Open Government 101: The Texas Open Meetings Act

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Public Records Act -R.C  …To be interpreted liberally to facilitate broader access  …Exceptions to be strictly interpreted in favor of disclosure.
Advertisements

The Open Meeting Law in Minnesota
Through 2008 Season Barry Bonds 762 Home Runs Roger Clemens 354 Wins Alex Rodriguez 553 Home Runs.
A Baker’s Dozen: 13 Issues Regarding the Open Meetings Law 2004 IARC Staff Retreat May 14, 2004 Ames, IA David Vestal General Counsel Iowa State Association.
The Public Information Act Rights and Responsibilities of a Governmental Body Local Government Seminar January 29, 2015 Presented by: Barry Gaines.
School Councils Conducting Public School Business in Public Public School Business in Public Presented by Samuel E. Brown, TUSD Staff Attorney.
Open Meetings Law N.C.G.S. § through As a general principle, official meetings of public bodies must be open to the public. HOWEVER,
Open Meetings Briefing for Public Body Chairpersons Presented by the Office of the University Attorney Fall 2001.
North Dakota Open Records & Meetings Law Government in the Sunshine.
The Texas Open Meetings Act Texas Municipal League.
Common Sense Approach to Wisconsin Open Meetings Law.
Sunshine Laws Sunshine laws Open Meetings law Public Records Law.
Arkansas Conservation Districts Training Program Power Point 7 Freedom of Information Act Open Meetings/Open Records.
NRS Chapter 241 OPEN MEETING LAW. Legislative Intent  All public bodies exist to aid in the conduct of the people’s business.  Deliberations must be.
OPEN MEETING LAW GENERAL LAWS, CHAPTER 39, SECTIONS 23A-D.
By Bob Bass Allison, Bass & Associates, LLP
Open Meetings & Public Records JOSH LAWSON, PIO TUESDAY, MARCH 31, 2015.
The Open Meetings Act The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq.
1 THE KENTUCKY OPEN MEETINGS ACT KRS – [T]he basic policy of KRS to is that the formation of public policy is public business.
The Indiana Open Door Law (ODL) “…It is the intent of this chapter that the official action of public agencies be conducted and taken openly, unless otherwise.
25 O.S. Sec. 301 et seq..  Declaration of Public Policy: to encourage and facilitate an informed citizenry’s understanding of the governmental process.
Open and Public Meetings Act Training Revised 1/12.
OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT Eva Rooks, MA Health Services Administrator/Trainer Health Systems Quality Assurance Division Washington State Department of Health.
Open Governmental Proceedings Act WV Code 6-9A-1 through 12.
PUBLIC MEETING LAW Clackamas County Counsel Steven Lounsbury.
Public Review Committee Linda Sullivan-Colglazier Assistant Attorney General July 28, 2011.
1 THE BROWN ACT CA Gov’t. Code Section et. seq. Office of the County Counsel.
Indiana’s Open Door Law Heather Willis Neal Indiana Public Access Counselor Presented to Fort Wayne Housing Authority Fort Wayne Housing Authority Board.
