Capturing Student Intent to Enhance Institutional Effectiveness

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
Advertisements

Kilgore College Balanced Scorecard FY 2013 Update.
Best Practices: Enrollment Management Plan Lorie Hach Director of Student Success Lisa McLaughlin Institutional Data Coordinator.
1 Strategies for Enrollment Enhancement September 24, 2007 Andreea M. Serban, Ph.D. Vice Chancellor, Technology and Learning Services SOCCCD Richard McCullough,
Student Success and Basic Skills An Introduction.
Predicting Student Retention: Last Students in are Likely to be the First Students Out Jo Ann Hallawell, PhD November 19, th Annual Conference.
San Bernardino Community College District Enrollment Management: College Reports Diana Rodriguez, President, San Bernardino Valley College.
College Data Trends for Strategic Planning
AGENDA What is Academic and Progress Probation ?
Once upon a time.
California’s Accountability: College and Career Index
Santa Ana College School of Continuing Education
Barriers that Adult Learners Face
College Credit Plus September 2017
UH Distance Learning Strategic Hope
Prior Learning Assessment: The Next Disruption
Accelerated Learning in Advanced Manufacturing
Immigration Information
Module 5.
AGENDA What is Academic and Progress Probation ?
Texas Success Initiative Report: CBM002
Los Angeles Unified School District
Dispelling Myths about Concurrent Students
A Collaborative approach to student success
Maine is IT! at SMCC Grant Playbook for
Group Advising Session
Federal Graduation Rates and Academic Success Rates Reporting
Student Success Metrics
Group Advising Session
Best Practices: Enrollment Management Plan
RFY Update for Faculty Senate
Riverside City College Overview
So you want to be a teacher
New Student Counseling Session
College Credit Plus February 8, 2017 Liz Cicchetti.
Once upon a time.
CCA Hawai‘i Summit UH Transfer Data
Strategic Planning Update
Defining and Measuring Student Success Dr
INSTITUTIONAL DATA UPDATE 1.
ACHIEVING 65 x 25: SPRING UPDATE MARCH 2017
IHL Strategic Initiatives
DE Coordinator’s November 2012 Telephone Meeting
Please don’t Go: Avoiding
Our Community Works for your employees.
Academic Coaching Not Just Another Project League for Innovations
Student Success Scorecard & Other Institutional Effectiveness Metrics
One Step Away Initiative
A Holistic Program for Student Planning
University of Minnesota Athletic Compliance
Performance Funding Model Overview
Institution-Set Standards for Improvement
Positioning Faculty Members for Success
First Year Plan Workshop Spring 2018
CCTI Year Three Research Findings
Degrees and Certificates
Central Piedmont Community College
Institution-Set Standards for Improvement
Guided Pathways Work Plan
Athens Technical College
Making Entering Student Surveys Relevant & Actionable
ADW Users Group Meeting
Foothill Strategic Objectives Update – Equity Plan and Enrollment
CUNY ASAP National Replication Institute April 15th, 2019
NCAS at Cerritos Info Session
Disproportionate Impact Study
Perkins Core Indicators of Performance Report
ADW Users Group Meeting
Highlights from the District-wide Annual Institutional
Riverside City College Overview
Presentation transcript:

Capturing Student Intent to Enhance Institutional Effectiveness Kirk Kelly, Vice Chancellor Information Technology (kkelly@pima.edu) Dr. Sylvia Lee, President Community Campus (slee@pima.edu)

Student Intent Process at PCC Developed by staff and administrators district-wide First launched in 2007 Updated for Fall 2009 registration Collects data for all students the first time they register in each semester

Select Reason for Attending PCC Pursuing a PCC degree or certificate Taking courses for transfer to a 4 year college/university Taking courses for personal interest Taking courses for job skills University of Arizona student taking courses at PCC

Pursuing a PCC Degree or Certificate Information on the student’s intended area of study, in addition to data on the courses the student takes at PCC

