The 85th Legislative Session

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joint Task Force on Local Effort Assistance Staff Presentation June 13, 2002 Bryon Moore, Senate Ways and Means Committee Staff Denise Graham, House Appropriations.
Advertisements

1 MFP 101 Understanding the Minimum Foundation Program Formula FY
Copyright©2007 Education Service Center Region XIII 1 Region 17 Summer School Finance Conference School Finance Update Presented by Omar Garcia Region.
School Finance 101 Midland Independent School District December 10, 2008.
Session V – February 26,  Texas ranks second behind California in the number of students enrolled in public schools.  With a 21.6% increase over.
The 29—Month Legislative Session Texas Impact - February 16, 2015 Presented by the.
Greenville ISD 3504 King St/P.O. Box 1022 Greenville, Texas Greenville Independent School District.
Kansas Legislative Research Department SCHOOL FINANCE BASICS 1 January 2013.
FAIR EDUCATION FUNDING: Recommendations of the Education Finance Working Group Tom Melcher Schools for Equity in Education Meeting November 30, 2012.
Forest Lake Area Schools Truth in Taxation Hearing for Taxes Payable in 2010 December 3, 2009 Presented by: Larry Martini Director of Business Services.
Piecing It All Together 82 nd Legislative Regular and Special Session Review Moak, Casey & Associates July Moak, Casey & Associates.
AUSTIN Independent School District Overview AISD Budget Challenges  Unprecedented and permanent state cut to AISD revenue of nearly $50 million net of.
BOARD OF EDUCATION Finance Presentation Thursday, February 9, 2012.
MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP) AN OVERVIEW OF HOW THE FORMULA IS CALCULATED.
Legislative Update & Overview June 12,  November 4, Election Day  November 10, Bill filing begins  January 13, 2015 – 84 th Session.
A Guide To Texas School Finance Module #2. Sources of Revenue Funding for Texas public school district budgets comes from 3 sources: local funds, primarily.
1 DeLeon Independent School District Facility Committee Organizational Meeting July 20, 2006.
HARLINGEN CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT HARLINGEN CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.
Texas Association of School Boards School Finance Plan October 2010.
1 LISD Budget & Tax Hearing August 23, 2004 Presentation by: R.J. Barber, Ed.D. Superintendent Jesus J. Amezcua, CPA Chief Financial Officer Rudy Sanchez,
And now…. 84 th Legislature Public Education Video 2 Presented by Doug Karr 1 hour, 10 minutes.
Texas Association Of Rural Schools 1 SCHOOL FINANCE FUNDAMENTALS An overview that determines the state and local revenue of a typical small/rural school.
Cost-of-Education Index Study Presentation to the Joint Committee on Public School Finance January 24, 2002.
Charter School Discussion School Finance Discussion School Report Card Assignment.
HARLINGEN CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT HARLINGEN CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.
TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY SCHOOLS (TACS) Annual Conference San Antonio, Texas September 14, 2015.
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues October 2012.
Module # 1 Basic Orientation to Texas School Finance.
October 12,   $4 Billion Dollar Reduction in State Funding for Public Education  Reduces Regular Program Funding by applying a reduction.
HARLINGEN CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1.
School Finance Update #28 on Legislative Session House Bill 604 -> Equity Funding House Bill 5 -> The What if Funding.
School Finance Update Fall Superintendents’ Leadership Conference Region 3 Education Service Center September 28, 2015.
1 © 2011 BOSC, Inc. A subsidiary of BOK Financial Corporation. Broker/Dealer Services and Securities offered by BOSC, Inc., an SEC registered investment.
CPS Budget Crisis. CPS Funding Basics  Local Funding - $2.858 billion in FY 15  Federal Funding - $735.8 million in FY 15  State Funding - $1.751 billion.
Texas School Coalition Community Group Presentation October 2015.
Funding for Illinois Public Schools Dr. William H. Phillips A special thank you goes to Toni Waggoner, Budget and Financial Management, Illinois State.
School Finance 101 Your Name Your School District Contact Information Date:
Public School Finance Seminar David Anderson Lisa Dawn-Fisher Texas Education Agency.
School Finance 101 NALEO Education Leadership Initiative March 8, 2014 San Diego, California.
School Finance Update TASA / TASB Mid-winter Conference January 27, 2015 Amanda Brownson, Director, State Funding Amy Copeland, FSP Operations Manager,
School Finance 101 Your name Your school district Date Contact Information.
School Finance in Arizona Chuck Essigs AASBO. Funding of Schools  Very little state assistance  Very little state control  Ability to fund.
Texas School Finance Johnny W. Hill, CPA Asst
HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE AND BUDGETING May 2017
Recapture: Purchasing Attendance Credits vs. Detachment
Platinum Sponsor 01/25/2015 Equity Center.
FACTS ABOUT SCHOOL FINANCE
Cohort X Doctorate Students July 13, Austin, TX
Commission on Innovation and Excellence in Education (Kirwan Commission) Formed in June 2016.
Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas (FIRST Report) 2005
Presentation to Plano ISD Key Communicators October 19, 2017
The Basics of School Finance
Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent
School Finance and Small Schools
Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent
Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues
Budgeting 101 March 28, 2018 Presented by Henri Gearing, Coordinator Financial Services ESC 15.
HARLINGEN CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Financing the Future Five-Year Financial Forecast
Property Tax Levy – Taxes Payable 2019
2008 TASBO Annual Conference
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #883
L E G I S L A T I V E U P D A T E February
Town Hall on Budget & Taxes
7 Did The District’s Academic Rating Exceed Academically Unacceptable? WFISD rated Academically Acceptable 5/13/ Was The Three-Year.
Prepared by David Stout, Bryson ISD Superintendent
Business Manager and CFO Roundtable Discussion
KENNEDALE ISD BUDGET WORKSHOP July 23, 2019.
Region I School finance update
Presentation transcript:

The 85th Legislative Session Equity Center Testimony Senate Finance Working Group on School Finance 1.27.17 Equity Center

Highlights of this Plan Less complicated, more innovative Simplifies school finance to a 1-sentence formula Reduces number of recaptured schools Local districts & taxpayers determine the local tax rate Stabilizes school district funding Eliminates inefficiencies Eliminates penalties to districts facing property value declines Provides schools with a steady, reliable revenue source Addresses student needs Increases the Basic Allotment All revenue is based on state-recognized costs of education Works within available funding Equity Center

A Plan for Fixing Texas’ M&O Funding Problem Simple – Fair – Efficient

Efficient Funding for Special Needs and Costs All districts are guaranteed access to the full allotment to which they are entitled for the categories below. This plan does not change current student and district weights for these categories, but does fix the small district and CEI penalties. Changes to weights are determined by the Legislature, but should be based on unbiased and objective studies to reflect actual costs. Regular Program Allotment Special Education Allotment Career and Technology Allotment Compensatory Education Allotment Bilingual Education Allotment Transportation Allotment Equity Center

A formula so simple we really don’t even need one Sum of Instructional Allotments X M&O Tax Rate + Transportation = Funding Transportation Reg Program + Sp Ed + Comp Ed + Bilingual + Career &Tech Reg Program + Sp Ed + Comp Ed + Bilingual + Career &Tech X $1.00 + = Transportation Equity Center

A formula so simple we really don’t even need one Sum of Instructional Allotments X M&O Tax Rate + Transportation = Funding Transportation 4% Enrichment Reg Program + Sp Ed + Comp Ed + Bilingual + Career &Tech Reg Program + Sp Ed + Comp Ed + Bilingual + Career &Tech X $1.04 + = Transportation Equity Center

A formula so simple we really don’t even need one Sum of Instructional Allotments X M&O Tax Rate + Transportation = Funding Transportation 17% Enrichment Reg Program + Sp Ed + Comp Ed + Bilingual + Career &Tech Reg Program + Sp Ed + Comp Ed + Bilingual + Career &Tech X $1.17 + = Transportation Equity Center

A formula so simple we really don’t even need one Sum of Instructional Allotments X M&O Tax Rate + Transportation = Funding Reg Program + Sp Ed + Comp Ed + Bilingual + Career &Tech Transportation 90% of Reg Program + Sp Ed + Comp Ed + Bilingual + Career &Tech X $0.90 + = Transportation Equity Center

Determining District Program Funding (Another view ) Examples: Assume a district’s 5 instructional program allotments (not including transportation) total $1 million. If its ATR = $1.00, its funding equals $1,000,000 x 1.00, or $1,000,000 If its ATR = $0.90, its funding equals $1,000,000 x 0.90, or $ 900,000 If its ATR = $1.04, its funding equals $1,000,000 x 1.04, or $1,040,000 If its ATR = $1.17, its funding equals $1,000,000 x 1.17, or $1,170,000 (ATR = the district’s adopted M&O tax rate) Equity Center

Determining State/Local Funding for M&O The State provides whatever is lacking after applying the Available School Fund Per Capita payment and the M&O tax collections (both current and delinquent) for the school year. District Funding Amount (including transportation) State Funding Local Tax Collections for the School Year Local M&O taxes collected during the school year constitute a district’s local share. The first payment to fund a district’s M&O funding amount comes from its Available School Fund Per Capita distribution. ASF Per Capita Equity Center

Determining M&O Recapture for Property Wealthy Districts Local Tax Collections for the School Year Excess to Formula Funding District Funding Amount (including transportation) Local M&O taxes collected during the school year constitute a district’s local share. In some very wealthy districts, ASF Per Capita plus collections will exceed the district funding amount. The first payment to fund a district’s M&O funding amount comes from its Available School Fund Per Capita distribution. ASF Per Capita Equity Center

