1970's DC-10 Disasters By: Clark Mosley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parts of an Aircraft Parts of an Aircraft Gateway To Technology®
Advertisements

Learning from failure Mahabubul Alam CS/SE 6361, Fall 2014  Term Paper Presentation – I  The University of Texas at Dallas Asiana Airlines #214.
ORLANDO FLIGHT SRANDARDS DISTRICT OFFICE FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR SPECIAL EMPHASIS PROGRAM Downloaded from
The Fuselage and Empennage
6th grade Springton Lake
Weather and General Aviation Accidents: A Statistical Perspective Jody James National Weather Service, Lubbock, TX Warning Coordination Meteorologist FAA.
LECTURE 3 WEIGHT CONTROL, EFFECT OF WEIGHT & WEIGHT CHANGE MASS (WEIGHT) & BALANCE 1 MBC SIR ARIFF AMC.
Tailwinds Flying Club Fall Safety Session Know your airplane Piper Arrow III PA28R- 201T.
Weather related Aviation Crashes & Deaths in 2004 by Type of Operation Crashes Deaths Crashes Deaths Scheduled Airlines 1 13Scheduled Airlines 1 13 Air.
Boeing Field 1.
Interstate Aviation Committee IAC’s Approach to Development of the Global Design Code.
Boeing Field. Downbursts can be Divided into Two Main Types MACROBURST: A large downburst with its outburst winds extending greater than 2.5 miles horizontal.
Investigation of the Crash of ValuJet Flight 592, the Relevant Stakeholders, Crisis System, and Crisis Mechanisms Matt Williams Dr. Petkov LAC 130.
Parts of an Aircraft. 8/7/2015Aerodynamics Day 12.
LESSON 2 Week 2 Glue fin on Colour the wing Colure the tail Cut out wing Glue front of wing Glue tail on Glue wing on.
Parts of an Aircraft Parts of an Aircraft Gateway To Technology®
Turkish Airlines Flight 981
_________________________________________ 4 coordinated terrorist attacks by al-Qaeda Attacks in New York City, Washington D.C. and Pennsylvania 19 terrorists.
Safety By Design Flight Certification AE 6362 Airbus Derivative Team Project Dr. Daniel P. Schrage Course Instructor.
 Discipline dealing with the art or science of applying scientific knowledge to practical problems  Examples:  building skyscrapers  jet planes 
Smoke on the Slopes A Digital narrative By Holly Marx.
PRINCIPLES OF FLIGHT CHAPTER 4 CONTROLS.
Problems and Solutions To Air Traffic Controllers Joshua Miguel.
Warm-Up – 8/25 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: What are the four forces of flight? Describes what.
LECTURE 6 OTHER POTENTIAL THREATS AVIATION SAFETY AND SECURITY.
ASIANA AIRLINES FLIGHT 214 BY DANIEL LEE. AIRCRAFT: BOEING 777.
2 2003, TNA543 於台南機場撞上施工車輛 Aloha Airline.
1.04 Documentation References: Canadian Aviation Regulations
Joseph R. Perea, MD, Major, CAP NM Wing Director of Safety March 2010.
Airplanes By : Hebron Yam,Justin Minucci. How do airplane work? Problem???
AVAT11001: Course Outline 1.Aircraft and Terminology 2.Radio Communications 3.Structure, Propulsion, Fuel Systems 4.Electrical, Hydraulic Systems and Instruments.
American Airlines Boeing :30 PM, Friday, June 2, 2006 at LAX   Doing a high power engine run had a #1 engine HPT failure:  
Lecture 7: Why Aircraft Needs to be Pressurized
Aviation Metal Fatigue
By: Maya Valerio & Lauren Mariani. US Airways flight 1549 departed from La Guardia Airport. Complications occurred shortly after takeoff when both engines.
What is Bernoulli’s principle?
September 11 th Conspiracy Theories Zak Burton. That Morning On the morning of September 11 th 2001, America witnessed a horrifying terrorists attack.
Aircraft Motion and Control
Office of Aviation Safety Pinnacle Airlines Flight 3701 Jefferson City, Missouri Operational Factors Captain David Tew.
New Mexico Wing Civil Air Patrol May 2009 Safety Briefing Joseph R. Perea, MD, Major, CAP Wing Director of Safety MAY 09 SAFETY BRIEFING.
Private Pilot Ground School
There are moments in history that bring countries and people together. The events of September 11, 2001, was one of those moments.
Aircraft Incidents Accidents & Mishaps Learning from the Past.
Crystal Airlines A Semester in Summary By: CJ Husselbee, Matt Burns, and Carly Mongeau Crystal Airlines Takes you anywhere you.
Natural Disasters Hurricanes.
Patuxent River Navy Flying Club Monthly Safety Briefing December 13, 2016 Dave Kirk PRNFC Safety Officer.
Aerodynamics Stef Petryszyn.
1.04 Documentation References: Canadian Aviation Regulations
Soaring Safety Foundation
RUNWAY INCURSION Runway safety and ground operations high visibility issue for FAA and pilots Accident on 11/22/94 at 2203 hrs at STL highlights seemingly.
The Flight Profile –From Takeoff To Touchdown
Aeronautical Facilities
Milano-Linate Runway Incursion 8th October 2001
1.04 Documentation References: Canadian Aviation Regulations
Lecture 8b: Landing Part 2
Warm-Up – 9/5 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: What are the four forces of flight? Describes what.
FROST/SNOW/ICE FAR Operating in icing conditions.
The Fuselage and Empennage
Arrow Air Disaster Dec 12, 1985.
Welcome to the VMC Club Meeting
AE 440 Performance Discipline Lecture 9
Design / Process Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (D/PFMEA)
Is the Bermuda Triangle normal waters? Or is that area different
Mastering the most dreaded maneuver in flight training
New York – Arlington – Shanksville
New York – Arlington – Shanksville
Runway Excursions.
New York – Arlington – Shanksville
Non-Movement Area Training
Myths, Mitigations and Discussion
Presentation transcript:

