INDOT Roadway Preservation Initiative Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Executive Summary Introduction In 1988, by virtue of State Statute , the Nebraska State Legislature first assigned the Nebraska Department.
Advertisements

Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez Stephen Henry
USE OF POLYURETHANE GROUT FOR CONCRETE PAVEMENT SLAB STABILIZATION Indiana County District 10-0 Lessons Learned 1.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 1 Introduction.
Alternate Bidding: The West Virginia Experience 2011Virginia Concrete Conference March 3, 2011 Richmond, VA Bob Long Executive Director ACPA Mid-Atlantic.
Pavement Preservation and Maintenance Private Roads Maintenance Workshop August 18, 2012.
Sect. 12A-2 – Accessible SW Requirements ADA Clarifications: – When are curb ramps required? – What constitutes an alteration? – Does the scope of resurfacing.
District Information Session For the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.
City of Auburn Hills Road Asset Management Program February 21, 2014 SEMCOG University.
Pavement Management Program Overview February 10, 2015 Presented By: Christopher J. Ott, E.I.
City of Somersworth Presentation to City Council on Pavement Management Presented by: Joe Ducharme, Jr., P.E. Contract City Engineer & Britt E. Audett,
Partnering & Pavement Preservation -A Contractors Perspective- AACE Meeting June 05, 2008 Mormon Lake, Arizona.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 1 Introduction.
Pavement Preservation in South Carolina J. C. “Clem” Watson, P.E. Chief Engineer for Operations South Carolina Department of Transportation.
Pavement Maintenance II Part 1a: SurfaceTreatments Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
Surface Rehabilitation Treatments
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
2014 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES Estimates Estimates 3 Point of the illustration? Document your assumptions.
VALUE ADDED FEATURES Who’s Excited??? 2015 Construction Academy Larry Ritchie July 28 th, 2015.
Pavement Preservation Protecting the Investment and the Environment R. Gary Hicks CP2 Center, Chico, CA Prepared for CEAC 2014 Conference March 26-28,
Influence of Pavement Condition on Project Selection
Chapter 3 Framework for Treatment Selection From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG)
Session 2 Introduction to Pavement Preventive Maintenance Concepts.
MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE WITH WARRANTY WORK. Warranty Program History Why Warranties ? Warranty Specifications Experience & Lessons Learned.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE 1: Part 1: Pavement Preservation Idaho Roads Scholar Program.
FD05 STATEWIDE RESURFACING PROGRAM OVERVIEW DIANA RADCLIFFE, TEBM, ROADWAY PRESERVATION, DIV OF MAINTENANCE.
Session 5 Techniques for Determining Pavement/ Treatment Feasibility.
Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh Gary Hicks and Rob Marsh April 19, 2005 April 19, 2005 Pavement Preservation Sub-Group on Strategy Selection & Evaluation.
Why we need a rating system
Session 4 Preventive Maintenance Treatments. Learning Objectives 1.Identify typical preventive maintenance techniques used on HMA and PCC pavements 2.Identify.
Mike McColeman, P.E. Assistant Maintenance Administrator Ohio Department of Transportation Defining Desired Outcomes Defining Desired Outcomes.
Capital Plan Update FMCB Meeting February 26, 2016 Pre-Decisional – Draft for discussion only.
Bridge Deck Overlay Projects 101 Presentation by Central Office Bridge Rehabilitation Group.
The Highway Fund – Planning, Measuring, and Reporting Mike Holder, PE, Chief Engineer 2015 CAPA / DOT Workshop February 24, 2015.
Pavement Preservation Program Emily McGraw, PE February 23 and 24, 2015 – NCDOT & CAPA Workshop.
Chip Seal Best Practices by: Larry Galehouse, P.E., P.S., Director National Center for Pavement Preservation.
2013 Roads and Sidewalk Capital Programs Roads and Parks Maintenance Department Development & Infrastructure Division December 2, 2013.
PROJECT SELECTION RIGHT TOOLS, RIGHT TIME, RIGHT PROJECT Presented by Joe Ririe, PE PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC. September 9, 2015.
Holistic Pavement Management – Experiences with Performance Based Pavement Management in Australia and South Africa PA Olivier – Dynatest Africa / Jeffares.
CITY OF BELLEVILLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Quality Pavement Preservation Projects
VDOT’S PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES & EXPECTATIONS
A Data-Driven Strategy to Improve the Quality
Level II Inspection.
Transportation Development District Presentation
Thin Hot Mix Asphalt Overlays PennDOT Research Findings
AN-Najah National University AN-Najah National University
Pierce County Pavement Preservation Program
City of Abilene Pavement Condition Survey 2017 Results and Discussion
INSPECTION POLICIES AND, PROCEDURES CLASS A CERTIFICATION REQUIREMNTS
Street Improvement Plan
Pavement condition index calculation
ALDOT Pavement Preservation Policy
Implementation of pavement preservation treatments
Pavement Working Group
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
2018 Pavement Workshop May 23-24, 2018
Pavement Preservation
Pavement Asset management section
Illinois’ Joint Research Adventure
Pavement Performance Measures In Georgia
Document Development for Metro Project: Performance-based Procurement Asphalt Overlay for Programmed Maintenance 17/01/2019.
Emulsion Task Force (ETF) Meeting
Quality Assurance for Emulsified Asphalt Surface Treatments
Prime Factors for Successful Preservation Treatments
Louis E. Feagans, P.E. Statewide Technical Services Director, INDOT
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
NRRA Pavement Workshop 2019
ACEC Designer Training
Presentation transcript:

