Morag Greig, Advocacy Manager (Enlighten) University of Glasgow

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Creating Institutional Repositories Stephen Pinfield.
Advertisements

Enlighten: Glasgows Universitys online institutional repository Morag Greig University Library.
Making Your Research Open Access: What you need to know National Biomedical Research Unit in Hearing 15 th November 2010 Willow Fuchs Centre for Research.
Advocacy and IPR tutorial Morag Greig Advocacy Manager: Enlighten Glasgow University Library Open Scholarship th October, 2006, Glasgow.
Electronic theses and copyright Janet Aucock Head of Repository services March 2014.
Document Repositories and the copyright issue Marc Goovaerts Hasselt University Library ODIN-PI TRAINING OSTENDE, May 2008.
Open Access, Research Funders and the Research Excellence Framework Open Access Team, Library.
Open Access, Research Funders and the REF Open Access Team, Library.
Open Access What’s Happening? Nia Wyn Roberts, March 2015.
Open Access Policies in Scotland and the UK Morag Greig, University of Glasgow.
ARC: Open Access and Research Data Justin Withers Director, Policy and Integrity Australian Research Council.
Copyright management in open access projects Iryna Kuchma Open Access Programme Manager Attribution 3.0 Unported.
Open Access and REF2020 How not to let new HEFCE rules ruin your life.
Administration & Workflow
QUT Library CRICOS No.00213J Division of Technology Information and Learning Support Keys to Success: Repository Policies and Copyright Management This.
Obtaining Permission to use Copyrighted Materials Insert Date Insert Instructors’ Names / Titles The following slides are based on the work of the UCLA.
Open Access: the post 2014 REF and the University Publications Policy Pat Spoor Nicola Barnett June 2015
© University of Reading October 2009 CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Introduction for ‘early adopters’ Alison.
Management, marketing and population of repositories Morag Greig, University of Glasgow.
Practical Advice Morag Greig Advocacy William J Nixon Service Development DAEDALUS Workshop – 27 June 2005.
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R Managing the legal issues: practical steps for handling copyright, IP and other legal issues Kylie.
Copyright: perspectives from the repository coalface Morag Greig Advocacy Manager- Enlighten University of Glasgow.
Uganda Scholarly Digital Library (USDL) Makerere University’s Institutional Repository By Margaret Nakiganda URL:
This project is part of the JISC FAIR programme The Copyright Conundrum: how to populate your repository and stay legal SPARC Workshop, 18-19th November.
Open Access Opportunities, Policies & Rights IAS ACE Programme 19 November 2015.
Traditional Distribution Electronic Distribution User Florida Entomologist Issues Reprints FTP.
Legal and copyright issues: experiences and advice Morag Greig.
Clearing Permissions for my manuscript What do I need to know and what do I do? Emily Hall Rights Manager
Open Access and the Research Excellence Framework
Open Access - from a Library perspective Susan Ashworth, University of Glasgow Library.
Open Access & REF202*.  Green OA  Deposit of pre-print or post-print of accepted paper for publishing within a repository.  Gold OA  Published version.
Research Outputs - Services for Staff and Students Valerie McCutcheon
REF: Open access requirements Directorate of Academic Support December 2015.
The Glasgow Experience: From DAEDALUS to Enlighten William J Nixon and Morag Greig Glasgow University Library IUA Librarians Group, 20 th February 2007.
Legal Issues Repositories Support Project Winter School, New Lanark Thursday 26 th February 2009 Morag Greig, Advocacy Manager (Enlighten) University of.
RCUK Policy on Open Access Name Job title Research Councils UK.
Complying with HEFCE open access requirement for eligibility to REF2021 submission How to create a record in Pure and upload your ‘Author’s Accepted Manuscript’
COPYRIGHT ISSUES FOR REPOSITORIES Workshop for Repository Administrators, Oxford, 11/8/10 Professor Charles Oppenheim
Copyright and RoMEO RSP Summer School Jane H Smith Services Development Officer, SHERPA
Title Rachel Proudfoot White Rose Research Online
Mafalda Picarra Schema for Open Access Policies. Overview » OA policy landscape » Rationale for developing a policy schema » An overview of the schema.
Leicester Research Archive (LRA): an overview of our workflow and some copyright issues Valérie Spezi Repository administrator 1.
Your Rights as a Scholarly Author: Negotiation and Strategy.
SHERPA/RoMEO Open Access Policy Tool for Publishers Peter Millington Centre for Research Communications University of Nottingham SHERPA/RoMEO for Publishers.
HEFCE policy on open access for the next REF Liz Neilly Michelle Double June 2016.
Introduction to SHERPA RoMEO and its Significance for Publishers
EIFL Licensing Training 2: EIFL LICENCE AGREEMENTS
Towards REF 2020 What we know and think we know about the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS Anglia.
Author Rights Sarah A. Norris, Scholarly Communication Librarian,
Open access, embargoes and your thesis
Copyright and Open Licensing
Copyright and Open Licensing
Moving on : Repository Services after the RAE
Open Access, Research Funders, Research Data, and the REF
Institutional Repository and Friends
Copyright and Higher Degree Students
Open Access to your Research Papers and Data
The DAEDALUS Project: Filling the repositories
SFU Open Access Policy Endorsed by Senate January 9, 2017
Open Access and Compliance with NIH Public Access Policy
Open access in REF – Planning Workshop
Zetoc: Electronic Table of Contents from the British Library
Academy Medical Centre
Policy Frameworks: building a firm foundation for your IR
“Seven-minute Staff Meeting”
CARL Guide to Author Rights
Copyright and Open Licensing
CARL Guide to Using the Canadian Author Addendum
Copyright and Higher Degree Students
Copyright and Higher Degree Students
Presentation transcript:

