Roads Operations, Public Works

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2010 Draft Municipal Budget
Advertisements

Ken Kopka LBWID Staff Manager STREET SWEEPING AS A BMP THE LAKE BARCROFT WATERSHED EXPERIENCE.
EA204 Environmental Technology Pavement Drainage Stormwater Sewer Design.
2014 STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 18, 2013.
Dillon and Christina Project Area Lander Streets and Utilities 2015 Public Meeting No. 2.
Introduction to Compliance Assistance Documents Part I.
Non Powell Bill Street Repair & Maintenance Strategies October 8, 2012.
Volusia County Public Works
MCM#6 Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Part 4 Part 4 Municipal BMPs – Cleaning &Maintenance.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Mission Statement Plan, Design, Construct, Operate and Maintain the roadway system under the jurisdiction of Lee County.
Winter Road Treatments & Snow Removal Costs Outline.
1 Town of Tillsonburg Lifecycle/Capital/Debt Strategy.
Safety Audit Components Safety assessment for risk Management.
Chapter 2 A Strategy for the Appraisal of Public Sector Investments.
Spreadsheet Session Purpose: To illustrate the process involved in recording municipal tangible capital assets Outline: Setting up municipal equipment.
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Training
Capital Improvement Program. During the Annual Strategic Action Plan (SAP) evaluation, long-term needs and priorities are identified by City Council Capital.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
1 Public Works Operations March 11, Streets – Street Sweeper Warranty repair in February resulted in about 5 weeks of downtime Streets are Dirty.
Municipal Maintenance Activities Presented on April 24, 2006.
Department of Public WorksDepartment of Public Works Performance Measures 2010.
Quality Avenue “Safe Streets” Improvements City of Lakeland, Minnesota Paul Pinkston Hamline University August 18, 2015.
North Main Street Improvements BID Meeting Wednesday, October 29, 2008.
STA Safety Project PID #76439 December 12, 2006.
MS4 APPLICATION PROCESS Mark Fife Water Bureau Water Bureau Permits Section Permits Section.
LOCAL GOVT. FINANCE: An Introduction to CAPITAL PLANNING Alan Probst, Local Government Specialist Local Government Center University of Wisconsin – Extension.
Town of Oro Valley Oro Valley Stormwater Utility Commission Overview.
PRESENTED AND PREPARED BY CITY OF MISSOULA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
PUBLIC WORKS FY 2012 Proposed Budget May 24, 2012.
RebuildIndy Indianapolis Department of Public Works March 2011.
Developing a Plan for Accessibility The City of Brandon Accessibility Plan 2016.
Brookeville Bypass Final Design Presentation Initech May 6, 2004.
2017 Public Works Budget September 6, 2016 Donald J. Theisen, P.E. Director.
FY 2017 BudgetHearing September 8, 2016 Mike Loftin, Assistant City Manager - Finance 1.
12/3/2017 Fleet Services Public Works.
Core Service Review: Maintenance of Unassumed and Private Roadways
Limited Service Agreements
Proposed Draft Financial Plan April 10, 2017
Public Works Roads Operations
Pothole Patching Alternatives
Financial Indicator Graphs for the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Using Surveys to Document LMI Area Benefit
South Kitsap Water Reclamation Facility Proposed Biennial Budget
Gladewood Bridge Summary: Built in 1920 Crosses the Yellow Creek
Weekly Executive Summary
Public Works Roads Operations
Curbside Waste Collection on Private Roads
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
6/12/2018 Grant Programs Review.
Local communities and municipalities
Limited Service Agreements
Considering Tax-Supported Debt May 10, 2004
City of Bloomfield Hills
Introduction to Development of a city-wide traffic calming program
2018 Staffing Recommendation
Public Information Meeting NW 100th Street Reconstruction Project
City of Saginaw Curb Side Leaf Collection Update
City of Katy – Pine Forest Workshop Update
A “Best Practices” Approach to Improved Operations & Maintenance of Water & Sewer Systems in Alaska Villages February 5, 2013 Bill Griffith Facility.
Financial Indicator Graphs for the Year Ended December 31, 2010
Safety Audit Components
Emily Guenther Zach Olson Laura Scott Cameron Wein
Village of Sherwood Stumpf Subdivision Paving and Drainage Improvements November 7, 2018.
Agenda Introductions: Roadway Focus Group - Jennifer
1200 West Widening and Reconstruction Project
Assessing Vulnerability & Climate Change Impacts
City of Greater Sudbury Lining Program Overview. Brittany Hallam, P
Our Municipality’s Finances
2018 – 2020 Budget| Presented by: Rick Bacon
2019 Capital Program Title of Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Roads Operations, Public Works 4/21/2018 Street Sweeping Roads Operations, Public Works