INDOT Roadway Preservation Initiative Update

Programs Pavement Preservation Initiative (PPI) Bridge/ Culvert Preservation Initiative (BCPI)

Pavement Preservation Initiative Strategic, long term program of identifying, programming, budgeting, and completing pavement preservation projects. Improve the statewide condition of INDOT’s pavement network at the lowest possible cost . Part of INDOT’s overall Pavement Preservation Program, which includes elements of the Maintenance Work Program and District Pavement Program.

Available Treatments HMA Treatments: 1. Asphalt Crack Seal (Activity 207, crack filling) 2. Rout and Seal (Activity 209, crack sealing) 3. Seal Coat 4. Microsurface 5. QC/QA HMA Surface 4.75mm (0.75 in. thickness) 6. UBWC

Available Treatments PCCP Treatments: 1. PCCP Patching 2. PCCP Joint Sealing 3. PCCP Profiling/Retexturing 4. PCCP Dowel Bar Retrofit  ADA requirements must be met as necessary.  See Indiana Design Manual (IDM) Chapter 52.11 and the INDOT Standard Specifications for specific details on each treatment.

Candidate Generation Asphalt Surface Criteria*: List 1: Age between 8 and 12 years and IRI < 130 List 2: Rut > 3/8” List 3: Friction Number< 25 Additional screening criteria for Seal Coat: Rutting < ¼ Inch ADT < 5,000 (ADT level can be customized per District) PCCP Surface Criteria*: List 1: Age = between 8 and 12 years List 2: IRI > 130 List 3: Friction Number < 25

FY 11 Chip Seal Program District Lane Miles Total Cost (excluding Shoulders) Life Extension Ln Mi Yrs Cost/Ln Mi Yr Crawfordsville* 177.1 $ 1,725,321.47 4 708.4 $2,435.52 Fort Wayne 223.8 $ 1,752,094.22 895.2 $1,957.21 Greenfield 160.4 $ 1,630,602.71 641.6 $2,541.46 LaPorte 193.2 $ 1,528,917.20 772.8 $1,978.41 Seymour * 254.4 $ 2,614,762.65 1017.6 $2,569.54 Vincennes * 224.5 $ 1,841,030.94 898 $2,050.15 Totals: 1233.4 $ 11,092,729.19 4,933.60 $2,248.40

Chip Seal Accomplishments Fiscal Year Lane Miles Total Cost Cost Per Lane Mile 2009 444 $3,645,879.52 $8,207.37 2010 705 $5,457,894.29 $7,744.77 2011 1233 $11,092,729.20 $8,993.89 *Total costs: Labor, Material & Equipment * Includes Fog Seal costs 2011 average statewide cost /syd = $1.27

Seal Coat Design INDOT is developing a seal coat design program With simple material inputs, will generate theoretical application rates Use as a starting point, field adjustments as required

Fog Seal Study Heritage Research Group (Asphalt Materials Inc.) Chip Seal on SR 43 Life Cycle of AE-F versus AE-F with SBR Additive Life Cycle of AE-F versus SS-1h Applicability of AE-F versus SS-1h for Fog Sealing Comparison of chip retention performance associated with each emulsion

AE-F (with SBR Additive) Study Layout AE-F Diluted SS-1h = Section Break where Felt Paper will be used to provide an emulsion break Each section will consist of one distributor load emulsion AE-F will be delivered jobsite and applied AE-F SBR additive will be added and mixed onsite SS-1h will be diluted and terminal, and be picked up AE-F (with SBR Additive)

Field Performance Testing Monitored by HRG Visual inspections at specified intervals Identifying at least one designated area within each section and photographing it immediately after construction and after specific intervals of time in the range of 1 to 5 years.