Morag Greig, Advocacy Manager (Enlighten) University of Glasgow Legal Issues Repositories Support Project Summer School, Thornton Hall Friday 20th June 2008 Morag Greig, Advocacy Manager (Enlighten) University of Glasgow

Broader legal issues for repositories and institutions Outline Copyright and repositories: the issues - Copyright and eprints - Copyright and other types of material - Copyright and e theses Broader legal issues for repositories and institutions

Copyright and repositories: background The ownership of the copyright of some of the items we want authors to deposit in our repositories often lies with publishers rather than authors Many journal publishers require authors to sign a copyright transfer agreement before they will publish an article Book authors more likely to retain copyright, but unlikely to retain rights relating to distribution of their work Theses authors generally retain copyright, but issues with 3rd party copyright material in their work Some material will not have significant copyright issues attached.

Copyright and repositories: not all doom and gloom! Although many publishers require authors to transfer copyright, many also give back certain rights to authors. Significant number of journal publishers do permit deposit in repositories so long as certain conditions are met. Some publishers offer a license to publish as an alternative to copyright transfer Over the last few years publishers have had to develop a more flexible approach to this area.

Copyright: academics and concerns Despite the fact that many publishers permit deposit in repositories so long as conditions are met, many academics are concerned that they may be in contravention of copyright law. Significant reassurance and advocacy work in this area are required. Important to educate authors about what they can and can’t do Possibility of encouraging authors to look more closely at copyright issues and perhaps use author addendums (e.g. those developed by SPARC and JISC/SURF), but this can be controversial May need to offer to check copyright situation for material being deposited

Journal articles and copyright Many publishers now have policies on whether authors may deposit in repositories or not. Best way of checking is to use the RoMEO publisher policies & self-archiving database (http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo.php) in conjunction with publisher web sites if necessary If a publisher/journal is not listed in RoMEO, recommend for inclusion or contact publisher directly (at Glasgow we use a standard e-mail template for contacting publishers)

Journal articles: common publisher conditions Important to look at conditions. Most common relate to: - version of paper that can be deposited; - when the paper can be deposited (embargo periods); - where the paper can be deposited (what type of repository, distinctions between personal website and repositories); - standard forms of wording that must be included within the repository record for the article.