Why do we sweep? Sweep roads and sidewalks Appearance Dust control 4/21/2018 Why do we sweep? Sweep roads and sidewalks Appearance Dust control Minimize sand accumulation on the roadside and in the storm sewers Vehicle and pedestrian safety

What are we doing now? Spring Sweeping and Maintenance Sweeping 4/21/2018 What are we doing now? Spring Sweeping and Maintenance Sweeping Spring Sweeping - Some areas done by City staff – Generally priority areas Spring Sweeping - Contract for other areas throughout the city (option for renewal) Contractor provides truck, water truck, sweeping machine, operators (hourly) Sweepings disposed at landfill

What are we doing now? Areas that are serviced were established historically We maintained levels from former municipalities A consistent level of service has not been established Each operating area determines their sweeping schedule, needs and priority areas

What are we doing now? All urban areas are done (anywhere with curb and gutter) All large bridges are done Intersections done in-house throughout the year Rural residential – no established criteria Some rural roads are swept to manage dust complaints

4/21/2018 Issues recorded

4/21/2018 What is it costing us?

What is it costing us?

What is it costing us? Complaints – chart 4/21/2018 What is it costing us? Complaints – chart 1 hr. supervisor time/complaint Service Centre time Contract administration – Tech (preconstruction meeting, tendering, reporting and payments) Contract administration – Supervisor (scheduling, contractor performance, disposal)

Options Keep current practice without a standard level of service 4/21/2018 Options Keep current practice without a standard level of service Establish a level of service to capture current practices (increase in some areas) Establish a minimum level of service (decrease in some areas)

Option 1 - Current Practice In-house sweeping with contractor to complete throughout the city Areas based on historical practice No standard level of service

Option 1 - Benefits Residents have become accustomed to the current practice We provide this service to a large part of the city Gain the benefits of minimizing the roadside build up

Option 1 - Risks Inconsistent service level No criteria to deny service Potential to expand without planning and budgeting

Option 1 - Costs 2016 Budget maintained at $408,422 – Includes costs of maintenance sweeping throughout season Contracted Services Estimated increase of 2% per annum Maintained Budget will result in less maintenance sweeping throughout season

Option 2 – Establish a Level of Service Establish a level of service to capture current practices (increase in some areas) Define service level for urban, rural residential and rural Include all areas currently serviced Could provide service in some areas that previously didn’t have it based on the criteria established

Option 2 - Benefits Consistent level of service Criteria to deny service Any service additions will be planned based on growth Doesn’t reduce service level Assists with scheduling and budgeting

Option 2 - Risks Increase in costs Indeterminate level of service

Option 2 - Costs Estimated increase in operating cost of 10-15%, based upon the following: Operating Areas generally following similar practices, with individual cases of special attention/level of service provided Requirement to sweep all of rural-residential hard surface roads

Option 3 – Establish a Minimum Level of Service Establish a minimum level of service (decrease in some areas - Rural) Define service level for urban, rural residential and rural Decreased level of service in some areas based on criteria

Option 3 - Benefits Decrease cost Consistent level of service Criteria to deny service Any service additions will be planned based on growth Assists with scheduling and budgeting

Option 3 - Risks Not providing the same level of service we have historically provided (in some areas) Increase in complaints Increased sand accumulation along roadsides and sidewalks that will affect drainage

Option 3 - Costs Hard Costs will decrease progressively based upon level of service established Increase in long term costs to maintain (i.e. – Sand Berm Removal, ditching and culvert flushing will be required more frequently) – Difficult to Quantify

Conclusion Public Works requires a decision in which direction the City would like to proceed Upon receiving direction, a detailed report and hard costs can be established – by means of an in depth report performed by technical Services (PW) Option 1 or 3 – 2016 Implementation Option 2 – 2017 Implementation