Determining M&O Recapture for Property Wealthy Districts Local Tax Collections for the School Year M&O collections in excess of the M&O funding level are recaptured and are used to increase the Basic Allotment, enriching the total system for all districts, taxpayers, and children. District Funding Amount (including transportation) Local M&O taxes collected during the school year constitute a district’s local share. The first payment to fund a district’s M&O funding amount comes from its Available School Fund Per Capita distribution. ASF Per Capita Equity Center

It is essential that we spend public education taxes on public education 100% of taxes collected for public education must be spent on public education—usually through the Basic Allotment 100% of recaptured funds must be spent on public education— with any increase used to increase the Basic Allotment, to the benefit of the entire system Equity Center

A Transition Plan – Should the Legislature Determine it is Appropriate Should the Legislature decide a transition plan is warranted, we suggest the transition be done differently to avoid the problems created by current hold harmless funding methods. Establish a dollar amount (not an amount per student or based on a formula) Separate it completely from the new funding as a separate line item in the budget for simplicity and transparency Phase funding down each year, beginning in the first year Equity Center

A Transition Plan – Should the Legislature Determine it is Appropriate Six years of fair warning has already been given for ASATR—it should not be re-adopted. There are no free lunches. Other districts and taxpayers pay for ASATR through a lower-than-necessary Basic Allotment and higher taxes. The current budget does not include funding for a new ASATR hold harmless. The Senate is correct in doing this and creating efficiencies to benefit the whole system. Equity Center

The Foundation School Program Per Capita Funding Outside the System ASAHE Double Dipping Early Agreement Credits Maintenance & Operation (M&O) Generally, the costs of running the school district Interest & Sinking (I&S) Generally, to make bond payments Fractional Funding Local Funding State Funding Ad valorem or Property tax collections generated by a locally-adopted I&S tax rate Instructional Facilities Allotment (IFA) & Existing Debt Allotment (EDA) Tier 1 Basic Instructional Program Regular Program Allotment - Special Education - Compensatory Education Bilingual Education Career & Technology Education Transportation New Instructional Facility (NIFA) - Public Education Grant High School Allotment Gifted & Talented 9 Special Purpose Allotments Tier 2 Enrichment Tier 2, Level 1 Golden Pennies First 6 pennies of adopted M&O tax rate above the compressed tax rate; called “golden” because high funding level and no recapture All pennies of M&O tax rate above the golden pennies (at least 11); called “copper” because low funding level and recaptured Tier 2, Level 2 Copper Pennies High School Allotment CEI Penalty Compressed Tax Rates Outside the System NIFA Funding Staff Allotment Prior Year Values Small Schools Penalty Wealth Hold Harmless

Terms No Longer Needed to Calculate Funding Tier 1 Compressed Tax Rates Tier 1 Equalized Wealth Level Tier 2, Level 1 Guaranteed Level Tier 1 Collections Tier 2 DTRs Multiple Basic Allotments Tier 2, Level 2 Copper Pennies Austin Level Tier 1 Local Fund Assignment Prior Year Values ASATR Tier 2, Level 2 Guaranteed Level Tier 2 Level 2 Collections Tier 2, Level 2 Equalized Wealth Level Tier 2, Level 1 Golden Pennies Tier 1 Local Fund Assignment Target Revenue WADA Wealth Hold-Harmless Tier 2 Level 1 Collections Equity Center

The New School Finance System Maintenance & Operation (M&O) Generally, the costs of running the school district Interest & Sinking (I&S) To make bond payments Local Funding State Funding Ad valorem or Property tax collections generated by a locally-adopted I&S tax rate Instructional Facilities Allotment (IFA) & Existing Debt Allotment (EDA) Instructional Program Regular Program Allotment 5 Special Purpose Allotments - Special Education - Compensatory Education Bilingual Education Career & Technology Education Transportation

Final Thoughts Funding for Texas’ students needs to make sense for everyone. It cannot be based on one district’s crisis or even on a set of runs. Funding decisions must be based on actual costs to educate students…holding to the TEC §42.001 promise to provide substantially equal access to a similar education at a similar tax rate. Funding Texas’ schools should be fair to Texas’ taxpayers. Your dollar should generate the same level of funding for your children as my dollar does for mine. When? Equity Center

Summary: Highlights of this Plan Less complicated, more innovative Simplifies school finance to a 1-sentence formula Reduces number of recaptured schools Local districts & taxpayers determine the local tax rate Stabilizes school district funding Eliminates inefficiencies Eliminates penalties to districts facing property value declines Provides schools with a steady, reliable revenue source Addresses student needs Increases the Basic Allotment All revenue is based on state-recognized costs of education Works within available funding Equity Center