Do You Plan to Return to PCC? Student can select yes or no for the following two terms If no to both, student can select their reason for not returning Completed program of study Achieved educational goal Transfer to a 4 year College/University Change in employment Relocation Military deployment Course(s) not available Financial reasons Family/personal reasons Other, tell us why

Reason for Attending Fall 2009 N %   Fall 2009 N % Pursuing a PCC degree or certificate 17,953 54.8% Taking courses for transfer to a 4 year college/university 10,402 31.7% University of Arizona student taking courses at PCC 1,859 5.7% Taking courses for job skills 919 2.8% Taking courses for personal interest 1,655 5.0% Total 32,788 100.0% Fall 2009 census date

Age by Reason for Attending Fall 2009 census date

Top Ten Courses by Reason for Attending   Pursuing a PCC degree or certificate N % WRT 101 2,041 4.1% MAT 122 1,639 3.3% 092 1,623 3.2% 086 1,414 2.8% 100 1,266 2.5% PSY 1,072 2.1% 102 1,066 082 1,032 REA 091 691 1.4% BIO 156IN 603 1.2%   Taking courses for transfer to a 4 year college/university N % WRT 101 1,304 4.3% MAT 122 1,227 4.1% 102 1,046 3.5% 092 982 3.3% 151 792 2.6% PSY 788 SPA 595 2.0% 086 593 HIS 567 1.9% SOC 538 1.8% Unduplicated count Fall 2009 census date

Reasons for Not Returning % Transfer to a 4 year College/University 1,811 45.5% Completed program of study 969 24.3% Achieved educational goal 646 16.2% Other, tell us why 220 5.5% Relocation 92 2.3% Course(s) not available 86 2.2% Family/personal reasons 69 1.7% Military deployment 35 0.9% Financial reasons 29 0.7% Change in employment 27 Total Non-Returning Students 3,984 100.0% Fall 2009 census date

Top Ten Programs: Non-Returning Students Intending to Transfer   Transfer to a 4 year College/University N % Liberal Arts(Agec-A)-AA 538 29.7% General Studies-AGS 308 17.0% Business Admin (ABUS)-AB 220 12.1% Courses For Transfer (Default) 152 8.4% Associate Of Science(AGEC-S)AS 134 7.4% Engineering Genrl Studies-AGS 49 2.7% Education-AA 41 2.3% Business, Basic-Cert 30 1.7% Accounting-AAS 21 1.2% Political Science-AA Fall 2009 census date

Other Available Data Any combination of student data can be combined with intent, including Education Level Instructional delivery method Time of Day Primary Day of Week Financial Aid Veteran Status Marital Status GPA and grades As more data become available, longitudinal analysis can be carried out

Reason for Attending Fall 2009 to Spring 2010   PCC degree or certificate Courses for transfer UA student Job skills Personal interest FALL 2009 70.2% 24.6% 0.9% 2.0% 2.4% 21.6% 72.6% 4.2% 0.6% 1.0% UA student 8.5% 26.8% 62.4% 0.5% 1.8% Job skills 46.9% 12.4% 1.1% 31.5% 8.1% 26.3% 18.0% 1.4% 5.4% 48.8%

Analysis Options Course completion rates, persistence and retention Longitudinal tracking to investigate: Are self-identified co-enrolled students actually co-enrolled? What proportion of students who specify that they intend to transfer go on to transfer? Are students who change their reason for attending less likely to succeed? And much more…

Utilizing Student Intent Information Identify any sub-populations who are less likely to succeed and provide additional support For students not intending to return, assist where possible with information on financial aid or other targeted materials Targeted marketing to students in order to provide relevant information Identify programs or subject areas where PCC and the state universities can collaborate to improve transfer student success

Summary PCC is now collecting a range of student intent information on all students registering in a given semester Includes categories on students pursuing a degree with the College and those intending to transfer Data is fully integrated with all demographic and course taking information Wide range of analysis options and ways to utilize the data