High Bandwidth Damper System: kicker impedance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impedance of the TOTEM Roman Pots Nicola Minafra, Benoit Salvant, Nicolò Biancacci, …
Advertisements

ERHIC Main Linac Design E. Pozdeyev + eRHIC team BNL.
Introduction to the High Bandwidth Transverse Feedback W. Hofle on behalf of HBTFB Team Proposed New System vs. Existing Feedback System Brief History.
DDS limits and perspectives Alessandro D’Elia on behalf of UMAN Collaboration 1.
Particle Studio simulations of the resistive wall impedance of copper cylindrical and rectangular beam pipes C. Zannini E. Metral, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant.
TDI longitudinal impedance simulation with CST PS A.Grudiev 20/03/2012.
STRIPLINE KICKER STATUS. PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1.Design of a stripline kicker for beam injection in DAFNE storage rings. 2.HV tests and RF measurements.
KICKER LNF David Alesini LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
Impedance aspects of Crab cavities R. Calaga, N. Mounet, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova Many thanks to F. Galleazzi, E. Metral, A. Mc Pherson, C. Zannini.
Few slides from J. Fox’ talk in last November’s LARP meeting LARP CM
Impedance and Collective Effects in BAPS Na Wang Institute of High Energy Physics USR workshop, Huairou, China, Oct. 30, 2012.
CLIC Drive Beam Beam Position Monitors International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010 Geneva Steve Smith SLAC / CERN
History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.
Elias Métral, APC meeting, 02/02/2006 1/35 E. Métral, G. Arduini and G. Rumolo u Observations of fast instabilities in the SPS (1988 and 2002/3) and PS.
Elias Métral, APC meeting, 09/06/20051/15 E. Métral (10 min) AMPLITUDE AND POWER SPECTRA COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT TYPES OF LONGITUDINAL BUNCH PROFILES.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
FAST KICKER STATUS Fabio Marcellini On behalf of LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
Simulation of Beam Instabilities in SPring-8 T. Nakamura JASRI / SPring-8
Update of the SPS transverse impedance model C. Zannini, G. Rumolo, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: H. Bartosik, O.Berrig, F. Caspers, E. Chapochnikova, G.
Calculations of wakefields for the LHCb VeLo. Olga Zagorodnova Desy Hamburg April 8,
Update on wire scanner impedance studies
Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS Chromaticity dependence of the vertical effective impedance in the PS S. Persichelli.
ILC Damping Rings Mini-Workshop, KEK, Dec 18-20, 2007 Status and Plans for Impedance Calculations of the ILC Damping Rings Cho Ng Advanced Computations.
Trapped Modes in LHC Collimator (II) Liling Xiao Advanced Computations Department SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Example: Longitudinal single bunch effects Synchrotron tune spread Synchrotron phase shift Potential well distortion Energy spread widening (microwave.
Update on TCTP heating H. Day, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: L. Gentini and the EN-MME team.
UPDATE ON KICKERS LNF David Alesini for the LNF fast kickers study group* * D. Alesini, F. Marcellini P. Raimondi, S. Guiducci.
Elias Métral, LHC collimation working group meeting, 17/07/061/26 E. Métral for the RLC team LATEST ESTIMATES OF COLLIMATOR IMPEDANCE EFFECTS u Reminder:
Update on the TDI impedance simulations and RF heating for HL- LHC beams Alexej Grudiev on behalf of the impedance team TDI re-design meeting 30/10/2012.
ELI and other things A. D’Elia 1. C-BAND STRUCTURES FOR MULTI-BUNCH RF LINACS: ELI_NP PROPOSAL Bunch charge 250 pC Number of bunches 40 Bunch distance.
CLIC Drive beam BPM Requirements and cost estimate.
1 Impedance of Holes and Slots Impedance of Holes and Slots S. De Santis Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory ICFA mini-Workshop on Wakefields and Impedances,
General – mode matching for transverse impedance being compared with CST and infinitely long pipes (Nicolo) – Carlo found a way to disentangle direct space.
DA  NE KICKERS David Alesini (LNF, INFN Frascati) 4th Low Emittance Rings Workshop INFN-LNF September 2014.
Geometric Impedance of LHC Collimators O. Frasciello, S. Tomassini, M. Zobov LNF-INFN Frascati, Italy With contributions and help of N.Mounet (CERN), A.Grudiev.
Operating Experience with Electron Cloud Clearing Electrodes at DAFNE
HOM coupler design and collective instability study
Longitudinal impedance of the SPS
Updated status of the PSB impedance model
Follow up on SPS transverse impedance
Little module (HeatLoadCalculator) available at:
Update on the impedance studies of the SPS wirescanners
HOM power in FCC-ee cavities
CTF3 kicker activities at CIEMAT
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
Electron cloud and collective effects in the FCC-ee Interaction Region
Closing remarks of “Session 3: Impedance measurements and control”
Laser-engineered surface structures (LESS) What is the beam impedance?
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
Impedance working group update
Dummy septum impedance measurements
E. Métral, N. Mounet and B. Salvant
TCTP the CST side F. Caspers, H. Day, A. Grudiev, E. Metral, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: R. Assmann, A. Dallocchio, L. Gentini, C. Zannini Impedance Meeting.
Intrabunch feedback system development at DAFNE
Status of the EM simulation of ferrite loaded kickers
ATF Fast Kicker R&D at LBNL ILCDR06, Cornell University
TCLIA/TCTV transverse impedance simulation
Laser-engineered surface structures (LESS) What is the beam impedance?
Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date
Simulation of trapped modes in LHC collimator
Beam impedance of 63mm VM with unshielded Bellows
CEPC Main Ring Cavity Design with HOM Couplers
Simulation of Longitudinal and Transverse Impedance of TCDD (original geometry) Grudiev
Simulations and RF Measurements of SPS Beam Position Monitors (BPV and BPH) G. Arduini, C. Boccard, R. Calaga, F. Caspers, A. Grudiev, E. Metral, F. Roncarolo,
SPS-DQW HOM Measurements
Power loss in the LHC beam screen at 7 TeV due to the multi-layer longitudinal impedance N. Mounet and E. Métral Goal: Check the effect of the multi-layer.
C. Zannini, G. Rumolo, V.G. Vaccaro
Status of the EM simulations and modeling of ferrite loaded kickers
Impedance working group update 07th August 2013
Two beam coupling impedance simulations
Presentation transcript:

