CS1, a SLAM family receptor involved in immune regulation, is a therapeutic target in multiple myeloma  André Veillette, Huaijian Guo  Critical Reviews.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fc Receptors Oct. 28, 2009 Extra reading on web Daniel Conrad 423 MSB, I. CD23.
Advertisements

Critical Role of TH Cells in Specific Immunity
Interferons Induction of synthesis Induction of antiviral activity Antiviral activities induced by interferons  and  Antiviral activities induced by.
Date of download: 9/17/2016 Copyright © 2016 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Schematic comparison of structural features of cell surface growth.
Chapter 43 The Immune System.
January 21, 2009 Penny Morel Natural Killer Cells January 21, 2009 Penny Morel
Chapter 7. 주조직적합성 복합체 1. 주조직적합성 복합체 (MHC)의 발견 2. MHC 분자의 구조
Schematic comparison of structural features of cell surface growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases and membrane-associated tyrosine kinase oncogene products.
Immune Receptors and Signal Transduction
B cells I. Differentiation of B cells in Bone marrow II
Suzanne L. Topalian, Charles G. Drake, Drew M. Pardoll  Cancer Cell 
Targeted therapies in hematological malignancies using therapeutic monoclonal antibodies against Eph family receptors  Sara Charmsaz, Andrew M. Scott,
Recognition of Antigen By T cells: The TCR
The Wnt signaling pathway in cancer
Gerhard J. Molderings  Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology 
Beyond the increasing complexity of the immunomodulatory HLA-G molecule by Edgardo D. Carosella, Benoit Favier, Nathalie Rouas-Freiss, Philippe Moreau,
Mario J. Grijalva, Ph.D. (pronounced gree-HALL-va)
Regulation of platelet plug formation by phosphoinositide metabolism
Molecular regulation of mast cell activation
The CD19–CD21 Complex Regulates Signal Transduction Thresholds Governing Humoral Immunity and Autoimmunity  Thomas F Tedder, Makoto Inaoki, Shinichi Sato 
Oncology Meets Immunology: The Cancer-Immunity Cycle
Chapter 13 Effector Responses
Natural killer cell receptors: new biology and insights into the graft-versus-leukemia effect by Sherif S. Farag, Todd A. Fehniger, Loredana Ruggeri, Andrea.
Isabel Barao, William J Murphy 
FcRL6, a new ITIM-bearing receptor on cytolytic cells, is broadly expressed by lymphocytes following HIV-1 infection by Timothy J. Wilson, Rachel M. Presti,
Chapter 13 Effector Responses Dr. Capers
Molecular regulation of mast cell activation
Biology of the immunomodulatory molecule HLA-G in human liver diseases
N. Clementi, F. Cappelletti, E. Criscuolo, M. Castelli, N. Mancini, R
An Uncommon Tail about the Common γ-Chain
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 4-8 (January 2006)
TIGIT-CD155 Interactions in Melanoma: A Novel Co-Inhibitory Pathway with Potential for Clinical Intervention  Karsten Mahnke, Alexander H. Enk  Journal.
Alison A. Laing, Christine J. Harrison, Brenda E. S
Targeted therapies in hematological malignancies using therapeutic monoclonal antibodies against Eph family receptors  Sara Charmsaz, Andrew M. Scott,
Jeffrey S Miller  Experimental Hematology 
Silvia Bolland, Roger N Pearse, Tomohiro Kurosaki, Jeffrey V Ravetch 
The Tim-3 pathway in cancer.
Turning Tumors into Vaccines: Co-opting the Innate Immune System
The CD19–CD21 Complex Regulates Signal Transduction Thresholds Governing Humoral Immunity and Autoimmunity  Thomas F Tedder, Makoto Inaoki, Shinichi Sato 
Fabiola Osorio, Caetano Reis e Sousa  Immunity 
Coinhibitory Pathways in the B7-CD28 Ligand-Receptor Family
Death receptor-mediated apoptosis and the liver
T cell receptor complex and diversity
Molecular mechanisms of IgE regulation
Volume 123, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Masaaki Murakami, Daisuke Kamimura, Toshio Hirano  Immunity 
SOCS Proteins, Regulators of Intracellular Signaling
Yan Feng, MD, Praveena S. Thiagarajan, PhD, Patrick C. Ma, MD 
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Regulation of the Immune Response by the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor
N. Clementi, F. Cappelletti, E. Criscuolo, M. Castelli, N. Mancini, R
The suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins
Antigen-Receptor Signaling to Nuclear Factor κB
Natural Killer Cell Education and Tolerance
Alexander Kiani, Anjana Rao, Jose Aramburu  Immunity 
Janna Krueger, Christopher E. Rudd  Immunity 
A Plethora of Taste Receptors
Molecular and cellular mechanisms of allergic disease
Vanessa L. Ott, PhD, John C. Cambier, PhD 
Releasing the Brakes on Cancer Immunotherapy
Vaccines for Lung Cancer
Guilty as charged Cancer Cell
Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in Melanoma: Can We Revert Bad into Good?
