The SPRINT Research Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
Advertisements

Reference Cooper BA, and the IDEAL study group. A randomized controlled trial of early versus late initiation of dialysis. N Engl J Med [Accessed.
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial ALLHAT study overview Double-blind, randomized trial to determine whether.
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
Lancet 373: , 2009 Baseline Characteristics of Participants and Study Design of Clinical Trials to Compare Intensive glucose- lowering versus.
Enrollment and Outcomes Fan Fan Hou, et al. N Engl J Med 2006;354:
The ACTIVE Investigators. N Engl J Med 2009 Apr 3 [Epub]
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
Baseline Characteristics of the Patients* - Part I The ONTARGET Investigators. N Engl J Med 2008 [Epub on Mar 31]
Rosuvastatin 10 mg n=2514 Placebo n= to 4 weeks Randomization 6weeks3 monthly Closing date 20 May 2007 Eligibility Optimal HF treatment instituted.
Enrollment and Outcomes Duckworth W, et al. N Engl J Med 2009;360:
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Effects of a Fixed-Dose Combination Strategy on Adherence.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 From: The Effect of a Lower Target Blood Pressure on the Progression of Kidney Disease: Long-Term Follow- up of the Modification.
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control The SPRINT Research Group* November 9, /NEJMoa R2 이성곤 /pf. 우종신.
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Making Sense of Statistics in Clinical Trial Reports:
Summary of “A randomized trial of standard versus intensive blood-pressure control” The SPRINT Research Group, NEJM, DOI: /NEJMoa Downloaded.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Antonio Coca, MD, PhD, FRCP, FESC
What should the Systolic BP treatment goal be in patients with CKD?
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Nephrology Journal Club The SPRINT Trial Parker Gregg
Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence July–August 2017
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors / angiotensin receptor blockers and contrast induced nephropathy in patients receiving cardiac catheterization:
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis  Stavros Stavrakis, MD  The American Journal.
Hypertension in the Post SPRINT era
Hypertension JNC VIII Guidelines.
Trial profile SAS denotes the Simvastatin in Aortic Stenosis Study
Copyright © 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Blood Pressure and Age in Controlling Hypertension
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Copyright © 2011 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Career choice for Chinese medical graduate: Safety Physician
Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure Target After SPRINT: Insights from a Network Meta- Analysis of Randomized Trials  Sripal Bangalore, MD, MHA, Bora Toklu,
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
The IDEAL Study Reference
Copyright © 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Timothy A. Brighton, M. B. , B. S. , John W. Eikelboom, M. B. , B. S
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
The following slides highlight a presentation at the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials session of the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November.
on behalf of the LEADER Trial Steering Committee and Investigators
The following slides highlight a report on a presentation at the Late-breaking Trials Session and a Satellite Symposium of the American Heart Association.
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) Principal Results
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes.
Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment on Acute Kidney Injury Events in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)  Michael V. Rocco,
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
Table of Contents Why Do We Treat Hypertension? Recommendation 5
The following slides are from a Cardiology Scientific Update in which Dr. Gordon Moe reported and discussed an original presentation by Drs. Bjorn Dahlof,
Inclusion Criteria for Patients with Multiple Atherothrombotic Risk Factors and for Those with Established Cardiovascular Disease Deepak L.Bhatt, et al,
Characteristics of the Patients at Baseline*
Flow diagram for exclusions of trials identified RCT indicates randomized controlled trial Hulten E, et al. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:
Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies  The Emerging.
Entry, Randomization, and Follow-up of Patients in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial Of the 461 patients who did not meet the protocol criteria,
KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: 2007 Update of Hemoglobin Target    American.
Volume 73, Issue 8, Pages (April 2008)
The ACCORD Study Group. NEJM 2010; Epub March 14
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
The ACCORD Study Group. NEJM 2010; Epub March 14
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Michael R. Lattanzio, Matthew R. Weir  Kidney International 
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Figure 1 Design of trials included in individual patient data meta-analysis. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
Presentation transcript:

The SPRINT Research Group Original Article A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control The SPRINT Research Group N Engl J Med Volume 373(22):2103-2116 November 26, 2015

Study Overview Patients at increased cardiovascular risk but without diabetes were assigned to intensive treatment of systolic BP (target, <120 mm Hg) or standard treatment (target, <140 mm Hg). After a median of 3.26 years, the rate of cardiovascular events was significantly lower with intensive treatment.

Eligibility, Randomization, and Follow-up. Figure 1 Eligibility, Randomization, and Follow-up. Discontinued intervention refers to participants who discontinued the study treatment but did not withdraw consent or become lost to follow-up. The SPRINT Research Group. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2103-2116

Systolic Blood Pressure in the Two Treatment Groups over the Course of the Trial. Figure 2 Systolic Blood Pressure in the Two Treatment Groups over the Course of the Trial. The systolic blood-pressure target in the intensive-treatment group was less than 120 mm Hg, and the target in the standard-treatment group was less than 140 mm Hg. The mean number of medications is the number of blood-pressure medications administered at the exit of each visit. I bars represent 95% confidence intervals. The SPRINT Research Group. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2103-2116

Primary Outcome and Death from Any Cause. Figure 3 Primary Outcome and Death from Any Cause. Shown are the cumulative hazards for the primary outcome (a composite of myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes) (Panel A) and for death from any cause (Panel B). The inset in each panel shows the same data on an enlarged y axis. CI denotes confidence interval. The SPRINT Research Group. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2103-2116

Forest Plot of Primary Outcome According to Subgroups. Figure 4 Forest Plot of Primary Outcome According to Subgroups. The dashed vertical line represents the hazard ratio for the overall study population. The box sizes are proportional to the precision of the estimates (with larger boxes indicating a greater degree of precision). The subgroup of no previous chronic kidney disease (CKD) includes some participants with unknown CKD status at baseline. Black race includes Hispanic black and black as part of a multiracial identification. The SPRINT Research Group. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2103-2116

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Participants. Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of the Study Participants. The SPRINT Research Group. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2103-2116

Primary and Secondary Outcomes and Renal Outcomes. Table 2 Primary and Secondary Outcomes and Renal Outcomes. The SPRINT Research Group. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2103-2116

Serious Adverse Events, Conditions of Interest, and Monitored Clinical Events. Table 3 Serious Adverse Events, Conditions of Interest, and Monitored Clinical Events. The SPRINT Research Group. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2103-2116

Conclusions Among patients at high risk for cardiovascular events but without diabetes, targeting a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, as compared with less than 140 mm Hg, resulted in lower rates of fatal and nonfatal major cardiovascular events and death from any cause, although significantly higher rates of some adverse events were observed in the intensive-treatment group.