Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observational constraints and cosmological parameters
Advertisements

Dark energy workshop Copenhagen Aug Why the SNLS ? Questions to be addressed: -Can the intrinsic scatter in the Hubble diagram be further reduced?
Current Observational Constraints on Dark Energy Chicago, December 2001 Wendy Freedman Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena CA.
Observational Cosmology - a laboratory for fundamental physics MPI-K, Heidelberg Marek Kowalski.
Lensing of supernovae by galaxies and galaxy clusters Edvard Mörtsell, Stockholm Jakob Jönsson, Oxford Ariel Goobar; Teresa Riehm, Stockholm.
Observational Cosmology - a unique laboratory for fundamental physics Marek Kowalski Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn.
The National Science Foundation The Dark Energy Survey J. Frieman, M. Becker, J. Carlstrom, M. Gladders, W. Hu, R. Kessler, B. Koester, A. Kravtsov, for.
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Dark Matter in Galaxies using Einstein Rings Brendon J. Brewer School of Physics, The University of Sydney Supervisor: A/Prof Geraint F. Lewis.
Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology Lecture 12; February
Dark matter and black holes over cosmic time TOMMASO TREU.
Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology Lecture 13; February
Measuring the local Universe with peculiar velocities of Type Ia Supernovae MPI, August 2006 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics.
On the Distribution of Dark Matter in Clusters of Galaxies David J Sand Chandra Fellows Symposium 2005.
A Primer on SZ Surveys Gil Holder Institute for Advanced Study.
Dark Energy J. Frieman: Overview 30 A. Kim: Supernovae 30 B. Jain: Weak Lensing 30 M. White: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations 30 P5, SLAC, Feb. 22, 2008.
1 What is the Dark Energy? David Spergel Princeton University.
Progress on Cosmology Sarah Bridle University College London.
Impact of intrinsic alignments on cosmic shear Shearing by elliptical galaxy halos –SB + Filipe Abdalla astro-ph/ Intrinsic alignments and photozs.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Eric V. Linder (arXiv: v1). Contents I. Introduction II. Measuring time delay distances III. Optimizing Spectroscopic followup IV. Influence.
The future of strong gravitational lensing by galaxy clusters.
Complementarity of weak lensing with other probes Lindsay King, Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge University UK.
Cosmology with Cluster Surveys Subha Majumdar Canadian Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics Toronto along with Joe Mohr, Martin White & Jose Diego International.
Constraining Dark Energy with Cluster Strong Lensing Priyamvada Natarajan Yale University Collaborators: Eric Jullo (JPL), Jean-Paul Kneib (OAMP), Anson.
Cosmological studies with Weak Lensing Peak statistics Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
PREDRAG JOVANOVIĆ AND LUKA Č. POPOVIĆ ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORY BELGRADE, SERBIA Gravitational Lensing Statistics and Cosmology.
Constraining cluster abundances using weak lensing Håkon Dahle Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo.
The dark universe SFB – Transregio Bonn – Munich - Heidelberg.
Our Evolving Universe1 Vital Statistics of the Universe Today… l l Observational evidence for the Big Bang l l Vital statistics of the Universe   Hubble’s.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
Constraining Cosmology with Peculiar Velocities of Type Ia Supernovae Cosmo 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics & Astronomy,
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
How Standard are Cosmological Standard Candles? Mathew Smith and Collaborators (UCT, ICG, Munich, LCOGT and SDSS-II) SKA Bursary Conference 02/12/2010.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Observational constraints and cosmological parameters Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Non-parametric Reconstruction of the Hubble Expansion History with a Monotonicity Prior Hu Zhan 1 & Youhua Xu 1, 2 1 National Astronomical Observatories.
Expected progress and break-throughs in ground-based extragalactic astronomy Ralf Bender ESO Council FORS Deep Field.
Type Ia Supernovae and the Acceleration of the Universe: Results from the ESSENCE Supernova Survey Kevin Krisciunas, 5 April 2008.
Constraining Cosmography with Cluster Lenses Jean-Paul Kneib Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille.
Racah Institute of physics, Hebrew University (Jerusalem, Israel)
23 Sep The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun Peking Univ./ CPPM.
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun.
Elinor Medezinski Johns Hopkins University Galaxy Galaxy Lensing in CLASH clusters.
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES IGM, and Scaling Laws. Emission Processes of Clusters of Galaxies in the X-ray Band.
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
CTIO Camera Mtg - Dec ‘03 Studies of Dark Energy with Galaxy Clusters Joe Mohr Department of Astronomy Department of Physics University of Illinois.
Measuring Cosmic Shear Sarah Bridle Dept of Physics & Astronomy, UCL What is cosmic shear? Why is it hard to measure? The international competition Overview.
The Dark Side of the Universe L. Van Waerbeke APSNW may 15 th 2009.
Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett With: Matt Auger, Vasily Belokurov, Phil Marshall and Alex Hall ArXiv:
Bayesian analysis of joint strong gravitational lensing and dynamic galactic mass in SLACS: evidence of line-of-sight contamination Antonio C. C. Guimarães.
Cosmology with Strong Lensing.
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
The Dark Energy Survey Probe origin of Cosmic Acceleration:
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Cosmological Constraints from the Double-
Glenn van de Ven Institute for Advanced Study
Advisors: Tom Broadhurst, Yoel Rephaeli
Cosmology with Supernovae
Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA
Probing the Dark Universe with Weak Gravitational Lensing
Lecture 2 IGM, Scaling Laws Clusters Cosmology Connection
Some issues in cluster cosmology
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and Weak Lensing Cluster Surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Presentation transcript:

Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge Probing Dark Energy with Double Source-plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge With: Matt Auger and others

Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett

RARE Double source plane strong lensing Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Double source plane strong lensing A gravitational lens system with two background sources, each at a different redshift. RARE

Few Probes Precise measurements Systematics important Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Few Probes Precise measurements Systematics important Mantz et al. 2014

Uncertainty in the mass model makes cosmography hard Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Uncertainty in the mass model makes cosmography hard Hubble constant + can add a term for spatial curvature Dark Energy Equation of State Matter Density

Approximately the ratio of Einstein radii Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett The observable: Lens Strength Ratio Approximately the ratio of Einstein radii

The observable: Lens Strength Ratio Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett The observable: Lens Strength Ratio

No dependence on the Hubble constant! Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett The observable: Lens Strength Ratio No dependence on the Hubble constant!

The observable: Lens Strength Ratio Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett The observable: Lens Strength Ratio

The observable: Lens Strength Ratio Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett The observable: Lens Strength Ratio

The observable: Lens Strength Ratio Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses The observable: Lens Strength Ratio Makes no assumptions about the lens mass distribution or source positions

Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett What do we need to do? ?

ρ∝ r ρ∝ r MASS LIGHT -η-1 -2 Lens modelling shear Sersic Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Lens modelling shear -η-1 -2 ρ∝ r ρ∝ r ~ MASS LIGHT Sersic Regularized, Pixellated Sources

Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Lens modelling ( ) S1 M =

Modelling J0946 Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Modelling J0946

Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Modelling J0946 σ=97±7 km/s 1.402 1.392 0.2 -1 -1 0.1 1.44 1.4 -1 1.36 -1 0.95 1 1.05 1.394 1.4 0.1 0.2 Powerlaw slope,

Second Source Redshift Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Second Source Redshift

Constraining Cosmology. Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Constraining Cosmology.

Constraining Cosmology. Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Constraining Cosmology.

Constraining Cosmology. Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Constraining Cosmology.

Constraining Cosmology. Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Constraining Cosmology.

Constraining Cosmology. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Constraining Cosmology.

Constraining Cosmology. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Constraining Cosmology. J0946 + WMAP prior:

Constraining Cosmology. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Constraining Cosmology. J0946 + WMAP prior (2013, 68% CLs)

Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett The Future The Future

Expect at least hundreds! (maybe several hundreds) Euclid Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Euclid Expect at least hundreds! (maybe several hundreds) ~105 galaxy scale strong lenses (based on COSMOS ) 1 in 40-80 galaxy scale lenses will be doubles (Gavazzi+ 2008)

Euclid Black: 6 lenses, Ωk = 0 FoM = 14.2 Red: 100 lenses, Ωk ≠ 0 Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Euclid Black: 6 lenses, Ωk = 0 FoM = 14.2 Red: 100 lenses, Ωk ≠ 0 FoM = 38 σ(Ωk) = 0.005 Collett+ in prep. (includes Planck prior)

