Toledo Public Schools Performance Report

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hickman Mills C-1 Parent University: AYP, APR, Accreditation….what does it all mean? Presented by: Casey Klapmeyer.
Advertisements

PVAAS (The Pennsylvania Value Added Assessment System )
The TI-30X IIS I hope this slide show will help you to feel more comfortable with the calculator and how it might be used in the classroom to enhance learning.
North Santiam School District State Report Cards
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
1 Union County School District Instructional Update 10 December 2007 Dr. David Eubanks Superintendent.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Enquiring mines wanna no.... Who is it? Coleman Report “[S]chools bring little influence to bear upon a child’s achievement that is independent of.
Using School Climate Surveys to Categorize Schools and Examine Relationships with School Achievement Christine DiStefano, Diane M. Monrad, R.J. May, Patricia.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Closing the GAP “No Child Left Behind” (ESEA) Who’s To Blame The college professor said, “Such rawness in a student is a shame. Lack of preparation in.
FOR DELAWARE’S STUDENTS A NEW STANDARD. The test has changed Delaware students are now taking DCAS – the Delaware Comprehensive Assessment System. This.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
2009 ABCs/AYP Results Accountability Services August 11, 2009.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
DLT September 28, State Indicators and Rating for OFCS (have) Key Factors and Points to Keep in Mind (have) This power point presentation (will.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
WBCSD District Strategic Goals Update August 10, 2015.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
MATRIX OF ACHIEVEMENT AND PROGRESS (MAAP) A New Interactive Data Tool for Ohio Districts.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind Education Week
Charles R. Drew Academy Aldine Independent School District 1910 W. Little York Rd. Houston, Texas “Academic Achievement and Growth, End of Story”
1 Getting Up to Speed on Value-Added - An Accountability Perspective Presentation by the Ohio Department of Education.
Completed forms may be placed in the box at the back of the room or mailed to C/SAC, Office of Staff Development. Questions? See Dixie at the registration.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
California’s New LCFF Accountability Rubrics and School DAshboard
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Teacher SLTs
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Lawrence W. Sherman and Richard Hofmann Miami University Oxford, Ohio
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Teacher SLTs
Toledo Public Schools.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
TESTING: How We Measure Academic Achievement
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
Gifted Data Reporting Oct.2017
Teacher SLTs
Teacher SLTs
AYP and Report Card.
Education and Accountability
Meeting the challenge Every Classroom Every Student Every Day
Teacher SLTs
Chief Tarhe Elementary Board Presentation Tuesday, May 24, 2012
English Learner Accountability Component
Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Presentation transcript:

Toledo Public Schools 2008 - 2009 Performance Report

Toledo Public Schools Achieves Continuous Improvement TPS remains in Continuous Improvement in 2008-2009 Continuous Improvement 50%-74.9% of Indicators or Performance Index of 80-89* or Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) or Value Added Growth Academic Watch 31%-49.9% of Indicators or Performance Index of 70-79* Academic Emergency 0%-30.9% of Indicators and Performance Index 0-69*

TPS District Ratings Academic Watch Continuous Improvement 06-07 07-08 08-09 5 Indicators 6 Indicators PI 79.1 PI 80.1 PI 81.0 Academic Watch Continuous Improvement

Indicators Achieved on Local Report Card 2008-2009 OAT Writing (Grade 4) 75.4% OGT Reading (Grade 10) 77.9% OGT Writing (Grade 10) 88.7% OGT Reading (Grade 11) 87.5%  OGT Writing (Grade 11) 88.6%  Attendance 94.9%

Additional Highlights

20 Schools Reach AYP Beverly Burroughs BTI Crossgates Edgewater Elmhurst Glendale-Feilbach Grove Patterson Harvard Larchmont Lincoln McKinley Old Orchard Old West End Ottawa River Raymer Start Stewart Toledo Early College High School Toledo Technology Academy

38 Schools Attain Continuous Improvement or Higher Excellent Elmhurst Harvard Start TECHS TTA Effective Continuous Improvement Arlington Beverly Edgewater Grove Patterson Navarre Oakdale OWE Academy Ottawa River Waite Birmingham Bowsher Burroughs BTI Byrnedale Chase Crossgates Garfield Glendale-Feilbach Hawkins Humanities Keyser Larchmont Lincoln Longfellow McKinley Old Orchard Raymer Reynolds Rogers SMART Stewart Walbridge Whittier

5 Schools Receive Excellent Rating Elmhurst 94.2% 4th grade Writing Met AYP Performance Index = 99.1 Met 8 out of 10 Indicators Harvard 97.5% 3rd grade Math Performance Index = 101.1 Met 10 out of 12 Indicators Start 96.3% 10th grade Writing Performance Index = 102.2 Met 11 out of 12 Indicators TECHS 100% Proficient in Reading and Writing in 10th grade and Reading, Writing, Math and SS in 11th grade Performance Index = 110.1 Met 11 out of 11 Indicators TTA Sixth year rated as Excellent Performance Index = 108.0 100% Proficient in Writing in 10th grade and Reading, Writing, Math and Science in 11th grade Met 12 of 12 indicators

2008-2009 Indicators Performance Index Adequate Yearly Progress No Child Left Behind

Performance Index Performance Index Score: One composite score for a school or district calculated by combining scores across all performance levels, tested grades and subjects.

Value Added A growth model that analyzes student test scores to determine the impact teachers and schools have on students’ academic performance over time The district’s overall Value Added rating is above expected growth.

31 Schools Above Expected Gains Arlington Beverly Birmingham Burroughs Chase East Side Central Edgewater Fulton Garfield Glendale-Feilbach Grove Patterson Hale Harvard Hawkins Keyser Lagrange Longfellow Marshall McKinley McTigue Navarre Oakdale Old Orchard Old West End Ottawa River Raymer Reynolds Riverside Rosa Parks Sherman Whittier