letter Word! Ruthie Pe’Vey Kneupper Educational Specialist, CTE Education Service Center, Region 20
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Introduction into CAPAAR AKA CPA 101.
Successful Practices Network New York City and Long Island Career Pathways Regional Conference June 9, 2011.
Session Overview Tennessee’s Current Postsecondary Landscape and Challenges Early Postsecondary Opportunities Reporting Processes for Specific.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Using CTE/Perkins Data to drive Program Improvement Program.
Career Clusters Debbie Grantham Instructional Management Coordinator
Successful Practices Network Staff and Curriculum Development Network June 2, 2011.
Successful Practices Network ACTEA Annual Leadership Conference March 24-25, 2011 Dr. Edward Shafer, Director Dr. Constance H. Spohn,
Data Warehouse New Data Administrator Training October 3, 2014 Data Coordinators: Larry Hunt & Angie Russell.
Successful Practices Network Career & Technical Education CTE Program Approval “Navigating the Process” Marsha Iverson NYC Field Associate.
2nd Annual Tech Valley Career Pathways Annual Conference January 27, 2011.
Perkins Update FY16 Federal Legislation Assistance Division Josh Miller Janet Cooper.
Kansas CTE Conference, Wichita, KS February 21, 2011 Mike Gross
Update on Data Reporting September Repository System Goal To consolidate the Department’s collection of individual student data in the repository.
Career Pathways and Programs of Study: A Federal Perspective Sharon Miller, Director Presentation at the NYS CTE TAC Annual Conference Holiday Inn, Albany,
Perkins Update July 9, 2015 Federal Legislation Assistance Division Josh Miller Janet Cooper.
Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.
Trends in CTE Trends in CTE Dr. Patrick Ainsworth Rob Atterbury November 19, 2010.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Data Collection and Reporting System.
CTE Pathway What we know at this time o an approved program is the major component of a CTE Pathway o 14 technical assessments have been approved for use.
Key Considerations in Collecting Student Follow-up Data NACTEI May 15, 2012 Portland, OR Promoting Rigorous Career and Technical Education Programs of.
An Introduction to The CTE Program Approval Process The New York State Education Department Career and Technical Education Team.
What is Perkins About and Why Should I Care? Student Services Endorsement Program November 3, 2015 Federal Legislation Assistance Division Janet Cooper.
Hofstra University CTE Conference November 13, “Multiple Pathways- A Closer Look” New York State Education Department.
CTE by the Numbers CTE data entry, verification and reporting Counselor & Administrator Conference Dover, Delaware January 26, 2016.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
Successful Practices Network
ACSA Conference 2016 Carolyn Zachry - CDE Carol Tomeo - SDCOE
Opening Frame The Issue Labels Traditional Cert Pathways
nNgo6n3F4 Sanatuliqsarvik
The CTE Program Approval Process: At-a-Glance
HS Accountability Reports
CTE PEIMS Coding Steve Neal Educational Consultant for CTE
Academic Achievement Sullivan West Central School
Graduation Pathways Eric Suhr Bureau Chief
Linking information for better lives in Connecticut
Intro of the presenters.
Data Collection and Reporting
High School Verification Reports
Developing an Innovative Approach to High School Academic Assessment New York Arts Pathway Assessment System Edward Roeber, Assessment Director, Michigan.
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Palm Springs Unified School District
2007 Article VII # ELFA 8 Education, Labor, and Family Assistance
Level 0 – NYSSIS – L2RPT – L0-Historical
Perkins IV Data and Accountability
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Career Pathways and Programs of Study: A Federal Perspective
2.01 WHAT is this CTE Stuff Anyway?
Let’s begin with Introductions
Karen Ann Breslow, MA, SELPA Program Coordinator
Northwest RESA Principals’ Council December 7, 2011
Secondary Perkins Data
Welcome Class of 2022 Parent Information Night
North Carolina Read to Achieve
Perkins IV Secondary Accountability
Standards-based Individualized Education Program: Module Eight: Additional Components Specific to Secondary IEPs SBIEP Module Eight: Additional Components.
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Data Security and Privacy
OCTAE presents: Up-to-Date with DATE
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) & CDOS PATHWAYS
CTE EMIS Conference October 19, 2018
Technical Assistance Webinar
CTE Program Approval Process
JESSICA SNYDER CURRICULUM STANDARDS AND STUDENT SUPPORT DIVISION
Career and College Promise Webinar November 25, 2014
Presentation transcript:

The Data Piece: MULTIPLE PATHWAYS FOR ALL STUDENTS: "Ensuring Career and College Readiness" The Data Piece: Strategies to Manage and Report CTE Data Jerry Pedinotti Center Data Specialist Rexford, NY jerry@spnet.us

CTE Technical Assistance Center (CTE TAC) Currently operating in Year 1 of our 2nd 5-year contract from NYSED Increases SED’s ability to serve, support and expand CTE at no cost to your district! Center- and field-based staff provide services throughout New York State.

By the end of this session … Why accurate CTE data is important Data that LEA’s are required to provide to SED Challenges to reporting accurate enrollment data Students Information Repository System (SIRS) General overview of codes and definitions Overview of the CTE TAC’s study of CTE data How the CTE TAC can assist you

CTE TAC Goal – Data Collection Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture of Career and Technical Education program performance. Conduct Impact Evaluations Provide SED with research on selected CTE topics Improve field-based data reporting to SIRS (Students Information Repository System)

Purpose To obtain a clear and accurate picture of how many students are currently participating in Career and Technical Education programs across the state. Need accurate enrollment data to make a case to Legislature for state funding. Perkins (Federal) funding impacted by enrollment in Approved Programs in BOCES and LEAs.

Challenges Historically, CTE data has been underreported Misunderstanding of SIRS coding at the local / district level Time Staffing Other priorities No immediate consequences for misreporting

SIRS – What is it? (SIRS) provides a single source of standardized individual student records for analysis at the local, regional, and State levels to improve student performance and to meet State and federal reporting and accountability requirements.

SIRS – What is it? SIRS has the ability to assist local and state agencies to track the 'Multiple Pathways' to graduation that CTE can provide through technical skills and work- based learning opportunities.

4 + 1 Option: Graduation Pathway Students may substitute one of the currently required Social Studies Regents exams (i.e., Global Studies or U.S. History) with a NYSED-Approved Assessment. Following the successful completion of a CTE Approved Program, a student would be eligible to take a Technical Skills Assessment (TSA). If the TSA is passed, it could be substituted for one of the Social Studies Regents.

Reporting Basics

Who Reports CTE Data in SIRS? All school districts with students in CTE courses must enter Program Service Records in SIRS. The school district accountable for the student is responsible for this reporting – even if the district’s students receive their CTE at another program service provider (e.g., BOCES).

How are CTE students identified? CTE students are those enrolled in any course within six content areas that can be a part of a CTE cluster: Agriculture Business & Marketing FACS Health Occupations Trade & Technical Education Technology Education

What is a CTE Program? CTE programs are comprised of at least three CTE courses or units of study that together form a cohesive concentration. CTE programs (whether in high schools or BOCES) provide academic and technical instruction in the six content areas.

What is a Cohesive Concentration? The new definition, “CTE programs are comprised of at least three CTE courses, or units of study that together form a cohesive concentration,” widens the number of students to be reported as CTE students (not just those in technical high schools or BOCES). Students are able, in essence, to build their own programs since a combination of CTE courses is permitted.

SIRS Coding Variables and Definitions

SIRS Coding Variables Student ID Service Provider Program Code Program Description Level of Intensity Start Date / End Date and End Reason Technical Skills Assessment (TSA) Score Grade

Student ID In the SIRS, each student record is uniquely identified with a 10-digit NYSSIS. Unique identifiers enhance student data reporting, improve data quality, and ensure that students can be tracked longitudinally as they transfer between LEAs.

Service Provider The agency that operates the CTE program is the service provider. It is the responsibility for all school districts to report CTE students served in their own high schools as well as reporting those sent to BOCES or other out-of-district providers.

CTE Program Code and Description A list of Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) codes has been selected by NYSED for reporting purposes. Local high schools can use one of the more broad- based CIP codes for the six major CTE content areas if students cross content areas, which is often the case.

The six content areas and their related CIP codes are: Agriculture (CIP 010599) Business and Marketing (CIP 529999) Family and Consumer Science (CIP 199999) Health Occupations (CIP 519999) Technology Education (CIP 151599) Trade and Technical (CIP 489999)

Level of Program Intensity for Local High School CTE Students ENROLLEE – has begun instruction in any CTE course. PARTICIPANT – has completed at least one CTE course (equivalent to one full-year course). CONCENTRATOR – has completed at least two sequenced CTE courses (equivalent to two full-year courses) out of a three-course cohesive concentration.