Discovery of a Secreted Tumor Suppressor Provides a Promising Therapeutic Strategy for Follicular Lymphoma  Marc R. Mansour, A. Thomas Look  Cancer Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 1-11 (July 1997)
HemITAM: A single tyrosine motif that packs a punch
Human cancer immunotherapy strategies targeting B7-H3 A, blockade of B7-H3 with blocking mAbs neutralizes inhibitory signaling in its unidentified receptor(s)
André Veillette, Zhongjun Dong, Sylvain Latour  Immunity 
Update on glucocorticoid action and resistance
Dendritic Tau in Alzheimer’s Disease
Presentation transcript:

CS1, a SLAM family receptor involved in immune regulation, is a therapeutic target in multiple myeloma  André Veillette, Huaijian Guo  Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology  Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages 168-177 (October 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.04.003 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Primary structure and features of a model SLAM family receptor. The primary structure of a model SLAM family receptor is shown. It contains an extracellular domain with one variable (V)-type immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domain and one constant (C)2-type Ig-like domain. It also has a single transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic domain with tyrosine-based motifs that undergo phosphorylation when the receptor is engaged by its ligand. Most SLAM family receptors are self-ligands that interact with ligands through the V-type Ig-like domain. Two types of tyrosine-based motifs exist in the cytoplasmic domain. When phosphorylated, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motifs (ITSMs) enable the recruitment of SAP family adaptors, which typically mediate cell activation. Non-ITSMs presumably bind other effectors, which may mediate cell inhibition. Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology 2013 88, 168-177DOI: (10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.04.003) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Primary structures and features of SAP family adaptors. The primary structures of SAP and EAT-2 are shown. These adaptors contain an amino-terminal Src homology 2 (SH2) domain and a short carboxyl-terminal tail. Through their SH2 domain, they bind phosphorylated immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motifs (ITSMs) in SLAM family receptors. In its SH2 domain, SAP also contains an arginine (R)-based motif (centered on R78) that mediates binding to the Src family protein tyrosine kinase Fyn. This permits the coupling of SLAM family receptors to protein tyrosine phosphorylation signals. In its carboxyl-terminal tail, EAT-2 contains a tyrosine (Y)-based motif (centered on Y127), which upon phosphorylation mediates the recruitment of alternative as yet poorly characterized effectors. Phospholipase C (PLC)-γ is a candidate effector of EAT-2. Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology 2013 88, 168-177DOI: (10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.04.003) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Primary structures, signaling mechanisms and functions of CS1 and its short isoform, CS1-S. (A) The primary structure of the long isoform of CS1 (CS1-L) is shown. It contains an extracellular domain with one variable (V)-type immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domain and one constant (C)2-type Ig-like domain. It also has a single transmembrane segment and a cytoplasmic domain with two conserved tyrosine-based motifs that undergo phosphorylation when the receptor is engaged by its ligand. Tyrosine (Y) 281 is located in a typical immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motifs (ITSMs). When Y281 is phosphorylated, it enables the recruitment of EAT-2, which in turn gets phosphorylated in its carboxyl-terminal tail and mediates cell activation. Y261 is not located in an ITSM. When phosphorylated, it presumably binds other effectors, which may mediate cell inhibition. In cells expressing EAT-2, the function of CS1-L is activating. In cells lacking EAT-2, the function of CS1-L is inhibitory. (B) The primary structure of the short isoform of CS1 (CS1-S) is shown. CS1-S is generated by alternative splicing of the CS1-encoding gene, and lacks both Y261 and Y281. Whether CS1 is functionally inactive or mediating alternative functions is not known. Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology 2013 88, 168-177DOI: (10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.04.003) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Primary mechanism of action of elotuzumab against multiple myeloma. Accumulating evidence indicates that elotuzumab mediates its anti-multiple myeloma (MM) effect primarily through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). In this mechanism, the Fab portion of elotuzumab binds the CS1 expressed on MM cells, while the Fc portion of elotuzumab binds the activating Fc receptor, CD16, on natural killer (NK) cells. These interactions trigger NK cell activation, release of cytotoxic granules and killing of MM cells. In addition, activated NK cells may release cytokines, such as interferon-γ, that stimulate the recruitment of other immune cell types and augment further the anti-MM effect of elotuzumab (not shown). Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology 2013 88, 168-177DOI: (10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.04.003) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Possible alternative mechanisms of action of elotuzumab against multiple myeloma. (A) It is possible that elotuzumab also directly activates NK cells by triggering the CS1 expressed on NK cells. CS1 is activating on NK cells, as these cells express the SAP family adaptor EAT-2. This further augments the ability of NK cells to kill MM cells. (B) There is also indication that elotuzumab interferes with the ability of MM cells to adhere to bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Although the mechanism of this effect is not known, it may relate to a direct effect of CS1 engagement on MM cells (model depicted). Alternatively, if BMSCs express CS1, it may relate to a direct impact on BMSCs (model not shown). (C) Elotuzumab may also interfere with the ability of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) to suppress anti-myeloma immune responses by T cells or other immune cells. Since MDSCs are derived from myeloid or monocyte precursors, they may express CS1. Critical Reviews in Oncology / Hematology 2013 88, 168-177DOI: (10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.04.003) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd Terms and Conditions