The Basics of Open Meetings Office of the Attorney General Mary Kae Kelsch.
OPEN MEETINGS ACT General Provisions Article, Sections through 3-501, Annotated Code of Maryland 1.
Government Data Practices and the Open Meeting Law August 2014.
Texas Open Meetings Act Documents at Meetings What are the Rules? Becky P. Casares Assistant Attorney General Opinion Committee.
Open Meetings Act Basic Training Jennie Hoelscher Division Chief Opinion Committee Charlotte Harper Deputy Division Chief Opinion Committee.
THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT Cal. Gov’t Code § et seq. Presented to the First 5 Commission San Mateo County Monali S. Sheth, Deputy Office of the County.
Utah’s Open Meetings Act. Declaration of Public Policy The Legislature finds and declares that the state, its agencies and political subdivisions exist.
Ann MacNeille Assistant Attorney General Maryland Attorney General’s Office Counsel, Open Meetings Compliance Board John S.
Open Meetings Open Records and Ethics Training Member Training.
Wyo. Stat. Ann. §§ through Public Meetings Act 1.
Results. Relationships. Reputation. Legal and Policy Elements to Community Planning and Zoning – Open Meeting Law Christopher A. Schmaltz Gust Rosenfeld,
Citizens’ Aide/Ombudsman Office Overview Open Meetings Law Presented by: Angela McBride Assistant Ombudsman for Public Records, Open Meetings, and Privacy.
Lawrence J. Bohlen Manager Member Services & Education Local Government Insurance Trust __________________________________ MACO Winter Conference January.
COUNTY COUNSEL Brown Act Public Records Act Presenter: Janice D. Killion Public Records Act – Ethics – Conflicts of Interest.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
Public Meeting Basics for Commission and Board Members Mary D. Tietjen Kennedy & Graven, Chartered March 12, 2014.
1 Brown Act Workshop  Seal Beach City Council Craig Steele, City Attorney May 9, 2016.
North Dakota Open Record & Meeting Law
North Dakota Open Record & Meeting Law
Utah’s Open Meetings Act
Florida’s Sunshine Law Public Meetings
Monique Coady, Assistant City Attorney
Complying with Maryland’s Open Meetings Act
The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq
Citizens of the World Los Angeles
OPEN GOVERNMENTAL PROCEEDINGS ACT April 18, 2017
Sen. Byron M. Baer Open Public Meetings Act(“Sunshine Law”)
The Open Meetings Act W.S et. seq
MEETINGS Seth Grigg – IAC Executive Director
THE SUNSHINE LAW.
West Virginia Economic Development Council Open Meetings Act Training 2018 Derek Knopp Staff Attorney West Virginia Ethics Commission.
The Idaho Open Meeting Law
INTRODUCTION TO THE OPEN MEETING LAW
OPEN GOVERNMENTAL PROCEEDINGS ACT April 18, 2017
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
III. Government Transparency Laws
Texas Open Meetings Act – What CAN I Do?
Government Data Practices & Open Meeting Law Overview
ARIZONA'S OPEN MEETING LAW
Top 5 Things to Know About TOMA in 2019
Florida’s Sunshine Law and the Council & Boards
Chuck Campbell Jackson Walker L.L.P
Presentation transcript:

Open Government 101: The Texas Open Meetings Act Texas Association of Counties Fall Judicial Education Session November 16, 2016

Open Meetings Act The Open Meetings Act – Government Code Chapter 551. The public has a right to know a lot about how, when and why you make your decisions as a public official. Judges and Commissioners Tax Assessor Collector on tax appraisal board Board and commission members All commissioners court meetings must be public.

What is a meeting? A meeting is a deliberation between a quorum of the members of the court during which: public business is discussed the commissioners court take formal action Quorum is three for commissioners court.

What is a meeting? (cont’d) ‘Walking quorum’ is meeting in less than a quorum in attempt to avoid the Act – this is being prosecuted. Minutes of a public meeting must be in writing and show: Each subject considered The vote, order, decision or action on each item

Agenda Preparation Commissioners court as a whole is responsible for preparation of the agenda Each member of the commissioners court must be permitted to place any item on the agenda Commissioners court may or may not use the county clerk to prepare and post its agenda

Notice of a Public Meeting Must be in writing posted not less than 72 hours before the beginning of the meeting at a place accessible to the public. Notice is posted both at the county courthouse and on-line if the county has a website. Notice must include: date, hour, place, actions under consideration.

Notice of a Public Meeting (cont’d) Commissioners court can only take action on an item that is on the agenda. No exceptions – this includes executive sessions. Emergency meetings require two hour notice, but must be real emergency: Imminent threat to public health and safety Unforeseeable situation that required immediate action

Executive Sessions Public meeting must be convened before you may go into executive session. Executive sessions are limited exceptions to rule of public action. For example: Consultation with attorney – lawyer must be there Personnel matters – must be county staff and must be open at request of employee under discussion

Executive Sessions (cont’d) Other exceptions of importance to county government: Real estate – must relate to county’s negotiations Economic development – must relate to county’s offer to business being solicited

Rights of the Public Public has a right to attend and record public meetings. Public does not have a right to talk during your meetings. Commissioners court may allow public comment as agenda item – must also post topics if known.

Do’s and Don’ts DO publish notice of a meeting, even a committee meeting of less than a quorum if court is likely to rubber stamp decision. DO get what you want to talk about on the agenda with enough information that a reasonably intelligent person will know what you are going to discuss.

Do’s and Don’ts (cont’d) DON’T communicate with other court members outside of a public meeting with the intention of persuading them to vote a certain way – this includes e-mail. DON’T vote in executive session – no ‘straw votes’. DON’T debate issues raised in public comment period unless it is also posted – limit response to facts or policy statement.

Penalties – Open Meetings Act Actions taken in violation of Open Meetings Act are voidable by court order. Misdemeanor: Meeting in number less than a quorum with intent to violate the law Participation in an illegal closed meeting Fine: $100 - $500 Jail: 1-6 months Both fine and jail

Penalties – Open Meetings Act. (cont’d) You can commit a violation by participating in an illegal executive session even if you don’t know that the closed meeting is not allowed. It is an affirmative defense if you relied on a written opinion from the county attorney saying the executive session is allowed. Conviction of a county officer for a misdemeanor involving official misconduct operates as a removal from office.

TOMA STATUTORY ANALYSIS: “WALKING QUORUM” PROHIBITED Under TOMA §551.143, it is a crime to knowingly conspire to circumvent the requirements of TOMA by meeting in numbers less than a quorum for the purpose of secret deliberation.   “Walking Quorum” = prohibited, sequential conferencing in numbers less than a quorum. The “physical presence of a quorum in a single place at the same time is not always necessary for a violation...to occur.” Op. Tex. Att’y Gen. No. DM-095 (1992) at 4. Members of a governmental body may “violate the Open Meetings Act even though they are not physically present in one place, for example by discussing public business of the governmental body over the telephone.” Tex. Att’y Gen. No. LO-055 (1995) at 3-4. Tex. Gov’t Code §551.143

TOMA STATUTORY ANALYSIS: 2011 TXOAG OPINION REGARDING “WALKING QUORUM” Op. Tex. Att’y Gen. No. GA-0896 (2011) at 1-2, citing Op. Tex. Att’y Gen. No. DM-095 (1992) and relevant case law  Facts = Email disseminated among members of governing body in numbers less than a quorum TXOAG concluded that:   Although TOMA applies to a “verbal exchange” of a “quorum” of the members of the body, the: (1) words need not be spoken in person; and (2) members need not be in the physical presence of each other to constitute a quorum.   Electronic communication (including email) may constitute “deliberation” and a “meeting” under TOMA -- thereby requiring TOMA compliance.   A determination of whether the members of the body violated TOMA involved an analysis of the “respective states of mind” of each member involved in an alleged violation -- this because the TOMA “walking quorum” statute (§551.143) requires the violator to “knowingly” commit the violation.   Risk exists for a “walking quorum” in view of the widespread use of electronic communication -- including email, texting, and social media.   Tex. Gov’t Code §§551.001, 551.143-.144