Level of Program Intensity for BOCES Students ENROLLEE – has begun instruction in any CTE course. PARTICIPANT – has successfully completed one-third of his or her program. (In the case of a BOCES two-year program, 27 weeks = 1/3) CONCENTRATOR – has successfully completed two-thirds of his or her program. (In the case of a BOCES two-year program, 54 weeks = 2/3)

Start Date / End Date and End Reason All students taking CTE have a CTE Program Service Record created in the school year they first start CTE. If the student is taking CTE over multiple years and has not completed or left the CTE program by the end of the first year, the student’s first year CTE Program Service Record is left without a “Reason for Ending” code. At the start of the following school year, each student has a new enrollment record created and that record has all the student’s Program Service Records for that year attached to it. If a student continues a CTE program that did not have a “Reason for Ending” code at the end of the preceding year, a new CTE program service record is created for year 2 to reflect the student’s continuation in that CTE program.

Technical Skills Assessment Score All CTE programs that have been approved (i.e., those that issue a Technical Endorsement on the high school diploma) offer a Technical Skills Assessment. To qualify for the Technical Endorsement, a student must successfully complete his or her CTE program and pass the three-part Technical Skills Assessment. A "P" for passed and an "F" for failed are to be used. A student must pass each of the three components of the technical skills assessment (i.e., written, student demonstration, and student project) to receive a “P.”

Managing CTE Data Elements

District Data Coordinator LEAs are responsible for maintaining and transmitting data elements in specified file formats to SIRS. As such, LEAs should employ District Data Coordinators whose responsibility is maintaining and transmitting the State’s required data elements.

District Data Coordinator Responsibilities Assemble and lead a team of district personnel. Define and document data collection standards. Review electronic management systems (SMS) for alignment to standards. Communicate data governance standards across departments. Develop a data verification protocol to ensure that data are accurate when they are transferred to the SIRS.

Study of CTE Data Management and Report Processes CTE TAC’s Study of CTE Data Management and Report Processes

Methodology Review of 2014-15 SIRS data in a cross-sectional representation of school districts. Conduct on-site visits to 20 districts throughout spring 2016. Identify common inaccuracies or deficiencies in the data collection, management, and reporting process and systematically isolate problem points before data is submitted to the state.

Districts Broadalbin-Perth CSD Greece CSD Utica City SD Palmyra-Macedon CSD Genesee Valley SD East-Syracuse Minoa SD Bethlehem CSD West Irondequoit SD New Rochelle CSD Sharon Springs SD Pulaski CSD Rochester City SD Binghamton City SD East Islip SD Saratoga Springs SD Syracuse City SD Plattsburgh City SD Farmingdale SD Fort Plain SD William Floyd SD

Common Reporting Challenges General Misunderstanding of SIRS Coding and Definitions Under-reported enrollment in high school CTE courses Over-reported CTE enrollment for single Service Provider Incorrect Service Provider coded CIP Code inaccuracies Incorrectly coded Intensity Levels Missing or invalid TSA scores

East Islip Summary (2014-15 SIRS)

East Islip Approved Programs

East Islip Data Excerpt (2014-15 SIRS)

East Islip Data Excerpt (2015-16 SIRS)

Impact of Review on 2015-16 SIRS 7 districts showed Much Improvement 7 districts showed Some Improvement 3 districts that had room to improve did not 2 districts that had a good handle on CTE reporting continued to do so 1 district had more deficiencies in 2015-16 than in the prior year

Recommendations (Small-scale) Blend SIRS review into field staff work with schools/districts. Central office to renew targeted site visit reviews to districts. BOCES / RIC to assist home high schools and districts to enter and verify SIRS data.

Recommendations (Big-scale) Data collection should not be limited to federal reporting needs but rather be blended with state reporting interests, such as completing a sequence and diploma endorsement. Link course enrollment to a centralized database managed by the state. The foundation exists with Data Warehouse, which could be used to aggregate students in CTE programs to be reported with the correct Intensity Levels. Mandate CTE reporting on student and school/district Report Cards.

End Thank you!