INDOT Crack Seal/ Fill Total Lane miles = 27,693.78 Crack Filling - $755/LM in FY 10 Crack Sealing - $893/LM in FY 10 Fiscal Year Crack Fill – Lane Miles Crack Seal – Lane Miles FY 08 4283.8 548.8 FY 09 4732.0 660.2 FY 10 5249.5 661.9

FY 11 PPI Contract Surface Treatment District Actual Lane Miles Actual Cost Life Extension Ln Mi Yrs Cost/Ln Mi Yr Crawfordsville 39.4 $ 1,923,706.71 8 315.2 $6,103.13 Fort Wayne 72.78 $ 2,584,370.93 582.24 $4,438.67 Greenfield 55.52 $ 1,794,556.98 444.16 $4040.34 LaPorte 54 $ 2,485,743.28 432 $5,754.04 Seymour 55.8 $ 2,298,935.35 446.4 $5,149.94 Vincennes 53.32 $ 2,542,792.40 426.56 $5,961.16 Totals: 330.82 $ 13,630,105.65 2646.56 $5,150.12 *Let to date: 232 lane miles @ $9,658,799.55

PPI Surface Treatment Breakdown Microsurface Average Treatment Cost/ SYS Lane Miles # Of Contracts 2009 $ 3.44 84.2 6 2010 $ 3.32 136.7 8 *2011 $ 3.02 108.5 UBWC 2009 $ 6.28 7.8 1 2010 $ 7.47 43.4 2 2011 $ 3.49 23.9 3 4.75mm Thin HMA 2010 $3.53 30.1 2 *2011 $ 3.21 59.0 3

INDOT Treatment Guidelines for Pavement Preservation INDOT manual Includes descriptions of all preservation treatments in INDOT’s toolbox Specification References Construction Procedure Applicable Distresses Corrected Special Considerations http://www.in.gov/indot/3220.htm

Bridge/Culvert Preservation Initiative The BCPI will be subdivided into 3 categories, due to differing inspection and management practices. Also listed is INDOT’s approximate inventory of each category: Bridges (Span > 20’) = 5,200 Large Culverts (Span between 4’ and 20’) = 9,000 Small Culverts (Span < 4’) = 90,000  

Benefits The long-term benefits of the BCPI will be: An overall improvement in network bridge and culvert condition An overall reduction in spending required to maintain INDOT bridges and structures, compared to traditional rehabilitation practices.

Expectation of Program Bridge – Wearing Surface, Deck, Joint Reduction in # bridges with ratings falling below 5 (<4)   Bridge – Superstructure and Substructure Reduction in # bridges falling below 5 (<4) Bridges Under Fill – Culvert Rating Culverts – Overall Rating (Type I, Type II and Small Culverts) Reduction in # culverts falling below 5 (<4)

Treatment Categories Qualified BCPI treatments may be considered as: Preventive Maintenance – Specific activities that are scheduled on a fixed cycle that are intended to maintain a structure at its current level, and prevent deterioration. Corrective Maintenance – Specific activities are not scheduled and are reactive in nature, intended to correct more extensive damage and prevent further deterioration but limited to localized areas of a specific structural element.

PM Activities Bridge preventive maintenance activities include: Cleaning/flushing bridge decks Substructure/superstructure washing Cleaning deck drains Cleaning/lubricating bearings Cleaning joints Deck sealing

Corrective Maintenance Bridge corrective maintenance activities include: Sliplining (bridge culverts only) Deck patching (shallow/deep) – Maximum 10% deck area Approach slab restoration Joint restoration/replacement Mudwall patching Thin deck overlay (e.g. Flexogrid) Spot coating Substructure patching/sealing Concrete Superstructure crack mitigation Erosion mitigation Debris removal/channel cleaning Brush Cutting/Herbicide Application* Railing repair* Relief joint repairs* Attenuator upgrades*

Candidate Selection Bridge Candidate Triggers Preventive Treatments Maintenance Activity Inspection Element Element Rating Cycle (years) Cleaning/flushing bridge decks 241/244   N/A 1 Substructure/superstructure washing Clean Deck Drains Cleaning/lubricating bearings Clean Joints Deck Sealing Item 58.01 & 58.02 6-8 5

Project Selection The Division of Maintenance Management and District Support in conjunction with the Division of Asset Management and Program Engineering will prepare a candidate list of BCPI projects from the appropriate databases. The District Systems Assessment Manager will review the candidate projects and develop a list of proposed structures and treatments. This list will be ranked according to priority and the method of performing the work (INDOT work forces or contract). The District will propose BCPI qualifying projects into SPMS. Projects will be defined as “maintenance and preservation” and scored according to BAMT scoring rule D-1. Preservation projects should not typically be considered if future rehabilitation work is programmed within the life of the preservation treatment. Once approved by the BAMT, the identified list of BCPI projects will be finalized as detailed in Section 4 to allow adequate contract development time (contract) or procurement of materials and scheduling of resources (District work forces

Questions??? Bill Tompkins : 317-233-3345 btompkins@indot.in.gov