TOMA STATUTORY ANALYSIS: MEETING REQUIREMENTS -- CLOSED SESSION RULES Subject matter notice of authorized closed session topic in agenda  = BEST PRACTICE Move to closed session through pronouncement of TOMA statute/authorized topic to support closed session   Weatherford v. City of San Marcos, 157 S.W.3d 473, 485 (Tex. App. -- Austin 2004, pet. denied) (TOMA does not prohibit opinions being expressed in closed session -- but decision must occur in open session)   REQUIRED RECORD = (1) certified agenda (describes subject matter, action taken, and announcement by presiding officer of date/time and beginning/end of session); or (2) tape recording; Record must be (1) preserved at least 2 years -- and to completion of any suit filed regarding meeting, and (2) is EXPRESSLY CONFIDENTIAL   Many authorized topics exist under TOMA -- including (1) personnel matters, (2) consultation with attorney, and deliberation regarding (3) real property, (4) gifts and donations, and (5) economic development negotiations  No person may be admitted whose interest is adverse to government -- exclusion extends to opposing suit parties and proposed seller of property to government  Tex. Gov’t Code §§551.071-.074, 551.087, 551.101-.104, 551.129

TOMA STATUTORY ANALYSIS: MEETING REQUIREMENTS -- RATIFICATION When governmental body fails to comply with TOMA it may later meet to RATIFY (or re-authorize) incorrect action through meeting conducted in full compliance with TOMA   RETROACTIVE EFFECT NOT PERMISSIBLE -- Ratification is effective only from date of proper ratification Attempted ratification must be explicit and in strict TOMA compliance

TOMA STATUTORY ANALYSIS: CIVIL ENFORCEMENT Tex. Gov’t Code § 551.142 -- Interested person (including media) may sue to stop, prevent, or reverse violation of TOMA through injunction, mandamus, or declaratory judgment relief   Court may assess costs and attorney’s fees, dependent on whether: (1) action was brought in good faith, and (2) the body’s conduct had reasonable legal basis  Body may be ordered to stop violation or perform duty required by statute. ALSO, COURT MAY (BUT IS NOT REQUIRED TO) VOID ACTION TAKEN IN VIOLATION OF TOMA   Tex. Gov’t Code § 551.146 -- Individual, corporation, or partnership can be held liable for damages if, without lawful authority, he/it knowingly discloses to public certified agenda/tape recording of meeting lawfully closed under TOMA  DAMAGES = (1) actual damages -- including personal injuries, lost wages, defamation, or mental/emotional distress; (2) attorney’s fees and court costs; and (3) exemplary damages  DEFENSE = (1) good reason existed to believe disclosure was lawful; or (2) disclosure was result of mistake  Tex. Gov’t Code §§551.142, 551.146

TOMA STATUTORY ANALYSIS: CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT Tex. Gov’t Code § 551.143 -- Member of body commits offense if he knowingly conspires to circumvent TOMA by meeting in numbers less than quorum for secret deliberations in violation of TOMA; PUNISHMENT = fine of not less than $100 or more than $500, jail confinement for not less than one month or more than six months, or both such fine and confinement   Tex. Gov’t Code § 551.144 -- Member of body commits offense if closed meeting is not permitted under TOMA, and he knowingly: (1) calls/aids in calling or organizing closed meeting, whether special or called meeting; (2) closes or aids in closing meeting if a regular meeting; or (3) participates in closed meeting, whether regular, special, or called meeting; PUNISHMENT = fine of not less than $100 or more than $500, jail confinement for not less than one month or more than six months, or both such fine and confinement. Tex. Gov’t Code § 551.145 -- Member of body commits offense if he participates in closed meeting knowing that certified agenda is not being kept or tape recording is not being made. PUNISHMENT = fine of not more than $500. Tex. Gov’t Code § 551.146 -- Individual, corporation, or partnership commits offense if, without lawful authority, he/it knowingly discloses to member of public certified agenda or tape recording of meeting lawfully closed to public under TOMA. PUNISHMENT = fine of not more than $2,000, jail confinement for not less than 180 days, or both such fine and confinement. Tex. Gov’t Code §§551.143-.146

How to Find Help TAC Legal toll-free: 888-ASK-TAC4 (275-8224) TAC Website: www.county.org Texas AG’s Open Government Helpline: 877-OPEN-TEX (673-6839) AG’s Website: www.texasattorneygeneral.gov