Euclid Black: 6 lenses, Ωk = 0 FoM = 14.2 Red: 100 lenses, Ωk ≠ 0 Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Euclid Black: 6 lenses, Ωk = 0 FoM = 14.2 Red: 100 lenses, Ωk ≠ 0 FoM = 38 σ(Ωk) = 0.005 Collett+ in prep. (includes Planck prior)

Summary Independent systematic errors Independent of Hubble constant Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Summary Independent systematic errors Independent of Hubble constant DSPLs will be competitive and complementary cosmological probes in the Euclid/LSST/SKA era

Source flux only in masked region Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Idealizations Pre-subtract galaxy Source flux only in masked region Deterministic location of first source mass Curvature regularized sources Simple Mass models No line of sight lensing

Finding more systems Piggy-back on deep, large area surveys Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Finding more systems Piggy-back on deep, large area surveys Target known lenses Target the most massive galaxies

Exotic lenses with Euclid/LSST Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Exotic lenses with Euclid/LSST ~ 40 lensed type Ia Sne ~ 30 DSPLs where one is an AGN ~ Triple source plane lenses? ~ Double time-delay systems? *These numbers have big error-bars!

Einstein Dartboards Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Einstein Dartboards

Systematics Mass between the two rings Mass of the intermediate source Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Systematics Mass between the two rings Mass of the intermediate source Mass along the line of sight

Perturbations by the intermediate source Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Perturbations by the intermediate source If completely neglected: LMC: ~1% systematic error on η MW: ~10% systematic error on η Effect is detectable: include in the lens model. (Sonnenfeld+ 2012, Fixed cosmology, photometric zs2)

Strong constraints on the mass profile γTOT = 1.98 ± 0.02 ± 0.01 OR Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Profile of the Lens Strong constraints on the mass profile γTOT = 1.98 ± 0.02 ± 0.01 OR γDM = 1.7 ± 0.2 Using dynamics and both Einstein radii (Sonnenfeld+ 2012)

Lens modelling Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Lens modelling

Lens modelling Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Lens modelling

Lens modelling Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Lens modelling

Lens modelling Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Lens modelling

Lens modelling Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Lens modelling

Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Lens modelling ( ) S1 M =

Intermediate source: θE=0.16”±0.05 σv≈100 kms-1 Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Intermediate source: θE=0.16”±0.05 σv≈100 kms-1 NB// Parametric source light

Intermediate source: θE=0.16”±0.05 σv≈100 kms-1 Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Intermediate source: θE=0.16”±0.05 σv≈100 kms-1 NB// Parametric source light

What about the assumption of flatness? Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Thomas Collett 45 45 45 What about the assumption of flatness? Ωk ≠ 0 Ωk ≡ 0

What if we can't measure the ratio of Einstein radii to 1%? Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett What if we can't measure the ratio of Einstein radii to 1%? 1. Compound lensing – the intermediate source has mass 2. The lens is an astrophysical object 3. Line of sight lensing may be significant

Cosmology with a population of systems. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Cosmology with a population of systems. SLACS: 1.1mm, S > 1 mJy → ~1.5 double source plane systems (1.5 in 78) 1.1mm, S > 0.3 mJy → ~3 double source plane systems (3 in 78) But can be more efficient if you focus only on the most massive lenses.

Constraints with 6 systems. Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Thomas Collett Constraints with 6 systems. Pick the set of systems that provided the median constraints on w. WMAP+6 systems is ~2.5 times better than WMAP+1. WMAP+ 1 system wDE = −0.99 ± 0.27 6 systems wDE = −1.01 ± 0.11 WMAP+BAO+Time Delay+ 6 systems wDE = −1.04 ± 0.09

Planck+6 Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett 49 49 49 Planck+6

ρ=ρ0r-γ' Probing the mass profile of galaxies Probing Cosmological Parameters with Strong Lenses Cosmology with Strong Lensing. Thomas Collett 50 Probing the mass profile of galaxies Combine Einstein Radius with stellar dynamics Fit a power-law: ρ=ρ0r-γ' Lenses are approximately isothermal (γ'=2). (Koopmans+ 2006) (Auger+ 2010) γ' = 2.078 ± 0.027 with an intrinsic scatter of 0.16 ± 0.02