Case #1 Regina V. Mitchell

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Defining and Measuring Crime Chapter 3. To teach the social expectations of society To protect citizens from criminal harm and punish wrong doers To express.
Advertisements

ATTEMPTS, SOLICITATION OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, AND CONSPIRACY
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
Miranda v. Arizona 1966 Read Miranda v. Arizona Parties Facts Issue.
Law 12 MUNDY Homicide: death of a human being by another wrongfully Murder can be either CULPABLE or NON-CULPABLE NON-CULPABLE murder means the.
SUBSTANTIAL IMPAIRMENT BY ABNORMALITY OF MIND & PROVOCATION Claus & Stephanie.
Criminal Law INTRO TO DEFENCES. What is a defence?
WHAT ARE YOUR RIGHTS?. 1. Grand Jury Indictment 2. Double Jeopardy 3. Protection Against Self Incrimination: “I PLEAD THE 5TH!” 4. Due Process of Law.
TRUTH AND PROOF: What constitutes ‘evidence’ Professor John Hatchard School of Law, The Open University.
 The list of excuses to absolve oneself of criminal responsibility.  For example: "I was framed," "The devil made me do it," "I didn't know it was a.
Objective: SWBAT determine when the felony murder rule can be used in a criminal prosecution Do Now While John is in the process of robbing a person, his.
Rights Warning/Waiver Certificate
Defenses Pages No Crime Has Been Committed The defendant usually must present evidence to show either… 1.There was no crime committed 2.There.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 18 Mental Health and the Law.
Miranda vs. Arizona Right to Remain Silent.
Criminal Defences CLN4U. Defences Every person is entitled to present a defence at trial Every person is entitled to present a defence at trial A defence.
Arrest and Detention Unit 2. ARREST Arrest is holding a person who is being charged with an offence. Arrest is holding a person who is being charged with.
The defendant may present evidence to show that (1) no criminal act was committed: –Example: he did not commit rape because he woman consented. (2) no.
Period 5.  People cannot be held responsible for their actions if they did not know what they were doing. This means that insanity can be a defense to.
Arrest and Detention. Police must follow procedures codified in the Criminal Code Police must follow procedures codified in the Criminal Code If they.
 When police place someone under arrest, they have to follow certain rules to ensure that the person’s Charter rights are being upheld  In order to.
Defences Legal Studies 3C. Defences  A person who admits to a criminal offence may adopt a defence that justifies or excuses their actions.  Specific.
 When police place someone under arrest, they have to follow certain rules to ensure that the person’s Charter rights are being upheld  In order to.
Interrogation Class 15. Confession and Immaturity Haley v Ohio –15 year old “lad” interrogated starting at midnight, denied him access to counsel, confronted.
Bell Ringer Criminal Law: Stages of a Criminal Case  Criminal prosecution develops in a series of stages.  Try to place the following stages in the correct.
Know Your Rights Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.
Crime and Elements of Crime. Purpose of Criminal Law Protect Citizens from Criminal Harm 2 categories of harms 1.Harms to individual citizens’ physical.
PRINCIPLES OF CRIMINAL LIABILITIES
Chapter 2 – Criminal Law A body of laws that deal with crime and the punishment of criminal offenses.
Criminal and Civil Competence
Criminal Law ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS Why does conflict develop? How can governments ensure citizens are treated fairly?
Necessity defence of self defence
Unit 4 Word power.
Miranda Warning Law Enforcement I.
Supreme Court briefs.
3-1 Assessment Kevin Kyle.
Interviewing the Elderly
Case #2 Regina V Girard Nicole Girard caused the death of Kevin Steel at Williams Lake on October 29, 1989 at approximately 02:07 hours. Girard caused.
10/24/07 BR- Describe the elements of a pizza.
OPINION RULE.
Voluntary Manslaughter
Self Defence/Prevention of a Crime
Defences for the Accused
Arrest power and interrogation techniques
Aim: What are the protections offered by the case of Miranda vs
Defences For The Accused
Arrest.
Case #1 Regina V Girard Nicole Girard caused the death of Kevin Steel at Williams Lake on October 29, 1989 at approximately 02:07 hours. Girard caused.
I am so happy to have you all in class today 
Defences For The Accused
Criminal Law 2.8 Criminal Defenses
Criminal Defenses.
Unit 2: The Court System Kinds of Laws
The Criminal Process Cases & Examples.
SAR Conference Presentation
Unit 2.A.4: Criminal Defenses
Canadian Criminal Code Part I Violent Crimes
It is NOT the defendant’s job to prove that he/she is not guilty!
Ch. 3-2 The Fifth Amendment Right to Remain Silent
Arrest and Detention.
Criminal Defences CLN4U.
Case #1 Regina V. Mitchell
Casey Anthony Trail The Tell-Tale Heart. Summary of Casey Anthony Trail  Casey Anthony was charged with the murder of her 2 year old daughter in 2002.
Miranda Rights You have the right to remain silent…
Justice in the Criminal Justice System
Unit Three: Day Three -- Arrest
Defences Legal Studies 3C.
General Considerations
by Marcos Cardona-7th period
Thursday, January 23rd Grab a yellow, orange and white sheet from the front table. Have your local government webquest on your desk. Read the front and.
Presentation transcript:

Case #1 Regina V. Mitchell November 24, 1991 – Roxanne Andrews was house sitting at 1352 Juniper Street in Williams Lake. The person who killed her committed the crime of murder. She died after being stabbed twenty-five times.

Case #1 Regina V. Mitchell March 31, 1991 – Cleo Sims was conducting an open house for prospective buyers at 1575 Midnight Drive in Williams Lake. The person who killed her committed the crime of first degree murder. She died after being stabbed twenty-two times, and there was evidence that she was sexually assaulted.

Case #1 Regina V. Mitchell Travis Mitchell, the man accused of the murders of Roxanne Andrews and Cleo Sims, does not admit that he killed either woman. The accused is a youth of sub normal mental capacity. The police arrested him on another charge and asked him if he understood the rights just read to him. He said that he did not understand but they continued to interrogate him. The police did not tell Mr. Mitchell that he was being detained for the murders nor did they advise him of his right to consult counsel. How might the actions of the police affect the outcome of this case? Predictions?

PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED BY DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED DEFENDANTS IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ‘Developmentally disabled people may be more likely than non-developmentally disabled people to exhibit characteristics, or experience social and economic conditions, that have been generally associated with criminality, such as low self esteem, poverty (Endicott, 1991), and a lack of social skills (Davis, 2002).’ ‘They may also be more susceptible to nonphysical coercion during interrogation. For example, developmentally delayed defendants may find comfort in the appearance of friendliness designed to induce confidence and cooperation.’ ‘The act of confessing is further complicated, in the case of developmentally disabled defendants, as the confession process assumes an understanding of Charter rights. (Everington & Fulero, 1999).’ Developmental Disability, Crime, and Criminal Justice: A Literature Review Simon Fraser University

Relevant Issues: Quality and reliability of evidence. How do we determine levels of competence and mens rea? How do we determine if someone has understood their rights? How is mental illness comparable to developmental disability? Medically? Legally? Socially?