High Bandwidth Damper System: kicker impedance Some slides on kicker impedance calculation from the High bandwidth damper system review of July 30th 2013

Beam Impedance calculation for slotted kicker A. Gallo on behalf of the INFN Frascati Hi-Lumi LHC Broadband FBK Team* (*) D. Alesini, A. Drago, A. Gallo, F. Marcellini, M. Zobov

Initial impedance calculations for slotted kicker D. Alesini, A. Drago, A. Gallo, F. Marcellini, M. Zobov. D. Mc. Ginnis Impedance simulations with GdfidL started on a simple slotted structure made by 2 rectangular waveguides on both top and bottom sides of the beam pipe. Real Imaginary

Slotted Kicker Impedance Calculations Comparison ReZL Longitudinal ReZT Transverse GdfidL (M.Zobov, LNF INFN) Moment method (J.Cesaratto, SLAC)

Slotted-coaxial kicker Impedance calculation Design evolution

Longitudinal Impedance Gaussian bunch, σz = 2 cm 25 ns

Total Power Loss 25 ns sz = 12 cm P = 820 W for 12 cm bunch length, Nb = 144, N = 4.09x1011 Because of the device directionality, most of the power is expected to be dissipated into the dummy loads connected to the downstream ports. A precise evaluation of the delivered power partition among ports and structure walls is needed.

Transverse Wakes and Impedance (2 cm bunch length, 2 mm offset) Gaussian bunch, σz = 2 cm 25 ns

CONCLUSIONS #1 We should not expect any additional harmful multibunch effects due to the slotted kicker since both longitudinal and transverse wakes decay in time shorter than the minimum bunch spacing of 25 ns The low frequency longitudinal impedance of 0.024 W is very small in comparison with the overall SPS longitudinal impedance budget (10 W ) The longitudinal loss factor for the shortest bunch length in SPS of 12 cm is estimated to be kl = 3.06x1010 V/C . This corresponds to the total lost power of 820 W for the worst scenario (Np =4.09x1011, Nb = 144), mainly flowing out through the device downstream ports. The real and imaginary parts of the total transverse impedance do not exceed 100 kW/m - to be compared with ≈ 7 MW/m contributed by the other SPS kickers.

Array of Stripline Kickers S. De Santis and H. Qian Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

Old vs. New Design No taper Taper TE01 cutoff: 1.08 GHz 6 Old vs. New Design No taper Taper 100 mm 100 mm 150 mm 130 mm TE01 cutoff: 1.08 GHz TE01 cutoff: 1.3 GHz S. De Santis – July 30th, 2013

Beam Coupling Impedance 10 Beam Coupling Impedance Shaded area coincides with most of the SPS beam power spectrum (98% reduction @ 800 MHz), with σz=12 cm. Even assuming uniform spectrum and uniform 40 Ω impedance over 800 MHz, the loss factor is around 0.03 V/pC. To be multiplied by Nmod. - Loss per bunch: <18 μJ -> ΔE/E < 750 eV/26 GeV ≈ 0 - Power absorbed by load: 750 W (@ 40 MHz rep rate, ~1kW @ 20 MHz) S. De Santis – July 30th, 2013

High Bandwidth Damper System: kicker impedance Recommendation on the SPS transverse impedance budget

SPS transverse impedance budget The effective impedance of the new wideband kicker should be compared with the effective impedance of installed devices. The total measured effective vertical impedance of SPS is around 18MΩ/m. Based on 3D simulations, coaxial wire measurements, beam induced heating measurements and history of the measured effective vertical impedance the kickers are the most important contributors (around 7MΩ/m). Presently there are 19 kickers installed in the machine, an average contribution per kicker of ≈ 0.37 MΩ/m. The beam coupling impedance of the new wideband kicker should not exhibit narrow resonances and must contribute by less than the average contribution per kicker, i.e. ≈ 0.37 MΩ/m. Preferably the beam coupling impedance should not exceed about 1% of the total SPS impedance, i.e. ≈ 0.18 MΩ/m.