1970's DC-10 Disasters By: Clark Mosley

American Airlines Flight 191 American Airlines Flight 191 was a regularly scheduled passenger flight from O'Hare International Airport in Chicago to Los Angeles International Airport. The McDonnell Douglas DC-10-10 crashed on May 25, 1979, moments after takeoff from Chicago. All 258 passengers and 13 crew on board were killed, along with two people on the ground. It is the deadliest aviation accident to occur on U.S. soil.

BACKGROUND A review of the aircraft's flight logs and maintenance records showed that no mechanical discrepancies were noted for May 11, 1979. On the day of the accident, the records had not been removed from the aircraft, as was standard procedure, and they were destroyed in the accident.

Engine Separation Witnesses were in universal agreement that Flight 191 had not struck any foreign objects on the runway and no pieces of the wing or other plane components were found with Engine No. 1, proving that nothing had broken off and hit it. The engine separation thus could only have come from an internal failure. he damage was not enough to cause an immediate failure of the plane though. "When we first got there, we were told that it was a cargo jet," Farinella recalled. "However, after you were on the scene and you spotted the first body or remains, there was no question that it was a passenger jet. The field was just totally ablaze because of all of the jet fuel. Nothing could prepare you for that."

The Accident The flight began its takeoff roll at 3:02 p.m. Everything appeared normal until just after the plane reached takeoff speed, when the number one engine and its pylon assembly that attached it to the wing separated from the aircraft, ripping away a 3-foot (0.91 m) section of the leading edge of the left wing. Both the engine and pylon flipped over the top of the wing and landed on the runway. In addition to the engine's failure, several related systems failed. The hydraulic systems had also failed due to the fact that an engine had been disconnected from the plane. As a result, the left wing entered a full aerodynamic stall. The plane continued rolling until it finally turned completely upside down and slammed wingtip-first into an open field at a 112-degree bank approximately 4,600 ft from the end of the runway.

DC-10s Afterward In response to this accident, American Airlines was fined $500,000 by the United States government for improper maintenance procedures. The crash of another DC-10 in November 1979, Air New Zealand Flight 901, added to the DC-10's negative reputation. The crash of flight 901, an Antarctic sightseeing flight which hit a mountain, was caused by several human and environmental factors not related to the airworthiness of the DC-10, and the aircraft was later completely exonerated in that accident. The crash of flight 901, an Antarctic sightseeing flight which hit a mountain, was caused by several human and environmental factors not related to the airworthiness of the DC-10, and the aircraft was later completely exonerated in that accident. The 1989 crash of another DC-10, United Airlines Flight 232, restored some of the aircraft's reputation.

Media Reaction The crash of Flight 191 brought strong criticism from the media regarding the DC-10's safety and design. The DC-10 had been involved in two accidents related to the design of its cargo doors, American Airlines Flight 96 and Turkish Airlines Flight 981. The final blow to the airplane's reputation was dealt two weeks after the crash, when the aircraft was grounded by the FAA. Although the aircraft itself would later be exonerated, the damage in the public's eye was already done.

The Accident Continued Large sections of aircraft debris were hurled by the force of the impact into an adjacent trailer park, destroying five trailers and several cars. Another DC-10 had also crashed into an old aircraft hangar at the former site of Ravenswood Airport that was used for storage located at the edge of the airport. The nearly-full fuel load triggered a massive explosion. Flight 191 was almost completely destroyed, with no significant pieces remaining. The only sizable components left were the landing gear, engines, and tail section.

Sources Taylor, Troy (2003). "Lingering Sprits of Flight 191". prairieghosts.com. "Special Report: American Airlines Flight 191". AirDisaster.com. Archived from the original on July 21, 2006. "Aircraft Accident: DC. 10 ZK-NZP Flight 901". New Zealand Disasters. Christchurch City Libraries. Archived from the original on July 8, 2011. https://www.dailyherald.com/article/20111014/news/710149919/ "Accident Photo: American 191". AirDisaster.Com.