Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 9:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rwanda Case Study Additional Slides on Stakeholder Involvement.
Advertisements

GENERATING DEMAND FOR DATA Module 1. Session Objectives  Understand the importance of improving data-informed decision making  Understand the role of.
DETERMINANTS OF DATA USE Session 2. Session Objectives  Explain the data-use conceptual framework  Highlight the determinants of data use  List potential.
UNDERSTANDING DATA AND INFORMATION FLOW Session 4.
Strengthening Health Information Systems: Creating an Information Culture Manila, June 14, 2011 Theo Lippeveld, MD, MPH,
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation. Learning Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Define program components Define.
Introduction to Group Work. Learning Objectives The goal of the group project is to provide workshop participants with an opportunity to further develop.
Unmet Need Exercise  Review the trends in CPR. What do you conclude about the performance of the FP program in each country?  Review trends in unmet.
Day 4: Field Practicum This presentation has been supported by the U.S President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the U.S. Agency for.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
MEASURE EVALUATION Session: 7 Developing Action Plans Based on Results Data Quality Assurance Workshop.
Data Use for Gender-Aware Health Programming Welcome and Introductions.
Data Demand & Use: Information Use Map Webinar Series #2 Tuesday, January 24, 2012 Presenters: Eric Geers and Tara Nutley.
Monitoring & Evaluation Capacity Strengthening Workshop WORKSHOP INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW.
Management of RHIS Resources
RHIS Governance ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 7:
Community Health Information System in Action in SSNPR/Ethiopia
RHIS Data Integration and Interoperability
Difference-in-Differences Models
Data Quality Assurance Workshop
Introduction MODULE 2: Indicators and Data Collection and Reporting
Introduction to Frameworks for Assessing RHIS
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 5:
RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 10:
Introduction to Data Quality
Data Quality Assurance
Session: 5 Using the RDQA tool for System Assessment
Using Data to Inform Community-Level Management
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 8:
Community Health Information System in Action in SNNPR/Ethiopia
Introduction MODULE 6: RHIS Data Demand and Use
Right-sized Evaluation
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
The PLACE Mapping Tool Becky Wilkes, MS, GISP Marc Peterson, MA, GISP
Training of Trainers on the OVC Household Vulnerability Prioritization Tool.
ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Measuring Success Toolkit
MEASURE Evaluation Using a Primary Health Care Lens Gabriela Escudero
Presenting an Information Needs Framework for PEPFAR OVC Programs
Introduction to Comprehensive Evaluation
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 4:
Overview of the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool
Session: 4 Using the RDQA tool for Data Verification
Use of Community Health Data for Shared Accountability
Community Health Information System in Action in SNNPR/Ethiopia
Assessment Implementation
Assessment Training Session 9: Assessment Analysis
Introduction to the Health Information System
Training Content and Orientation
Overview of the PRISM Tools
Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 3:
Data and Interoperability:
Introduction RHIS Design and Reform ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Introduction to the PRISM Framework
Information Systems for Health:
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Information Systems for Health:
Introduction to Health Informatics:
Introduction MODULE 7: RHIS Governance and Management of Resources
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
Siân Curtis, PhD OVC Evaluation Dissemination Meeting,
Data and Interoperability:
Use of Information for Decision Making
Measuring Data Quality
Introduction to Health Informatics
Session: 9 On-going Monitoring & Follow Up
Process Improvement, System Design, and Usability Evaluation
EHRs and Privacy Protection in LMICs
Willis Odek, PhD Chief of Party/Senior Technical Advisor,
Presentation transcript:

Introduction ROUTINE HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS MODULE 9: A Curriculum on Basic Concepts and Practice MODULE 9: RHIS Performance Assessment Introduction The complete RHIS curriculum is available here: https://www.measureevaluation.org/our-work/ routine-health-information-systems/rhis-curriculum

MODULE 9: Learning Objectives By the end of this module, participants will be able to: Explain frameworks for assessing RHIS Demonstrate understanding of the RHIS standards across the four assessment domains Demonstrate understanding of the three categories of determinants of RHIS performance Diagnose RHIS performance (to measure production, management, and use of high-quality data) Describe the RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool and the purpose of its implementation Apply the PRISM tools to identify and analyze possible constraints on successful implementation of an RHIS

MODULE 9: Structure Duration: 6 hours Number of sessions: 3 Session 1: Introduction to Frameworks for Assessing RHIS (1h) Session 2: Overview of RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool (2h) Session 3: Overview of PRISM Assessment Tools (3h)

MODULE 9: Suggested References Aqil, A., Lippeveld, T., & Hozumi, D. (2009). PRISM framework: a paradigm shift for designing, strengthening and evaluating routine health information systems. Health Policy and Planning, 24(3):217-228. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/ja-09-99 Aqil, A., Lippeveld, T., Moussa, T., & Barry, A. (2012). Performance of Routine Information Systems Management (PRISM) tools user guide. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: MEASURE Evaluation, University of North Carolina. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/ms-12-51 Belay, H. & Lippeveld, T. (2013). Inventory of PRISM framework and tools: application of PRISM tools and interventions for strengthening routine health information system performance. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: MEASURE Evaluation, University of North Carolina. Retrieved fromhttp://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/wp-13-138?searchterm=PRISM+invent Heywood, A. & Boone, D. (2015). Guidelines for data management standards in routine health information systems. Chapel Hill, NC: MEASURE Evaluation, University of North Carolina. Retrieved from www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/publications/ms-15-99

MODULE 9: Suggested References Hotchkiss, D., Aqil, A., Lippeveld, T., & Mukooyo, E. (2010). Evaluation of the Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM) framework: evidence from Uganda. BMC Health Services Research, 10:188. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/10/188. International Health Partnership + Related Initiatives (IPH+) and World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). Monitoring, evaluation and review of national health strategies: A country-led platform for information and accountability. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/country_monitoring_evaluation/documentation/en/ MEASURE Evaluation. (2016). RHIS Rapid Assessment Tool (RAT). Chapel Hill, NC, USA: MEASURE Evaluation, University of North Carolina.  MEASURE Evaluation. PRISM: Performance of Routing Information System Management Framework [Website]. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/measure/resources/tools/monitoring-evaluation-systems/prism. World Health Organization (WHO). (2014). Health facility and community resource kit. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/facility_information_systems/en/

This presentation was produced with the support of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of MEASURE Evaluation cooperative agreement AID-OAA-L-14-00004. MEASURE Evaluation is implemented by the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partnership with ICF International; John Snow, Inc.; Management Sciences for Health; Palladium; and Tulane University. The views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government.