Journal articles: versions Most publishers do not permit deposit of the final published version of an article they produce (a small number still do) Generally what they permit is the ‘author final version’/’author post-print’ Requires authors to keep a version of their articles that is as close to the published version as possible Can be problematic

Journal articles: embargo periods Can range from 6-18 months depending on the publisher Can be dealt with by software – automatically making papers available on a specific date Best not to wait until the end of an embargo period to get papers from authors At Glasgow we make the metadata available immediately and add information about the embargo and when it will expire.

Journal articles: where the paper can be deposited Some publishers permit deposit in an institutional but not in a subject based repository Some publishers make a distinction between repositories and author’s personal websites Some ways of addressing this, though not all ideal.

Journal articles: publisher required wording Some publishers require a standard wording to be included within the record in the repository e.g. Blackwell ‘The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com’.

Journal articles: watch out for… Publishers sometimes changes their policies Idiosyncratic policies e.g. ‘Authors are required to contact publisher before posting (permissions below will always be granted)’ Always check the conditions carefully

Copyright and other types of material: books Books and book chapters: nearly always necessary to contact the publisher and seek permission – usually a case by case basis decision Useful if author can help with this process Publishers more likely to give permission if book is several years old and/or out of print Making one chapter available can act as useful free advertising for publishers! Often very rewarding if permission is granted

Copyright and other types of material: conferences Conference publications – some major publishers of conference proceedings make available their copyright transfer agreements on their websites In many cases may be necessary to seek permission directly If necessary ask authors to help direct you to the appropriate person to ask about permissions

Copyright and other types of material Sound recordings, performances, design etc. Many different rights holders involved Permission seeking likely to be resource intensive and take time Critical to involve author Educate ‘authors’ to consider permissions issues if they are planning performances etc.

Most universities permit students to retain copyright in their thesis Copyright and theses Most universities permit students to retain copyright in their thesis Major issue is inclusion of 3rd party material within theses Tolerated within print theses – historically students have not sought permission to include this material However, generally agreed that permission needs to be sought if the thesis is to be made available online (‘communication to the public’)

Advice and training likely to be necessary Copyright and theses Best if students can seek permission to include 3rd party copyright material within electronic version of their thesis Advice and training likely to be necessary Need to build in procedures if students cannot get permission for material or are asked to pay for it

Copyright challenges for repositories Who checks if it is ok for an article to be made available within your repository? How do you check? Should you encourage authors to use author addendums etc. ? How can you reassure authors about their copyright concerns?

Broader legal issues for repositories and institutions

Legal issues for repositories and institutions Risk assessment Deposit licenses/agreements Take down policies

Consider possible risks your repository might face Risk assessment Consider possible risks your repository might face Some low level risk is necessary in order to progress But remember that all repositories are in the same position No evidence so far that any repositories have faced legal action from publishers or individuals

Institutional legal departments/staff May be helpful to consult with your internal legal department (if you have one) However, bear in mind that institutional lawyers are likely to advise erring on the side of caution Can be difficult for lawyers to advise on repository matters, as there is no case law or precedent in this area May need to decide if it is better to have clear policy documents rather than legally binding agreements

Deposit license/agreement Consider developing a license for depositors Do you want this to have legal standing? Rights and responsibilities of depositors and the repository Could include details of eligible depositors; deposition rules; moderation; content quality control; publishers' and funders' embargos; copyright policy etc. (Source: OpenDOAR Policies tool) Can also develop use policies for end users

May not have legal standing, but very useful to put in place Take down policy May not have legal standing, but very useful to put in place Makes clear how the repository will deal with material which has been challenged, e.g. by a publisher or by an author Guidance from JISC Legal suggests that with a robust take down policy in place complaints are unlikely to be taken further

An awareness of the legal issues relating to repositories is important Summary An awareness of the legal issues relating to repositories is important However, legal issues do not need to stand in the way of developing successful repositories Important to reassure authors that they CAN deposit in repositories without contravening copyright law Use the UK repository community for advice and reassurance

Discussion groups: questions What are the major legal issues for your repository? Do you need to put any policies in place that address legal issues? Do you need to talk to people in your organisation about legal issues? If so, who, and about what? Each group to report back briefly on the outcome of the discussions and actions to take back to your institutions.