Progile Automated Verification Engineer • PAVE •

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MGD Services, Inc. The IT Quality Assurance Specialists
Advertisements

CS487 Software Engineering Omar Aldawud
Eric Nickell.  History  What is Feature Driven Development?  What is a Feature?  Feature Driven Development Roles ◦ Class Ownership  Feature Driven.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 3.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
Module Based Regression Test Selection Strategy for Web applications Author: Annamariale Chandran Honeywell Technology Solutions For International Conference.
Agile Testing with Testing Anywhere The road to automation need not be long.
© 2006, Cognizant Technology Solutions. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Automation – How to.
Approaches to ---Testing Software Some of us “hope” that our software works as opposed to “ensuring” that our software works? Why? Just foolish Lazy Believe.
Overview of Change Management ClearQuest Overview for CORUG January, 2008.
Next Generation Trnsport Trnsport Users Group Conference Field Management TAG November 7, 2005.
The information contained in this document is highly confidential and privileged. No part of this document may be copied or circulated without express.
Chapter 3 – Agile Software Development 1Chapter 3 Agile software development.
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING MCS-2 LECTURE # 5. RAD (RAPID APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT) MODEL  In RAD model the components or functions are developed in parallel.
-Nikhil Bhatia 28 th October What is RUP? Central Elements of RUP Project Lifecycle Phases Six Engineering Disciplines Three Supporting Disciplines.
What is a life cycle model? Framework under which a software product is going to be developed. – Defines the phases that the product under development.
SOFTWARE TESTING Scope of Testing  The dynamic Indian IT industry has always lured the brightest minds with challenging career.
CPSC 2150 August 21, Chapter 1 Object Oriented Software Development This is an introductory course In this chapter we will look at 3 topics Challenges.
Software cost estimation Predicting the resources required for a software development process 1.
Martin Cryer Software Development. ‹#› Development Processes Traditional e.g. Waterfall Method Agile –Design Build (Quick to Market) –Combines Engineering,
Software Engineering Spring (C) Vasudeva VarmaClass of 32 CS3600: Software Engineering: Process and Product* *Most of the Content drawn.
Clinical Application. The Problem Clinical Systems are extremely complex IT configures and deploys best practices (best guesses) about what users want.
Formal Methods in Software Engineering
How to Improve the Safety of Signalling Systems with a Shortened Construction Period in Engineering Construction Projects Gao Guoliang Safety Assurance.
Software Process Or how to make strength productive Tools Requirements Management Visual Modeling Test coverage and metrics Change Management Requirements.
M Global Software Group 1 Motorola Internal Use Only Better Software Quality at a Lower Cost: Testing to Eliminate Software Black Holes Isaac (Haim) Levendel,
©Ian Sommerville 2000Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 26Slide 1 Software cost estimation l Predicting the resources required for a software development.
PROC-1 1. Software Development Process. PROC-2 A Process Software Development Process User’s Requirements Software System Unified Process: Component Based.
CS5103 Software Engineering Lecture 02 More on Software Process Models.
Anubha Gupta | Software Engineer Visual Studio Online Microsoft Corp. Visual Studio Enterprise Leveraging modern tools to streamline Build and Release.
Overview of RUP Lunch and Learn. Overview of RUP © 2008 Cardinal Solutions Group 2 Welcome  Introductions  What is your experience with RUP  What is.
Chapter 10 Information Systems Development. Learning Objectives Upon successful completion of this chapter, you will be able to: Explain the overall process.
An Agile Requirements Approach 1. Step 1: Get Organized  Meet with your team and agree on the basic software processes you will employ.  Decide how.
CS223: Software Engineering Lecture 15: Software construction.
ITC Software ITC AUTOMATION TESTING SERVICES Date (Day Month, Year) Place (City, Country)
Chapter 8. Iteration 1, Elaboration: book view differs from reality for pedagogical reasons not doing “risk-driven” up front uses many OOA/D skills should.
optional client logo FINANCIAL MARKETS 00 MONTH 2004 Project: Operational Testing Strategy Author: Johan Lundin.
How We Got Here PC and Internet changed the rules –Viruses, information sharing, “outside” and “inside” indistinguishable –Vulnerability research for.
Contact us: Call: , , Mail: Visit:
Chapter 3 Agile software development 1 Chapter 3 – Agile Software Development.
Implementing Full-Stack Test Automation for Drupal 8
Automated Software Testing
Engaging Business Analysts in Test Automation
Performance Testing of Web Apps
System Testing Antares Rocket Test Launch ( HQ) System Testing.
Software Life Cycle “What happens in the ‘life’ of software”
CS 5150 Software Engineering
Introduction SOFTWARE ENGINEERING.
Board Concerns About Cyber Security
SENIOR MANAGER - SOFTWARE TESTING PRACTICE
TestResults.io – An Introduction –
Approaches to Systems Development
Introducing Automation in Traditional Software Testing Best Practices.
Script-less Automation: An Approach to Shift-Left.
Important Software Performance Testing That Ensure High Quality Solutions.
Advantages OF BDD Testing
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN SOFTWARE TESTING
Introduction to Software Testing
Automation Of Software Test
ABHISHEK SHARMA ARVIND SRINIVASA BABU HEMANT PRASAD 08-OCT-2018
Introducing ISTQB Agile Foundation Extending the ISTQB Program’s Support Further Presented by Rex Black, CTAL Copyright © 2014 ASTQB 1.
CS240: Advanced Programming Concepts
State Design Pattern Brandon Jacobsen.
Summary.
Regression testing Tor Stållhane.
Small Organizations are Different?
Open Source Tool Based Automation solution with Continuous Integration and end to end BDD Implementation Arun Krishnan - Automation Manager Maria Afzal-
Training 01: Project Lifecycle & Business Technology Analysis
Walking dead. How to save project?
Jamie Cool Program Manager Microsoft
Open Source Tool Based Automation solution with Continuous Integration and end to end BDD Implementation Arun Krishnan - Automation Manager Maria Afzal-
Presentation transcript:

Progile Automated Verification Engineer • PAVE •

Quality Challenges In Complex Software Quick Release Cycles Unknown relation between modules High team fluctuation Progile Automated Verification Engineer (PAVE)

Automated Testing in 2 Steps And Reality? 1 2 Create a test framework Create an automated testing pyramid All your problems are solved… or not? Progile Automated Verification Engineer (PAVE)

Some Points About Regulations Development and Verification need to be independent Subject under test needs to follow configuration control Severe impact of newly introduced issues Submission to regulatory agency Progile Automated Verification Engineer (PAVE)

Don’t Automate, Test Like A Human OPTION 1: More testers bring higher quality in less time More people, more problems. Solution doesn’t scale OPTION 2: Longer duration of the testing phase Not possible in today’s scenarios OPTION 3: Progile’s automated verification engineer Let the testers do what they are great at; remove the burden of execution Progile Automated Verification Engineer (PAVE)

Progile’s Automated Verification Engineer (PAVE) Brings you automated testing as a service, e.g. no new tools, no new trainings, no new experts, no change in your process, no upfront investment. 100% We bring you 100% regression testing of your solution, overnight, fully black boxed, without human interaction and within the bounds of your validated process. Progile Automated Verification Engineer (PAVE)

Demo Short extract of a live test Progile Automated Verification Engineer (PAVE)

Automated Testing As A Service 01 | provide specification and software 02 | 03 | PAVE one-time: automate test cases provide test cases Your Verification request execution Your Development provide test results on request: execute test cases provide test results Progile Automated Verification Engineer (PAVE)

Key Advantages Executes the test cases like a human tester 01 Execute all test cases for each SW iteration 02 Minimizes the risks of introducing new software bugs 03 Test team can focus on test case design and result analysis 04 Doesn’t require any changes to your source code or environment 05 Easy to incorporate in your product development process 06 Progile Automated Verification Engineer (PAVE)

Simple Pricing 01 | 02 | Automated Test Case Design Test Case Execution OVERALL PRICE/STEP less than 500 100.- 500 – 1’000 90.- more than 10’000 65.- RESPONSE TIME PRICE/h Within a month 10.- Within a week 20.- Within a day 50.- Progile Automated Verification Engineer (PAVE)

Questions & Next Steps